請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64529完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林火旺 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tse-Mei Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳澤玫 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T17:52:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2012-08-17 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-17 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ⅰ、中文部分
一、期刊論文 石元康〈交疊共識與民主社會中政治哲學的工作：洛爾斯理論最近的發展〉，收入石元康等合著，《當代政治思潮》，臺北市：民主基金會（1992）：131-176。 何信全〈多元社會交疊共識如何可能？──羅爾斯對社會整合之證成〉，《國立政治大學哲學學報》第五期（1999）：123-142。 李有蓉〈台灣經濟與人權發展之辯證關係：以漢生病病患為例〉，《臺灣民主季刊》第六卷第二期（2009）：169-209。 林火旺〈公共理性的功能及其限制〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》第八期（2004）：47-77。 ---〈審議民主與公民養成〉，《國立臺灣大學哲學論評》第二十九期（2005）：99-143。 周保松〈正義感的優先性與契合論〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》第三十期（2009）：165-202。 張福建〈多元主義與合理的政治秩序：羅爾斯《政治自由主義》評釋〉，《政治科學論叢》第八期（1997）：111-132。 許漢〈容忍之困難與可能的解決之道〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》第二十八期（2009）：1-48。 陳宜中〈羅爾斯與政治哲學的實際任務〉，《政治科學論叢》第十四期（2001）：47-74。 蔡英文〈多元與統一：多元主義與自由主義的一項政治議題〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》第九卷第三期（1997）：45-84。 錢永祥〈羅爾斯論公共性：公共理性或公共論述〉，收入林從一主編，《哲學分析與視域交融》，臺北市：臺灣大學出版中心（2010）：255-271。 二、網站資料庫 「自由時報電子報」：http://iservice.libertytimes.com.tw/IService2/search.php 「聯合知識庫」：http://udndata.com/library/ Ⅱ、英文部分 Ackerman, Bruce, and James S. Fishkin. “Deliberation Day.” Debating Deliberative Democracy. Edited by James S. Fishkin and Peter Laslett. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. Pp. 7-30. Archard, David. “Citizenship Education and Multiculturalism.” Education for Democratic Citizenship: Issues of Theory and Practice. Edited by Andrew Lockyer, Bernard Crick, and John Annette. Aldershot, Hants, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003. Pp. 89-102. Arneson, Richard J. “Rawls versus Utilitarianism in the Light of Political Liberalism.” The Idea of a Political Liberalism: Essay on Rawls. Edited by Victoria Davion and Clark Wolf. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2000. Pp. 231-252. Arneson, Richard J., and Ian Shapiro. “Democratic Autonomy and Religious Freedom: A Critique of Wisconsin v. Yoder.” Political Order: Nomos XXXⅧ. Edited by Ian Shapiro and Russell Hardin. New York: New York University Press, 1996 . Pp. 365-411. Audard, Catherine. “The Idea of Free Public Reason.” Ratio Juris. 8, 1 (1995): 15-29. Baier, Kurt. “Justice and the Aims of Political Philosophy.” Ethics. 99, 4 (1989): 771-790. Barry, Brian. “John Rawls and the Search for Stability.” Ethics. 105, 4 (1995): 847-910. Benhabib, Seyla. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy.” Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Edited by Seyla Benhabib. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1996. Pp. 67-94. Boettcher, James. “Public Reason and Religion.” The Legacy of John Rawls. Edited by Thom Brooks and Fabian Freyenhagen. London; New York: Thoemmes Continuum, 2005. Pp. 124-151. Bohman, James. “Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism: Political Liberalism and the Problem of Moral Conflict.” Political Theory. 23, 2 (1995): 253-279. Brennan, Samantha, and Robert Noggle. “Rawls's Neglected Childhood: Reflections on the Original Position, Stability, and the Child's Sense of Justice.” The Idea of a Political Liberalism: Essay on Rawls. Edited by Victoria Davion and Clark Wolf. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2000. Pp. 46-72. Brighouse, Harry. “Civic Education and Liberal Legitimacy.” Ethics. 108, 4 (1998): 719-745. Buck, Richard M. “Sincerity and Reconciliation in Public Reason.” Communication, Conflict, and Reconciliation. Edited by Cheryl Hughes and James Wong. Charlottesville, Va.: Philosophy Documentation Center, 2003. Pp. 21-35. Burke, Edmund. “Speech to the Electors of Bristol on Being Elected.” The Political Philosophy of Edmund Burke. Edited by Ian Hampsher-Monk. London: Longman, 1987. Pp. 108-111. Burrow, Sylvia. “Reasonable Moral Psychology and the Kantian Ace in the Hole.” Communication, Conflict, and Reconciliation. Edited by Cheryl Hughes and James Wong. Charlottesville, Va.: Philosophy Documentation Center, 2003. Pp. 37-55. Callan, Eamonn. “Pluralism and Civic Education.” Studies in Philosophy and Education. 11 (1991): 65-87. --- Creating Citizens: Political Education and Liberal Democracy. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press, 1997. Chambers, Simone. “Constitutional Referendums and Democratic Deliberation.” Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites, and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Edited by Matthew Mendelsohn and Andrew Parkin. New York: Palgrave, 2001. Pp. 231-255. --- “Deliberative Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science. 6 (2003): 307-326. --- “Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation.” The Journal of Political Philosophy. 12 (2004): 389-410. Cohen, Joshua. “A More Democratic Liberalism.” Michigan Law Review. 92, 6 (1994): 1503-1546. --- “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Edited by Seyla Benhabib. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1996. Pp. 95-119. --- “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Edited by James Bohman and William Rehg. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1997. Pp. 67-91. Colby, Anne, Thomas Ehrlich, Elizabeth Beaumont, and Jason Stephens. Educating Citizens: Preparing America's Undergraduates for Lives of Moral and Civic Responsibility. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2003. Cooke, Maeve. “Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy.” Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives. Edited by Maurizio Passerin D'Entreves. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2002. Pp. 53-87. Costa, M. Victoria. Rawls, Citizenship, and Education. New York and London: Routledge, 2011. Dagger, Richard. Civic Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. de Marneffe, Peter. “Rawls’s Idea of Public Reason.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 75 (1994): 232-250. Doppelt, Gerald. “Is Rawls’s Kantian Liberalism Coherent and Defensible?.” Ethics. 99, 4 (1989): 815-851. Dworkin, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2000. Elkin, Stephen L. “Thinking Constitutionally: The Problem of Deliberative Democracy.” Social Philosophy and Policy. 21, 1 (2004): 39-75. Elster, Jon. “Introduction.” Deliberative Democracy. Edited by Jon Elster. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1998a. Pp. 1-18. --- “Deliberation and Constitution Making.” Deliberative Democracy. Edited by Jon Elster. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1998b. Pp. 97-122. Enslin, Penny, Shirley Pendlebury, and Mary Tjiattas. “Deliberative Democracy, Diversity and the Challenges of Citizenship Education.” Journal of Philosophy of Education. 35, 1 (2001): 115-130. Fearon, James D. “Deliberation as Discussion.” Deliberative Democracy. Edited by Jon Elster. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Pp. 44-68. Fishkin, James S. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991. --- The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997. --- “Deliberative Democracy.” The Blackwell Guide to Social and Political Philosophy. Edited by Robert L. Simon. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2002. Pp. 221-238. --- “Defending Deliberation: A Comment on Ian Shapiro's The State of Democratic Theory.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 8, 1, (2005): 71-78. Fishkin, James S., and Cynthia Farrar. “Deliberative Polling: From Experiment to Community Resource.” The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century. Edited by John Gastil and Peter Levine. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005. Pp. 68-79. Fishkin, James S., and Robert C. Luskin. “Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion.” Acta Politica. 40, 3 (2005): 284-298. Freeman, Samuel. “Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Comment.” Philosophy and Public Affairs. 29, 4 (2000): 371-418. --- “Introduction.” The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 2003a. Pp. 1-61. --- “Congruence and the Good of Justice.” The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 2003b. Pp. 277-315. Frohock, Pred M. “The Boundaries of Public Reason.” The American Political Science Review. 91, 4 (1997): 833-844. Galeotti, Anna Elisabetta. “Do We Need Toleration as a Moral Virtue?.” Res Publica. 7, 3 (2001): 273-292. Galston, William A. “Moral Personality and Liberal Theory: John Rawls's 'Dewey Lectures'.” Political Theory. 10, 4 (1982): 492-519. --- “Civic Education in the Liberal State.” Liberalism and the Moral Life. Edited by Nancy L. Rosenblum. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989. Pp. 89-101. --- Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Duties in the Liberal State. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1991. --- “Two Concepts of Liberalism.” Ethics. 105, 3 (1995): 516-534. --- “Value Pluralism and Liberal Political Theory.” American Political Science Review. 