Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65937Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 葉信宏(Hsin-Hung Yeh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tung Kuan | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 管 彤 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:15:51Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-07-18 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-07-18 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-07-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | References
Abel PP, Nelson RS, De B, Hoffmann N, Rogers SG, et al. 1986. Delay of disease development in transgenic plants that express the tobacco mosaic virus coat protein gene. Science 232:738-43 Agrios GN. 2005. Plant pathology. Amsterdam ; Boston: Elsevier Academic Press. xxiii, 922 p. pp. Bakker PAHM, Ran LX, Pieterse CMJ, van Loon LC. 2003. Understanding the involvement of rhizobacteria-mediated induction of systemic resistance in biocontrol of plant diseases. Can J Plant Pathol 25:5-9 Bargabus RL, Zidack NK, Sherwood JE, Jacobsen BJ. 2004. Screening for the identification of potential biological control agents that induce systemic acquired resistance in sugar beet. Biol Control 30:342-50 Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg BJ. 2001. Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:343-50 Cazorla FM, Duckett SB, Bergstrom ET, Noreen S, Odijk R, et al. 2006. Biocontrol of avocado dematophora root rot by antagonistic Pseudomonas fluorescens PCL1606 correlates with the production of 2-hexyl 5-propyl resorcinol. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19:418-28 Chen YT, Lin MJ, Yang CH, Ko WH. 2011. Characterization of a fungistatic substance produced by Aspergillus flavus isolated from soil and its significance in nature. N Biotechnol 28:679-83 Conrath U. 2006. Systemic acquired resistance. Plant Signal Behav 1:179-84 Conrath U, Beckers GJ, Flors V, Garcia-Agustin P, Jakab G, et al. 2006. Priming: getting ready for battle. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19:1062-71 Cook RJ. 2000. Advances in Plant Health Management in the Twentieth Century. Annu Rev Phytopathol 38:95-116 Cook RJ, Baker KF. 1983. The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens. St. Paul, Minn.: American Phytopathological Society. xvi, 539 p. pp. Copping LG, Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain). Information Services. 1996. Crop protection agents from nature : natural products and analogues. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry Information Services. xxviii, 501 p. pp. Daayf F, Adam L, Fernando WGD. 2003. Comparative screening of bacteria for biological control of potato late blight (strain US-8), using in-vitro, detached-leaves, and whole-plant testing systems. Can J Plant Pathol 25:276-84 Djonovic S, Pozo MJ, Dangott LJ, Howell CR, Kenerley CM. 2006. Sm1, a proteinaceous elicitor secreted by the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma virens induces plant defense responses and systemic resistance. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19:838-53 Doumbou CL, Salove MKH, Crawford DL, Beaulieu C. 2001. Actinomycetes, promising tools to control plant diseases and to promote plant growth. Phytoprotection 82:85-102 Dwivedi D, Johri BN. 2003. Antifungals from fluorescent pseudomonads: Biosynthesis and regulation. Curr Sci India 85:1693-703 El-Tarabily KA, Sivasithamparam K. 2006. Non-streptomycete actinomycetes as biocontrol agents of soil-borne fungal plant pathogens and as plant growth promoters. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1505-20 Folman LB, Postma J, van Veen JA. 2003. Inability to find consistent bacterial biocontrol agents of Pythium aphanidermatum in cucumber using screens based on ecophysiological traits. Microb Ecol 45:72-87 Fravel DR. 1988. Role of Antibiosis in the Biocontrol of Plant-Diseases. Annual Review of Phytopathology 26:75-91 Fravel DR. 2005. Commercialization and implementation of biocontrol. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:337-59 Fuchs M, McFerson JR, Tricoli DM, McMaster JR, Deng RZ, et al. 1997. Cantaloupe line CZW-30 containing coat protein genes of cucumber mosaic virus, zucchini yellow mosaic virus, and watermelon mosaic virus-2 is resistant to these three viruses in the field. Mol Breeding 3:279-90 Gullino ML, Leroux P, Smith CM. 2000. Uses and challenges of novel compounds for plant disease control. Crop Prot 19:1-11 Haas D, Defago G. 2005. