請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65671
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳逸民(Yih-Min Wu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ya-Chi Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉雅琪 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T23:57:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-18 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-02-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-02-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Allam, A. A., and Y. Ben-Zion, 2012. Seismic velocity structures in the southern California plate-boundary environment from double-difference tomography. Geophys. J. Int., 190(2), 1181–1196, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05544.x.
2. Aki, K., 1965. Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N = a ‒ bM and its confidence limits. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ., 43, 237–239. 3. Amitrano, D., 2003. Brittle-ductile transition and associated seismicity: experimental and numerical studies and relationship with the bvalue. J. Geophys. Res., 108(B1), 1–15, doi:10 .1029 /2001JB000680. 4. Amorèse, D., J.-R. Grasso, and P.A. Rydelek, 2010. On varying b-values with depth: results from computer-intensive tests for Southern California. Geophys. J. Int., 180(1), 347-360, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04414.x. 5. Bachmann, C. E., S. Wiemer, B. P. Goertz-Allmann, and J. Woessner, 2012. Influence of pore-pressure on the event-size distribution of induced earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39(9), L09302, doi:10.1029/2012GL051480. 6. Babcock, E. A., 1974. Geology of the Northeast Margin of the Salton Trough, Salton Sea, California. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 85(3), 321-332, doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1974)85<321:GOTNMO>2.0.CO;2. 7. Bloch, W., T. John, J. Kummerow, P. Salazar, O. S. Kruger, and S. A. Shapiro, 2018. Watching dehydration: Seismic indication for transient fluid pathways in the oceanic mantle of the subducting Nazca slab. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 19(9), 3189–3207, doi:10.1029/2018GC007703. 8. Chapman, A. D., J. B. Saleeby, D. J. Wood, A. Piasecki, S. Kidder, M. N. Ducea, and K. A. Farley, 2012. Late Cretaceous gravitational collapse of the southern Sierra Nevada batholith, California. Geosphere, 8(2), 314-341, doi:10.1130/GES00740.1. 9. Chapman, A. D., C. E. Jacobson, W. G. Ernst, M. Grove, T. Dumitru, J. Hourigan, and M. N. Ducea, 2016. Assembling the world's type shallow subduction complex: Detrital zircon geochronologic constraints on the origin of the Nacimiento block, central California Coast Ranges. Geosphere, 12(2), 533–557, doi:10.1130/GES01257.1. 10. Chen, S. K., H. H. Huang, and Y. M. Wu, 2020. First evidence on Vp/Vs ratio dependence of earthquake size distribution. in preparation. 11. Chen, S. K., Y. M. Wu, Y. J. Hsu, and Y. C. Chan, 2017. Current crustal deformation of the Taiwan orogen reassessed by cGPS strain-rate estimation and focal mechanism stress inversion. Geophys. J. Int., 210(1), 228–239, doi:10.1093/gji/ggx165. 12. Cheng, Y., and Y. Ben-Zion, 2019. Transient Brittle‐Ductile Transition Depth Induced by Moderate‐Large Earthquakes in Southern and Baja California. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46(11), 109-117, doi:10.1029/2019GL084315. 13. Chiba, K., 2019. Spatial and temporal distributions of b-values related to long-term slow-slip and low-frequency earthquakes in the Bungo Channel and Hyuga-nada regions, Japan. Tectonophysics, 757(1), 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2019.02.021. 