請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65646
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 簡怡雯(Yi-Wen Chien) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yung-Chieh Lu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 呂永潔 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T23:55:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-22 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-07-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-07-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | REFERENCE
Adaval, Rashmi (2001), 'Sometimes It Just Feels Right: The Differential Weighting of Affect-Consistent and Affect-Inconsistent Product Information,' Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (June), 1-17. Baba, Shiv and Alexander Fedorikhin (1999), “Heart and Mind in Conflict: the Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, 278-292. Barry, J. Babin, William R. Darden and Mitch Griffin (1994), “Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20, No. 4 (March), 644-656. Batra, Rajeev and Olli T. Ahtola (1991), “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes,” Marketing Letters. 2 (April), 159-170. Bazerman, Max H., Ann E. Tenbrunsel and Kimberly A. Wade-Benzoni (1998), 'Negotiating with Yourself and Losing: Understanding and Managing Conflicting Internal Preferences,' Academy of Management Review, 23, 225-241. Berkowitz, Leonard (1983), “Aversively Stimulated Aggression: Some Parallels and Differences in Research with Animals and Humans,” American Psychologist, 38, 1135-1144. Berkowitz, Leonard and Bartholomeu T. Troccoli (1990), “Feelings, Direction of Attention, and Expressed Evaluations of Others,” Cognition and Emotion, 4, 305-25. Bless, Herbert, Diane M. Mackie, and Norbert Schwarz (1992), “Mood Effects on Attitude Judgments: Independent Effects of Mood before and after Message Elaboration,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 (4), 585–95. Bower, Gordon H. (1981), “Mood and Memory,” American Psychologist, 36, 129-148. Bower, Gordon and Paul Cohen (1982), 'Emotional Influences in Memory and Thinking: Data and Theory,' in M. Clark and S. Fiske (eds.), Affect and Cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cacioppo, John T., Richard. E. Petty, and Katherine Morris (1983), “Effects of Need for Cognition on Message Evaluation, Recall, and Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805-818. Carlson, Michael and Norman Miller (1987), 'Explanation of the Relation between Negative Mood and Helping,' Psychological Bulletin, 102, 91–108. Clark, M. S. and Alice M. Isen (1982), “Toward Understanding the Relationship between Feeling States and Social Behavior,” In A. H. Hastorf & A. M. Isen (Eds.), Cognitive Social Psychology, Elsevier: New York, 73-108. Crowley, Ayn E., Eric Spangenberg and Kevin R. Hughes (1992), “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Attitudes toward Product Categories,” Marketing Letters. 3 (3). 239-49. Dhar, Ravi and Klaus Wertenbroch (2000), “Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 37, No.1 (Feb.), 60-71. Finman, Rona and Leonard Berkowitz (1989), “Some Factors Influencing the Effect of Depressed Mood on Anger and Overt Hostility Toward Another,” Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 70-84. Forgas, Joseph. P. (1992), “Affect in Social Judgments and Decisions: A Multiprocess Model,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25. 227. Forgas, Joseph. P. (1995a), “Mood and Judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM),” Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 117(Jan), 39-66. Gorn, Gerald J., Marvin E Goldberg and Kunal Basu (1993), “Mood, Awareness, and Product Evaluation,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 3, 237-256. Hirschman, Elizabeth C. and Morris B. Holbrook (1982), “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts Methods, and Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 46 (Summer), 92-101 Hsiao, Chung C., Yi W. Chien and Guan Y. Liang (2009), “A Two-Factor Explanation of Consumers’ Self-Activated Bias Correction in Product Judgment,” Journal of Management, Vo. 27, No. 4, 319-335. Isen, Alice M. (1984), “The Influence of Positive Affect on Decision Making and Cognitive Organization,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11, 534-537. Isen, Alice M. (1993), “Positive Affect and Decision Making,” In M. Lewis and J.M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (pp. 261-277), New York/ London: Guilford Press, xiii, 653. Irwin, Julie R. and Rajagopal Raghunathan (2001), “Walking the Hedonic Product Treadmill: Default Contrast and Mood-Based Assimilation in Judgments of Predicted Happiness with a Target Product,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 28 (3), 355-368 Lambert, Alan J., Saera R. Khan, Brian A. Lickel and Katja Fricke (1997), “Mood and the Correction of Positive versus Negative Stereotypes,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 72 (May), 1002-1016 Lin, Pei Y. (2011), “Correction for Positive Mood Bias in Product Judgment: Hedonic vs. Utilitarian based Product Attitude,” Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan University, Taiwan. Lingle, John H., Nehemia Geva, Thomas M. Ostrom and Michael R. Leippe (1979), “Thematic effects of Person Judgments on Impression Organization,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 37(5), 674-687. Martin, Leonard L. (1986), “Set/Reset: Use and Disuse of Concepts in Impression Formation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (September), 493–504. Martin, Leonard L., John J. Seta, and Rick A. Crelia (1990), 'Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of People's Willingness and Ability to Expend Effort in Forming an Impression,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 (January), 27-37. Mayer, John D., Yvonne N. Gaschke, Debra L. Braverman and Temperance W. Evans (1992). “Mood-Congruent Judgment is a General effect,” Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 63, 119-132. Petty, Richard. E. and John T. Cacioppo (1984), “The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69-81. Petty, Richard. E. and John T. Cacioppo (1986b), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion,” In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19, 123-205, San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pham, Michel T. (1998), 'Representativeness, Relevance and the Use of Feelings in Decision Making,' Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (September), 144-60. Rajeev, Batra and Douglas M. Stayman (1990), “The Role of Mood in Advertising Effectiveness”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, No. 2, 203-214. Rule, Brendan G., Brian R. Taylor and Allen R. Dobbs (1987), 'Priming Effects of Heat on Aggressive Thoughts,' Social Cognition, 5 (2), 131-143. Schwarz, Norbert (1990), “Feelings as Information: Informational and Motivational Functions of Affective States,” In E.T. Higgins and R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, Vol. 2, 527-561, New York: Guilford Press. Schwarz, Norbert (1992), “Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Attitude Measurement: An Inclusion/Exclusion Model,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 19, 72. Schwarz, Norbert and Gerald L. Clore (1983), “Mood, Misattribution, and Judgments of Well Being: Informative and Directive Functions of Affective States,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (September), 513–23. Schwarz, Norbert and Gerald L. Clore (1988), “How Do I Feel about It? Informative Functions of Affective States,” in Affect, Cognition, and Social Behavior, ed. Klaus Fiedler and Joseph Forgas, Toronto: Hofgrefe International, 44–62. Shavitt, Sharon and Russell H. Fazio (1990), 'Effects of Attribute Salience on the Consistency of Product Evaluations and Purchase Predictions,' in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17, eds. Marvin E. Goldberg, Gerald Gom, and Richard W. Pollay, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 91-97. Strahilevitz, Michal A. and John G. Myers (1998), “Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on what you are Trying to Sell,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (March), 434-436. Vaughn, Richard (1986), 'How Advertising Works: A Planning Model Revisited,' Journal of Advertising Research, February/March, 57-66. Voss, Kevin E., Eric R. Spangenherg and Bianca Grohmann (2003), 'Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude,' Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (August), 310-320. Wegener, Duane T. (1994), “The Flexible Correction Model: Using Naive Theory of Bias to Correct Assessments of Targets.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus. Wegener, Duane T. and Richard E. Petty (1995), “Flexible Correction Process in Social Judgment: The Role of Naive Theories in Corrections for Perceived Bias,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68. No. 1 (Jan), 36-51. Wegener, Duane T. and Richard E. Petty (1997), “The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction,” In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 29. 141-208, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Wegener, Duane T. and Richard E. Petty (1994), “Mood Management across Affective States: The Hedonic Contingency Hypothesis,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 66(6), 1034-1048. Wegener, Duane T., Richard E. Petty and Stephen M. Smith (1995), “Positive Mood Can Increase or Decrease Message Scrutiny: The Hedonic Contingency View of Mood and Message Processing,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (July), 5–15. Wyland, Carrie L. and Joseph P. Forgas (2007), “On Bad Mood and White Bears: The Effects of Mood State on Ability to Suppress Unwanted Thoughts,” Cognition and Emotion, Vol. 21, Issue 7, 1513-1524 Yi, Youjae (1990), “The Effects of Contextual Priming in Print Advertisements,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (September), 215-22. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65646 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究的目的為要驗證兩個主要的議題。首先,當消費者意識到情感的偏誤時,在負面情緒及效用型屬性思考操弄下,對於目標評價修正量會比在負面情緒及享樂型思考操弄下來得多。第二,對情緒的偏誤修正方向,可以分成兩種可能的狀況;第一種是當消費者感受到情緒狀態的移動(從正面到負面或反之亦然),並視之為對於目標評價的潛在偏誤因子,那麼他們將會對情緒狀態的移動方向做反向的修正。第二種是當消費者沒有感受到情緒狀態的移動,但感受到當下的情緒狀態為目標評價偏誤的潛在的因子時,他們將會對情緒狀態做反向的修正。我們進行了兩項實驗來探討我們的假設,結果驗證了當消費者意識到他們的情感偏誤及具備充分的認知資源時,他們都會修正產品的偏誤,往情緒狀態移動的反方向或當下情緒狀態的反方向移動。而這比起以享樂型屬性思考的消費者,更多發生在以效用型屬性思考的消費者身上。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The present study was designed to demonstrate how consumer judgment corrections could be affected in two different ways. First, when consumers are under negative mood condition and primed with utilitarian processing, the amount of correction of a target judgment when aware of the affective bias are likely to be more than those under negative mood condition and primed with hedonic processing. Second, the consumers’ mood bias correction direction could affect their judgment, and this is divided into two possible situations. In the first situation, when consumers sense a shift in mood state (from positive to negative or vice versa) and perceive this as a potential bias factor toward the target judgment, then they will correct opposite to the shifting direction of mood state. In the second situation, when consumers sense no shift in mood state but perceive the current mood status as potential bias factor toward the target judgment, then they will correct opposite to their mood state. Two studies were performed to investigate the hypothesis, and the results demonstrated that when consumers are aware of their affective bias and have sufficient cognitive resources, they are likely to correct their biases opposite to the shift in mood state or current mood state. This occurs usually more among the utilitarian user than the hedonic user. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T23:55:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99749017-1.pdf: 1378301 bytes, checksum: c3fe176338aa981072ba608547ea2c95 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | TABLE OF CONTENT
中文摘要 i ABSTRACT ii TABLE OF CONTENT iii LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES v INTROUDCTION 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 4 PROPOSED HYPOTHESES 17 STUDY 1 PRETEST 22 METHOD 24 RESULTS 32 DISCUSSION FOR STUDY 1 41 STUDY 2 PRETEST 43 METHOD 45 RESULTS 48 DISCUSSION FOR STUDY 2 58 PRACTICAL IMPLICATION 60 LIMITATION & FUTURE RESEARCH 61 REFERENCE: 63 APPENDIX: Questionnaires 68 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 負面情緒與產品態度修正量:享樂型與效用型導向的產品判斷對負面情緒修正量之不同影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Correction for Negative Mood Bias in Product Judgment: Hedonic vs. Utilitarian based Product Attitude | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蕭中強(Chung-chiang Hsiao),練乃華(Nai-Hwa Lien),陳建維(Chien-Wei Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 偏誤察覺,心情偏誤,產品評價,享樂型屬性,效用型屬性,彈性修正模型,涉入程度, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Bias Awareness,Mood Bias,Product Judgment, Hedonic Attribute,Utilitarian Attribute,Flexible Correction Model,Involvement, | en |
dc.relation.page | 87 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-07-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 企業管理碩士專班 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA) |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.35 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。