請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65128完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳俊忠(Chun-Chung Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yen-Chun Lu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 盧彥君 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T23:26:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-07-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-17 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-07-31 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Adizes, I., 1979. Organizational Passages:Diagnosing and Treating Life Cycle Problem of Organizations. Organizational Dynanics, 7(1), pp. 3-24.
2. Appelbaum, S. H., St-Pierre, N. & Glavas, W., 1998. Strategic Organizational Change the Role of Leadership, Learning, Motivation and Productivity. Management Decision, 36(5), pp. 289-301. 3. Armenakis, A. A. & Bedeian, A. G., 1999. Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management June, 25(3), pp. 293-315. 4. Armenakis, A. A. & Harris, S. G., 2009. Reflections: our Journey in Organizational Change Research and Practice. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), pp. 127-142. 5. Becker, B. E. & Ulrich, D., 2001. The HR Scorecard: Linking People, Strategy, and Performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 6. Bennis, W., 1993. Learning Some Basic Truisms About Leadership. In: M. Ray & A. Rinzler, eds. The New Paradigm in Business : Emerging Strategies for Leadership and Organizational Change. New York, NY: The Putnam Brekley Group Inc.. 7. Burnes, B., 2004. Kurt Lewin and the Planned Approach to Change: A Re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), pp. 977-1002. 8. Charman, A., 1999. Global Mergers and Acquisitions: The Human Resource Challenge. In: International Focus. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management. 9. Cummings, T. G. & Worley, C. G., 2009. Organization Development and Change. 9th ed. Australia ; Mason, OH: South-Western/Cengage Learning. 10. Eisenbach, R., Watson, K. & Pillai, R., 1999. Transformational Leadership in the Context of Organizational Change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(2), pp. 80-89. 11. Gozdz, K., 1993. Building Community as a Leadership Discipline. In: M. Ray & A. Rinzler, eds. New York: The Putnam Brekley Group Inc.. 12. Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E. & Schuler, R. S., 1997. Technical and Strategic Human Resource Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance. 40(1), pp. 171-188. 13. Kanter, R. M. & Stein, B., 1992. The Challenge of Organizational Change. New York: The Free Press. 14. Katz, D. & Kahn, R., 1966. The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley. 15. Kotter, J. P., 2002. 領導人的變革法則. 第二版 邱如美譯 台北市: 天下遠見. 16. Lundberg, C. C., 1985. Toward a Contextual Model of Human Resource Strategy: Lessons from the Reynolds Corporation. Human Resource Management, 24(1), pp. 91-112. 17. Mintzberg, H. & Westley, F., 1992. Cycles of Organizational Change. Strategic Management Journal, Volume 13, pp. 39-59. 18. Mom, T. J. M., Bosch, F. A. J. V. D. & Volberda, H. W., 2007. Investigating Managers' Exploration and Exploitation Activities: The Influence of Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Horizontal Knowledge Inflows*. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), p. 910–931. 19. Pascale, R., Millemann, M. & Gioja, L., 2001. Changing the Way We Change. In: Harvard Business Review on Turnarounds. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 55-88. 20. Pascale, R. T. & Athos, A. G., 1982. The Art of Japanese Management: Applications for American Executives. New York: Warner Books. 21. Pettigrew, A. M., 1987. Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6), pp. 649-670. 22. Pettigrew, A. M., 1990. Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice. Organization Science, 1(3), pp. 267-292. 23. Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W. & Cameron, K. S., 2001. Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), pp. 697-713. 