14. Christensen, N. I., 1996. Poission’s ratio and crustal seismology. J. Geophys. Res., 101(B2), 3139–3156, doi:10.1029/95JB03446. 15. Christensen, N. I., and W. D. Mooney, 1995. Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust: A global view. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 100(B6), 9761–9788, doi:10.1029/95JB00259. 16. Corral, A., 2004. Long-term clustering, scaling, and universality in the temporal occurrence of earthquakes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(10), 1-4, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.108501. 17. Dal Zilio, L., Y. van Dinther, T. V. Gerya, and C. C. Pranger, 2018. Seismic behaviour of mountain belts controlled by plate convergence rate. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 482, 81-92, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2017.10.053. 18. Davis, S. D., and C. Frohlich, 1991. Single-link cluster analysis of earthquake aftershocks: decay laws and regional variations. J. Geophys. Res., 96(B4), 6336–6350. 19. Eymold, W. K., T. H. Jordan, 2019. Tectonic regionalization of the Southern California crust from tomographic cluster analysis. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth, 124(11), 11840-11865, doi:10.1029/2019JB018423. 20. Felzer, K. R., and T. Cao, 2008. Appendix H: WGCEP historical California earthquake catalog. U.S. Geol. Surv., Open-File Rept. 2007-1437H, 127 pp. 21. Freed, A. M., and J. Lin, 2001. Delayed triggering of the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake by viscoelastic stress transfer. Nature, 411, 180–183, doi:10.1038/35075548. 22. Freed, A. M., 2005. Earthquake triggering by static, dynamic, and postseismic stress transfer. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 33, 335-367, doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122505. 23. Glazner, A. F., and J. R. O'Neil, 1989. Crustal structure of the Mojave Desert, California: Inferences from Sr and O isotope studies of Miocene volcanic rocks. J. Geophys. Res., 94(B6), 7861–7870, doi:10.1029/JB094iB06p07861. 24. Godano, C., E. Lippiello, and L. de Arcangelis, Variability of the b value in the Gutenberg–Richter distribution. Geophys. J. Int., 199(3), 1765-1771, doi:10.1093/gji/ggu359. 25. Godfrey, N. J., G. S. Fuis, V. Langenheim, D. A. Okaya, and T. M. Brocher, 2002. Lower crustal deformation beneath the central Transverse Ranges, southern California: Results from the Los Angeles Region Seismic Experiment. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 107(B7), ETG 8‐1–ETG 8‐19, doi:10.1029/2001JB000354. 26. Goebel, T. H. W., D. Schorlemmer, T. W. Becker, G. Dresen, and C. G. Sammis, 2013. Acoustic emissions document stress changes over many seismic cycles in stick-slip experiments. Geophys. Res. Lett., 40(10), 2049–2054, doi:10.1002 /grl .50507. 27. Gomberg, J., P. A. Reasenberg, P. Bodin, and R. A. Harris, 2001. Earthquake triggering by seismic waves following the Landers and Hector Mine earthquakes. Nature, 411, 462-466, doi:10.1038/35078053. 28. Gromet, P., and L. T. Silver, 1987. REE variations across the Peninsular Ranges batholith: Implications for batholithic petrogenesis and crustal growth in magmatic arcs. J. Petrol., 28(1), 75–125, doi:10.1093/petrology/28.1.75. 29. Gulia, L., and S. Wiemer, 2010. The influence of tectonic regimes on the earthquake size distribution: A case study for Italy. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37 (10), doi:10.1029/2010GL043066. 30. Hauksson, E., 2000. Crustal structure and seismicity distribution adjacent to the Pacific and North America plate boundary in southern California. J. Geophys. Res., 105(B6), 13,875–13,903, doi:10.1029/2000JB900016. 