請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65848
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林能白 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Hsuan Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李怡萱 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:13:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-17 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-09-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-07-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、 中文文獻
1. 王慶堯、何定為、戚玉樑(2007)。以服務導向架構為基礎整合個人健康紀錄的服務應用。2007年國際醫學資訊研討會 (MIST 2007)。 2. 吳仁和、林信惠(2010)。系統分析與設計:理論與實務應用,第五版,臺北市:智盛文化。 3. 周怡廷、劉德明、陳致宏、潘美連(2008)。使用臨床文件架構建置個人健康記錄交換介接平台。2008年台灣國際醫學資訊聯合研討會 (JCMIT2008)。 4. 侯穎蕙(2009)。個人健康紀錄系統使用意向之影響因素探討。國立台灣大學醫療機構管理研究所博士論文。 5. 莊秀惠(2007)。Web-Based個人健康管理系統。臺北醫學大學醫學資訊研究所碩士論文。 6. 陳柏文、林永修、張禾坤(2009)。以IHE基礎之個人健康紀錄管理系統。國際醫學資訊研討會論文集。 7. 游峰碩(2006)。UML系統分析與設計,臺北市:學貫行銷股份有限公司。 8. 陳亭羽(2010)。影響北部三所醫院醫護人員個人健康紀錄使用意願之因素。臺北醫學大學醫務管理學研究所碩士論文。 9. 張文秀(2009)。以DM個管師角度探討影響病人使用ePHR之因素。安泰醫護雜誌,15卷1期。 10. 曾鈺秋(2010)。社區醫療群就在你身邊。全民健康保險雙月刊,第84期。 11. 雲端醫療產業分析報告(2012年3月30日)。智財交易加值服務網(IPExchange)。取自 http://www.uipex.com/monpub_show.aspx?ID=MP12033014453392。 二、 英文文獻 1. Ahmadi, M., Jeddi, F. R., Gohari, M. R., & Sadoughi, F. (2010). A Review of the Personal Health Records in Selected Countries and Iran. Journal of Medical Systems. 2. American Health Information Management Association (2005). Defining the personal health . Journal of AHIMA 76(6):24-25. 3. American Health Information Management Association (2007). The Value of Personal Health Records: A Joint Position Statement for Consumers of Health Care, available at < http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1_033819.hcsp?dDocName=bok1_033819 > 4. Angst, C. M. and Agarwal, R. (2009) Adoption of Electronic Health Records in the Presence of Privacy Concerns: The Elaboration Likelihood Model and Individual Persuasion, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 33, 2, 339-371. 5. Ash, J. S., & Bates, D. W. (2005). Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: Report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. [Article]. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(1), 8-12. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1684 6. Ash J. S., Lyman J, Carpenter J, et al. (2001). A diffusion of innovations model of physician order entry. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22–6. 7. Ball, M. J., Smith, C., & Bakalar, R. S. (2007). Personal health records: empowering consumers. Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 21(1), 76-86. 8. Baker DB, Masys DR. PCASSO: a design for secure communicationof personal health information via the internet. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 1999 May;54(2):97–104. 9. Denton, I. C. (2001). Will patients use electronic personal health records? Responses from a real-life experience. Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 15(3): 251-259. 10. Detmer, D., Bloomrosen, M., Raymond, B., & Tang, P. (2008). Integrated Personal Health Records: Transformative Tools for Consumer-Centric Care. [Article]. Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 8, 14. 11. Detmer, D., Steen, E. (2006). Learning from Abroad: Lessons and Questions on Personal Health Records for National Policy. Available from: http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/health/2006_10_phr_abroad.pdf (accessed 01 April 2012). 12. Endsley S., Kibbe D.C., M., Linares A., Colorafi K.(2006) An Introduction to Personal Health Records. Family Practice Management, 13(5):57– 62. 13. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intentions and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston: Addison-Wesley. 14. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Bate, P., Macfarlane, F., Kyriakidou, O. (2005). Diffusion of Innovations in Health service Organizations. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 15. Greenhalgh, T., Wood, G. W., Bratan, T., Stramer, K., & Hinder, S. (2008). Patients' attitudes to the summary care record and HealthSpace: qualitative study. British Medical Journal, 336(7656), 1290-1295. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a114 16. Greiver M, Barnsley J, Glazier RH, Moineddin R, Harvey BJ. (2011). Implementation of electronic medical records. Effect on the provision of preventive services in a pay-for-performance environment. Canadian Family Physician. 57:e381–9 17. Gysels, M., Richardson, A., & Higginson, I. J. (2007). Does the patient-held record improve continuity and related outcomes in cancer care: a systematic review. Health Expect, 10(1), 75-91. 18. Healthcare Information Management and Systems Society (2006). Electronic Medical Records vs. Electronic Health Records: Yes, There Is a Difference. A HIMSS AnalyticsTM White Paper. 19. Healthcare Information Management and Systems Society (2007). HIMSS Personal Health Records Definition and Position Statement, September 2007, available at < http://www.himss.org/asP/topics_FocusDynamic.asp?faid=617> (last visited April 01, 2012) 20. Hess, R., Bryce, C. L., Paone, S., Fischer, G., McTigue, K. M., Olshansky, E., . . . Siminerio, L. (2007). Exploring challenges and Potentials of personal health records in diabetes self-management: Implementation and initial assessment. [Article]. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 13(5), 509-517. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.0089 21. Hincapie, A. L., Warholak, T. L., Murcko, A. C., Slack, M., & Malone, D. C. (2011). Physicians' opinions of a health information exchange. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(1), 60-65. doi: jamia.2010.006502 [pii] 22. Hoffer, J. A., George, J. F., and Valacich, J. S., Modern Systems Analysis & Design, 3rd Edition, Addison-Wesley, Reading Massachusetts, 2003. 23. Iakovidis, I. (1998). Towards personal health record: current situation, obstacles and trends in implementation of electronic healthcare record in Europe. [Article; Proceedings Paper]. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 52(1-3), 105-115. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(98)00129-4 24. Jones R, McConville J, Mason D, Macpherson L, Naven L, McEwen J. Attitudes towards, and utility of, an integrated medical-dental patient-held record in primary care. British Journal of General Practice. 1999 May;49(442):368 –73. 25. Kaelber, D. C., Jha, A. K., Johnston, D., Middleton, B., & Bates, D. W. (2008). A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15(6), 729-736. 26. Kaelber, D., & Pan, E. C. (2008). The value of personal health record (PHR) systems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 343-347. 27. Kahn, J. S., Aulakh, V., & Bosworth, A. (2009). What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record. Health Affairs (Millwood), 28(2), 369-376. doi: 28/2/369 [pii] 28. Kittler A. F., Carlson G. L., Harris C., et al. (2004). Primary care physician attitudes towards using a secure web-based portal designed to facilitate electronic communication with patients. Informatics in primary carea. 12(3):129 –38. 29. Kim MI, Johnson KB. Personal health records: evaluation of functionality and utility. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2002 Mar-Apr;9(2):171– 80. 30. Kim EH, Wang M, Lau C, Kim Y. Application and evaluation of personal health information management system. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;5:3159–62. 31. Lee TT. (2004). Nurses' adoption of technology: application of Rogers' innovation-diffusion model. Applied Nursing Research. 17:231–238. 32. Markle Foundation (2003). The Personal Health Working Group Final Report. Connecting for Health: A Public-Private Collaborative, Markle Foundation. 33. Markle Foundation (2004). Connecting Americans to their Healthcare: Final Report. Connecting for Health. Working Group on Policies for Electronic Information Sharing Between Doctors and Patients, Markle Foundation. 34. Martino, L., & Ahuja, S. (2010). Privacy policies of personal health records: an evaluation of their effectiveness in protecting patient information. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium, Arlington, Virginia, USA. 35. Mandl, K. D., Simons, W. W, Crawford, W. C., Abbett, J.M. (2007) Indivo: a personally controlled health record for health information exchange and communication. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 7:25. 36. Moen, A., Brennan, P. F. (2005) Health@Home: the work of health information management in the household (HIMH): implications for consumer health informatics (CHI) innovations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(6):648–56. 37. National Alliance for Health Information Technology (2008). Report to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology on Defining Key Health Information Technology Terms 38. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2006). Personal Health Records and Personal Health Record Systems, available at (last visited April 01, 2012) [hereinafter NCVHS]. 39. Patel V. N., Abramson E. L., Edwards A. M., Cheung M.A. , Dhopeshwarkar R. V., Kaushal R. (2011). Consumer attitudes toward personal health records in a beacon community. American Journal of Managed Care. 17:e104-20. [PMID: 21774099] 40. Patel, V. N., Abramson, E. L., Edwards, A. M., Malhotra, S., & Kaushal, R. (2011). Physicians' potential use and preferences related to health information exchange. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(3), 171-180. doi: S1386-5056(10)00228-5 [pii] 41. Rahimi B, Timpka T, Vimarlund V, Uppugunduri S, Svensson M. (2009). Organization-wide adoption of computerized provider order entry systems: a study based on diffusion of innovations theory. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 9:52 42. Raisinghani, M. S., & Young, E. (2008). Personal health records: key adoption issues and implications for management. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare, 4(1), 67-77. 43. Ralston, J. D., Carrell, D., Reid, R., Anderson, M., Moran, M., & Hereford, J. (2007). Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction. [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(6), 798-806. 44. Rogers, E. M., (1983). Diffusion of Innovation, 3rd ed., New York: The Free Press. 45. Rogers, E.M., (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed., New York: The Free Press. 46. Rogers, E. M., (2003). Diffusion of Innovation., 5th ed., New York: The Free Press. 47. Royce, W. W.,(1970). Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques. Proceeding, Wescon, August 1970. 48. Shah, S., Shah, S. S., Kaelber, D. C., Vincent, A., Pan, E. C., Pan, E., Middleton, B. (2008). A cost model for personal health records (PHRs). AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 657-661. 49. Sittig, D. F. (2002). Personal health records on the internet: a snapshot of the pioneers at the end of the 20th Century. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 65(1), 1-6. doi: S1386505601002155 [pii] 50. Srinivasan A. Keeping online personal records private: security and privacy considerations for Web-based PHR systems. Journal of AHIMA. 2006 Jan;77(1):62–3, 8. 51. Tang, P. C., Ash, J. S., Bates, D. W., Overhage, J. M., & Sands, D. Z. (2006). Personal health records: Definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. [Article]. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(2), 121-126. 52. Tang, P. C., & Lansky, D. (2005). The missing link: bridging the patient-provider health information gap. Health Affairs (Millwood), 24(5), 1290-1295. 53. The official U.S. Government Site for Medicare. Medicare PHR Choice. Retrieved from http://www.medicare.gov/navigation/manage-your-health/personal-health-records/medicare-phr-choice.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1 54. Ueckert, F., Goerz, M., Ataian, M., Tessmann, S., & Prokosch, H. U. (2003). Empowerment of patients and communication with health care professionals through an electronic health record. [Article; Proceedings Paper]. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 70(2-3), 99-108. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(03)00052-2 55. Vest, J. R. (2010). More than just a question of technology: factors related to hospitals' adoption and implementation of health information exchange. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(12), 797-806. doi: S1386-5056(10)00161-9 [pii] 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.09.003 56. Waegemann, C.P. (2002). Testimony: national committee on vital and health statistics regarding personal health records. 24 July, available at (retrieved 23 July 2006). 57. Weitzman Elissa R, Kaci Liljana, Mandl Kenneth D. (2009). Acceptability of a personally controlled health record in a community-based setting: implications for policy and design. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2009;11(2):e14. 58. Whiddett, R., Hunter, I., Engelbrecht, J., & Handy, J. (2006). Patients' attitudes towards sharing their health information. [Article]. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75(7), 530-541. 59. Witry, M. J., Doucette, W. R., Daly, J. M., Levy, B. T., & Chrischilles, E. A. (2010). Family physician perceptions of personal health records. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 7, 1d. 60. Wright, A., Soran, C., Jenter, C. A., Volk, L. A., Bates, D. W., & Simon, S. R. (2010). Physician attitudes toward health information exchange: results of a statewide survey. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17(1), 66-70. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3241 61. Wuerdeman, L., Volk, L., Pizziferri, L., Tsurikova, R., Harris, C., Feygin, R., . . . Bates, D. W. (2005). How accurate is information that patients contribute to their Electronic Health Record? AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 834-838. doi: 58681 [pii] 62. Wynia, M., Dunn, K. (2010). Dreams and nightmares: practical and ethical issues for patients and physicians using personal health records. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 38(1), 64-73. 63. Wynia, M. K., Torres, G. W., & Lemieux, J. (2011). Many physicians are willing to use patients' electronic personal health records, but doctors differ by location, gender, and practice. Health Affairs (Millwood), 30(2), 266-273. doi: 30/2/266 [pii] 64. Yau, G. L., Williams, A. S., & Brown, J. B. (2011). Family physicians' perspectives on personal health records Qualitative study. [Article]. Canadian Family Physician, 57(5), E178-E184. 65. Zhang R, Liu L. Security models and requirements for healthcare application clouds. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD); The 3rd IEEE International Conference on Cloud; July 5-10, 2010; Miami, FL, USA. New York, NY: IEEE; 2010. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65848 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景:個人健康記錄(Personal Health Records, PHRs)是一個以電子化方式儲存民眾終生與健康相關之資訊紀錄,藉由資訊化與系統化的方式個人健康紀錄能夠協助民眾管理健康,增進醫病溝通以及病患賦權。近年來PHRs之概念受到美國、英國與澳洲政府的重視,臺灣亦逐步朝建構PHRs邁進。由於過去研究發現民眾認為PHRs系統有價值的功能皆與醫師相關,加上醫療屬於高知識密集的產業,醫師相較於民眾更為瞭解PHRs的定位與系統需求。綜合過往研究並未從醫師之觀點對整體PHRs之系統需求、使用意願、發展議題等面向進行探討,因此探討此一議題為目前PHRs系統發展初期相當重要之課題。
目的:本研究旨在從醫師觀點進行PHRs的初步系統需求分析,內容包含PHRs系統應含括的功能、系統價值與採行障礙。進一步以創新擴散模式探討醫師對於PHRs的使用意願與影響因素。最後,整合醫師對於PHRs發展之觀點,進而提供未來發展之建議。 方法:本研究採質性研究之深度訪談方式,針對家庭醫學科以及內科醫師為對象以立意取樣進行資料蒐集。資料蒐集期間自2011年11月1日至2012年5月15日,共有17位受訪者。訪談過程以半結構式訪談大綱引導並進行錄音,訪談後將錄音檔整理成逐字稿,以內容分析及編輯式編輯分析方式作為資料分析方法。 重要結果:(一)PHRs使用者應為全體民眾,考量回收效益推動可能有所先後,但最終目標應為每個人皆能擁有以達整合照顧與健康資源的全面共享。系統功能面以就診、健康管理及醫病間溝通三大功能為主。PHR系統的採行在民眾面、醫師面或是社會層面皆能產生許多價值,然而由於民眾的教育、相關法律的制定以及系統建置準備尚未就位,可預見PHRs的推行會遇到許多困難。(二)多數醫師表示願意使用PHRs,其所產生的多方價值及合適的健保支付制度為醫師使用PHRs的誘因,相對的系統複雜性與相容性兩面向則是主要影響醫師採取行動的關鍵因素。(三)PHRs的發展建議:標準設置、法律、財務、應用等四個層面是PHRs發展的主要關鍵。政府應確立立場,決定是否由政府統一建置全國性的PHRs,若開放民間企業建置則需考量法律的可行性以及跨醫療機構之間的資訊共通性。應制定PHRs相關法令保障民眾資訊隱私與安全,並避免醫師因所產生之法律責任風險而卻步。而在PHRs推行初期可從「疾病類型」、「世代」、「個人意願」或「健保制度」等四個面向著手逐步推動。最後,為了社會健康的平等,政策面上應針對弱勢族群加以補助與協助。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background
Personal Health Records (PHRs) is an individual electronic record of health-related information and can help an individual to manage their health, improve physician-patient communication and patient empowerment by computerized tools. In recent years, the concept of PHRs has been taken into account in US, UK and Australia. With this trend Taiwan is also stepping toward developing PHRs. According to research studies, people believe the most valuable function of PHRs is related to physician. Aside from that, healthcare is a highly knowledge-intensive industry therefore physicians have more understanding of PHRs orientation and system requirements than public. Past research hardly mentioned physician’s view on PHRs development and willingness to use, therefore this is an important topic to discuss in Taiwan. Objective The purpose of this study is to explore physicians’ perspective on the need assessment of, value of, barriers to and use of PHRs. Furthermore, explore factors affecting physicians’ usage intention of PHRs by innovation diffusion theory. Ultimately, provide policy recommendations for developing PHRs. Method This qualitative study adopted in-depth interview and purposive sampling. The 17 physicians participated in semistructured interview, which were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data were collected from November 2011 to May 2012. The method of content analysis and editing analysis were employed for analysis. Findings 1. PHRs should provide services for all people for the goal of integrated care and healthcare resource-sharing. However, there might be a sequence to contain every person when considering recovery benefits. The main function of PHRs is medical treatment, health management and physician-patient communication. There will be many benefits for public, physician, and society; nevertheless, popular education, laws and PHRs systems has not ready for putting PHRs in practice. 2. Participants are willing to use PHRs. Their incentives are benefits of many aspect and proper payment system. On the other hand, system complexity and compatibility are key impact factors of adopting PHRs. 3. Policy Suggestion: There are 4 main issue should be discussed, that is PHRs standard, related laws, finance and application. Besides, government should take a stand on deciding whether to develop nationwide PHRs. If PHRs were set up by enterprise, legal feasibility and interoperability between organizations should be taken in to account. Government need to constitute regulation for protect public privacy and information safety and avoiding physician hang back because of legal risk. At initial stage, government can advance PHRs adoption by 4 ways that is “sickness”, “generation”, “intention” or “NHI institution”. Ultimately, government should subsidize and assist disadvantaged minorities for the goal of health equity and social justice. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:13:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99848017-1.pdf: 1379332 bytes, checksum: dde779af5905ade198d1ed10b64f94ef (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
誌 謝 II 摘 要 III ABSTRACT IV 目 錄 VI 表目錄 VIII 圖目錄 IX 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 個人健康記錄 4 第二節 主要國家之個人健康記錄發展 13 第三節 個人健康記錄相關實證文獻 14 第四節 系統需求分析 18 第五節 創新擴散理論 21 第三章 研究方法 25 第一節 研究設計 25 第二節 訪談對象與訪談內容 26 第三節 資料蒐集與分析方法 30 第四節 研究倫理 32 第四章 研究結果與討論 33 第一節 PHRS系統功能與內容 33 第二節 潛在效益與施行障礙 45 第三節 醫師使用意願與影響因素 57 第四節 PHRS發展議題 61 第五節 綜合討論 69 一、PHRs使用者與系統功能 69 二、醫師採行PHRs影響因素 72 三、PHRs政策與發展之建議 75 第五章 結論與建議 78 第一節 研究結論 78 第二節 研究貢獻 80 第三節 研究限制 81 第四節 未來研究建議 82 參考文獻 83 附錄一 訪談題綱 90 附錄二 受訪者同意書 91 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 醫師對於個人健康記錄之認知與使用意願初探 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Physicians’ Cognition and Willingness to Use on Personal Health Records | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳秀珠,陳恆順 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 個人健康紀錄,電子化個人健康紀錄,隨身病歷,創新擴散模式,需求分析, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Personal Health Records,Electronic personal health records,Health record to go,Diffusion of Innovations,Need assessment, | en |
dc.relation.page | 93 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-07-09 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.35 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。