請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64704完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 翁儷禎 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ya-Lun Ou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 區雅倫 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T22:57:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-08-28 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-28 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
大學入學考試中心（1995）。「大學入學考試中心興趣量表使用手冊八十四年版」。台北：作者。 大學入學考試中心（2001）。「大學多元入學新方案」。台北：作者。 王思峰、黃思聞（2012）。學系精博特徵與學職契連特徵：從類型論到特徵論。「測驗學刊」，59，277-301。 王思峰、劉兆明、吳濟聰、蔡秦倫（2012）。走出象牙塔！但走去哪？學職轉換觀點之政策分析。「跨界：大學與社會參與」，1。取自：http://interlocution.tw/aboutus.php。 台灣PISA國際研究中心（2012）。PISA（the Programme for International Student Assessment）國際學生能力評量計畫學生能力國際排名。2012年5月5日，取自：Web: http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/link_rank_tw.htm 田秀蘭（1996）。我國高中學生職業興趣結構之比較研究。「中華輔導學報」，4，69-93。 林一真（2007）。「生活彩虹探索」。台北：心理出版社。 林幸台（1984）。職業自我探索量表之編製研究。「彰化教育學院學報」，9，63-81。 林幸台、金樹人、張小鳳、陳清平（1996）。「生涯興趣量表之編製研究」。台北：財團法人宗倬章先生教育基金會。 林幸台、林世華、陳清平、區雅倫（1995）。「大學入學考試中心興趣量表電腦化之研究」。台北：大學入學考試中心。 林幸台、簡茂發、洪冬桂、陳清平、劉澄桂、區雅倫、蔡家燕（2007）。「興趣量表工作世界圖研發工作報告」。台北：大學入學考試中心。 林幸台、簡茂發、洪冬桂、劉兆明、陳清平、劉澄桂、蔡家燕、區雅倫（2008）。「興趣量表工作世界圖研發工作報告（二）」。台北：大學入學考試中心。 林佳瑩（2008）。「我國高中職學生職業興趣傾向變遷之研究」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所。 林清山（1986）。多向度量尺法（MDS）的理論及統計方法。「測驗年刊」，33，109-124。 邱愛玲（2005）。「我國大學多元入學方案改革之社會學評析」。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（計畫編號NSC93-2413-H-017-017），未出版。 金樹人 （1986）。我國高中男女生職業類型的因素結構。「教育心理學報」，19，219-254。 金樹人（1991）。職業興趣與人格之關聯性研究。「教育心理學報」，24，91-115。 金樹人（1992）。我國高中學生職業興趣結構分析。「測驗年刊」，39，219-254。 金樹人（1997）。「生涯諮商與輔導」。台北：東華書局。 金樹人（2011）。「生涯諮商與輔導」（重修版）。台北：東華書局。 金樹人、田秀蘭、林世華（2000）。「國中生涯興趣量表」。台北：心理出版社。 金樹人、林幸台、陳清平、區雅倫（1993）。「興趣量表編製之研究報告（一）」。台北：大學入學考試中心。 金樹人、林幸台、陳清平、區雅倫（1994）。「興趣量表編製之研究報告（二）」。台北：大學入學考試中心。 陳清平（1999）。「Holland 類型論之空間構形分析研究」（未發表之博士論文）。台北：國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。 陳嬿竹（2002）。「網路與真實人際關係、人格特質及幸福感之相關研究」（未發表之碩士論文）。屏東縣：國立屏東教育大學教育心理與諮商研究所。 區雅倫（1998）。「高中生涯輔導資訊系統的藍圖與實踐」第八屆亞洲職業與教育輔導會議（台北）的口頭報告論文。 區雅倫（2001）。「台灣興趣量表在兩岸高中生測試數據比較研究」海峽兩岸升學與就業指導測驗研討會（廣西桂林）的口頭報告論文。 區雅倫、翁儷禎（2004）。「興趣測驗個人與學類組型圖示之再探」2004年會暨教育與心理測驗學術研討會（台北）的口頭報告論文。 區雅倫、翁儷禎、李庚霖（印製中）。台灣高中生的生涯興趣結構分析-以大考中心興趣量表為例。「教育心理學報」。 區雅倫、翁儷禎、李庚霖（印製中）。CEEC興趣量表簡版之編製。「測驗年刊」。 區雅倫、陳清平（2001）。「大學入學考試中心興趣量表使用手冊」。台北：大學入學考試中心。 路君約、簡茂發、盧欽銘、林一真（1989）。「職業探索量表研究報告」。台北﹕行政院青年輔導委員會。 葉興華（2005）。談國中小學課程「一綱多本」的現在與未來。「研習資訊」，22，54-62。 簡成熙（1999）。我國升學競爭的機制與變革：以近年來高中入學制度為例。「教育研究資訊」，7，61-84 簡茂發、林一真、陳清平、區雅倫、劉澄桂、舒琮慧（2007）。「大學入學考試中心興趣量表使用手冊-2007年修訂版」。台北：大學入學考試中心。 劉長江、Rounds（2003）。評估職業興趣的結構，「心理學報」，35，411-418。 鄭士鴻（2006）。「由TIMSS 2003的結果分析各國八年級學生科學學習成就與影響因素以及探討我國不同特質的班級理化課課堂活動」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣師範大學化學研究所。 鄭秋霞（2002）。「從教育改革談台灣地區大學入學制度之變革（1994-迄今）」（未發表之碩士論文）。嘉義縣：南華大學公共行政與政策研究所。 楊期泰（2003）。「高中職學生網路使用動機、需求滿足與疏離感之相關研究—以台中縣市為例」（未發表之碩士論文）。台中縣：靜宜大學青少年兒童福利研究所。 ACT. (2001). Career Planning Survey technical manual. Iowa City, IA: Author. ACT. (2008). The World-of-Work Map. Retrieved Dec 8, from the ACT World Wide Web: http://www.act.org/wwm/. ACT. (2009). ACT Interest Inventory Technical Manual. Iowa City, IA: Author. Allen, J., & Robbins, S. B. (2008). Prediction of college major persistence based on vocational interests, academic preparation, and first-year academic performance. Research in Higher Education, 49, 62-79. American College Testing Program. (1981). Technical report for the Unisex Edition of the ACT Interest Inventory (UNIACT). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing program. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing .Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Anderson, M. Z., Tracey, T. J., & Rounds, J. (1997). Examining the invariance of Holland's vocational interest model across gender. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 349-364. Armstrong, P. I., Fouad, N. A., Rounds, J., & Hubert, L. (2010). Quantifying and interpreting group differences in interest profiles. Journal of Career Assessment, 18, 115-132. Armstrong, P. I., Hubert, L., & Rounds, J. (2003). Circular unidimensional scaling: A new look at group differences in interest structure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 297-308. Armstrong, P. I., Rounds, J., & Hubert, L. (2008). Re-conceptualizing the past: Historical data in vocational interest research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 284-297. Arnold, J. (2004). The congruence problem in John Holland's theory of vocational decisions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 95-113. Bai, L. G. (1995). The survey of vocational interests and the major location on the occupational map for Chinese undergraduate students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Beijing: The Institute of Psychology of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Betz, N. E., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1987). The career psychology of women. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Brown, S. D., & Gore Jr., P. A. (1994). An evaluation of interest congruence indices: Distribution characteristics and measurement properties. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 41, 162-182. Browne, M. W., & Du Toit, S. H. C. (1992). Automatted fitting of nonstandard model. Multivatiate Behavioral Research, 27, 269-304. Bubany, S. T.,& Hansen, J. C. (2011). Birth cohort change in the vocational interests of female and male college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78, 59-67. Burger, G. K. (1991). The role of elevation, scatter, and shape in MMPI profiles. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 158-167. Burt, C. L. (1937). Correlations between persons. British Journal of Psychology, 28, 59-96. Campell, D. P., & Holland, J. (1972). A Merger in vocational interest research: Applying Holland’s theory to Strong’s data. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2, 353-376. Cattell, R. B. (1949). rp and other coefficients of pattern similarity. Psychometrika , 14, 279-98. Chartrand, J., & Walsh, W. B. (1999). What should we expect from congruence? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 136-146. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cole, N. S., & Cole, W. L. (1970). An analysis of spatial configuration. The vocational interests of young adults. Iowa City, IA: ACT. Cole, N. S., & Hanson, G. R. (1971). An analysis of the structure of vocational interests. Iowa City, IA: ACT. Cole, N. S., Whitney, D. R., & Holland, J. L. (1971). A spatial configuration of occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1, l-9. Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes P. R. (1971). Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1953). Assessing similarities between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 456-473. Darcy, M. A. (2005). Examination of the structure of Irish students' vocational interests and competence perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 321-333 Darcy, M. U., & Tracey, T. J. (2007). Circumplex structure of Holland’s RIASEC interests across gender and time. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 17-31. Darley, J. B., & Hagenah, T. (1955). Vocational interest measurement: Theory and practice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Dawis, R. V. (1992). The individual differences tradition in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 7-19. Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual differences model and its applications. Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press. Day, S. X., Rounds, J., & Swaney, K. (1998). The structure of vocational interests for diverse racial-ethnic groups. Psychological Science, 9, 40-44. Dik, B. J., Strife, S. R.,& Hansen, J. C. (2010). The flip side of Holland type congruence: Incongruence and job satisfaction. Career Development Quarterly, 58, 352-358. Duan, L. L. (2001). The comparison of vocational interests for high school students between mainland China and Taipei in Taiwan (Unpublished master thesis). Beijing: Department of Psychology, Beijing Normal University. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Edwards, K. J., & Whitney, D. R. (1972). A structural analysis of Holland’s personality types using factor and configural analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 136-145. Egghe, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Salton's cosine measure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 5, 1027-1036. Einarsdottir, S., Rounds, J., Agisdottir, S., & Gerstein, L. H. (2005). The structure of vocational interests in Iceland: Examining Holland’s and Gati’s RIASEC models. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 85-95. Farh, J., Leong, F. T. L., & Law, K. S. (1998). Cross-cultural validity of Holland’s model in Hong Kong. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 425-440. Feldman, S., & Meir, E. I. (1976). Measuring women’s interests using Holland’s vocational classification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 9, 345-353. Fouad, N. A. (1999). Validity evidence for interest inventories. In M. L. Savickas & R. L. Spokane (Eds.), Vocational interests: Meaning, measurement, and counseling use (pp. 193-209). Palo Alto, CA: Davis-Black. Fouad, N. A., & Dancer, L. S. (1992). Cross-cultural structure of interests: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 129-143. Fouad, N. A., Harmon, L. W., & Hansen, J. C. (1994). Cross cultural use of the Strong. In L. W. Harmon, J. C. Hansen, E. H. Borgen, & A. C. Hammer (Eds.), SII applications and technical guide (pp. 255-280). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Gati, I. (1979). A hierarchical model for the structure of vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 15, 90-106. Guilford, J. P. (1948). Factor analysis in a test-development program. Psychological Review, 6, 79-94. Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., Bond, N. A., Jr., & Sutton, M. A. (1954). A factor analysis study of human interests. Psychological Monographs, 68,1-38.. Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258-348). New York: Russell & Russell. Hackett, G., & Lonborg, S. D. (1993). Career assessment for women: Trends and issues. Journal of Career Assessment, 1, 197-216. Hansen, J-I. C. (1988). Changing interests of women: Myth or reality. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 37, 133-150. Hansen, J-I. C. (1992). Does enough evidence exist to modify Holland's theory to accommodate the individual differences of diverse populations? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 188-193. Hansen, J-I. C. (1996). What goes around, comes around. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 73-76. Hansen, J-I. C., Collins, R. C., Swanson, J. L., & Fouad, N. A. (1993). Gender differences in the structure of interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 200-211. Hansen, J-I. C., & Haviland, M. G. (2000). The interest structure of native American college students. Journal of Career Assessment, 8, 159-165. Hansen, J-I. C., Sarma, Z. M., & Collins, R. C. (1999). An evaluation of Holland’s model of vocational interests for Chicana (o) and Latina (o) college students. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 32, 2-13. Harmon, L. W., Hansen, J-I. C., Borgen, F. H., & Hammer, A. L. (1994). Strong Interest Inventory: Applications and technical guide. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Herr, E. L., & Cramer, S. H. (1984). Career guidance & counseling through the life span (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company. Hogan, R. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1982. Personality: Current theory and research (pp. 55-89). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. Holland, J. L. (1958). A personality inventory employing occupational titles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 42, 336-342. Holland, J. L. (1959). A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 35-45. Holland, J. L. (1965). Manual for the vocational preference inventory (6th ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Holland, J. L. (1966). The psychology of vocational choice: A theory of personality type and model environments. Waltham, MA: Blaisdell. Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Holland, J. L. (1979). Professional manual for the Self-Directed Search. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choice: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Holland, J. L., Whitney, D. R., Cole, N. S.,& Richards, J. M.,(1969). An empirical occupational classicication derived from a theory of personality and intended for practice and research. (ACT Reasearch Report No. 29). Iowa City, IA: ACT. Holland, J., Fritzsche, B., & Powell, A. (1994). Technical manual for the Self-Directed Search. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources . Holland, J. L. & Gottfredson, G. D. (1992). Studies of the hexagonal model: An evaluation (or the perils of stalking the perfect hexagon). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, Special Issue: Holland's theory, 158-170. Holland, J. L., Whitney, D. R., Cole, N. S., & Richards, J. M. (1969). An empirical occupational classification derived from a theory of personality and intended for practice and research. (ACT Research Report No. 29). Iowa City, IW: American College Testing Program. Hubert, L. & Arabie, P. (1987). Evaluating order hypotheses within proximity matrices. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 172-178. Hubert, L., Arabie, P., & Meulman, J. (1997). Linear and circular unidimensional scaling for symmetric proximity matrices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 50, 253-284. Hubert, L., Arabie, P., & Meulman, J. (2006). The structural representation of proximity matrices with MATLAB. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM. Iachan, R. (1984). A measure of agreement for use with the Holland classification system. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 24, 133-141. Jin, S. R. (1986). Holland typology: An empirical study on its factorial structure. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 19, 219-254. Jin, S. R. (1987). The factorial structure of the Holland typology in Chinese high school students: Sex differences. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champalgn, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 2512A. Johansson, C. B. (1986). The career assessment inventory. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Assessments. Johansson, C. B. (2003). Career assessment inventory: The enhanced version manual (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems. Kapes, J. T., Mastie, M. M., & Whitfield, E. A. (Eds.). (1994). A counselor's guide to career assessment instruments (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: National Career Development Association. Konraes, S. (1990). Cross-cultural cross validation of the lawyer and engineer scales for linguistically equivalent forms of the Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 2669B. Konraes, S., & Haraldsson, E. (1994). The validity of using US based interest norms of the Strong Interest Inventory for Icelandic college population. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 38, 65-76. Kotz, S., & Johnson, N. L. (Eds.) (1983). Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1-27. Kruskal, J. B. (1977). Multidimensional scaling and other methods for discovering structure. In K. Enslein, A. Ralston, & H. S. Wilf (Eds.), Statistical methods for digital computers. (pp. 296-339). New York: Wiley. Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Kuder, G.F. (1939). Kuder Preference Record - Form A. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Bookstore. Leung, S. A., & Hou, Z. J. (2005). The structure of vocational interests among Chinese students. Journal of Career Development, 32, 74-90. Long, L., & Tracey, T. J. (2006). Structure of RIASEC scores in China: A structural meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 39-51. Long, L., Watanabe, N., & Tracey, T. J. (2006). Structure of interests in Japan: Application of the Personal Globe Inventory Occupational Scales. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Developmen, 38, 222-235. Low, K. S. D., Yoon, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rounds, J. (2005). The stability of vocational interests from early adolescence to middle adulthood: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 713-737. Lunneborg, C. E., & Lunneborg, P. W. (1975). Factor structure of the vocational interest models of Roe and Holland. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 7, 313-326. Myors, B. (1996). A simple, exact test for the Holland hexagon. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 339-351. Nauta, M. M. (2010). The development, evolution, and status of Holland’s theory of vocational personalities: Reflections and future directions for counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 11-22. Osipow, S. H., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1996). Theories of career development (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Parsons, F. (1909). Choosing a vocation. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Phillips, S. D., & Jome, L. M. (2005). Vocational choices: What do we know? What do we need to know? In W. B. Walsh & M. L. Savickas (Eds.), Handbook of vocational psychology ( 3rd ed.) ( pp. 127-153). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Prediger, D. J. (1976). The viability of Holland’s consistency construct and raw score assessments of personality. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 9, 124-131. Prediger, D. J. (1981). Mapping occupations and interests: A graphic aid for vocational guidance and research. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 30, 21-36. Prediger, D. J. (1982). Dimensions underlying Holland’s hexagon: Missing link between interests and occupations? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 259-287. Prediger, D. J., & Swaney, K.B. (2004). Work task dimensions underlying the World of Work: Research results for diverse occupational databases. Journal of Career Assessment, 12, 440-459. Prediger, D. J., Swaney, K., & Mau, W. (1993). Extending Holland's hexagon: Procedures, counseling applications, and research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 71, 422-428. Prediger, D. J., & Vansickle, T. R. (1992). Locating occupations on Holland's hexagon: Beyond RIASEC. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 111-128. Reardon, R. C., Lenz, J. G., Sampson J. P., & Perterson G. W. (2009). Career development and planning: A comprehensive approach. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning. Roe, A. (1957). Early determinants of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4, 212- 7. Rounds, J. B. (1995). Vocational interests: Evaluation of structural hypotheses. In D. Lubinski & R. V. Dawis (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings (pp. 177-232). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Rounds, J. B., Davison, M. C., & Dawis, R. V. (1979).The fit between Strong- Campbell Interest Inventory themes and Holland's hexagonal models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 15, 303-315. Rounds, J. B., & Tracey, T. J. (1993). Prediger’s dimensional representation of Holland’s RIASEC circumplex. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 875-890. Rounds, J. B., & Tracey, T. J. (1996). Cross-cultural structural equivalence of RIASEC models and measures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 310-329. Rounds, J. B., Tracey, T. J., & Hubert, L. (1992). Methods for evaluating vocational interest structural hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 239-259. Rowe, F. A. (1994). Career connection for college education. IN: JISN Works. Shepard, R. N. (1974). Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects. Psychometrika, 39, 373-422. Siegal, S. (1957). Nonparametric methods for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill. Silverstein, A. B. (1990). Short forms of individual intelligence tests. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 3-11. Sparrow, A. (1989). The measurement of job profile similarity for the prediction of transfer of learning: A research note. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 337-341. Spokane, A. R., Meir, E. I., & Catalano, M. (2000). Person-environment congruence and Holland’s theory: A review and reconsideration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 137-187. Strong, E. K. (1927). Vocational interest blank. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Strong, E. K. (1943). The vocational interests of men and women. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859-884. Sverko, I., & Babarovic, T. (2006). The validity of Holland’s theory in Croatia . Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 490-507. Swanson, J. L. (1992a). In search of structural validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 229-238. Swanson, J. L. (1992b). The structure of vocational interests for African-American college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 144-157. Tak, J. (2004). Structure of vocational interests for Korean college students. Journal of Career Assessment ,12, 298-311. Tang, M. (2001). Investigation of the structure of vocational interests of Chinese college students. Journal of Career Assessment, 9, 365-379. Tang, M. (2002). A comparison of Asian American, Caucasian American, and Chinese college students: An initial report. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 30, 124-134. Thorndike, R. L., & Hagen, E. (1962). Ten thousand careers. New York: Wiley. Thurstone, L. L., (1931). Multiple factor analysis. Psychological Review, 38, 406-427. Tiedman, D. V., Brayan, J. G., & Rulon, P. J. (1951). The utility of the Airman Classification Battery for assignment of airmen to eight Air Force specialties. Cambridge, MA: Educational Research Corporation. Tien, H. L. (1993). The development of the Chinese Vocational Interest Inventory and a comparison of Holland and Gati interest model (Doctoral dissertation). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa. Tinsley, H. E. A. (2000a). The congruence myth: An analysis of the efficacy of the person-environment fit model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 147-179. Tinsley, H. E. A. (2000b). The Congruence Myth Revisited. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56,405-427. Tracey, T. J. G. (1997). RANDALL: A Microsoft FORTRAN program for a randomization test of hypothesized order relations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 164-168. Tracey, T. J. G. (2002a). Development of interests and competency beliefs: A 1-year longitudinal study of fifth- to eighth-grade students using the ICA-R and structural equation modeling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 148-163. Tracey, T. J. G. (2002b). Personal globe inventory: Measurement of the spherical model of interests and competence beliefs. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 113-172. Tracey, T. J. G., & Robbins, S. B. (2006). The interest major congruence and college success relation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69 , 64-89. Tracey, T. J. G., Robbins, S. B., & Hofsess, C. D. (2005). Stability and change in interests: A longitudinal study of adolescents from grades 8 through 12. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 1-25. Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. B. (1992). Evaluating the RIASEC circumplex using high-point codes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 41, 295-311. Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. B. (1993). Evaluating Holland's and Gati's vocational interest models: A structural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 229-246. Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. B. (1994). An examination of the structure of Roe’s eight interest fields. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 279-296. Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. B. (1995). The arbitrary nature of Holland's RIASEC types: A concentric circles structure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 431-439. Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. B. (1996). The spherical representation of vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 3-41. Tracey, T. J. G., & Ward, C. C. (1998). The structure of children’s interests and competence perceptions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 290-303. Tracey, T. J. G., Watanabe, N., & Schneider, P. (1997). Structural invariance of vocational interests across Japanese and American cultures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44,346-354. Trice, A. D., & Rush, K. (1995). Sex-stereotyping in four-year-olds’ occupational aspirations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 701-702. Tuck, B. F., & Keeling, B. (1980). Sex and cultural differences in the factorial structure of the Self -Directed Search. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 105-114. Wakefield, J. A., & Doughtie, E. B. (1973). The geometric relationship between Holland's personality typology and the vocational preference inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 20, 513-518. Watkins, C. E., Campbell, V. L., Nieberding, R., & Hallmark, R. (1995). Contemporary practice of psychological assessment by clinical psychologists. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 26, 54-60. Watkins, M. W., & Glutting, J. J. (2000). Incremental validity of WISC-III profile elevation, scatter, and shape information for predicting reading and math achievement. Psychological Assessment, 12, 402-408. Wiggins, J.D., & Weslander, D.(1977). Expressed vocational choices and later employment compared with Vocational Preference Inventory and Kuder Preference Record-Vocational scores. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 11, 158-165. Wong, C., & Wong, P. (2006). Validation of Wong’s Career Interest Assessment Questionnaire and Holland’s revised hexagonal model of occupational interests in four Chinese societies. Journal of Career Development, 32, 378-393. Yang, W., Lance, C. E., & Hui, C. H. (2006). Psychometric properties of the Chinese Self-Directed Search (1994 edition). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 560-576. Yang, W., Stokes, G. S., & Hui, C. H. (2005). Cross-cultural validation of Holland's interest structure in Chinese population. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 379-396. Yu, J., & Alvi, S. A. (1996). A study of Holland’s typology in China. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 245-252. Zener, T. B., & Schnuelle, L. (1976). Effects of the Self-Directed Search on high school students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23, 363-359. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64704 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Holland之興趣類型論強調人與環境的交互作用，測驗解釋也著重個人與生涯環境適配之探索。學者發現過去適配的測量指標與生涯成就之相關普遍不佳，建議應採用具良好效度之測驗工具，並發展理想的適配測量方法。為研議較佳的適配測量方法，本研究以三個子研究進行探討，主要目的乃為發展一個創新的學系適配圖示法，使個人藉由興趣分數得出合宜的適配學系。由於測驗工具符合理論架構是良好適配效果的重要前提，研究一以橫斷與縱貫式分析CEEC興趣量表之測驗資料，結果發現台灣學生的興趣結構不受世代與年齡成長的影響，穩定的符合Holland的興趣六角形模式。研究二以個人與學系的興趣分數相似度作為適配程度的考量，彙整多種相似度的測量方法，其中以距離D、相關r與角度θ等方法的正確率與預測率表現良好，本研究最為推薦；以z分數計算之距離Dz與角度θz，因其具空間圖示的實務功能，亦推薦使用。以圖示呈現學系適配乃符合新世代學生的閱讀需求，且有一覽多系的視覺優勢，研究三提出「角度與距離圖示法」，依個人與學系的興趣分數計算角度與距離，以極座標標記於圖上，個人位於圖示中心的極點，個人與學系的角度愈小表示愈適配，在相同角度下，距離愈小愈適配。效能分析發現角距圖能正確區分適配與不適配學類，也不受興趣分數一致性高低之影響，而能合宜的反映適配學系，顯示角距圖具有較佳的適配效能與生涯輔導實用價值。建議未來增加質性研究以檢驗角距圖之預測效度。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Holland’s hexagonal model emphasizes the congruence between interest types and environments. The interpretation of test results from interest inventory also focuses on the exploration of person-environment fit. Yet hexagonal congruence has been found to be a poor predictor of vocational outcomes. It has been suggested that well-validated instruments should be employed to verify Holland's theory and better measures of congruence ought to be developed. The purpose of this dissertation is to develop a new graphical representation of interest-major congruence and includes three studies using the CEEC Interest Inventory. Study 1 examines the hexagonal model of interest structure across cohorts and age. The test scores appeared to follow Holland’s simple circular hypothesis and the calculus hypothesis. Study 2 compares the performance of several frequently used measures of similarity between profiles in psychological research. Based on the degrees of match between profiles, the Euclidean distance, the angle, and the Pearson correlation between two profile vectors are highly recommended. The Euclidean distance and the angle computed from standardized interest scores are