31. Hauksson, E., J. Stock, K. Hutton, W. Yang, and J. A. Vidal-Villegas, 2011. The 2010 Mw 7.2 El Mayor-Cucapah earthquake sequence, Baja California, Mexico and southernmost California, USA: Active seismotectonics along the Mexican Pacific margin. Pure Appl. Geophys, 168(8-9), 1255-1277, doi:10.1007/s00024-010-0209-7. 32. Hauksson, E., W. Yang, and P. M. Shearer, 2012. Waveform relocated earthquake catalog for Southern California (1981 to June 2011). Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 102(5), 2239-2244, doi:10.1785/0120120010. 33. Helmstetter, A., Y. Y. Kagan, and D. D. Jackson, 2006. Comparison of short‐term and time‐independent earthquake forecast models for Southern California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96(1), 90–106, doi:10.1785/0120050067. 34. Huang, H. H., Y. M. Wu, X. D. Song, C. H. Chang, S. C. Lee, T. M. Chang, and H. H. Hsieh, 2014. Joint VP and VS tomography of Taiwan: implications for subduction-collision orogeny. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 392, 177–191, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2014.02.026. 35. Huang, Y., and G. C. Beroza, 2015. Temporal variation in the magnitude-frequency distribution during the Guy-Greenbrier earthquake sequence. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42(16), 6639-6646, doi:10.1002/2015GL065170. 36. Hutton K., J. Woessner, and E. Hauksson, 2010. Earthquake monitoring in southern California for seventy‐seven years (1932–2008). Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 100(2), 423–446, doi:10.1785/0120090130. 37. Jiang, H., and C.‐T. A. Lee, 2017. Coupled magmatism–erosion in continental arcs: Reconstructing the history of the Cretaceous Peninsular Ranges batholith, southern California through detrital hornblende barometry in forearc sediments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 472, 69–81, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2017.05.009. 38. Johnson, C. E., 1979. I. CEDAR—An approach to the computer automation of short-period local seismic networks. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, doi:10.7907/DBG9-3260. 39. Kagan, Y. Y., 1997. Seismic moment-frequency relation for shallow earthquakes: regional comparison. J. Geophys. Res., 102(B2), 2835-2852, doi:10.1029 /96JB03386. 40. Kagan, Y., D. D. Jackson, and Y. Rong, 2006. A new catalog of southern California earthquakes, 1800–2005. Seism. Res. Lett., 77(1), 30–38, doi: 10.1785/gssrl.77.1.30. 41. Kanamori, H., J. Mori, E. Hauksson, T. H. Heaton, L. K. Hutton, and L. M. Jones, 1993. Determination of earthquake energy release and ML using Terrascope. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 83(2), 330–346. 42. Kimbrough, D. L., M. Grove, and D. M. Morton, 2015. Timing and significance of gabbro emplacement within two distinct plutonic domains of the Peninsular Ranges batholith, southern and Baja California. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 127(1‐2), 19–37, doi:10.1130/B30914.1. 43. Kisslinger, C., 1993. The stretched exponential function as an alternative model for aftershock decay rate. J. Geophys. Res., 98(B2), 1913-1921, doi:10.1029/92JB01852. 44. Kistler, R. W., and Z. E. Peterman, 1978. Reconstruction of crustal blocks of California on the basis of initial strontium isotopic compositions of Mesozoic granitic rocks, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 1071 (17 pp.). Washington, DC. 45. Kohler, M. D., H. Magistrale, and R. W. Clayton, 2003. Mantle heterogeneities and the SCEC reference three-dimensional seismic velocity model version 3, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93(2), 757–774, doi:10.1785/0120020017. 