請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65577
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 姜皇池(Huang-Chih Chiang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Aleris Frank do Nascimento Mendes | en |
dc.contributor.author | 艾瑞時 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T23:51:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-27 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-07-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-07-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bibliography
Books [1] African Development Bank and the Africa Union, Oil and Gas in Africa, Supplement to the African Development Report, Oxford University Press, 2009. [2] Strati et al, Anastasia, Unresolved Issues and New Challenges to the Law of the Sea, Time Before and Time After, Martinus Nijhoof Publishers, 2006. [3] Vukas, Budislav The Law of the Sea, Selecting Writings, Publications on Ocean Development, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004. [4] Colson, David A. & Smith, Robert W., International Maritime Boundaries, Volume V, The American Society of International Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005. [5] Bolukbasi, Deniz Turkey and Greece, The Aegean Disputes, A Unique Case in International Law, Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2004. [6] Brown, E.D., The International Law of the Sea, Introductory Manual Vol. I, Dartmouth Publishing Company Ltd., 1994. [7] Yang, Haijiang, Jurisdiction of the Coastal State over Foreign Merchant Ships in Internal Waters and the Territorial Sea, Springer Berlin-Heidelberg, 2006. [8] Grotius, Hugo, The Freedom of the Seas, or The Right Which Belongs to the Dutch to take Part in the East Indian Trade, The Law book Exchange, Ltd, Union, New Jersey, 2001. [9] Charney, Jonathan I. & Smith, Robert W., International Maritime Boundaries, Volume IV, The American Society of International Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2002. [10] Sohn, Louis B. & Noyes, John E., Cases and Materials on the Law of the Sea, Transnational Publishers, 2004. [11] Munavvar, Mohamed, Ocean States, Archipelagic Regimes in the Law of the Sea, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995. [12] Nordquist et al, Myron H., Freedom of Seas, Passage Rights and the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009. [13] Klein, Natalie, Dispute Settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Cambridge Studies in International Law, Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition, 2005. [14] Antunes, Nuno Marques, Towards the Maritime Conceptualisation of Maritime Delimitation, Legal and Technical Aspects of a Political Process, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2003. [15] Weil, Prosper, The Law of Maritime Delimitation – Reflections, University of Paris, Grotius Publications Ltd., 1989. [16] Lagoni, Rainer and Vignes, Daniel, Maritime Delimitation, Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, 2006. [17] de Oliveira, Ricardo Soares, Oil and Politics in the Gulf of Guinea, C. Hurst & Co. Publisher Ltd, 2007. [18] Churchill, R.R. & Lowe, A.V., International Law of the Sea, Melland Schill Studies in International Law, Manchester University Press, 3rd ed., 1999. [19] Hong, Seoung-Yong & Dyke, Jon M. Van, Maritime Boundary Disputes, Settlement Processes, and the Law of the Sea, Martinus Nihjhoff Publishers, 2009. [20] McDorman et al, Ted. L.., International Ocean Law, Materials and Commentaries, Carolina Academic Press, 2005. [21] Acer, Yucel, The Aegean Maritime Disputes and International Law, Dartmouth Publishing Company, Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2003. Internet Sources [1] Agencia Nacional de Petroleo de Sao Tome e Principe (National Petroleum Agency of Sao Tome and Principe), http://www.anp-stp.gov.st/pt/ [2] ANGONOTICIAS (Angola News Agency), Noticias de Angola em Tempo Real, Angola Assume Presidencia da Comissao do Gulfo da Guine, http://www.parlamento.st/ [3]Assembleia Nacional de Sao Tome e Principe (National Assembly of Sao Tome and Principe), http://www.parlamento.st/ [4] BBC News, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12261276 [5] Central Intelligence Agency, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ni.html, [6] Direccao Geral de Turismo de Sao Tome e Principe (Tourism Office of Sao Tome and Principe), http://www.stptourism.st/sobre_stp/historia/osprimordios.htm [7] First United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, United Nations Diplomatic Conference’swebsite, http://untreaty.un.org/cod/diplomaticconferences/lawofthesea-1958/lawofthesea-1958.html. [8] France 24, International