Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65283
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃崇興
dc.contributor.authorBing-Rong Wuen
dc.contributor.author吳秉容zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T23:34:28Z-
dc.date.available2014-08-01
dc.date.copyright2012-08-01
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.submitted2012-07-27
dc.identifier.citationBawden, David and Lyn Robinson (2009), “The Dark Side of Information: Overload, Anxiety and Other Paradoxes and Pathologies,” Journal of Information Science, 35 (April), 180-191.
Bettman, James R. and C. Whan Park (1980), “Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes: A Protocol Analysis,” Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (December), 234–248.
Boland, Wendy Attaya, Merrie Brucks, and Jesper H. Nielsen (2012), “The Attribute Carryover Effect: What the Runner-Up Option Tells Us about Consumer Choice Processes,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (February), 872-885.
Bryant, Peter and Richard Dunford (2008), “The Influence of Regulatory Focus on Risky Decision-Making,” Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57 (2), 335-359.
Chernev, Alexander (2004), “Goal Orientation and Consumer Preference for the Status Quo,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (December), 557–565.
(2009), “Choosing versus Rejecting: The Impact of Goal-Task Compatibility on Decision Confidence,” Social Cognition, 27 (2), 249-260.
Creyer, Elizabeth H., James R. Bettman, and John W. Payne (1990), “The Impact of Accuracy and Effort Feedback and Goals on Adaptive Decision Behavior,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3 (January), 1–16.
Crowe, Ellen, and Higgins, E. Tory (1997), “Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69 (February), 117−132.
Dhar, Ravi and Klaus Wertenbroch (2000), “Consumer Choice between Hedonic and
Utilitarian Goods,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (February), 60-71.
Ganzach, Yoav (1995), “Attribute Scatter and Decision Outcome: Judgment versus Choice,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 62 (April), 113-122.
Gensch, Dennis H. (1987), “A Two-Stage Disaggregate Attribute Choice Model,” Marketing Science, 6 (Summer), 223-239.
Hauser, John R. and Birger Wernerfelt (1990), “An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (March), 393-408.
Heller, Daniel, Irwin P. Levin, and Martin Goransson (2002), “Selection of Strategies for Narrowing Choice Options: Antecedents and Consequences,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89 (November), 1194-1213.
Higgins, E. Tory (1997), “Beyond Pleasure and Pain,” American Psychologist, 52 (December), 1280−1300.
(2000), “Making a Good Decision: Value from Fit,” American Psychologist, 55 (November), 1217−1230.
Higgins, E. Tory, Lorraine Chen Idson, Antonio L. Freitas, Scott Spiegel, and Daniel C. Molden (2003), “Transfer of Value from Fit,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (June), 1140−1153.
Houston, David A. and Steven J. Sherman (1995), “Cancellation and Focus: The Role of Shared and Unique Features in the Choice Process,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31 (July), 257–378.
Huber, Vandra L., Margaret A. Neale, and Gregory B. Northcraft (1987), “Decision Bias and Personnel-Selection Strategies,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40 (August), 136–147.
Koenig, Anne M., Joseph Cesario, Daniel C. Molden, Spee Kosloff, and E. Tory Higgins (2009), “ Incidental experiences of regulatory fit and the processing of persuasive appeals,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35 (October), 1342-1355.
Laran, Juliano and Keith Wilcox (2011), “Choice, Rejecting, and Elaboration on Preference-Inconsistent Alternatives,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (August), 229-241.
Levin, Irwin P., J. D. Jasper, and W. S. Forbes (1998), “Choosing versus Rejecting Options at Different Stages of Decision Making,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11 (September), 193–210.
Levin, Irwin P., Caryn M. Prosansky, Daniel Heller, and Brad M. Brunick (2001), “Prescreening of Choice Options in ‘Positive’ and ‘Negative’ Decision Making Tasks,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14 (October), 279-293.
Lussier, Denis A. and Richard W. Olshavsky (1979), “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Brand Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 6 (September), 154-165.
Miller, George A. (1994), “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information,” Psychological Review, 101 (April), 343-352.
Mourali, Mehdi and Frank Pons (2009), “Regulatory Fit from Attribute-Based versus Alternative-Based Processing in Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19 (October), 643-651.
Mourali, Mehdi and Anish Nagpal (2011), “The Powerful Select, the Powerless Reject: Power's Influence in Decision Strategies,” Journal of Business Research, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 27 December 2011.
Ordonez, Lisa D., Lehman Benson III, and Lee Roy Beach (1999), “Testing the Compatibility Test: How Instructions, Accountability, and Anticipated Regret Affect Pre-Choice Screening of Options,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78 (April), 63-80.
Payne, John W. (1976), “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: An Information Search and Protocol Analysis,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16 (August), 366-387.
Payne, John W., James R. Bettman, and Eric J. Johnson (1988), “Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(July), 534-552.
Shafir, Eldar (1993), “Choosing versus Rejecting: Why Some Options Are Both Better and Worse Than Others,” Memory and Cognition, 21 (July), 546-556.