46. Komatitsch, D., and J. Tromp, 1999. Introduction to the spectral element method for three-dimensional seismic wave propagation, Geophys. J. Int., 139(3), 806–822, doi:10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00967.x. 47. Kossobokov, V. G., 2006. Testing earthquake prediction methods: The West Pacific short‐term forecast of earthquakes with magnitude MwHRV ≥ 5.8. Tectonophysics, 413(1-2), 25–31, doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2005.10.006. 48. Lachenbruch, A. H., J. H. Sass, and P. Morgan, 1994. Thermal regime of the southern Basin and Range Province: 2. Implications of heat flow for regional extension and metamorphic core complexes. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth, 99(B11), 22,121–22,133, doi:10.1029/94JB01890. 49. Lee, E.-J., P. Chen, T. H. Jordan, P. B. Maechling, M. A. M. Denolle, and G. C. Beroza, 2014. Full-3-D tomography for crustal structure in Southern California based on the scattering-integral and the adjoint-wavefield methods. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth, 119(8), 6421–6451, doi:10.1002/2014JB011346. 50. Lohman, R. B., and J. J. McGuire, 2007. Earthquake swarms driven by aseismic creep in the Salton Trough, California. J. Geophys. Res., 112(B4), B04405, doi:10.1029/2006JB004596. 51. Lombardi, A. M., 2003. The maximum likelihood estimator of b-value for mainshocks. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93(5), 2082-2088, doi:10.1785/0120020163. 52. Lombardi, A. M., A. Akinci, L. Malagnini, and C. S. Mueller, 2005. Uncertainty analysis for seismic hazard in Northern and Central Italy. Ann. Geophys., 48(6), 853–865., doi:10.4401/ag-3239. 53. Lovely, P., J. H. Shaw, Q. Liu, and J. Tromp, 2006. A structural V P model of the Salton Trough, California, and its implications for seismic hazard. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 96(5), 1882–1896, doi:10.1785/0120050166. 54. Luen, B., and P. B. Stark, 2012. Poisson tests of declustered catalogues. Geophys. J. Int., 189, 691–700, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05400.x. 55. Luttrell, K., and B. Smith-Konter, 2017. Limits on crustal differential stress in southern California from topography and earthquake focal mechanisms. Geophys. J. Int., 211(1), 472-482, doi:10.1093/gji/ggx301. 56. Magistrale, H., K. McLaughlin, and S. Day, 1996. A geology-based 3D velocity model of the Los Angeles basin sediments. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86(4), 1161–1166. 57. Magistrale, H., S. Day, R. W. Clayton, and R. Graves, 2000. The SCEC Southern California reference three-dimensional seismic velocity model version 2. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90(6B), S65–S76, doi:10.1785/0120000510. 58. Martínez-Garzón, P., V. Vavryčuk, G. Kwiatek, and M. Bohnhoff, 2016. Sensitivity of stress inversion of focal mechanisms to pore pressure changes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43(16), 8441-8450, doi:10.1002/2016GL070145. 59. Mavko, G. M., 1980. Velocity and attenuation in partially molten rocks. J. Geophys. Res., 85(B10), 5173–5189, doi:10.1029/JB085iB10p05173. 60. Mogi, K., 1962. On the time distribution of aftershocks accompanying the recent major earthquakes in and near Japan. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo, 40, 175-185. 61. Mogi, K., 1967. Earthquakes and fractures. Tectonophysics, 5(1), 35-55, doi:10.1016/0040-1951(67)90043-1. 62. Moos, D., and M. D. Zoback, 1983. In situ studies of velocity in fractured crystalline rocks. J. Geophys. Res., 88(3), 2345–2358, doi: 10.1029/JB088iB03p02345. 63. Mori J., and R. E. Abercrombie, 1997. Depth dependence of earthquake frequency-magnitude distributions in California: Implications for rupture initiation. J. Geophys. Res., 102(B7), 15081-15090, doi:10.1029/97JB01356. 