also recommended considering their superior display in the geometric space. Study 3 developed a new graphical representation of person-environment fit, called the Plot of Angle and Distance, to illustrate the fit between individual interest profile and major profiles. The individual is located at the center of the pole and the location of each major is decided by the angle and the distance between the individual profile vector and that of the majors. Small angles and shorter distances indicate better congruence between the person and the major. The new graphical method performs well even with interest profiles of low consistency. Future qualitative research on this new proposed method should be conducted to further investigate its validity | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T22:57:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-D92227005-1.pdf: 12416039 bytes, checksum: 212c513742b300d4b5d7f83f24a06374 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
壹、Holland興趣理論的發展 1 貳、研究目的 7 參、預期成果 9 第二章 研究一：興趣結構跨時間之穩定性探討 11 壹、文獻探討 11 貳、研究方法 32 參、研究結果 40 肆、結果討論 60 第三章 研究二：興趣分數相似度之測量方法 65 壹、文獻探討 65 貳、研究方法 75 參、研究結果 81 肆、結果討論 88 第四章 研究三：角度與距離圖示法之效能分析 107 壹、文獻探討 107 貳、角度與距離圖示法 113 參、研究方法 121 肆、研究結果 127 伍、結果討論 141 第五章 綜合討論 145 壹、研究結果 146 貳、研究貢獻 147 參、角距圖的前瞻與應用 148 肆、未來研究方向 150 參考文獻 153 附錄 175 附錄一 1995~2009年男女生CEEC興趣量表六類型 之平均數、標準差與相關係數矩陣 175 附錄二 2008年追溯樣本一CEEC興趣量表六類型 之平均數、標準差與相關係數矩陣 178 附錄三 2008年追溯樣本25個學類的人數、興趣平均數與標準差 179 附錄四 2004年25個學類的人數、興趣平均數與標準差 181 表目次 表2-1 隨機重配前後之相關係數矩陣例舉 16 表2-2 在正六角形假設下三參數與單參數模型之興趣六型分數 相關係數矩陣 19 表2-3 符合六角形模式假設之相關名次矩陣 20 表2-4 1995∼2009興趣六型相關係數符合六角形模式檢驗結果 44 表2-5 2008年追溯樣本興趣六型相關係數符合六角形模式檢驗結果 55 表3-1 曾史二氏適配性指數 66 表3-2 M指數 66 表3-3 ABC三位學生的興趣六型分數示例 69 表3-4 七種測量相似度方法所反映屬性一覽表 74 表3-5 25個學類的相似與不相似學類對照表 80 表3-6 乙生與四個學類之興趣六型分數相似度測量結果 82 表3-7 七種測量相似度方法的正確率與預測率 87 表3-8 相似度測量方法之總體評估表分析 89 表3-9 25個學類之正確測量結果 93 表3-10相似度測量方法在大學「就讀學類」之預測率分析結果 102 表3-11相似度測量方法在大學「就讀學群」之預測率分析結果 104 表4-1 乙丙生與四個學類的興趣六型原始分數與z分數 118 表4-2 乙生與四個學類的角度與距離 118 表4-3 六位學生之興趣六型分數與分數形態 126 表4-4 角距圖反映適配學類與參照標準比較表 128 表4-5 六位學生在三種圖示的適配結果與參照標準比較 132 圖目次 圖2-1 Holland的六角形模式圖 12 圖2-2 環狀單向度量尺（CUS）的正六角形模式與某樣本 檢驗結果示例 22 圖2-3 研究一之研究流程 33 圖2-4 1995∼2009男生各年度興趣六型平均分數分布圖 41 圖2-5 1995∼2009女生各年度興趣六型平均分數分布圖 41 圖2-6 1995∼2009各年度男生興趣六型分數側面圖 42 圖2-7 1995∼2009各年度女生興趣六型分數側面圖 42 圖2-8 1995-2009年高中男女生興趣六型分數之MDS圖 48 圖2-9 1995-2009各年度男女生興趣六型分數之CUS圖 51 圖2-10 2008年追溯樣本之大學與高中男生樣本興趣六型分數側面圖 55 圖2-11 2008年追溯樣本之大學與高中女生樣本興趣六型分數側面圖 55 圖2-12 2008年追溯樣本之大學與高中興趣六型分數之MDS圖 58 圖2-13 2008年追溯樣本之大學與高中興趣六型分數之CUS圖 59 圖3-1 ABC三位學生的興趣六型分數側面圖 70 圖3-2 角度θ的幾何空間示意圖 72 圖3-3 研究二之研究流程 76 圖3-4 乙生與四個學類之興趣六型分數側面圖 83 圖4-1 距離Dz與角度θz的極座標示意圖 114 圖4-2 乙生與四個學類之角距圖 119 圖4-3 乙生與25個學類之角距圖 119 圖4-4 丙生與25個學類之角距圖 120 圖4-5 乙生與一萬個模擬學系的角距圖 120 圖4-6 研究三之研究流程 121 圖4-7 八個學類之角距圖 129 圖4-8 六位學生與25個學類在三種學系適配圖示之比較 135 圖4-9 以N1角距圖為例之適配準則 144 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 相似度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 學系適配 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Holland六角形模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生涯輔導 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 興趣量表 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 組型分數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | profile scores | en |
| dc.subject | career counseling | en |
| dc.subject | Holland’s hexagonal model | en |
| dc.subject | interest-major congruence | en |
| dc.subject | similarity | en |
| dc.subject | interest inventory | en |
| dc.title | 個人與學系興趣分數相似度測量與適配圖示之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | On Assessing the Similarity between Person and Major RIASEC Profiles | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 姚開屏,劉淑慧,王思峰,陳清平,林幸台 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 興趣量表,生涯輔導,Holland六角形模式,學系適配,相似度,組型分數, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | interest inventory,career counseling,Holland’s hexagonal model,interest-major congruence,similarity,profile scores, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 182 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-09 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 12.13 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。