24. Ray, M. & Rinzler, A., 1993. The New Paradigm in Business:Emerging Strategies for Leadership and Organizational Change. New York: The Putnam Berkley Group Inc.. 25. Robbins, S. P., 2002. 組織行為學. 第九版 李靑芬、李雅婷和趙慕芬譯 台北市: 華泰. 26. Robertson, P. J., Roberts, D. R. & Porras, J. I., 1993. Dynamics of Planned Organizational Change: Assessing Empirical Support for a Theoretical Model. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), pp. 619-634. 27. Rossiter, N. & Vedala, S., 2006. 共用服務在中國漸行其道. IT 時代週刊, 第 13 冊, pp. 70-71. 28. Schuler, R. S., 1990. Repositioning the Human Resource Function: Transformation or Demise?. The Academy of Management executive, 4(3), pp. 49-60. 29. Schweiger, D. M. & DeNisi, A. S., 1991. Communication with Employees following a Merger: A Longitudinal Field Experiment. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), pp. 110-135. 30. Self, D. R., Armenakis, A. A. & Schraeder, M., 2007. Organizational Change Content, Process, and Context: A Simultaneous Analysis of Employee Reactions. Journal of Change Management, 7(2), pp. 211-229. 31. Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S., 2000. The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), pp. 217-226. 32. Storey, J., 1992. Developments in the Management of Human Resources. Oxford: Blackwell. 33. Tichy, N. M. & Ulrich, D. O., 1984. The Leadership Challenge - A Call for the Transformational Leader. Sloan Management Review, 26(1), pp. 59-69. 34. Tichy, N. & Sherman, S., 1993. Control Your Destiny or Someone Else Will. New York: Doubleday. 35. Tsui, A. S., 1987. Defining the Activities and Effectiveness of the Human Resource Department: A Multiple Constituency Approach. Human Resource Management, 26(1), pp. 35-69. 36. Tushman, M. L., Newman, W. H. & Romanelli, E., 1996. Convergence and Upheaval: Managing the Unsteady Pace of Organizational Evolution. California Management Review, 29(1), pp. 29-44. 37. Tushman, M. L. & O'Reilly III, C. A., 1997. Winning Through Innovation. Boston,MA: Harvard Business Review Press. 38. Ulrich, D., 2001. 人力資源最佳實務. 初版 李芳齡譯 台北市: 商周. 39. Van de Ven, A. H. & Poole, M. S., 1995. Explaining Development and Change in Organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp. 510-540. 40. Weick, K. E., 2000. Emergent change as a universal in organizations. In: M. Beer & N. Nohria, eds. Breaking The Code Of Change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 41. 王曉玟, 2007. 版圖轉移搶灘全球市場. 天下雜誌,天下調查中心, Issue 371. 42. 吳秉恩, 2004. 企業人力資源管理定位與功能轉型. 人力資源管理學報, 4(3), pp. 1-27. 43. 吳復新; 孫本初; 許道然, 2010. 組織變革管理與技術. 台北縣: 國立空中大學. 44. 柳文濤, 2010. 促進組織變革的人力資源管理策略探討. 商業時代, Issue 28, p. 97 +107. 45. 紀乃文 & 張火燦, 2006. 人力資源主管角色、人力資源部門績效指標與組織績效關係之研究. 人力資源管理學報, 6(3), pp. 71-93. 46. 徐聯恩, 1996. 企業變革系列研究. 台北市: 華泰. 47. 徐聯恩, 1998. 企業變革架構. 中華管理評論, 1(1), pp. 1-7. 48. 張火燦, 1996. 策略性人力資源管理. 台北市: 揚智. 49. 黃良志, 等, 2007. 人力資源管理:理論與實務. 台北市: 華泰. 50. 管康彥, 1998. 組織演變的四大階段. 能力雜誌, Issue 504, pp. 140-145. 51. 賴志超, 2006. 華人組織行為-議題、作法及出版. 台灣: 華泰 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65128 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著世界進入全球化競爭與知識經濟的時代,瞬息萬變的市場變動不斷挑戰國內零售企業的經營能耐,故企業紛紛以組織變革來因應與維繫競爭力。同時在變革過程中,由於各家公司規章制度的落差、經營管理的差異、組織文化的不同等等,使企業必須更仰賴人力資源部門的斡旋,促使人力資源便由傳統行政延伸至策略性角色。
本研究以T集團為研究對象,經由深入訪談與廣泛地資料蒐集,輔以脈絡論的分析架構,研究T集團整併旗下子公司時如何與變革關係人(Stakeholder)互動,透過整合職能部門建立全球運籌的零售偕同平台;並運用Ulrich(2002) 人力資源多元角色模型,探討各功能角色在組織變革下的活動,以及彼此間如何相輔相成,強化變革促進者的內涵。最後,根據個案分析的結果,發現在適度的順序安排下,可以化解多元角色模型的矛盾現象,並建構人力資源部門在變革過程中的多元角色評估指標,以掌握角色之間的平衡關係。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The pace of change today, due to globalization competition and knowledge economy, is both dizzying and dazzling. Companies hope to gain sustained competitive advantage by organizational change to overcome the change in domestics market. At the process of change, many companies are discovering a need to reinvent the human resource function, beyond its traditional operational and transactional role, to deal with the gap of regulation system, the diversity of managing method, the difference of organizational culture, and so on.