64. Nishikawa, T., and S. Ide, 2014. Earthquake size distribution in subduction zones linked to slab buoyancy. Nat. Geosci., 7(12), 904–908, doi:10 .1038 /ngeo2279. 65. O’Connell, R. J., and B. Budiansky, 1974. Seismic velocities in dry and saturated cracked solids. J. Geophys. Res., 79(35), 5412-5426. 66. Page, B. M., 1970. Sur‐Nacimiento Fault Zone of California: Continental margin tectonics. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 81(3), 667–690, doi:10.1130/0016‐7606(1970)81[667:SFZOCC]2.0.CO;2. 67. Persaud, P., Y. Ma, J. M. Stock, J. A. Hole, G. S. Fuis, and L. Han, 2016. Fault zone characteristics and basin complexity in the southern Salton Trough, California. Geology, 44(9), 747–750, doi:10.1130/G38033.1. 68. Petruccelli, A., D. Schorlemmer, T. Tormann, A. P. Rinaldi, S.Wiemer, P.Gasperini, and G.Vannucci, 2019a. The influence of faulting style on the size-distribution of global earthquakes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 527, 115791, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115791. 69. Plesch, A., J. H. Shaw, C. Benson, W. A. Bryant, S. Carena, M. Cooke, J. Dolan, G. Fuis, E. Gath, L. Grant, E. Hauksson, T. Jordan, M. Kamerling, M. Legg, S. Lindvall, H. Magistrale, C. Nicholson, N. Niemi, M. Oskin, S. Perry, G. Planansky, T. Rockwell, P. Shearer, C. Sorlien, M. P. Süss, J. Suppe, J. Treiman, and R. Yeats, 2007. Community Fault Model (CFM) for Southern California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97(6), 1793–1802, doi:10.1785/0120050211. 70. Prindle, K., and T. Tanimoto, 2006. Teleseismic surface wave study for S-wave velocity structure under an array: Southern California. Geophys. J. Int., 166(2), 601–621, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02947.x. 71. Reasenberg, P., 1985. Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969-1982. J. Geophys. Res., 90(B7), 5479–5495, doi:10.1029/JB090iB07p05479. 72. Richter, C. F., 1958. Elementary Seismology,W.H. Freeman, San Francisco. 73. Scholz, C. H., 1968. The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 58(1), 399–415. 74. Scholz, C. H., 2015. On the stress dependence of the earthquake b value. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42(5), 1399-1402, doi:10.1002/2014GL062863. 75. Schorlemmer, D., S. Wiemer, and M. Wyss, 2005. Variations in earthquake-size distri-bution across different stress regimes. Nature, 437, 539–542, doi:10.1038 /nature04094. 76. Share, P., H. Guo, C. H. Thurber, H. Zhang, and Y. Ben-Zion, 2019. Seismic Imaging of the Southern California Plate Boundary around the South-Central Transverse Ranges Using Double-Difference Tomography. Pure Appl. Geophys. 176(3), 1117–1143, doi:10.1007/s00024-018-2042-3. 77. Sharman, G. R., S. A. Graham, M. Grove, D. L. Kimbrogh, and J. E. Wright, 2015. Detrital zircon provenance of the Late Cretaceous–Eocene California forearc: influence of Laramide low‐angle subduction on sediment dispersal and paleogeography. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 127(1‐2), 38–60, doi:10.1130/B31065.1. 78. Shaw, J. H., A. Plesh, C. Tape, M. P. Suess, T. H. Jordan, G. Ely, E. Hauksson, J. tromp, T. Tanimoto, R. Graves, K. Olsen, C. Nicholson, P. J. Maechling, C. Rivero, P. Lovely, C. M. Brankman, and J. Munster, 2015. Unified Structural Representation of the southern California crust and upper mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 415, 1-15, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2015.01.016. 79. Shelly, D. R., D. P. Hill, F. Massin, J. Farrell, R. B. Smith, and T. Taira, 2013. A fluid‐driven earthquake swarm on the margin of the Yellowstone caldera. J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth, 118(9), 4872-4886, doi:10.1002/jgrb.50362. 80. Siggins, A. F., and D. N. Dewhurst, 2003. Saturation, pore pressure and effective stress from sandstone acoustic properties. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(2), 1089, doi:10.1029/2002GL016143. 81. Silver, L. T., H. P. Taylor, and B. W. Chappell, 1979. Some petrological, geochemical and geochronological observations the Peninsula Ranges batholith near the international border of the U.S.A. and Mexico. In P. L. Abbott, and V. R. Todd (Eds.), Mesozoic Crystalline Rocks: Peninsular Ranges Batholith and Pegmatites, Point Sal Ophiolite (pp. 83–110). San Diego, Calif: San Diego State University. 82. Spada, M., T. Tormann, S. Wiemer, and B. Enescu, 2013. Generic dependence of the frequency-size distribution of earthquakes on depth and its relation to the strength profile of the crust. Geophys. Res. Lett., 40(4), 709-714, doi:10.1029/2012GL054198. 83. Süss, M. P., and J. H. Shaw, 2003. P wave seismic velocity structure derived from sonic logs and industry reflection data in the Los Angeles basin, California. J. Geophys. Res., 108(B3), 2170, doi:10.1029/2001JB001628. 84. Tape, C., Q. Liu, A. Maggi, and J. Tromp, 2009. Adjoint tomography of the Southern California crust. Science, 325(5943), 988–992, doi:10.1126/science.1175298. 85. Tape, C., Q. Liu, A. Maggi, and J. Tromp, 2010. Seismic tomography of the southern California crust based on spectral-element and adjoint methods. Geophys. J. Int., 180(1), 433–462, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04429.x. 86. Utsu, T., 1961. A statistical study of the occurrence of aftershocks. Geophys. Mag., 30, 521–605. 87. Utsu, T., Y. Ogata, and R. S. Matsu'ura, 1995. The centenary of the Omori formula for a decay law of aftershock activity. J. Phys. Earth, 43(1), 1–33, doi:10.4294/jpe1952.43.1. 88. Vidale, J. E., and P. M. Shearer, 2006. A survey of 71 earthquake bursts across southern California: Exploring the role of pore fluid pressure fluctuations and aseismic slip as drivers. J. Geophys. Res., 111, B05312, doi:10.1029/2005JB004034. 89. Warren, N. W., and G. V. Latham, 1970. An experimental study of thermally induced microfracturing and its relation to volcanic seismicity. J. Geophys. Res., 75(23), 4455–4464, doi:10.1029/JB075i023p04455. 90. Warren-Smith, E., B. Fry, L. Wallace, E. Chon, S. Henry, A. Sheehan, K. Mochizuki, S. Schwartz, S. Webb, and S. Lebedev, 2019. Episodic stress and fluid pressure cycling in subducting oceanic crust during slow slip. Nat. Geosci., 12, 457–481, doi:10.1038/s41561-019-0367-x. 91. Wang, X.-Q., A. Schubnel, J. Fortin, E. C. David, Y. Guéguen, and H.-K. Ge, 2012. High Vp/Vs ratio: Saturated cracks or anisotropy effects? Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L11307, doi:10.1029/2012GL051742. 92. Wei, S., J.-P. Avouac, K. W. Hudnut, A. Donnellan, J. W. Parker, R. W. Graves, D. Helmberger, E. Fielding, Z. Liu, F. Cappa, and M. Eneva, 2015. The 2012 Brawley swarm triggered by injection-induced aseismic slip. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 422, 115-125, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2015.03.054. 93. Wiemer, S., and M. Wyss, 1994. Seismic Quiescence before the Landers (M = 7.5) and Big Bear (M = 6.5) 1992 Earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84(3), 900-916. 94. Wiemer, S., and M. Wyss, 2000. Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90(4), 859–869, doi:10.1785/0119990114. 95. Wu, Y. M., and L. Y. Chiao, 2006. Seismic quiescence before the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Mw7.6 earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96(1), 321-327, doi:10.1785/0120050069. 96. Wu, Y. M., and C. C. Chen, 2007. Seismic reversal pattern for the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, MW 7.6 earthquake. Tectonophysics, 429(1), 125-132, doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2006.09.015. 97. Wu, Y. M., C. C. Chen, L. Zhao, and C. H. Chang, 2008. Seismicity characteristics before the 2003 Chengkung, Taiwan earthquake. Tectonophysics, 457(3-4), 177-182, doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2008.06.007. 98. Wu, Y. M., J. B. H. Shyu, C. H. Chang, L. Zhao, M. Nakamura, and S. K. Hsu, 2009. Improved seismic tomography offshore northeastern Taiwan: implications for subduction and collision processes between Taiwan and the southernmost Ryukyu. Geophys. J. Int. 178, 1042–1054, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04180.x. 99. Wu, Y. M., S. K. Chen, T. C. Huang, H. H. Huang, W. A. Chao, and I. Koulakov, 2018. Relationship between earthquake b-values and crustal stresses in a young orogenic belt. Geophys. Res. Lett., 45(4), 1832–1837, doi:10.1002/2017GL076694. 100. Wyss, M., 1973. Towards a physical understanding of the earthquake frequency distribution. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 31(4), 341–359, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.1973.tb06506.x. 101. Yan, Z., and R. W. Clayton, 2007. Regional mapping of the crustal structure in southern California from receiver functions. J. Geophys. Res., 112, B05311, doi:10.1029/2006JB004622. 102. Yang, W., and E. Hauksson, 2013. The tectonic crustal stress field and style of faulting along the Pacific North America Plate boundary in Southern California. Geophys. J. Int., 194(1), 100-117, doi:10.1093/gji/ggt113. 103. Zhu, L., and H. Kanamori, 2000. Moho depth variation in southern California from teleseismic receiver functions. J. Geophys. Res., 105(B2), 2969–2980, doi:10.1029/1999JB900322. 104. Zigone, D., Y. Ben-Zion, M. Campillo, and P. Roux, 2015. Seismic Tomography of the Southern California Plate Boundary Region from Noise-Based Rayleigh and Love Waves. Pure Appl. Geophys., 172(5), 1007-1032, doi:10.1007/s00024-014-0872-1. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65671 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 地震活動不同規模大小的頻率 (即地震b值) 最主要受到地殼不同應力區的應力變化而改變;高地殼應力能導致較高的大地震發生頻率 (即b值較低),反之亦然。許多研究指出仍有其他次要物理因素能影響地震b值,例如孔隙壓力。根據地殼淺部注水實驗結果已知於地殼小於5公里處,地震b值與孔隙水壓兩者之間可同時呈現正比或反比關係,然而在較深部地殼,孔隙水壓能如何影響地震b值目前尚不明瞭。近期研究發現台灣地區地殼內地震b值與Vp/Vs呈現反比相關,經由實驗室岩石三軸應力試驗結果得知Vp/Vs可以反映地殼孔隙壓飽和度變化,這項研究提供一個於整個地殼尺度觀察地震規模大小分布與孔隙壓力變化的先例。基於南加州地區擁有高品質、高密度的地震觀測資料以及較完整的地震目錄,本研究使用上述研究相同的方法檢驗南加州地區是否同樣觀察得到地震b值與Vp/Vs之間的反比關係。本研究使用南加州地震觀測網 (SCSN) 1981年4月至2017年12月的地震資料,將地震資料去除地震群集以回復到背景地震值,地震b值的計算使用最大似然法以0.1° × 0.1° × 10公里格點中心的半徑20公里地震事件計算。Vp/Vs計算使用SCSN以及Harvard的速度模型資料,重新空間取樣至與地震b值相同大小的格點,並將這兩者觀測資料空間上重疊者進行比較。研究結果顯示南加州地區地震b值與Vp/Vs兩者反比關係沒有台灣地區的觀察明顯,南加州地區Vp/Vs分布範圍比起台灣地區集中緊密,b值相對應分布變化也因此較小。本研究發現南加州地區地殼0-5公里範圍,b值與Vp/Vs有負線性相關,地殼5-10公里範圍則為b值與Vp/Vs線性關係轉換過渡帶,地殼10-20公里範圍b值與Vp/Vs呈正線性相關。本研究推論南加州地區地殼0-5公里範圍內b值與Vp/Vs負相關較弱與線性斜率較緩的原因,可能與其地殼含水量較低、軸差應力較低、孔隙水壓變化較小有關。此結果有助於了解不同規模天然地震發生頻率的變化與物理機制。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Earthquake-size distribution (b value) is reported to be governed by crustal stress which depends on different stress regimes (faulting types). Several studies suggest that b value can be influenced by secondary factors locally, e.g., pore fluid pressure. Injection experiments have shown that b value can both be directly and inversely proportional to pore pressure in shallow crust (< 5 km). However, how pore pressure changes affect b value in general and at deeper depths is still unclear. Recently, b values in the whole curst of Taiwan orogen are founded to be inversely