93, 4 (1999a): 769-778. --- “Diversity, Toleration, and Deliberative Democracy: Religious Minorities and Public Schooling.” Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Edited by Stephen Macedo. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999b. Pp. 39-48. Gambetta, Diego. “ ‘Claro!’: An Essay on Discursive Machismo.” Deliberative Democracy. Edited by Jon Elster. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Pp. 19-43. Gaus, Gerald F. Justificatory Liberalism: An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. George, Robert P. “Public Reason and Political Conflict: Abortion and Homosexuality.” The Yale Law Journal. 106, 8 (1997): 2475-2504. Goodin, Robert E. “Democratic Deliberation Within.” Philosophy and Public Affairs. 29, 1 (2000): 81-109. Greenawalt, Kent. “On Public Reason.” Chicago-Kent Law Review. 69 (1994): 669-689. Gutmann, Amy. “Civic Education and Social Diversity.” Ethics. 105, 3 (1995): 557-579. --- Democratic Education. Revised Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999. Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996. --- “Democratic Disagreement.” Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Edited by Stephen Macedo. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Pp. 243-279. --- Why Deliberative Democracy?. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2004. Habermas, Jurgen. “Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism.” The Journal of Philosophy. 92, 3 (1995): 109-131. Hayward, Bronwyn M. “The Greening of Participatory Democracy: A Reconsideration of Theory.” Environmental Politics. 4, 4 (1995): 215-236. Hill Jr., Thomas E. “The Stability Problem in Political Liberalism.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 75 (1994): 333-352. Horton, John. “Rawls, Public Reason and the Limits of Liberal Justification.” Contemporary Political Theory. 2 (2003): 5-23. Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by David Fate Norton and Mary I. Norton. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. Kant, Immanuel. “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.” Practical Philosophy. Translated and Edited by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Pp. 37-108. Krasnoff, Larry. “Consensus, Stability, and Normativity in Rawls’s Political Liberalism.” The Journal of Philosophy. 95, 6 (1998): 269-292. Kukathas, Chandran, and Philip Pettit. Rawls: A Theory of Justice and Its Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990. Kymlicka, Will. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995. --- Politics in the Vernacular. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. --- “Civil Society and Government: A Liberal-Egalitarian Perspective.” Civil Society and Government. Edited by Nancy L. Rosenblum and Rovert C. Post. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002. Pp. 79-110. Larmore, Charles. “Pluralism and Reasonable Disagreement.” Cultural Pluralism and Moral Knowledge. Edited by Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey Paul. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Pp. 61-79. --- The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1996. --- “Public Reason.” The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Pp. 368-393. Lehning, Percy B. “The Idea of Public Reason: Can It Fulfill Its Task? A Reply to Catherine Audard.” Ratio Juris. 8, 1 (1995): 30-39. Lynch, Sterling. “The Fact of Diversity and Reasonable Pluralism.” Journal of Moral Philosophy. 6, 1 (2009): 70-93. Macedo, Stephen. Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks, 1990. --- “Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism: The case of God v. John Rawls?. ” Ethics. 105, 3 (1995): 468-496. --- “Introduction.” Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Edited by Stephen Macedo. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Pp. 3-14. --- “In Defense of Liberal Public Reason: Are Slavery and Abortion Hard Cases?.” Natural Law and Public Reason. Edited by Robert P. George and Christopher Wolfe. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2000. Pp. 11-49. Mansbridge, Jane, James Bohman, and Simone Chambers, et al. “The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy. 18, 1 (2010): 64-100. McAfee, Noelle. “Three Models of Democratic Deliberation.” Journal of Speculative Philosophy. 18, 1 (2004): 44-59. McCabe, David. “Liberal Education is Moral Education. ” Social Theory and Practice. 21, 1 (1995): 83-96. Mill, John Stuart. “Considerations on Representative Government.” On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1991. Pp. 203-467. --- On Liberty. Edited by David Bromwich and George Kateb. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2003. Miller, David. “Is Deliberative Democracy Unfair to Disadvantaged Groups?.” Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives. Edited by Maurizio Passerin D'Entreves. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2002. Pp. 201-225. --- “Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice.” Debating Deliberative Democracy. Edited by James S. Fishkin and Peter Laslett. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. Pp. 182-199. Neblo, Michael. “Part I: A Systemic View of Deliberation-Thinking through Democracy: Between the Theory and Practice of Deliberative Politics.” Acta Politica. 40, 2 (2005): 169-181. Newman, Anne. “Education for Deliberative Character: The Problem of Persistent Disagreement and Religious Individuals.” Philosophy of Education. (2005): 311-320. Nino, Carlos Santiago. The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1996. Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974. Nussbaum, Martha C. Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997. Prusak, Bernard. “Commonweal Interview with John Rawls.” John Rawls: Collected Papers. Edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999. Pp. 616-622. Quinn, Philip. “Political Liberalisms and Their Exclusions of the Religious.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. 69, 2 (1995): 35-56. Rawls, John. “The Sense of Justice.” Philosophical Review. 72, 3 (1963): 281-305. --- A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971. --- “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical.” Philosophy and Public Affairs. 14, 3 (1985): 223-251. --- “The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus.” New York University Law Review. 64 (1989): 233-255. --- Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993. --- “Introduction to the Paperback Edition.” Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, c1996. Pp. xxxvii-lxii. --- “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” John Rawls: Collected Papers. Edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999a. Pp. 573-615. --- A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999b. --- Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Edited by Erin Kelly. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001. Raz, Joseph. “Facing Diversity: The Case of Epistemic Abstinence.” Philosophy and Public Affairs. 19, 1 (1990): 3-46. Reidy, David. “Rawls's Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough.” Res Publica. 6, 1 (2000): 49-72. Rourke, Francis E. “The Quest for Political Stability.” Ethics. 67, 4 (1957): 286-293. Sandel, Michael J. “A Response to Rawls’ Political Liberalism.” Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Pp. 184-218. Sanders, Lynn. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory. 25, 3 (1997): 347-376. Saward, Michael. “Rawls and Deliberative Democracy.” Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives. Edited by Maurizio Passerin D'Entreves. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2002. Pp. 112-130. Scanlon, T. M. “Rawls on Justification.” The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Pp. 139-167. Schauer, Frederick. “Talking as a Decision Procedure.” Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Edited by Stephen Macedo. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Pp. 17-27. Scheffler, Samuel. “The Appeal of Political Liberalism.” Ethics. 105, 1 (1994): 4-22. Schwartzman, Micah. “The Completeness of Public Reason.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics. 3, 2 (2004): 191-220. Shapior, Ian. “Enough of Deliberation.” Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Edited by Stephen Macedo. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Pp. 28-38. Smith, Graham. Deliberative Democracy and the Environment. London and New York: Routledge, 2003. Smith, Graham, and Corinne Wales. “Citizens' Juries and Deliberative Democracy.” Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives. Edited by Maurizio Passerin D'Entreves. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2002. Pp. 157-177. Solum, Lawrence B. “Constructing an Ideal of Public Reason.” San Diego Law Review. 30, 4 (1993): 729-762. --- “Inclusive Public Reason.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 75 (1994): 217-231. Spinner-Halev, Jeff. “Cultural Pluralism and Partial Citizenship.” Multicultural Questions. Edited by Christian Joppke and Steven Lukes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Pp. 65-86. Squires, Judith. “Deliberation and Decision Making: Discontinuity in the Two-Track Model.” Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives. Edited by Maurizio Passerin D'Entreves. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2002. Pp. 133-156. Sterba, James P. “Reconciling Public Reason and Religious Values.” Social Theory and Practice. 25, 1 (1999): 1-28. Sunstein, Cass R. “Democracy and Shifting Preferences.” The Idea of Democracy. Edited by David Copp, Jean Hampton, and John E. Roemer. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Pp. 196-230. --- Republic.com. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001. --- “The Law of Group Polarization.” Debating Deliberative Democracy. Edited by James S. Fishkin and Peter Laslett. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2003a. Pp. 80-101. --- Why Societies Need Dissent. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2003b. Talisse, Robert B. “Rawls on Pluralism and Stability.” Critical Review. 15 (2003): 173-194. Thomson, Judith Jarvis. “A Defense of Abortion.” The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion. Edited by Marshall Cohen, Thomas Nagel, and Thomas Scanlon. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1974. Pp. 3-22. Waldron, Jeremy. “Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism.” The Philosophical Quarterly. 37, 147 (1987): 127-150. --- “Disagreements about Justice.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 75 (1994): 372-387. Wall, Steven P. “Public Justification and the Transparency Argument.” The Philosophical Quarterly. 46, 185 (1996): 501-507. Weithman, Paul. “Citizenship and Public Reason.” Natural Law and Public Reason. Edited by Robert P. George and Christopher Wolfe. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2000. Pp. 125-170. Wertheimer, Alan. “Internal Disagreements.” Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Edited by Stephen Macedo. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Pp. 170-183. Westmoreland, Robert. “The Truth about Public Reason.” Law and Philosophy. 18, 3 (1999): 271-296. Williams, Andrew. “The Alleged Incompleteness of Public Reason.” Res Publica. 6, 2 (2000): 199-211. Williams, Melissa S. “The Uneasy Alliance of Group Representation and Deliberative Democracy.” Citizenship in Diverse Societies. Edited by Will Kymlicka and Wayne Norman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Pp. 124-152. Wingenbach, Ed. “Unjust Context: The Priority of Stability in Rawls's Contextualized Theory of Justice.” American Journal of Political Science. 43, 1 (1999): 213-232. Young, Iris Marion. Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997. --- “Justice, Inclusion, and Deliberative Democracy.” Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Edited by Stephen Macedo. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Pp. 151-158. --- Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64529 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文的目的在於闡明多元社會的穩定性問題，並為之提供適當的解答。在當代自由民主社會存在多元的全面性學說之事實下，公民經常對各種社會制度和公共政策有著分歧的意見。於是，我們所面臨的穩定性問題是：如何促使抱持不同道德觀、價值觀和正義觀的公民，自願接受並遵守各種制度和政策的規範？本文欲探討的穩定性並非奠基在「暫訂協議」之上，而是一種「出於正當理由的穩定」。要確保這樣的穩定性，則適當的解答必須正視引發政治歧見的相關原因，並提供用以解決爭議或做決策的機制。
本文首先探討羅爾斯在《正義論》和《政治自由主義》中的三個穩定性論證，筆者將指出，這類從社會正義原則層次所提供的解答，無法成功地回答穩定性問題。而後，筆者將提出一個穩定性架構，其包含三個基本要素。第一個要素是羅爾斯的公共理性寬廣觀點，其可用以指導公民對各種基本政治問題的思考與推理。其次是古德曼和湯普森的審議民主觀。公共審議所發揮的功能可以擴展公民對相關資訊和觀點的瞭解、將個人的偏好從自利轉向公共利益的考量，並可促進良好的集體決策。經審議過後所進行的投票則可賦予最終的結果合法性，其使得人們更願意支持並遵守政策決議的結果。最後一個要素是審議公民的教育。唯有培養出具備審議相關能力和德行的公民，我們才可能真正實現公共理性和審議民主的理想。筆者將指出，這個穩定性架構是理論上可欲且實作上可行的，因此，它能夠作為多元社會穩定性問題的適當解答。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this dissertation is to formulate and present a proper solution to the problem of the stability of a pluralist society. Given the fact of the plurality of reasonable comprehensive doctrines in a liberal democratic society, citizens frequently disagree about various social institutions and public policies. The problem of stability we are faced with, then, is how citizens can be motivated so that they will accept and comply with these institutions and policies voluntarily, even if they affirm different conceptions of morality, good, and justice. The stability with which this dissertation is concerned is not based on a modus vivendi, but “stability for the right reasons”. In order to secure this kind of stability, the proper solution must respond appropriately to various sources of political disagreement and provide mechanisms for settling disputes or making policy decisions.
In this dissertation, I will begin by examining three arguments of stability proposed by John Rawls in A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism. Then I will explain why Rawls’s solutions, which are located at the level of principles of social justice, cannot resolve the problem of stability successfully. Next, I will propose a framework of stability that includes three essential elements. The first element is Rawls’s wide view of public reason. His view can be used to guide citizens’ thinking and reasoning about fundamental political questions. The second element is the conception of deliberative democracy from Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson. Various effects of public deliberation can broaden the information and perspectives of citizens, transform individuals’ preferences from private interests to public interests, and promote good collective decisions. Voting that follows deliberation can confer legitimacy on the ultimate results such that people will be more willing to support or comply with the results of policy-making. The third element is the education of deliberative citizens. Only if we can cultivate citizens with certain capabilities and virtues relevant to deliberation can we realize the ideals of public reason and deliberative democracy. I will argue that this framework is both defensible in theory and feasible in practice; hence, it can provide a proper solution to the problem of the stability of a pluralist society. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T17:52:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-D94124004-1.pdf: 2033534 bytes, checksum: a56e4b57f7e33f784d11aad2ba2a6912 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 導論 …………………………………………………………… 1
第一章 《正義論》中的穩定性論證 ……………………… 13 第一節 正義原則的推導 ……………………………… 14 第二節 正義感的論證 ………………………………… 19 第三節 契合性論證 …………………………………… 26 第四節 羅爾斯的穩定性論證出了什麼錯？ ………… 31 第二章 政治自由主義與重疊共識 ………………………… 39 第一節 作為政治正義觀的「正義即公平」………… 40 第二節 重疊共識與政治穩定 ………………………… 45 第三節 多元社會有「重疊共識」？ ………………… 53 第三章 羅爾斯的公共理性觀 ……………………………… 67 第一節 公共理性的意涵 ……………………………… 67 第二節 公共理性與民主公民 ………………………… 73 第三節 從單一到寬廣的公共理性 …………………… 79 第四章 公共理性與多元社會的穩定 ……………………… 93 第一節 公共理性如何促成政治穩定 ………………… 94 第二節 民主多數決與政治穩定 ……………………… 104 第三節 公共理性的侷限 ……………………………… 113 第五章 古德曼和湯普森的審議民主觀 …………………… 121 第一節 民主的加總觀與審議觀之對比 ……………… 122 第二節 動態且寬廣的審議觀 ………………………… 130 第三節 審議的規範原則 ……………………………… 136 第六章 審議民主與多元社會的穩定 ……………………… 147 第一節 審議民主如何促成政治穩定 ………………… 148 第二節 對審議民主理論的挑戰 ……………………… 157 第三節 從理論到實踐：審議式民調 ………………… 163 第四節 提供少數族群平等的發聲機會 ……………… 170 第七章 審議公民的教育 …………………………………… 179 第一節 審議的相關能力與德行 ……………………… 180 第二節 自主性作為審議能力的爭論 ………………… 194 第三節 教育審議公民的最適當場所 ………………… 201 結論 …………………………………………………………… 207 參考書目 ……………………………………………………… 219 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 羅爾斯 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公民德行 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 古德曼 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 審議民主 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 湯普森 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 穩定性問題 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公共理性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Amy Gutmann | en |
| dc.subject | Public Reason | en |
| dc.subject | Deliberative Democracy | en |
| dc.subject | Civic Virtues | en |
| dc.subject | John Rawls | en |
| dc.subject | The Problem of Stability | en |
| dc.subject | Dennis Thompson | en |
| dc.title | 多元社會的穩定：論公共理性、審議民主與公民德行 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Stability of a Pluralist Society: On Public Reason, Deliberative Democracy, and Civic Virtues | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳宜中,陳張培倫,許漢,蕭高彥 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 穩定性問題,公共理性,審議民主,公民德行,羅爾斯,古德曼,湯普森, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | The Problem of Stability,Public Reason,Deliberative Democracy,Civic Virtues,John Rawls,Amy Gutmann,Dennis Thompson, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 233 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-13 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 哲學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.99 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。