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:307-19 Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M. 2004. Trichoderma species--opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:43-56 Herms S, Seehaus K, Koehle H, Conrath U. 2002. A strobilurin fungicide enhances the resistance of tobacco against tobacco mosaic virus and Pseudomonas syringae pv tabaci. Plant Physiol 130:120-7 Iavicoli A, Boutet E, Buchala A, Metraux JP. 2003. Induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana in response to root inoculation with Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 16:851-8 Kang BC, Yeam I, Jahn MM. 2005. Genetics of plant virus resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:581-621 Karlovsky P, SpringerLink (Online service). 2008. Secondary metabolites in soil ecology. In Soil biology,, pp. xi, 293 p. Berlin: Springer Kavitha S, Senthilkumar S, Gnanamanickam S, Inayathullah M, Jayakumar R. 2005. Isolation and partial characterization of antifungal protein from Bacillus polymyxa strain VLB16. Process Biochem 40:3236-43 Kim BS, Hwang BK. 2007. Microbial fungicides in the control of plant diseases. J Phytopathol 155:641-53 Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang SA. 2004. Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 94:1259-66 Kloepper JW, Schroth MN. 1981. Relationship of Invitro Antibiosis of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria to Plant-Growth and the Displacement of Root Microflora. Phytopathology 71:1020-4 Knudsen IMB, Hockenhull J, Jensen DF, Gerhardson B, Hokeberg M, et al. 1997. Selection of biological control agents for controlling soil and seed-borne diseases in the field. Eur J Plant Pathol 103:775-84 Ko WH, Tsou YJ, Ju YM, Hsieh HM, Ann PJ. 2010a. Production of a fungistatic substance by Pseudallescheria boydii isolated from soil amended with vegetable tissues and its significance. Mycopathologia 169:125-31 Ko WH, Tsou YJ, Lin MJ, Chern LL. 2010b. Activity and characterization of secondary metabolites produced by a new microorganism for control of plant diseases. N Biotechnol 27:397-402 Ko WH, Yang CH, Lin MJ, Chen CY, Tsou YJ. 2011. Humicola phialophoroides sp. nov. from soil with potential for biological control of plant diseases. Botinical studies 52:197-202 Kohli RK, Singh HP, Batish D. 2001. Allelopathy in agroecosystems. New York: Food Products Press. xvii, 447 p. pp. Loper JE, Gross H. 2007. Genomic analysis of antifungal metabolite production by Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:265-78 Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F. 2009. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:541-56 Lugtenberg BJ, Dekkers L, Bloemberg GV. 2001. Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:461-90 Luo Y, Zhang DD, Dong XW, Zhao PB, Chen LL, et al. 2010. Antimicrobial peptaibols induce defense responses and systemic resistance in tobacco against tobacco mosaic virus. Fems Microbiol Lett 313:120-6 Maheshwari DK. 2011. Bacteria in agrobiology : plant nutrient management. Heidelberg ; New York: Springer. xii, 345 p. pp. Matthews REF. 1991. Plant virology. San Diego: Academic Press. xxii, 835 p. pp. Ongena M, Duby F, Rossignol F, Fauconnier ML, Dommes J, Thonart P. 2004. Stimulation of the lipoxygenase pathway is associated with systemic resistance induced in bean by a nonpathogenic Pseudomonas strain. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17:1009-18 Pang YD, Liu XG, Ma YX, Chernin L, Berg G, Gao KX. 2009. Induction of systemic resistance, root colonisation and biocontrol activities of the rhizospheric strain of Serratia plymuthica are dependent on N-acyl homoserine lactones. Eur J Plant Pathol 124:261-8 Pliego C, Ramos C, de Vicente A, Cazorla FM. 2011. Screening for candidate bacterial biocontrol agents against soilborne fungal plant pathogens. Plant Soil 340:505-20 Punja ZK, De Boer S, Sanfacon H. 2007. Biotechnology and plant disease management. Wallingford Oxfordshire, UK ; Cambridge, MA: Cabi Pub. xi, 574 p. pp. Raaijmakers JM, Vlami M, de Souza JT. 2002. Antibiotic production by bacterial biocontrol agents. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 81:537-47 Ragsdale, NN, Sisler, HD. 1991. The nature, modes of action, and toxicity of fungicides. In Handbook of Pest Management in Agarculture, ed. D. Pimental, 2:461-96. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 757 pp. Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW, Pare PW. 2004. Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 134:1017-26 Samuel G. 1931. Some experiments on inoculating methods with plant viruses, and on local lesions. Ann Appl Biol 18:494-507 Schroth MN, Hancock JG. 1982. Disease-suppressive soil and root-colonizing bacteria. Science 216:1376-81 Schwinn, FJ. 1992. Significance of fungal pathogens in crop production. Pestic. Outlook 3:18-25 Shen JG, Zhang ZK, Wu ZJ, Ouyang MA, Xie LH, Lin QY. 2008. Antiphytoviral activity of bruceine-D from Brucea javanica seeds. Pest Manag Sci 64:191-6 Suzuki S, Isono K, Nagatsu J, Mizutani T, Kawashim.Y, Mizuno T. 1965. A New Antibiotic Polyoxin A. J Antibiot 18:131-& Takeuchi S, Hirayama K, Ueda K, Sakai H, Yonehara H. 1958. Blasticidin-S, a New Antibiotic. J Antibiot 11:1-5 Tanaka Y, Omura S. 1993. Agroactive Compounds of Microbial Origin. Annual Review of Microbiology 47:57-87 Umezawa H, Okami Y, Hashimot.T, Suhara Y, Hamada M, Takeuchi T. 1965. A New Antibiotic Kasugamycin. J Antibiot 18:101-& van Loon LC. 2007. Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:243-54 van Loon LC, Bakker PA, Pieterse CM. 1998. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:453-83 Vera J, Castro J, Gonzalez A, Barrientos H, Matsuhiro B, et al. 2011a. Long-term protection against tobacco mosaic virus induced by the marine alga oligo-sulphated-galactan Poly-Ga in tobacco plants. Mol Plant Pathol 12:437-47 Vera J, Castro J, Gonzalez A, Barrientos H, Matsuhiro B, et al. 2011b. Long-term protection against tobacco mosaic virus induced by the marine alga oligo-sulphated-galactan Poly-Ga in tobacco plants. Molecular Plant Pathology 12:437-47 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65937 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來,社會意識逐漸開始關心化學農藥的使用對於環境與非病原生物所產生的負面影響,因而促進其他植物病害防治替代方法的發展。土壤微生物能夠產生許多具有廣泛生物活性的次級代謝物,其中有些具有發展成農藥替代物的潛力以對抗植物病害。先前研究指出某些土壤微生物的次級代謝物可以誘導植物抗性以減弱植物真菌病原及細菌病原所引起的病害,但是目前對於是否可以利用這些土壤微生物的次級代謝物來對抗植物病毒病害仍不清楚。植物病毒病害每年都在世界各地造成嚴重農業損失,因其無法以化學農藥防治,造成在防治上的困難。有鑑於土壤微生物的代謝物具有高度的抗病發展潛力,若能以這些代謝物誘導植物產生對病毒病害的抗病或耐病能力,則可為病毒病害防治提供一個良好策略。為了釐清這個議題,本篇論文建立一個篩選土壤微生物並且檢測其代謝物是否具有抗病毒病害能力的系統。首先,我們從台灣不同地區收集土壤並且分離能夠利用蔬菜混合物生長的土壤微生物,接著使用植物病毒Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) 及其寄主 Nicotiana glutinosa 建立了分析抗病毒之系統。此外,我們也利用產生的病斑數目和葉片壞疽面積這兩個指標來判斷病徵的嚴重程度,並且使用水楊酸作為病毒病徵下降的正對照組以驗證兩個指標。研究結果中,我們檢驗了55種不同的土壤微生物及其代謝物之抗病毒病害能力,其中發現來自土壤樣本NTU1的真菌菌株F8最具抗TMV的潛力(減低60% 以上的病徵表現)。我們的研究成果提供了一個簡單而且快速的方式去篩選土壤微生物產生的天然代謝物質來對抗植物病毒病害。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The use of chemical pesticides has increased public concern about the negative impacts on the environment and non-specific targets, resulting in the development of alternative disease control strategies. Soil microorganisms produce a remarkable array of metabolites with broad bioactivity, some of which are potential alternatives for their anti-phytopathogenic ability. Previous studies have shown that metabolites of soil microorganisms effectively reduced plant fungal and bacterial disease symptoms by inducing plant resistance. However, the application of soil microbial metabolites on viral disease control remains largely to be explored. Plant viral diseases cause severe agricultural losses worldwide every year for the lack of effective chemical control methods. Given that bioactive metabolites of soil microorganisms are promising resources for disease control, the application of microbial metabolites may probably confer resistance or tolerance on plant to control plant viral diseases. To address this issue, we established an assay system for testing the anti-viral activity of soil microbial metabolites on plants, and isolated soil microorganisms by method described in Ko et al. (2010b). First, we collected several soil samples from different regions in Taiwan and then isolated the target soil microorganisms which can utilize vegetable mixture for growth. Second, we established a virus-plant inoculation system with Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and local-lesion tobacco, Nicotiana glutinosa. We used salicylic acid (SA) as positive control for symptom reduction and determined two distinct parameters including lesion number and necrotic area to quantify symptom severity. We have examined 55 metabolites derived from soil microorganisms candidates for their anti-viral activity, and found that a fungus candidate, NTU1-F8, was the best to induce resistance against TMV (about 60% of symptom redaction). The results of this study may provide a simple and effective way to discover natural substances that can induce plant resistance against various viral pathogens. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:15:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99633005-1.pdf: 13801621 bytes, checksum: 501eec91356d2e9011dc1a8c54289f9c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
口試委員會審定書 i Acknowledgement ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract iv Abbreviations vi Contents vii Chapter I INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Plant disease 1 1.2 Plant disease control 1 1.2.1 Chemical control 1 1.2.2 Alternative strategies 2 1.2.3 Biocontrol 2 1.3 Microorganisms served as biocontrol agents 3 1.4 Biocontrol microorganisms mostly came from soil 3 1.5 Secondary metabolites applied in plant disease management 4 1.5.1 Secondary metabolite-mediated inhibition 4 1.5.2 Host resistance induction 5 1.6 Screening strategies for disease-suppressive soil microorganisms and their limitations 6 1.6.1 Limitation of screening strategy 6 1.6.2 Limitation of applying soil microorganisms in field 7 1.7 Plant viral disease management 8 1.8 A newly reported screening strategy for soil microorganisms with promising metabolites 8 1.9 Objectives of the study 9 Chapter II MATERIALS & METHODS 11 2.1 Selective medium preparation 11 2.1.1 Soil extract 11 2.1.2 Fungus-selective medium 11 2.1.3 Actinomycete-selective medium 12 2.1.4 Bacterium-selective medium 12 2.2 Isolation of soil microorganisms by vegetable mixture 12 2.2.1 Soil sample collection 12 2.2.2 Vegetable mixture preparation 13 2.2.3 Isolation of target soil microorganisms 13 2.3 Advanced culture of selected colony in vegetable broth 14 2.3.1 V-8 medium preparation 14 2.3.2 Subculture the selected colont to vegetable broth 15 2.3.3 Culture filtrate preparation 15 2.4 Plant material and virus material 16 2.4.1 Plant material and growth condition 16 2.4.2 Preparation of TMV inoculum 16 2.5 Anti-viral activity assay of microbial culture filtrate 17 2.6 Quantification of disease symptom 18 2.7 Statistics 18 Chapter III RESULTS 19 3.1 Efficacy of three selective media for fungi, actinomycetes, and bacteria 19 3.2 Population size of three classes of soil microorganisms 20 3.3 Three classes of microorganisms that capable of utilizing vegetable mixture were isolated from soil environment 21 3.4 Determine the optimal inoculation method and TMV amount for TMV-N. glutinosa assay system 21 3.5 Establish and validate the symptom quantification method by SA application 23 3.6 Screening of soil microbial metabolites 24 Chapter IV DISCUSSION 27 4.1 Microbial metabolites with anti-viral activity 27 4.2 Local lesion host in our assay system 28 4.3 Evaluation of the reduction of local lesion symptom 29 4.3.1 Two parameters for evaluating symptom severity 29 4.3.2 Other factors that influence the symptom expression and evaluation 29 4.4 The efficiency of the screening system and the potential candidates with anti-viral activity 30 4.5 Future direction 31 Chapter V CONCLUSION 33 References 34 List of Figures Figure 1 Efficacy of three selective media with specific inhibitors 42 Figure 2 Population size of three major classes of soil microorganisms 44 Figure 3 Three classes of target microorganisms that isolated from the soil environment 46 Figure 4 Mechanical inoculation was the best method for inducing typical local lesions in the TMV-N. glutinosa assay system 47 Figure 5 Determination of the amounts of TMV inocula for inducing appropriate lesion numbers in the TMV-N. glutinosa assay system 49 Figure 6 Quantification of the symptom reduction with lesion number on inoculated leaf by SA treatment 51 Figure 7 Quantification of the symptom reduction with necrotic area on inoculated leaf by SA treatment 52 Figure 8 Effect of blank VB on the level of local lesion symptom 53 Figure 9 Screening of metabolites with anti-viral activity 54 Figure 10 Further anti-viral activity assay of potential microorganism candidates 56 List of Tables Table 1 Detailed properties of soil samples collected in this study 57 Table 2 Data of potential candidates for anti-viral activity 58 Appendix Appendix Figure 1 Illustration of strategy for isolating the target soil microorganisms by vegetable mixture 60 Appendix Figure 2 The local lesion number could not reflect the amount of TMV inocula in C. quinoa 61 Appendix Figure 3 SA induced damages on N. glutinosa leaves 62 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 抗病毒 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生物防治 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 微生物代謝物 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 土壤微生物 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 煙草嵌紋病毒 (TMV) | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | soil microbes | en |
| dc.subject | anti-viral | en |
| dc.subject | bio-control | en |
| dc.subject | TMV | en |
| dc.subject | microbial metabolite | en |
| dc.title | 篩選能產生次級代謝物以誘導植物抗病毒病害的土壤微生物 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Screening of metabolites derived from soil microorganisms for induction of plant resistance against viruses | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 柯文雄(Wen-Hsiung Ko),蘇鴻基(Hong-Ji Su),洪挺軒(Ting-Hsuan Hung) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 抗病毒,生物防治,微生物代謝物,土壤微生物,煙草嵌紋病毒 (TMV), | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | anti-viral,bio-control,microbial metabolite,soil microbes,TMV, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 62 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-07-04 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 植物病理與微生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 植物病理與微生物學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf Restricted Access | 13.48 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
