請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65846完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳耀宗 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Ling Sung | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 宋佳玲 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:13:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-07-19 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-07-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-07-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
李建然、許書偉與陳政芳，2003，非審計服務與異常應計數之關聯性研究，會計評論，第37期：1-30。 李建然、陳政芳，2004。審計客戶重要性與盈餘管理：以五大事務所組別為觀察標的，會計評論，第38期：59-80。 李建然、陳政芳與李啟華，2003，董監事持股集中度與會計師獨立性—對會計師出具繼續經營疑慮查核意見之影響，當代會計，第4卷第2期：191-210。 李春安、吳欽杉與葉麗玉，2003，所有權結構與公司非法行為關係之研究-以台灣上市公司為例，證券市場發展季刊，第14卷第4期：75-138。 官月鍛、郭子建，2011，客戶重要性、非審計服務與會計師任期對審計品質之影響，當代會計，第12卷第1期：1-30。 林宜潔，2008，財務報表重編對盈餘資訊內涵之影響，國立台灣大學管理學院會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。 邱秀清、李慕萱與劉仲凱，2009， 董監事專業能力與財務報表重編，文大商管學報，第14卷第1期：1-18。 邱秀清、鄭鈞介，2008，董監事會及審計品質與財務報表重編，商學學報，第16期：67-86。 姜家訓、楊雅雯，2005，會計師之產業專精及查核年資與盈餘品質之關係，當代會計，第6卷第1期：23-60。 洪碧瑩，2011，財務報表重編與會計師產業專精關聯性之實證研究，輔仁大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。 范宏書、陳慶隆與吳靜宜，2007，審計客戶重要性與會計師的產業專精程度對公司盈餘品質之影響：審計組別之證據，文大商管學報：75-108。 張瑞當、方俊儒與曾玉琦，2007，核心代理問題與盈餘管理：董事會結構與外部監督機制之探討，管理學報，第24卷第1期：17-39。 許文馨、古又帆，2011，盈餘管理和關係企業間損益之移轉，會計評論，第53期：1-34。 許月瑜、許龍生、尤連慶與傅裕耀，2011，會計師之任期、產業專精、審計公費與審計品質關係之研究，2011第三屆管理創新與行銷專案研討會。 許崇源、李怡宗、林宛瑩與鄭桂蕙，2003，控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之衡量(上)，貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊，第42期：15-31。 郭美珍，2010，會計師個人專業能力與財務報表重編之關聯性研究，國立台灣大學管理學院會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。 陳牡丹，1999，上市公司財務報表重編次數、重編影響方向與操縱盈餘動機之關聯性研究，台中商專學報，第31期：193-214。 陳昱儒，2009，集團客戶重要性與財務報表重編，國立師範大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。 陳超塵，2004，計量經濟學原理，台北市，台灣商務印書館。 陳麗婷，2005，財務報表重編與公司治理特性之研究，國立交通大學，經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文。 陳耀宗、吳姍穎，2004，審計產業專家、審計公費與會計師事務所規模：台灣審計市場之實證，中華會計學刊，第5卷第1期：41-69。 黃詠棻，2009，公司治理特性與財務報告重編之關聯性研究，國立台灣大學管理學院會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。 楊炎杰、官月緞，2006。客戶重要性與非審計服務是否影響審計品質？Enron後的觀察，會計評論，第43期：27-61。 廖秀梅、洪筱雯，2010，非審計服務、會計師任期與審計品質，當代會計，第11卷第2期：151-178。 鄭鈞介，2006，董監事特性及審計品質對財務報表重編之影響，中國文化大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 盧其群，2006，會計師審計品質與財務報表重編之關聯性，國立中興大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。 薛敏正、林嬋娟與林秀鳳，2008，董事會特性與財務報告重編，交大管理學報，第28卷第2期：73-103。 簡俱揚、陳玉梅，2009，產業審計專家與獨立董監事對新發行公司債資金成本的影響，當代會計，第10卷第1期：99-130。 羅宥騏，2005，剩餘淨利的影響因子，國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 英文文獻 Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 2004. Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements：A Study of the Efficacy of Certain Blue Ribbon Committee Recommendations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 23(1): 69-87. Agrawal, A., and S. Chadha. 2005. Corporate governance and accounting scandals. Journal of Law and Economics 48: 371-406. Arrunada, B. 1999. The Economic of audit quality: Private incentives and regulation of audit and non-audit services. Norwell MA：Kluwer Academic Publishers Ashbaugh, H., R. LaFond, and B. W. Mayhew. 2003. Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review 78 (3): 611-639. Balsam, S., J. Krishnan, and J. Yang. 2003. Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (2): 71-97. Beasley, M. S., 1996. An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review 71(4): 443-465. Becker, C., M. Defond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. Subramanyam. 1998. The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (Spring): 1-24. Bradshaw, M. and R. Sloan. 2002. GAAP versus The Street: An Empirical Assessment of Two Alternative Definitions of Earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 40: 41-66. Brickley, J. A., R. C. Lease and C.W. Smith, 1988. Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Finance economics 20 (1-2)：267-291. Carcello, J. V., and L. Nagy. 2004. Client Size, Auditor Specialization and Fraudulent Reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal: 651-668. Casterella, J.R., J.R. Francis, B.L. Lewis, and P.L. Walker. 2004. Auditor industry specialization, client bargaining power, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(March): 123-140. Chen, K. Y., and K. S. Wu. 2002. The effect of industry specialization on audit fees in Taiwan: The role of industry type. Working Paper, National Cheng Kung University. Chen, K. Y., and R. J. Elder. 2001. Industry specialization and audit fees: The effect of industry type and market definition. Working Paper, Syracuse University. Cheng, S. 2008. Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics 87 (1): 157-176. Chi, Wuchun and Huichi Huang. 