proportional to pore pressure, which is estimated from seismic Vp/Vs ratios. Also, degree of crustal pore fluid saturation can be evaluated from Vp/Vs ratio that is supported by laboratory rock experiments. In this study, we apply the same approach in Southern California examining whether we can see the same relationship in the crust, where high-quality seismic observations exist. We declustered the seismicity during Apr. 1981 to Dec. 2017 from the Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN) for calculating crustal b values under the state of background seismicity. We estimated b values in a radius of 20 km from the center of 0.1° × 0.1° × 10 km grids using the Maximum likelihood approach. Then we estimated seismic Vp/Vs ratios in the same grids as b values for comparison which are derived from SCSN and Harvard. We noticed that both of the b value and Vp/Vs ratio distributions in general are denser than the case of Taiwan. In Southern California, the b values decrease with increasing Vp/Vs ratios in the crustal range of 0-5 km, conversely, the b values increase with increasing Vp/Vs ratios at the 10-20 km depths. There is a transition of the linear relationship between b values and Vp/Vs ratios in the 5-10 km depths. Overall, the negative correlation between b value and Vp/Vs ratios founded in the 0-5 km depths is weaker and much shallower than that has been observed in Taiwan. We inferred that the Southern California crust is mainly composed of igneous and metamorphic rocks with low fluid content, and this condition cause less pore pressure effect while the crust is under low differential stress. Our results contribute the understanding of variation in natural earthquake-size distribution and the physical mechanisms. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T23:57:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-R06224206-1.pdf: 14075284 bytes, checksum: 2e2794a49fad5a77315e220b8a974767 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 vi 圖目錄 viii 表目錄 xi 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 何謂地震b值 1 1.2 研究動機 2 1.3 研究區域背景介紹 6 第二章 研究資料與方法 9 2.1 研究資料 9 2.1.1 南加州地震觀測網發展 9 2.1.2 地震資料選取 12 2.1.3 地震速度模型選取與簡介 15 2.2 去除地震群集(declustered)方法 16 2.2.1 何謂地震群集 16 2.2.2 時間域與空間域雙鍵結地震序列分析法 17 2.2.3 時空參數選取與測試 19 2.2.4 Poisson Process理論檢驗 19 2.3 b值與MC計算 22 2.3.1 最大似然法 (b值估算) 22 2.3.2 最大曲率法 (MC估算) 22 2.3.3 空間取樣 22 2.3.4 格點法與半徑法 23 2.4 Vp/Vs取值與重新計算 24 2.5 b值與Vp/Vs回歸分析 25 第三章 結果與測試討論 26 3.1 去除地震群集之背景地震活動度 26 3.1.1 去除地震群集之地震時空分布測試 26 3.1.2以Poisson Process檢驗背景地震目錄 33 3.2 最小完整地震規模MC與b值空間分布 37 3.3 Vp/Vs空間分布 42 3.4 b值與Vp/Vs回歸結果 46 3.5 其餘參數測試 57 3.5.1格點法與半徑法測試 57 3.5.2 b值與Vp/Vs上部地殼分層測試 64 第四章 討論 67 4.1 b值與Vp/Vs相關性案例:台灣 67 4.2 比較與解釋 71 第五章 結論 74 參考文獻 75 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 南加州地區地震b值與Vp/Vs關係之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A study of the relationship between earthquake b value and Vp/Vs in Southern California | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃信樺(Hsin-Hua Huang),趙韋安(Wei-An Chao),陳達毅(Da-Yi Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 地震活動不同規模大小之頻率,地震b值,Vp/Vs值,孔隙壓力,南加州, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | earthquake-size distribution,earthquake b value,Vp/Vs ratio,pore pressure,Southern California, | en |
dc.relation.page | 87 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202000401 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-02-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 地質科學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 地質科學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-109-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 13.75 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。