請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65804完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳鴻基(Houn-Gee Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tze-An Chi | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 紀則安 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:12:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-07-18 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-07-18 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-07-11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
光寶科技（2010），99年度財務年報 光寶科技，2006 ~ 2010歷年企業社會責任報告書 光寶科技（2010），光寶集團企業社會及環保責任行為準則，取自http://www.liteon.com/UserFiles/光寶集團企業社會及環保責任行為準則.pdf 沈華榮（2003），台灣環境會計制度發展的經驗與檢討，取自http://www.acc.scu.edu.tw/academic/seminar/20030109/file/07.pdf 呂苡榕、夏道緣（2009），CSR？近五成中小企業又愛又怕，台北訊，取自http://e-info.org.tw/node/44362 呂愛麗、陳宗怡（2010），成功祕訣，就是多做「E」點的CSR，遠見雜誌，3月號，第285期，取自http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_15876_1.html 吳必然、賴衍輔（2006），企業社會責任（CSR）概念的理論與實踐，證券櫃檯月刊，第122期，頁31-42。 來新陽（2008），「EICC-電子工業行為準則」發展與簡介，電機電子環境發展協會CED報導， 第125期，頁4-5。 信義房屋（2005），多栽一棵樹：信義的企業文化，信義文化 信義房屋（2010），信義房屋99年度年報 信義房屋，2009 ~ 2010企業永續發展報告書 胡憲倫、許家偉、蒲彥穎（2006），策略的企業社會責任：企業永續發展的新課題。應用倫理研究通訊，第40期，頁37-50。 高希均、林怡諄（2008），企業社會責任入門手冊，天下文化。 高宜凡（2010），超過七成企業，用CSR選擇供應商，遠見雜誌，3月號，第285期，取自http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_15847.html 黃怡翔（2008），決戰CSR，改變世界的企業社會責任力，鳴嵐智識。 國立清華大學科技管理學院（2009），服務科學入門10講，智勝文化。 英文部分 Agle, B. R., R. K. Mitchell and J. A. Sonnenfeld（1999）, “Who Matters to CEOs ? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values.” Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 507–525. Alas, R. and Tafel, K.（2008）, “Conceptualizing the dynamics of social responsibility: Evidence from a case study of Estonia.” Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 371-385. Beurden, P., Gossling, T.（2008）, “The Worth of Values a Literature Review on the Relation Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance.” Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 407-424. Bhattacharya, C. B. and S. Sen（2004）, “Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives.” California Management Review 47(1), 9–25. Bowen, H. R.（1953）, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York, NY.: Harper-Row Burnes, B.（1996）, “No Such Thing as a ‘One Best Way’ to Manage Organizational Change.” Management Decision 34(10), 11–18. Carroll, A. B.（1979）, “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4, No. 4, 497-505. Carroll, A. B.（1991）, “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders.” Business Horizons, July-August 1991 Clarkson, M. B.（1988）, “Corporate Social Performance in Canada, 1976–86”, in L. E. Preston (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 241–265. Cramer, J. M.（2005）, “Experiences with Structuring Corporate Social Responsibility in Dutch Industry.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(6), 583–592. Dahl, R. A.（1957）, The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2: 201-215. Dahlsrud, A.（2008）, “How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Mgmt.. Davis, K. （1960）, “Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities?” California Management Review. 2 (3), 70-76. De Bakker, F. G. A., P. Groenewegen and F. Den Hond（2005）, “A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance.” Business & Society 44(3), 283–317. Ditlev-Simonsen C. D., Midttun A.（2010）. “What motivates managers to pursue Corporate Responsibility? A survey among key stakeholders.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Mgmt. 18, 25–38. Drucker, P F.（1984）, “The new meaning of corporate social responsibility.” California Management Review, 26, 53-63. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1999), “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Epstein, E. M.（1987）, “The corporate social policy process: Beyond business ethics, corporate social responsibility and corporate social responsiveness.” California Management Review, 29, 99-114. Esty, D. C. and A. S. Winston（2006）, Green to Gold: How Smart Companies Use Environmental Strategy to Innovate, Create Value, and Build Competitive Advantage (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT). Freeman, R. E.