2005. Discretionary Accruals, Audit-firm Tenure and Audit-partner Tenure: Empirical Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics 1 (1): 65-92. Chung, H., and S. Kallapur. 2003. Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 78 (4): 931-955. Craswell, A. T., J. R. Francis, and S. L. Taylor. 1995. Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (3): 297-322. Daily, C. M., and D. R. Dalton. 1993. Boards of Directors, Leadership and Structure: Control and Performance Implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 17 (3): 65-81. Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, J. L. Johnson, and A. E. Ellstrand. 1999. Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Journal 42 (December): 674-686. DeAngelo, L. E. 1981b. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (3): 193-225. DeAngelo, L. E. 1981a. Auditor Independence, Low Balling, and Disclosure Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (2): 113-27. Dechow, P. M., and I. D. Dichev. 2002. The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accruals Estimation Errors. The Accounting Review 77: 35-59. Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (1): 1-36. Defond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1991. Incidence and Circumstances of Accounting Errors. The Accounting Review 66 (3): 643-655. DeFond, M. L., K. Raghunandan, and K. R. Subramanyam. 2002. Do non-audit service Fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (4): 1247-1274. Dopuch, N., and D. A. Simunic. 1980. The nature of competition in the auditing profession: A descriptive and normative view. In Regulation and the Accounting Profession, edited by J.W. Buckly and J.F. Weston (Lifetime Learning, 1980, 77-94). Dopuch, N., R. Holthausen, and R. Leftwich. 1987. Predicting audit qualifications with financial and market variables. The Accounting Review 62: 431-454. Dye. 1993. Auditing Sandards, Legal Liability, and Auditor Wealth. Journal of Political Economy 101: 887-914. Firth, M., and A. Smith. 1992. The Accuracy of Profits in Initial Public Offering Prospectuses. Accounting and Business Research 22: 239-247. Francis, J. R. and M. D. Yu. 2009. Big 4 Office Size and Audit Quality. The Accounting Review 84 (5):1521-1552. Francis, J. R., E. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. 1999. The Role of Big 6 Auditors in The Credible Reporting of Accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 18 (2): 17-34. Frankel, R. M., M. F. Johnson, and K. Nelson. 2002. The Relations Between Auditors’ Fee for Nonaudit Services and Earnings Management. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 71-105. Gaver, J. J., and J. S. Paterson. 2007. The influence of large clients on office-level auditor oversight: evidence from the property-casualty insurance industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 43: 299-320. Ghosh, A., and D. Moon. 2005. Auditor Tenure and Perceptions of Audit Quality. The Accounting Review 80 (2): 585-612. Hanna, J. D. 1999. Analysts’ earnings forecasts and the recognition of special items. Working paper, University of Chicago. Hogan, C. E., and D. C. Jeter. 1999. Industry specialization by auditors. Auditing: A Journal of practice & Theory 18 (Spring): 1-17. Hribar, P., and N. Jenkins. 2004. The Effect of Accounting Restatements on Earnings Revisions and the Estimated Cost of Capital. Review of Accounting Studies 9 : 337-356. Huang, H. W., L. L. Liu, K. Raghunandan, and D. V. Rama. 2007. Auditor industry specialization, client bargaining power, and audit fees: further evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 26 (1): 147-158. Hunt, A. K., and A. Lulseged. 2007. Client importance and non-big 5 auditors’ reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 26: 212-248. Jensen, M. C. 1993. The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of the Internal Control System. Journal of Finance 48 (3): 831-880. Jensen, M. C., and R. S. Ruback. 1983. Market for Corporate Control: Empirical Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11: 5-50. Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360. Jones, K. L., G. V. Krishnan, and K. D. Melendrez. 2008. Do models of discretionary accruals detect actual cases of fraudulent and restated earnings? An empirical analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (2): 499–531. Kandel E. and E. P. Lazear. 1992. Peer Pressure and Partnerships. Journal of Political Economy 100 (4): 801-817. Kim J. B., and C. H. Yi. 2006. Ownership Structure, Business Group Affiliation, Listing Status, and Earnings Management: Evidence from Korea. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (2): 427-464. Kinney, W. Jr., and L. S. McDaniel. 1989. Characteristics of firms correcting previously reported quarterly earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11(1):71-93. Kinney, Z-V. Palmrose, and S. Scholz. 2004. Auditor Independence, Non-Audit Services, and Restatements Was the U.S. Government Right? Journal of Accounting and Economics 42 (3): 561-588. Klein, A. 2002. Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (3): 375-400. Knapp, M., 1991. Factor That Audit Committee Members Use as Surrogates for Audit Quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 10 (1): 35-52. Krishnan, G. V. 2003a. Does Big 6 Auditor Industry Expertises Constrain Earnings Management? Accounting Horizons 17 (Supplement): 1-16. Krishnan, G. V. 2003b. Audit Quality and the Pricing of Discretionary Accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 22 (1): 109-126. Lennox, C. S. 1999. Audit quality and auditor size: An evaluation of reputation and deep pockets hypotheses. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 26 (7/8): 779-805. Libby, R. 1995. The role of knowledge and memory in audit judgment. In A. H. Ashton, and R.H. Ashton (ed.). Judgment and Decision Making Research in Accounting and Auditing. New York: Cambridge University Press. Loebbecke, J. K., M. M. Eining, and J. J. Willingham. 1989. Auditors Experience with Material Irregularities: Frequency, Nature, and Detectability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 9 (1): 1-28. Mautz, R. K., and H. A. Sharaf. 1961. The Philosophy of Auditing. American Accounting Association Monograph 6: 204-231. Mayhew, B. W., and M. Wilkins. 2001. Audit firm industry specialization as a differentiation strategy: Evidence from fees charged to firms going public. Working Paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison. McConnell, J. and H. Servaes. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value, Journal of Financial Economics 27：595-612. McVay, S. M. 2006. Earnings management using classification shifting: An Examination of Core Earnings and Special Items. The Accounting Review 81(May): 501-32. Myers, J., L. A. Myers, and T. C. Omer. 2003. Exploring the Term of the Auditor-client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation. The Accounting Review 78 (July): 779-799. Nissim, D., and S. Penman. 2001. Ratio analysis and equity valuation: From research to practice. Review of Accounting Studies 6 (1):109-154. Ou, J., and S. Penman. 1989. Financial statement analysis and prediction of stock returns, Journal of Accounting and Economics 11 (4): 295-329. Oviatt, B.M., 1998. Agency and Transaction Cost Perspectives on the Manager-Shareholder Relationship: Incentive for Congruent Interests. Academy of Management Review 13 (2): 214-225. Palmrose, Z.V. 1986. Audit Fees and Audit Size. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (Spring): 97-110. Palmrose, Z.V., and S. Scholz. 2004. The Circumstances and Legal Consequences of Non-GAAP Reporting: Evidence From Restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (1): 139-190. Palmrose, Z.V., J. Richardson, and S. Scholz. 2004. Determinants of Market Reactions to Restatement Announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37 (1): 59-89. Patton, A., and J. C. Baker. 1987. Why Won't Directors Rock the Boat? Harvard Business Review 65: 10-15. Penman, S. H. 2001. Financial statement analysis and security valuation. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Rechner, P. L. 1989. Corporate Governance: Factor Fiction? Business Horizons 4: 11-15. Reynolds, J. K., and J. R. Francis. 2001. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30: 375-400. Reynolds, J. K., D. R. Deis, and J. R. Francis. 2004. Professional service fees and auditor objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (1): 29-52. Richardson, S., I. Tuna, and M. Wu. 2002. Predicting Earnings Management: The Case of Earnings Restatements. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Romanus, R. N., J. J. Maher, and D. M. Fleming. 2008. Auditor Industry Specialization, Auditor Changes, and Accounting Restatements. Accounting Horizons 22 (4)：389-413. Simunic, D. A. 1984. Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research 22: 679-702. Simunic, D. A., and M. T. Stein. 1987. Product Differentiation in Auditing: Auditor Choice in the Market of Unseasoned New Issues. Canadian Certified General Accountants’ Research Foundation Vancouver, BC. Simunic, D. A., and M. T. Stein. 1990. Audit risk in a client portfolio context. Contemporary Accounting Research 6 (2): 329-343. Solomon, I., M. D. Shields, and O. R. Whittington. 1999. What Do Industry-specialist Auditors Know? Journal of Accounting Research 37 (1): 191-208. Srinivasan, S. 2005. Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. Journal of Accounting Research 43 (2): 291-334. Stanley, J. D., and F. T. DeZoort. 2007. Audit firm tenure and financial restatements: an analysis of industry specialization and fee effects. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 26: 131-159. Uzun, H., S. H. Szewczyk, and R. Varma. 2004. Board Composition and Corporate Fraud. Financial Analysis Journal 60 (5) and (6): 76-97. Velury, U., J. T. Reisch, and D. M. O'Reilly. 2003. Institutional ownership and the selection of industry specialist auditors. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 21 (1): 35-48. Warfield, T., J. Wild, and K. Wild. 1995. Managerial Ownership, Accounting Choices, and Informativeness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20: 61-91. Watts, R.L. and J.L. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. World Bank, 1999. Corporate Governance: A Framework for Implementation Overview. Wu, M. 2002. Earnings Restatement: A Capital Market Perspective. Working paper, New York University. Young, C. S., L. C. Tsai, and H. W. Hsu. 2008. The effect of controlling shareholders’ excess board seats control on financial restatements: evidence from Taiwan. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 30: 297-314. Zmijewski, M. E. 1984. Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction model. Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement): 59-82. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65846 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 現今經濟環境蓬勃發展，資本市場發達的情況下，各國企業與投資人間之關係已密不可分，因投資人無法接觸公司的日常營運，故與公司間存在資訊不對稱。此時，投資人可利用財務報表了解公司的營運狀況，降低資訊不對稱的程度。財務報表當中之核心盈餘部分係代表著公司的主要營運活動狀況，對投資人而言，為評價企業與投資分析之重要依據之一，故核心盈餘重編代表原先之錯誤資訊可能會誤導投資人；對會計師而言，進行查核工作時，是以核心盈餘為查核重點，若核心盈餘發生重編，代表會計師無法查核出核心盈餘之既存誤述，將使會計師查核之審計品質受到嚴重質疑。
本研究旨在探討審計品質與核心盈餘重編之關聯性，且將審計品質進一步區分為會計師之專業能力與獨立性，探討會計師之專業能力與獨立性是否能有效抑止核心盈餘重編之可能性。 研究結果顯示，當會計師之專業能力與獨立性越高時，越能適時地發現財務報表中之錯誤或舞弊，並且公正客觀地將其報導出來，能有效抑止對投資人而言更為攸關及重要之核心盈餘重編之可能性，達成監督公司之成效，並充分發揮其公司治理外部機制之精神。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | There are information asymmetry between investors and enterprises, because investors can’t observe enterprises’ operation. With financial statements, investors can understand the operation of enterprises and reduce the degrees of information asymmetry. The core earnings in the financial statements stand for the main operation activities in enterprises. For investors, core earnings are important information to evaluate firms’ operation and investment activities. If there are core earnings restatements, it indicates that investors may be misled by the information reported in the financial statements. For accountants, core earnings are the key part of the auditors’ work. If accountants can’t detect the misstatements in core earnings, the financial statements users may have significant doubt about auditors’ quality.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relation between audit quality and core earnings restatements, and further examine whether firms with more competent and independent auditors are more likely to be associated with lower core earnings restatements. The empirical results indicate that firms with high quality auditors are associated with lower possibility of core earnings restatements and thus have higher quality financial reporting. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:13:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99722039-1.pdf: 692956 bytes, checksum: 1b9326d1ad36c63eafeab285f07a5316 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 論文架構與流程 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 財務報表重編 6 第二節 核心盈餘科目重編 9 第三節 審計品質 12 第三章 研究方法 19 第一節 研究假說 19 第二節 實證模型 23 第三節 變數定義及衡量 26 第四節 資料來源與樣本選取 34 第四章 實證結果 36 第一節 敘述性統計與相關係數分析 36 第二節 順序羅吉斯迴歸分析 43 第三節 敏感性分析 48 第五章 結論與建議 53 第一節 研究結論 53 第二節 研究限制 54 第三節 研究建議 54 參考文獻 56 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 審計品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 會計師 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 專業能力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 獨立性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 核心盈餘 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | independence | en |
| dc.subject | audit quality | en |
| dc.subject | auditors | en |
| dc.subject | core earnings | en |
| dc.subject | competence | en |
| dc.title | 審計品質與核心盈餘重編之關聯性研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Relation between Audit Quality and Core Earnings Restatement | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 曾智揚,洪聖閔 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 審計品質,會計師,專業能力,獨立性,核心盈餘, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | audit quality,auditors,competence,independence,core earnings, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 63 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-07-09 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 676.71 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。