Simonson, Itamar (1992), “The Influence of Anticipating Regret and Responsibility on Purchase Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (June), 105-118.
─── (2008), “Will I Like a ‘Medium’ Pillow? Another Look at Constructed and Inherent Preferences,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18 (July), 155−169.
Smith, Pamela K., Daniel H.J. Wigboldus, and Ap Dijksterhuis (2008), “Abstract Thinking Increases One’s Sense of Power,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (March), 378-385.
Ursic, Michael L. and James G. Helgeson (1990), “The Impact of Choice Phase and Task Complexity on Consumer Decision Making, ” Journal of Business Research, 21 (August), 69-90.
Wan, Echo Wen, Jiewen Hong, and Brian Sternthal (2009), “The Effect of Regulatory Orientation and Decision Strategy on Brand Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (April), 1026-1038.
Wedell, Douglas H. (1997), “Another Look at Reasons for Choosing and Rejecting,” Memory and Cognition, 25 (November), 873-887.
Wright, Peter (1975), “Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying vs. Optimizing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (February), 60-67.
Yaniv, Ilan and Yaacov Schul (1997), “Elimination and Inclusion Procedures in Judgment,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10 (September), 211-220.
Zhang, Yinlong, Vikas Mittal, and Lawrence Feick (2002), “To Choose or to Reject: It Is Up to Who I Am. The Impact of Self-Construal on Decision Strategy,” in Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 5, ed. Rami Zwick and Tu Ping, Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research, 212-216.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65283-
dc.description.abstract本研究以兩階段決策為架構,檢驗了決策階段對於決策策略使用傾向的影響。實驗一中驗證了決策者在決策的第一階段因為會比第二階段感到困難,使用刪去法的傾向會較第二階段為高。這種階段之間難度的差異,對於不同規範焦點的決策者原先的策略偏好也會造成影響。促進焦點決策者在第一階段使用刪去法的傾向會大於第二階段,而預防焦點決策者在兩個階段使用刪去法的傾向則沒有明顯變化。此外,當使用的策略和規範焦點配適時,決策者會有較高的滿意度。最後,實驗結果顯示了促進焦點決策者若在決策第一階段使用了和規範焦點不配適之策略時,相較於使用規範配適之策略,會有明顯的改變策略傾向,而預防焦點決策者不論使用何種策略,改變策略之傾向都沒有明顯差異。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis research examines the impact of decision stage on the usage of decision strategies in the two-staged decision. Because it is more difficult to make a decision in Stage 1 than in Stage 2, decision makers tend to use rejecting strategy more in Stage 1 than in Stage 2. Besides, the gap of difficulty between stages moderates the impact of regulatory focus on the strategy usage. Promotion-focused people use rejecting strategy more in Stage 1 than in Stage 2, whereas prevention-focused people have no difference in the usage of rejecting strategy between two stages. Moreover, when the used strategy fits the regulatory focus, the decision makers would be more satisfied than those who use the other strategy. Finally, if promotion-focused people use the strategy which is not regulatory-fit, they are more possible to shift strategy in Stage 2 than those who use the regulatory-fit strategy. But whatever strategy prevention-focused people use, there are no difference between their tendencies to shift strategy.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T23:34:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-101-R99741013-1.pdf: 565978 bytes, checksum: 0d164e6af40b8825b275209717adbca8 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 i
摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
目錄 iv
壹、 緒論 1
貳、 文獻探討 2
一、影響決策策略採用之因素 2
二、兩階段決策之成因與階段間之差異性 4
三、難度與權力感大小對決策策略的影響 6
四、規範焦點與兩階段決策 8
五、策略配適與滿意度 12
六、規範焦點與決策轉變傾向 13
參、 實驗一 14
一、參與者與實驗情境 14
二、實驗方法與流程 14
三、實驗結果 18
四、結論 19
肆、 實驗二 20
一、參與者與實驗情境 20
二、實驗方法與流程 20
三、實驗結果 21
四、結論 24
伍、 結論與建議 25
一、研究貢獻 25
二、研究限制 27
三、管理意涵 28
四、未來研究方向 28
附錄一 30
參考文獻 32
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject選擇zh_TW
dc.subject刪去zh_TW
dc.subject決策策略zh_TW
dc.subject決策階段zh_TW
dc.subject規範焦點zh_TW
dc.subject滿意度zh_TW
dc.subjectRegulatory focusen
dc.subjectChooseen
dc.subjectDecision stageen
dc.subjectSatisfactionen
dc.subjectRejecten
dc.subjectDecision Strategyen
dc.title不同決策階段對決策策略採用傾向的影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe Impact of Decision Stage on the Usage of Decision Strategiesen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear100-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳鴻基,翁崇雄
dc.subject.keyword選擇,刪去,決策策略,決策階段,規範焦點,滿意度,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordChoose,Reject,Decision Strategy,Decision stage,Regulatory focus,Satisfaction,en
dc.relation.page34
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2012-07-27
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:商學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-101-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
552.71 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved