請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64947完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林克忠(Keh-Chung Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shih-Pin Hsu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 許世賓 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T23:09:41Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2012-09-18 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-09-18 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-06 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | REFERENCES
Altschuler, E. L., Wisdom, S. B., Stone, L., Foster, C., Galasko, D., Llewellyn, D. M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (1999). Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet, 353(9169), 2035-2036. doi: S0140673699009204 [pii] Bohannon, R. W., & Smith, M. B. (1987). Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther, 67(2), 206-207. Chang, J. J., Tung, W. L., Wu, W. L., & Su, F. C. (2006). Effect of bilateral reaching on affected arm motor control in stroke--with and without loading on unaffected arm. Disabil Rehabil, 28(24), 1507-1516. doi: 10.1080/09638280600646060 Conforto, A. B., Ferreiro, K. N., Tomasi, C., dos Santos, R. L., Moreira, V. L., Marie, S. K., . . . Cohen, L. G. (2010). Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function after subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 24(3), 263-272. doi: 10.1177/1545968309349946 Connell, L. A., & Tyson, S. F. (2012). Measures of sensation in neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil, 26(1), 68-80. doi: 10.1177/0269215511412982 Daly, J. J., Hogan, N., Perepezko, E. M., Krebs, H. I., Rogers, J. M., Goyal, K. S., . . . Ruff, R. L. (2005). Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 42(6), 723-736. Dimitrijevic, M. M. (1994). Mesh-glove. 1. A method for whole-hand electrical stimulation in upper motor neuron dysfunction. Scand J Rehabil Med, 26(4), 183-186. Dimitrijevic, M. M., Stokic, D. S., Wawro, A. W., & Wun, C. C. (1996). Modification of motor control of wrist extension by mesh-glove electrical afferent stimulation in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 77(3), 252-258. Dohle, C., Pullen, J., Nakaten, A., Kust, J., Rietz, C., & Karbe, H. (2009). Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23(3), 209-217. doi: 10.1177/1545968308324786 Duncan, P. W., Bode, R. K., Min Lai, S., & Perera, S. (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84(7), 950-963. Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jaasko, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med, 7(1), 13-31. Funase, K., Tabira, T., Higashi, T., Liang, N., & Kasai, T. (2007). Increased corticospinal excitability during direct observation of self-movement and indirect observation with a mirror box. Neurosci Lett, 419(2), 108-112. Garry, M. I., Loftus, A., & Summers, J. J. (2005). Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability. Exp Brain Res, 163(1), 118-122. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2226-9 Golaszewski, S. M., Bergmann, J., Christova, M., Kunz, A. B., Kronbichler, M., Rafolt, D., . . . Nardone, R. (2012). Modulation of motor cortex excitability by different levels of whole-hand afferent electrical stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol, 123(1), 193-199. Golaszewski, S. M., Kremser, C., Wagner, M., Felber, S., Aichner, F., & Dimitrijevic, M. M. (1999). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human motor cortex before and after whole-hand afferent electrical stimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med, 31(3), 165-173. Golaszewski, S. M., Siedentopf, C. M., Koppelstaetter, F., Rhomberg, P., Guendisch, G. M., Schlager, A., . . . Mottaghy, F. M. (2004). Modulatory effects on human sensorimotor cortex by whole-hand afferent electrical stimulation. Neurology, 62(12), 2262-2269. Graham, J. V., Eustace, C., Brock, K., Swain, E., & Irwin-Carruthers, S. (2009). The Bobath concept in contemporary clinical practice. Top Stroke Rehabil, 16(1), 57-68. Gregson, J. M., Leathley, M., Moore, A. P., Sharma, A. K., Smith, T. L., & Watkins, C. L. (1999). Reliability of the Tone Assessment Scale and the modified Ashworth scale as clinical tools for assessing poststroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 80(9), 1013-1016. Haaland, K. Y., Prestopnik, J. L., Knight, R. T., & Lee, R. R. (2004). Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. Brain, 127(Pt 5), 1145-1158. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh133 Hammer, A. M., & Lindmark, B. (2010). Responsiveness and validity of the Motor Activity Log in patients during the subacute phase after stroke. Disabil Rehabil, 32(14), 1184-1193. Hendricks, H. T., van Limbeek, J., Geurts, A. C., & Zwarts, M. J. (2002). Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83(11), 1629-1637. Hsieh, Y. W., Wu, C. Y., Lin, K. C., Chang, Y. F., Chen, C. L., & Liu, J. S. (2009). Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 40(4), 1386-1391. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.530584 Hsueh, I. P., Lin, J. H., Jeng, J. S., & Hsieh, C. L. (2002). Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 73(2), 188-190. Hu, X. L., Tong, K. Y., Song, R., Zheng, X. J., & Leung, W. W. (2009). A comparison between electromyography-driven robot and passive motion device on wrist rehabilitation for chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23(8), 837-846. doi: 10.1177/1545968309338191 Hubbard, I. J., Parsons, M. W., Neilson, C., & Carey, L. M. (2009). Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occup Ther Int, 16(3-4), 175-189. doi: 10.1002/oti.275 Hummel, F. C., & Cohen, L. G. (2005). Drivers of brain plasticity. Curr Opin Neurol, 18(6), 667-674. Keith, R. A., Granger, C. V., Hamilton, B. B., & Sherwin, F. S. (1987). The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil, 1, 6-18. Klaiput, A., & Kitisomprayoonkul, W. (2009). Increased pinch strength in acute and subacute stroke patients after simultaneous median and ulnar sensory stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23(4), 351-356. Kong, K. H., Chua, K. S., & Lee, J. (2011). Recovery of upper limb dexterity in patients more than 1 year after stroke: Frequency, clinical correlates and predictors. NeuroRehabilitation, 28(2), 105-111. Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B. J., van der Grond, J., & Prevo, A. J. (2003). Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke, 34(9), 2181-2186. Langhorne, P., Coupar, F., & Pollock, A. (2009). Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol, 8(8), 741-754. Laufer, Y., & Elboim-Gabyzon, M. (2011). Does sensory transcutaneous electrical stimulation enhance motor recovery following a stroke? A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25(9), 799-809. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318214f64a Lee, M. M., Cho, H. Y., & Song, C. H. (2012). The Mirror Therapy Program Enhances Upper-Limb Motor Recovery and Motor Function in Acute Stroke Patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. Levin, M. F., Kleim, J. A., & Wolf, S. L. (2009). What do motor 'recovery' and 'compensation' mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23(4), 313-319. Levin, M. F., Michaelsen, S. M., Cirstea, C. M., & Roby-Brami, A. (2002). Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res, 143(2), 171-180. Liao, W. W., Wu, C. Y., Hsieh, Y. W., Lin, K. C., & Chang, W. Y. (2012). Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil, 26(2), 111-120. Lin, J. H., Hsueh, I. P., Sheu, C. F., & Hsieh, C. L. (2004). Psychometric properties of the sensory scale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil, 18(4), 391-397. Lin, K. C., Chang, Y. F., Wu, C. Y., & Chen, Y. A. (2009). Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions, and quality of life in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23(5), 441-448. doi: 10.1177/1545968308328719 Lin, K. C., Hsieh, Y. W., Wu, C. Y., Chen, C. L., Jang, Y., & Liu, J. S. (2009). Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23(5), 429-434. doi: 10.1177/1545968308331144 Lincoln, N. B., Jackson, J. M., & Adams, S. A. (1998). Reliability and Revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for Stroke Patients. Physiotherapy, 84(8), 358-365. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9406(05)61454-x Maeda, A., Yuasa, T., Nakamura, K., Higuchi, S., & Motohashi, Y. (2000). Physical performance tests after stroke: reliability and validity. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 79(6), 519-525. Massie, C., Malcolm, M. P., Greene, D., & Thaut, M. (2009). The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 90(4), 571-579. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.574 Meesen, R. L., Cuypers, K., Rothwell, J. C., Swinnen, S. P., & Levin, O. (2011). The effect of long-term TENS on persistent neuroplastic changes in the human cerebral cortex. Hum Brain Mapp, 32(6), 872-882. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21075 Mendoza, J. E., & Foundas, A. L. (2008). The Somatosensory Systems. In J. E. Mendoza & A. L. Foundas (Eds.), Clinical neuroanatomy : a neurobehavioral approach (pp. 23-47). Spring Street: New York : Springer. Michaelsen, S. M., Dannenbaum, R., & Levin, M. F. (2006). Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke: randomized control trial. Stroke, 37(1), 186-192. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000196940.20446.c9 Michielsen, M. E., Selles, R. W., van der Geest, J. N., Eckhardt, M., Yavuzer, G., Stam, H. J., . . . Bussmann, J. B. (2011). Motor Recovery and Cortical Reorganization After Mirror Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25(3), 223-233. Michielsen, M. E., Smits, M., Ribbers, G. M., Stam, H. J., van der Geest, J. N., Bussmann, J. B., & Selles, R. W. (2011). The neuronal correlates of mirror therapy: an fMRI study on mirror induced visual illusions in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 82(4), 393-398. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.194134 Morris, D. M., Uswatte, G., Crago, J. E., Cook, E. W., 3rd, & Taub, E. (2001). The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 82(6), 750-755. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.23183 Nojima, I., Mima, T., Koganemaru, S., Thabit, M. N., Fukuyama, H., & Kawamata, T. (2012). Human motor plasticity induced by mirror visual feedback. J Neurosci, 32(4), 1293-1300. Nouri, F., & Lincoln, N. (1987). An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1(4), 301-305. doi: 10.1177/026921558700100409 Ottenbacher, K. J., Hsu, Y., Granger, C. V., & Fiedler, R. C. (1996). The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 77(12), 1226-1232. Patel, A. T., Duncan, P. W., Lai, S. M., & Studenski, S. (2000). The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 81(10), 1357-1363. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.9397 Penta, M., Tesio, L., Arnould, C., Zancan, A., & Thonnard, J. L. (2001). The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: Rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke, 32(7), 1627-1634. Peurala, S. H., Pitkanen, K., Sivenius, J., & Tarkka, I. M. (2002). Cutaneous electrical stimulation may enhance sensorimotor recovery in chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil, 16(7), 709-716. Platz, T., Pinkowski, C., van Wijck, F., Kim, I. H., di Bella, P., & Johnson, G. (2005). Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil, 19(4), 404-411. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice In L. G. Portney & M. P. Watkins (Eds.), Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice (3 ed., pp. 830-855). Upper Saddle River: NJ: Prentice Hall Health. Ramachandran, V. S., & Altschuler, E. L. (2009). The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain, 132(Pt 7), 1693-1710. Sabes, P. N. (2000). The planning and control of reaching movements. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 10(6), 740-746. Schabrun, S. M., & Hillier, S. (2009). Evidence for the retraining of sensation after stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil, 23(1), 27-39. doi: 10.1177/0269215508098897 Sheean, G. (2002). The pathophysiology of spasticity. Eur J Neurol, 9 Suppl 1, 3-9; dicussion 53-61. Sommerfeld, D. K., Gripenstedt, U., & Welmer, A. K. (2012). Spasticity After Stroke: An Overview of Prevalence, Test Instruments, and Treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31825f13a3 Stoykov, M. E., & Corcos, D. M. (2009). A review of bilateral training for upper extremity hemiparesis. Occup Ther Int, 16(3-4), 190-203. Sullivan, J. E., & Hedman, L. D. (2008). Sensory dysfunction following stroke: incidence, significance, examination, and intervention. Top Stroke Rehabil, 15(3), 200-217. doi: 10.1310/tsr1503-200 Sullivan, J. E., Hurley, D., & Hedman, L. D. (2012). Afferent stimulation provided by glove electrode during task-specific arm exercise following stroke. Clin Rehabil. doi: 10.1177/0269215512442915 Taub, E., Uswatte, G., Mark, V. W., & Morris, D. M. (2006). The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys, 42(3), 241-256. Thieme, H., Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Behrens, J., & Dohle, C. (2012). Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3, CD008449. Tyson, S., & Connell, L. (2009). The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil, 23(11), 1018-1033. doi: 10.1177/0269215509339004 Uswatte, G., Taub, E., Morris, D., Light, K., & Thompson, P. A. (2006). The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology, 67(7), 1189-1194. Uswatte, G., Taub, E., Morris, D., Vignolo, M., & McCulloch, K. (2005). Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke, 36(11), 2493-2496. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000185928.90848.2e van der Lee, J. H., Wagenaar, R. C., Lankhorst, G. J., Vogelaar, T. W., Deville, W. L., & Bouter, L. M. (1999). Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke, 30(11), 2369-2375. Vidoni, E. D., Acerra, N. E., Dao, E., Meehan, S. K., & Boyd, L. A. (2010). Role of the primary somatosensory cortex in motor learning: An rTMS study. Neurobiol Learn Mem, 93(4), 532-539. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2010.01.011 Vidoni, E. D., & Boyd, L. A. (2009). Preserved motor learning after stroke is related to the degree of proprioceptive deficit. Behav Brain Funct, 5, 36. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-5-36 Ward, N. S., & Cohen, L. G. (2004). Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol, 61(12), 1844-1848. Welmer, A. K., von Arbin, M., Murray, V., Holmqvist, L. W., & Sommerfeld, D. K. (2007). Determinants of mobility and self-care in older people with stroke: importance of somatosensory and perceptual functions. Phys Ther, 87(12), 1633-1641. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060349 Wolf, S. L., Catlin, P. A., Ellis, M., Archer, A. L., Morgan, B., & Piacentino, A. (2001). Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke, 32(7), 1635-1639. Wu, C. Y., Chen, C. L., Tang, S. F., Lin, K. C., & Huang, Y. Y. (2007). Kinematic and clinical analyses of upper-extremity movements after constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 88(8), 964-970. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.012 Yavuzer, G., Selles, R., Sezer, N., Sutbeyaz, S., Bussmann, J. B., Koseoglu, F., . . . Stam, H. J. (2008). Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 89(3), 393-398. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.162 Zehr, E. P. (2005). Neural control of rhythmic human movement: the common core hypothesis. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 33(1), 54-60. Zehr, E. P., Klimstra, M., Dragert, K., Barzi, Y., Bowden, M. G., Javan, B., & Phadke, C. (2007). Enhancement of arm and leg locomotor coupling with augmented cutaneous feedback from the hand. J Neurophysiol, 98(3), 1810-1814. doi: 10.1152/jn.00562.2007 Zehr, E. P., & Loadman, P. M. (2012). Persistence of locomotor-related interlimb reflex networks during walking after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol, 123(4), 796-807. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.07.049 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64947 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 目的：比較鏡像治療併用刺激輸入、鏡像治療及一般動作復健對慢性中風病患感覺動作復原與日常生活功能之效應。
設計：隨機分派，前測後測比較，安慰劑控制組試驗。 環境：醫院之復健科部。 受試者：23名慢性中風個案(平均年齡50.84年，平均中風時間27個月)隨機分派至鏡像治療併用刺激輸入、鏡像治療或一般動作復健當中一組，接受每週五天、每天90分鐘，為期四週之療程。 成效評量：主要評估工具包含有傅格-梅爾動作評估量表(Fugl-Meyer Assessment)、沃夫動作功能測驗(Wolf Motor Function Test)；次要評估工具有修訂版艾許沃斯量表(Modified Ashworth Scale)、功能獨立量表之動作項目(motor items of Functional Independence Measure)、動作活動日誌(Motor Activity Log)、十公尺步行測驗(10-Meter Walking Test)、傅格-梅爾感覺評估量表(sensory section of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment)、修訂版諾丁漢感覺評估量表(Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment)以及運動學分析。 結果：個案接受四週治療後動作復原皆有改善，然而鏡像治療併用刺激輸入和鏡像治療在遠端動作損傷和遠端肌肉張力之改善程度優於一般復健；相較其他組別，鏡像治療合併刺激輸入可促進患側手之日常使用，並且增進行走的獨立程度。運動學分析結果，一般復健組在肩膀外展角度顯著增加，表示使用代償動作完成伸手及物任務。另外，鏡像治療合併刺激輸入在感覺功能呈現正向效應的趨勢；其餘參數則無顯著差異。 結論：鏡像治療併用刺激輸入和鏡像治療對於改善遠端動作損傷之成效優於一般復健組，且相較於一般復健組，不會過度使用近端做代償。此外，鏡像治療加上刺激輸入可有效促進患側手於日常生活之使用，以及行走獨立能力。以上發現值得後續研究驗證。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare the effects of mirror therapy combined with mesh-glove stimulation (MGS), mirror therapy with placebo stimulation (MTP), and conventional upper-limb rehabilitation (CR) on sensorimotor functions and daily functions for patients with chronic stoke.
Design: A randomized, pretest-posttest, placebo-controlled design was used. Settings: Outpatient rehabilitation clinics Subjects: Twenty-three patients (mean age = 50.84 year; mean time after stroke = 27 month) were randomized to MGS, MTP, or CR groups. Each group received treatment for 90 minutes/day and 5 days/week over 4 consecutive weeks. Main measures: Primary outcomes were Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Wolf Motor Function Test. Secondary outcomes were Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), motor items of Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Motor Activity Log (MAL), 10-Meter Walking Test, sensory section of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment, and kinematic analysis. Results: After four week treatment, all participants had better motor recovery. Compared with CR group, patients received MGS or MTP significantly reduced motor impairment in distal part of FMA, decreased muscle tone in distal part of MAS and less shoulder abduction in reaching movement. Enhanced functional performance was found for MGS group in the MAL and locomotion subcomponent of the FIM. No significant difference but a positive trend for MGS was showed in sensory outcomes. Conclusions: Compared with CR group, MGS and MTP may improve motor impairment of the distal upper extremity and prevent compensatory pattern at shoulder joint. MGS group may enhance the effect of activity level on functional arm-use and locomotion than other groups. These positive results on sensorimotor functions and daily functions encourage enrolling larger sample size to confirm the findings for similar participants. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T23:09:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99429004-1.pdf: 26212440 bytes, checksum: a1e8384390cd9a7cf5c2185657439302 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
誌謝 II 中文摘要 III Abstract V Table of Contents VII List of Tables IX List of Figures X Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Study Purposes and Hypotheses 7 Chapter 2. Methods 8 2.1 Study Design 8 2.2 Participants 10 2.3 Interventions 11 2.3.1 Mirror Therapy with Mesh-glove Stimulation 11 2.3.2 Mirror Therapy with Placebo Stimulation 13 2.3.3 Conventional Upper-limb Rehabilitation 14 2.4 Outcome Measures 15 2.4.1 Primary Outcomes 15 2.4.2 Secondary Outcomes 17 2.4.3 Kinematic Analysis 20 2.5 Data Analysis 23 Chapter 3. Results 24 3.1 Effects of Treatments on Primary Outcomes 24 3.2 Effects of Treatments on Secondary Outcomes 26 Chapter 4. Discussion 28 4.1 Effects of MGS and MTP Relative to CR 28 4.2 Superior Effects of MGS Relative to MTP and CR 32 4.3 Comparable Effects among Three Groups 38 4.4 Study Limitations and Suggestions 40 Chapter 5. Conclusions 43 References 44 Tables 59 Figures 70 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 鏡像治療併用刺激輸入對慢性中風病患感覺動作復原與生活功能之成效 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Effects of Mirror Therapy with Afferent Stimulation on Sensorimotor Recovery and Daily Functions in Patients with Chronic Stroke | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳菁宜(Ching-Yi Wu),張雅如(Ya-Ju Chang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 鏡像治療,感覺電刺激,中風神經復健,安慰劑對照, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | mirror therapy,somatosensory electrical stimulation,stroke neurorehabilitation,placebo-controlled study, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 75 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-06 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 職能治療研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 職能治療學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 25.6 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。