News Agency, http://www.france24.com/en/20080724-nigerian-rebels-cameroon-troops-deadly-clash-nigeria-cameroon [9] Government of the Democratic Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, the Constitution of the Republic, http://www.gov.st/data/filestorage/docs/constistp.pdf [10] Instituto Nacional de Estatistica de Sao Tome e Principe (National Institute of Statistics of Sao Tome and Principe), http://www.ine.st/ [11] International Court of Justice, www.icj-cij.org [12] International Peace Institute, Pacific Settlement of Border Disputes: Lessons from the Bakassi Affair and the Greentree Agreement, http://humansecuritygateway.com/documents/IPI_PacificSettlementOfBorderDisputes.pdf [13] Second United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, United Nations Diplomatic Conference, http://untreaty.un.org/cod/diplomaticconferences/lawofthesea-1960/lawofthesea-1960.html [14] TELANON (a Sao Tome and Principe online news agency), http://www.telanon.info/politica/2011/12/06/9196/fugas-na-aprovacao-do-oge-pela-adi-com-mais-um-voto-do-mdfm-pl-solitario/ [15] United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm [16] United Nations News Centre, http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=41390&Cr=gulf+of+guinea&Cr1 [17]Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sao_tome_and_principe Working papers [1] Damian Ondo Mane, Emergence of the Gulf of Guinea in the Global Economy: Prospects and Challenges, (IMF Work paper, N05/235, December 2005), http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2005/wp05235.pdf [2] J. Tanga Bianga, The Joint Development Zone Between Nigeria and Sao Tome and Principe: A case of provisional arrangement in the gulf of guinea international law, State Practice and Prospects for Regional Integration, 10,The United Nations – The Nippon Foundation of Japan Fellowship Programme 2009-2010, http://www.un.org/depts/los/nippon/unnff_programme_home/fellows_pages/fellows_papers/tanga_0910_cameroon.pdf. [3] Ngang & Udayakumar, Understanding the Bakassi Conflic, A Show Case of Conflict Prevention in Practice, A Town for Peace, EPU Research Papers, Issue 04/07, STADS CHLAINING, http://epu.ac.at/fileadmin/downloads/research/rp_0407.pdf [4] Nugzar Dundua, Delimitation of Maritime Boundary between Adjacent States, United Nations – The Nippon Foundation Fellow, 2006 – 2007, http://www.un.org/depts/los/nippon/unnff_programme_home/fellows_pages/fellows_papers/dundua_0607_georgia.pdf. [5] United Nations, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Pacific, Towards and ppropriate Regulatory Environment for the Multimodal Transport and Logistics Industry, http://www.unescap.org/ttdw/common/TFS/FFMultimodalTx/Technical_Material.pdf [6] United Nations – The Nippon Foundation of Japan, Fellowship Programme 2008-2010, The Governance of Coastal Marine Biodiversity in the Gulf of Guinea, ETOGA Galax Yves Landry, http://www.un.org/depts/los/nippon/unnff_programme_home/fellows_pages/fellows_papers/etoga_0809_cameroon_ppt.pdf Articles [1] Charney, Jonathan I., Progress in International Maritime Boundary Delimitation Law, American Journal of International Law, Westlaw, 88 AMJIL 227. [2] SHI, Jiuyong, Maritime Delimitation in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice, The Wang Tieya Lecture in Public International Law, Westlaw, 9 Chinese JIL 271. Table of Cases [1] Case concerning the Aegean Sea Continental Shelf (Greece/Turkey) Judgment of 19 December 1978, www.icj-cij.org [2] Case concerning Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta); Judgment of 3 June 1985, www.icj-cij.org [3] Case concerning Continental Shelf (Tunisia/Libyan Arab Jamahiriya); Judgment of 24 February 1982, www.icj-cij.org [4] Case concerning Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Republic of Mali); Judgment of 22 December 1986, www.icj-cij.org [5] Case concerning Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea intervening); Judgment of 10 October 2002. www.icj-cij.org [6] Case concerning North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands); Judgment of 20 February 1969, www.icj-cij.org [7] Case concerning Maritime Delimitation and Territorial questions between Qatar and Bahrain (Qatar/Bahrain); Judgment of 16 March 2001, www.icj-cij.org [8] Case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1993, www.icj-cij.org [9] Case concerning Maritime Delimitation of the Boundary in the Gulf of Maine area (Canada/United States of America); Judgment of 12 October 1984, www.icj-cij.org [10] Case concerning North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands); Judgment of 20 February 1969, www.icj-cij.org [11] Case concerning Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua/Honduras); Judgment of 8 October 2007, www.icj-cij.org Other references [1] Charter of the United Nations, www.un.org [2] Statute of the International Court of Justice, www.icj-cij.org [3] United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Done on 10 December 1982 in Montego Bay, Jamaica, entered into force on 16 November 1984. [4] Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties of 1969 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65577 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 摘要
本篇論文著重在從聖多美與普林西比共和國(Democratic Republic of Sao Tome and Principe),以下簡稱STP觀點,討論幾內亞灣海洋劃界的議題,並且特地參考2002年柯麥隆(Cameroon)及奈及利亞(Nigeria) 陸地與海域界線的案件。在1994年的3月29號,柯麥隆在國際法庭提出對奈及利亞的訴訟申請,爭執的焦點集中在「巴卡西半島」(Bakassi Penisula) 的主權糾紛。此外, 在1999年6月30號,「赤道幾內亞」(Equatorial Guinea)根據《國際法院規約》(Statute of International Court of Justice) 第62條,提出要參加上開訴訟的申請,目的是要藉由所有可能的司法手段,以尋求其在幾內亞灣權利及利益的保障,並且告知法院其將受到法院審議所影響之法律上權利與利益。 相對於赤道幾內亞,STP選擇不參與訴訟,亦不對法院之判決發表任何意見。因此,本文著重於查明基於何種理由STP選擇不去介入;其次,找出STP在幾內亞灣的法律上權利與利益為何;且進一步了解STP如何從法院的判決中理解本身的法律上權益。 本論文將嘗試以一個適當角度來探討議題,共包含五個章節。章節一簡略的介紹幾內亞灣的地理、歷史及法律觀點;章節二呈獻海域法(Law of the Sea)之相關規定與其發展歷史;章節三討論並比較分析柯麥隆與奈及利亞間,關於陸地及海域劃界的案件;章節四從STP的觀點,並參考2002年柯麥隆與奈及利亞領土與海洋劃界的案件,以探討幾內亞灣的海洋劃界。章節五則提出本文結論。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACT
This thesis aims to encompass the issue concerning the Gulf of Guinea maritime boundary delimitation from the perspective of the Democratic Republic of Sao Tome and Principe (hereinafter, Sao Tome and Principe) with particular reference to 2002 Land and Maritime Boundary Delimitation between Cameroon and Nigeria case. On 29 March 1994, the Republic of Cameroon filed an application before the International Court of Justice (I.C.J.) instituting proceedings against the Federal Republic of Nigeria in respect of a dispute described as “relating essentially to the question of sovereignty over the Bakassi Peninsula.” In addition, on 30 June 1999, the Republic of Equatorial Guinea instituted before the ICJ an application for permission to intervene in the case pursuant to article 62 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice. The object was to seek protection of its legal rights and interests in the Gulf of Guinea by all legal means available and to inform the Court of the nature of its legal rights and interests that could be affected by the Court’s decision. Contrarily to Equatorial Guinea, Sao Tome and Principe however chose not to intervene on any basis, nor did pronounce any concern regarding the Court’s deliberation. Thus, in light of those concerns, this thesis tries to find out the underlying reasons of why Sao Tome and Principe choose not to intervene; secondly to find out what are the Sao Tome and Principe legal rights and interests in the Gulf of Guinea; and further to know how Sao Tome and Principe sees its legal rights and interests from the Court’s deliberation. The present thesis consists of five chapters. Chapter I present a brief introduction of geographical, historical and legal perspectives of the Gulf of Guinea. Chapter II presents an historical analysis of the Law of the Sea. Chapter III discusses and makes a comparative analysis of the International Court of Justice’s deliberation in case concerning Land and Maritime Boundary Delimitation between Cameroon and Nigeria. Chapter IV elaborates on Gulf of Guinea Maritime Boundary from the perspective of Sao Tome and Principe with a particular reference to 2002 Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria. Chapter V gives an conclusion of the overall thesis. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T23:51:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99A21125-1.pdf: 3148902 bytes, checksum: 6fca2151795b6aa8f27ca2032f9c065d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Table OF Contents
Content Page Certificate of Oral Defense………………………………………………………………………..i Acronyms………………………………………………………………………………………….ii Dedication………………………………………………………………………………………...iii Acknowledgement………………………………………………………………………………..iv Abstract…………………….………….………………………………………………………….v List of Figures………………………………………………………………………………….....xi CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION…………………………..……………………………………..1 CHAPTER II: THE LAW OF THE SEA…………….………………………………………….6 2. History of the Law of the Sea.....………………………………………………...6 2.1. Geneva Convention s on the Law of the Sea ………..…………………………..9 2.2. United Nation Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III)……………..11 2.3. Obligation Arising out of Relevant International Conventions and Practices in Relation to Maritime Boundary Claims….…………………………..…………..16 2.4. Territorial Sea…………...……………………………………………………….23 2.4.1. The Concept of the Territorial Sea ……………………………………………...23 2.4.2. The Criteria, Rules and Principles Governing the Delimitation of the Territorial Sea……………………………………………………………………………….26 2.5. The Exclusive Economic Zone…………………………………………………..29 2.5.1. The Concept of the Exclusive Economic Zone ……………………………........29 2.5.2. The Rights and Obligation in of the Coastal and non-Coastal States in the EEZ………………………………………………………………………………30 2.5.3. The Rights of the Land-locked and Geographically Disadvantaged States in the EEZ………………………………………………………………………………32 2.6. The Concept of the Continental Shelf.……………......………………………….33 2.6.1. The Outer Limit of the Continental Shelf……………….....…………………..34 2.6.2. The Criteria, Rules and Principles Governing the EEZ and the Continental Shelf……………………………………………………………………………...35 2.7. Island’s Maritime Areas………………………………………………………....42 2.7.1 The Continental Shelf and the EEZ of Islands…………………......…………....42 CHAPTER III: GULF OF GUINEA MARITIME BOUNDARY DELIMITATIONS………………….…..43 3. Historical Perspective of the Conflict Prior To Decolonization of the Parties……....43 3.1. Historical Perspective of the Conflict After the Parties’ Decolonization……….49 3.2. The Reasons that Prompted Cameroon to Resort to International Court of Justice……………………………………………………………………………53 3.3. Cameroon and Nigeria Before the International Court of Justice……………...54 3.3.1. Introduction………………………………………….............................................54 3.3.2. The Claims of Cameroon and Nigeria…..…………………………………….....55 3.3.3. Question of Land Title…………………………………………………………...55 3.3.4. The Court’s Deliberation over the Question of Land Title Claims……………...61 3.3.5. Question of Maritime Jurisdiction Claimed by the Parties……………………..67 3.3.6. An Analysis of the International Court of Justice Deliberation Concerning the Maritime Boundary Delimitation between Cameroon and Nigeria…………......76 3.3.7. The Task which the Court must take as the Starting Point for the Determination of the Maritime Rights of the Coastal State……………………………………......77 3.3.8. The Drawing of the Single Boundary Line…………………………...80 3.3.9. Ascertaining the Relevant Circumstances……………………………………….85 3.3.10 The Impact of the Court Judgment in Cameroon/Nigeria case…………………93 3.3.11 The Parties’ Obligations upon the International Court of Justice’s Rulings…...95 3.3.12 Third State rights and interests in the Gulf of Guinea………………………….100 CHAPTER IV: GULF OF GUINEA MARITIME BOUNDARY DELIMITATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE…………………………………………………………………...103 4. Historical Background of Sao Tome and Principe……………………………………...…...103 4.1. Sao Tome and Principe’ Maritime Claims in the Gulf of Guinea……………...107 4.2. Sao Tome and Principe’s Maritime Boundary Delimitation…………….…......111 4.2.1. Sao Tome and Principe’s Rights and Interests in the Gulf of Guinea………....121 4.2.2. The Rights which Cameroon Could Claim in the Gulf of Guinea……………..133 4.2.3. The Third States Reserved Rights in the Waters of Sao Tome and Principe…..137 4.2.4. The Remaining Rights and Interests of Sao Tome and Principe in the Gulf of Guinea………………………………………………………………………….141 4.2.5. Reasons that Prompted Sao Tome and Principe not to Intervene in the Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria …………………………148 4.2.6. Legal Principles which Sao Tome and Principe Could use in its Future Maritime Boundary Negotiation………………………………………………154 4.2.6.1. Negotiation Strategic Considerations…………………………………………154 4.2.6.2. Ascertaining Factors Constituting Relevant Circumstances in the Maritime Boundary between Sao Tome and Principe and Nigeria………………………157 4.2.6.3. Proposed Legal Methods, Rules and Principles for Sao Tome and Principe’ Future Maritime Boundary Negotiations………………………………………171 CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………..177 BIBLIOGRAPHY..……………………………………………………………………………181 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 從聖多美及普林西比角度檢視 幾內亞灣海域劃界: 特別論及2002年 喀麥隆和奈及利亞的陸上和海上邊界 | zh_TW |
dc.title | GULF OF GUINEA MARITIME BOUNDARY DELIMITATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE:
With particular reference to 2002 Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 海事,劃界,幾內亞灣,聖多美與普林西比,STP,柯麥隆,奈及利亞,赤道幾內亞,加蓬,巴卡西半島, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Boundary,Delimitation,Gulf of Guinea,Sao Tome and Principe,STP,Cameroon,Nigeria,Equatorial Guinea,Gabon,Bakassi Peninsula, | en |
dc.relation.page | 187 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-07-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 法律學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.08 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。