The author conducts a case study of T Group with contextualism framework. Through deep interview and generally collection of all relative data to understand how to interact between the company with change stakeholders when the group integrates its own subsidiary company? And how to combine the functional department from different companies to build the global logistics service platform? In addition, this research verifies and analyzes the activities of various HR functional roles and interconnects to support the change agent at organizational change by multiple-role model (Ulrich, 2002). The findings are that, for multiple-role model, the contradictions could be solve by appropriate sequence and then set the indicator of multiple roles for human resource department to keep balance. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T23:26:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99724022-1.pdf: 2050665 bytes, checksum: 1dbb979605e4d1f2e3fa291329b0fa3b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝詞 i
中文摘要 ii English Abstract iii 目錄 iv 表目錄 vii 圖目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 2 第三節 研究流程 3 第四節 研究方法 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 組織變革 5 一、 組織變革的定義 5 二、 變革的類型 6 三、 變革關係人 10 第二節 脈絡論的分析架構 19 一、 脈絡論變革架構 19 二、 變革的情境 21 三、 變革的內容 23 四、 變革的過程 25 第三節 人力資源發展 28 一、 多元角色模型 28 二、 人力資源部門指標 31 三、 人力資源與組織變革 33 四、 促進組織變革的人力資源管理策略 35 第三章 個案公司變革描述 37 第一節 集團背景 37 一、 發展歷程 37 二、 零售通路產品與文化 39 第二節 個案描述 42 一、 變革的情境 42 二、 變革啟動與變革領導者 45 三、 變革的內容 46 四、 變革的過程 47 第三節 垂直脈絡與水平時間軸分析 52 一、 醞釀期 52 二、 解凍期 53 三、 改變期 53 四、 再凍結期 55 第四章 變革過程中人力資源的策略性角色 58 第一節 人力資源管理與組織變革 58 一、 股權整併 58 二、 職能部門整合 60 三、 文化重塑 61 四、 鞏固制度並深植文化 62 第二節 人力資源管理與組織生命徵候 64 一、 穩定員工士氣 64 二、 轉變員工認同與降低派系衝突 65 三、 學習制度 66 第三節 人力資源部門的挑戰 68 一、 事業單位主管的觀點 68 二、 派系融合的困難 69 三、 不同階段下四個角色的平衡兼顧 70 第四節 組織變革下人力資源部門的績效追蹤 71 一、 個案公司變革的關鍵議題 71 二、 人力資源部門績效指標 74 三、 部門指標與角色的一致性 79 第五章 結論與建議 83 第一節 研究結論 83 一、 研究發現 83 二、 行動建議 86 第二節 研究貢獻與管理意涵 91 第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 93 參考書目 95 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 組織變革 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 脈絡論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 人力資源管理活動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 人力資源部門角色 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 人力資源部門績效指標 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Human Resource Management Practices | en |
| dc.subject | Human Resources Department Role | en |
| dc.subject | HR Performance Indicators | en |
| dc.subject | Contextalism | en |
| dc.subject | Organizational Change | en |
| dc.title | 組織變革過程中人力資源策略性運用─以T集團為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Organizational Change Process with Strategic Human Resource Application:A Case Study of T Group | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝明慧(Ming-Huei Hsieh),郭佳瑋(Chia-Wei Kuo) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 組織變革,脈絡論,人力資源管理活動,人力資源部門角色,人力資源部門績效指標, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Organizational Change,Contextalism,Human Resource Management Practices,Human Resources Department Role,HR Performance Indicators, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 98 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-07-31 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