（1984）, Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. Global Reporting Initiative（2011）, G3.1 Guidelines Government of Canada（2006）, Corporate Social Responsibility: An Implementation Guide for Canadian Business. Haigh, M. & Jones, M （2006）, “The Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Review.” The Business Review, Cambridge, Vol. 5 (2) Jan Jonker & Marco C. De Witte（2006）, The Challenge of Organizing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility, Palgrave Macmillan. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H.（1976）, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-360. Khoo, H. H. and K. C. Tan（2002）, “Using the Australian Business Excellence Framework to Achieve Sustainable Business Excellence.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9(4), 196–205. Lewin, K.（1951）, Field Theory in Social Science (Harper & Row, New York). Maignan, I., O. C. Ferrell and L. Ferrell（2005）, “A Stakeholder Model for Implementing Social Responsibility in Marketing.” European Journal of Marketing 39(9/10), 956–977. Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V.（2009）, “Designing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Integrative Framework Grounded in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 71-89. Mazurkiewicz, P.（2004）, “Corporate Environmental Responsibility: Is a Common CSR Framework Possible?” in 24th Annual IAIA Conference, Vancouver, BC. McGuire, J. W.（1963）, Business and society. New York: McGraw-Hill. McIntosh, Thomas, Leipziger, Coleman（2003）, “Analysis: International standards for corporate responsibility,” EC Newsdesk, 30 January 2003. Michell, R. K., Agle B. R., Wood, D. J.（1997）, “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts.” Academy of Management Review, 22, No.4, 853-886. Nijhof, A., O. Fisscher（2001）, “Unravelling morally responsible behavior; Aprocess model for developing ethics programs.” Paper presented at the Production and Environmental Management Conference, Nijmegen. O’Connell, C. S.（2004）, “Corporate Responsibility is More than Cause-Related Marketing.” Corporate Responsibility Management 1(1), 3. Panapanaan, V. M., L. Linnanen, M. M. Karvonen and V. T. Phan（2003）, “Roadmapping Corporate Social Responsibility in Finnish Companies.” Journal of Business Ethics 44(2), 133–146. Pedersen, E. R.（2006）, “Making Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Operable: How Companies Translate Stakeholder Dialogue into Practice.” Business and Society Review, 111(2), 137-163. Pfeffer, J.（1981）, Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman. Porter, Michael E. amd Mark R. Kramer（2006）, “Strategy and Society, The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility.” Harvard Business Review, December. Savitz, A. W. and K. Weber（2006）, The Triple Bottom Line: How Today’s Best-Run Companies are Achieving Economic, Social, and Environmental Success—and How You can too (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA). Sethi, S. P.（1975）, “Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytic framework.” California Management Review, 17, 58-64. Smith, N. C.（2003）, “Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How?” California Management Review 45(4), 52–76. Suchman, M. C（1995）, “Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. ” Academy of Management Review, 20: 571-610. Van Marrewijk, M.（2003）, “Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion.” Journal of Business Ethics, 44, pp. 95-105. Werre, M.（2003）, “Implementing Corporate Responsibility: The Chiquita Case.” Journal of Business Ethics 44(2–3), 247–260. Williamson（1975）. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press. Williamson（1985）. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press. Wood, D. J.（1991）, “Corporate social performance revisited.” Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718. Yin, R. K. (1994), “Case Study Research: Design and Methods,” 2nd edition, Sage Publications, London, UK. 網站連結 1. CSR•天下企業公民•天下雜誌http://issue.cw.com.tw/issue/2011csr/2011report-1.jsp 2. 世界企業永續發展協會World Business Council for Sustainable Development http://www.wbcsd.org/work-program/business-role/previous-work/corporate-social-responsibility.aspx 3. 光寶科技 LiteOn Technology Corporation http://www.liteon.com/index.aspx 4. 信義房屋 Sinyi Realty Inc. http://www.sinyi.com.tw/ 5. 國際標準組織 International Standards Organization http://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm 6. 經濟合作與發展組織 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development http://www.oecd.org/home/ 7. 《遠見雜誌》企業社會責任獎 http://www.gvm.com.tw/CSR2012/review.html 8. 聯合國全球盟約 The UN Global Compact http://www.unglobalcompact.org/ 9. 歐盟執行委員會European Commission http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/index_en.htm | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65804 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來全球對於企業社會責任的重視程度日益提升，在受到來自外部與內部的壓力下，有越來越多的企業開始企圖導入與落實企業社會責任，但對於企業社會責任，大部分的企業只知其重要性，而不知其落實之方法，再加上實際落實企業社會責任的過程中，企業必須面對到許多艱難的挑戰，導致推動的進度緩慢，難以得到預期之效果。因此本研究希望參考過去之文獻，並透過個案研究之方式，選擇目前已經有推動企業社會責任多年經驗，且成果備受肯定的兩間企業：光寶科技與信義房屋，分析和探討其落實企業社會責任之模式，採取之具體作法以及經驗和建議，並配合過去文獻所提出落實企業社會責任之觀點和建議，彙整成為有用之資訊，對於未來企業在落實企業社會責任上能有所助益。
透過次級資料收集，以及與內部高階主管和企業社會責任推動人員進行訪談，本研究詳細整理出光寶科技和信義房屋落實企業社會責任之內容與模式，推論出企業落實企業社會責任之模式，可分為體認、規劃、執行、評估/改善、內化等五個階段，並提出以下之具體做法與建議。在推動企業社會責任的過程中，企業內部應由高階主管領導成立企業社會責任推動委員會，以確保企業社會責任之落實內容能與各部門工作結合，並透過高階主管由上而下地將理念傳達至整個組織，讓所有同仁對於落實企業社會責任的理念與目標一致，而在推動之方向上，應該評估重要利害關係人所關注之議題對於組織的衝擊性，並從企業的核心營運活動著手，將企業社會責任與核心能力結合，為企業創造更大的價值，而對於各地區的營運據點以及供應鏈，透過資訊系統的建置，將落實企業社會責任之步驟與流程標準化，有助於提升管理效率，加強企業社會責任的落實與內化。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The corporate social responsibility has become one of major issues for enterprise seeking sub stability and comparative advantage. With more public awareness and appealing, many enterprises have begun to plan and deploy CSR programs. However only limited studies have been done and a systematic deployment model has yet been explored. Besides, many of direct/indirect or internal/external stakeholders engaged in the process of CSR deployment make this a challenge issue. First, this study attempts to conduct a meta-analysis on existing CSR implementation models and then select LiteOn Technology and Sinyi Realty for in-depth case study to discuss the implementation details in the deployment process. LiteOn Technology and Sinyi Realty are two highly cited companies in pursuing CSR values and have been awarded for their benchmarking performance in respective industry.
The results of the case studies reveal that a stage-wide process with detailed planning is crucial for its success. A five stage identified include: awareness building, plan, do, check/improve, and anchor. A thorough plan to identify major stakeholders in each stage is important. As so, a committee is formed and lead by top manager. Such committee will formulate a meaning CSR vision and communicate with players/stakeholders to ensure the congruous goal. In shaping the CSR mission statement, it is strongly suggested to align well with corporation’s core competence and consider the impact of key stakeholders’ perspective. A CSR-based IT system provides an effective mechanism for better monitoring, communication, and data analysis. The results of such system indeed expedite the CSR implementation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:12:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99741050-1.pdf: 1382798 bytes, checksum: 0687e5998f94a2450a68ebcbeb4fe3cc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 #
中文摘要 i Abstract ii 目錄 iii 圖目錄 v 表目錄 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第二章 文獻探討 3 第一節 企業社會責任概述 3 第二節 落實企業社會責任之模式 13 第三節 落實企業社會責任所面臨的挑戰 21 第四節 小結 23 第三章 研究方法 25 第一節 研究架構 25 第二節 研究方法 26 第三節 研究流程 28 第四章 個案研究 29 第一節 光寶科技個案介紹 29 第二節 光寶科技個案分析 35 第三節 信義房屋個案介紹 56 第四節 信義房屋個案分析 61 第五章 結論與建議 73 第一節 研究結論 73 第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 82 參考文獻 83 附錄一 89 附錄二 107 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 個案研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 利害關係人 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業社會責任落實模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業社會責任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Corporate Social Responsibility | en |
| dc.subject | CSR Implementation model | en |
| dc.subject | Stakeholder | en |
| dc.subject | Case study | en |
| dc.title | 企業社會責任之落實模式－光寶科技和信義房屋之個案研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation Model - Case Studies of LiteOn Technology and Sinyi Realty | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 江俊毅,周子元 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 企業社會責任,企業社會責任落實模式,利害關係人,個案研究, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Corporate Social Responsibility,CSR Implementation model,Stakeholder,Case study, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 114 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-07-11 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.35 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。