請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6446完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊培珊(Pei-Shan Yang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsiao-Chu Hung | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 洪曉筑 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-16T16:29:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2013-08-26 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-16T16:29:49Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-26 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一. 中文部分
內政部(2007)中華民國九十五年身心障礙者生活需求調查報告。台北:內政部。 內政部(2006)。台灣成年心智障礙者社區居住與生活服務實務操作手冊。台北:內政部。 王國羽、呂朝賢(2004)。世界衛生組織身心障礙人口定義概念之演進:兼論我國身心障礙人口定義系統問題與未來修正方向。社會政策與社會工作學刊,8(2),193-235。 江亮演(2007)。身心障礙者福利。台北:松慧出版社。 余漢儀(2005)。身心障礙的相關理論。載於江亮演(主編),老人與身心障礙福利(頁225-255)。台北:國立空中大學。 吳芝儀、廖梅花(譯)(2001)。質性研究入門—紮根理論研究方法(原作者:Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.)。嘉義:濤石文化。(原著出版年:1998) 吳秀照(2005)。從理論到實踐:身心障礙者就業服務的理論與實務之探討。社區發展季刊,112,104-116。 周月清(2003)。成年心智障礙者居住服務政策與措施探討-社區生活與社會融合(1/2)(國科會專題研究計畫成果報告編號:NSC91-2412-H-031-008)。台北:中華民國行政院國家科學委員會。 周月清(2000)。障礙者自立生活運動緣起與意涵-美加英文參考文獻探討。社區發展季刊,106,331-345。 周月清(2005)。發展智能障礙者社區居住與生活:美英兩國探討比較。社會政策與社會工作學刊,9(2),139-196。 周月清、朱貽莊(2011)。檢視台灣身心障礙福利政策與法案之歷史進程與變革。載於中華救助總會主編, 2011兩岸社會福利學術論壇「社會福利模式-從傳承到創新」研討會論文集。台北:中華救助總會。 周月清、李婉萍、張意才(2006)。住民社區居住與生活參與、選擇與自主:以台灣六個團體家庭成年智障者為例。東吳社會工作學報,16,37-78。 林宏熾(1999)。智能障礙青年社區生活品質驗證性因素分析及其相關因素之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,17,59-83。 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究,3(2),122-135。 邱滿豔(2010)。身心障礙需求分析、資源盤點與政策規劃。內政部委託研究報告。台北:內政部。 胡幼慧編(2010)。質性研究—理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流圖書公司。 馬家蕙(1995)。台灣地區智障者家長團體之發展—兼論其與社工專業之互動。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣大學社會學研究所。台北。 曾凡慈(譯)(2010)。污名—管理受損身份的筆記(原作者:Erving Goffman)。台北:群學出版有限公司。(原著出版年:1963) 張宏哲、林哲立(譯)(2003)。人類行為與社會環境(原作者:Ashford. J. B., Lecroy C. W. & Lortie. K. L.)。台北:雙葉。(原著出版年:1997) 張恆豪(2007)。特殊教育與障礙社會學:一個理論的反省。教育與社會研究,13,71-94。 陳向明(2002)社會科學質的研究。台北市:五南出版。 陳明淑(2010)。台南教養院中高齡智能障礙者休閒參與內涵及經驗之探討。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣大學社會工作系研究所。臺北。 黃源協(2003)。身心障礙福利的發展趨勢與內涵-國際觀點的分析。社區發展季刊,104,342-360。 黃源協、蕭文高(2007)。社會政策與社會立法。台北:雙葉書廊。(Ch10, p305) 董和銳(2003)。身心障礙之概念架構與社會意涵。身心障礙研究,1(1),32-42。 廖福特(2008)。從「醫療」、「福利」到「權利」-身心障礙者權利保障之新發展。中研院法學期刊,2,167-210。 潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究—理論與應用。台北:心理出版社。 鄭雅莉(譯)(2007)。智能障礙—定義、分類和支持系統(原作者American Association on Mental Retardation, AAMR)。台北:合記圖書出版社。(原著出版年:2002) 蔡佳穎、陳政智(2010)。以「損傷」與「障礙」並重的社會模式探討身心障礙生活品質。社區發展季刊,131,516-529。 簡春安、鄒平儀(2004)。社會工作研究法。台北:巨流圖書公司。 羅秀華(1993)。從社區組織觀點看台灣地區智障者家長團體之成長與運作。東吳社會學報,2,147-173。 嚴嘉楓、林金定(2003)。身心障礙者人權與福利政策發展。身心障礙研究,1(1),20-31。 二. 西文部分 Alison, B. M. & Christopher, B. K. (1996). Awareness, Action, and Collaboration: How the Self-advocacy Movement is Empowering for Persons with Developmental Disabilities. Mental Retardation, 34, 312-319. Barron, K. (2001). Autonomy in Everyday Life, for Whom? Disability & Society, 16(3), 431-447. Beart, S., Hardy, G. & Buchan, L. (2004). Changing Selves: a Grounded Theory Account of Belonging to a Self-advocacy Group for People with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 91-100. Bigby C. (2008). Known well by no-one: Trends in the informal social networks of middle-aged and older people with intellectual disability five years after moving to the community. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 33(2), 148-157. Björnsdóttir, K. & Jóhannesson, IÁ. (2009). People With Intellectual Disabilities in Iceland: A Bourdieuean Interpretation of Self-Advocacy. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(6), 436-446. Bollard, M. (2009). Intellectual Disability and Social Inclusion. England, London: Churchill Livingstone. Buchanan, I. & Walmsley, J.(2006). Self-advocacy in historical perspective. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 133-138. Bylov, F. (2006).Patterns of Culture & Power After ‘The Great Release’: the History of Movements of Subculture & Empowerment among Danish People with Learning Difficulties. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(3),139-145. Chou Y. C., Lin L. C., Chang A. L., and Schalock R. L. (2007). The Quality of Life of Family Caregivers of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities in Taiwan. Journal of Appilied Research in Intellectual Disability, 20, 200-210. Dye, L., Hare, D. J. & Hendy S.(2007). Capacity of People with Intellectual Disabilities to Consent to Take Part in a Research Study. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability, 20, 168-174. Dunn, P. (2002). The Evolution of Government Independent Living Policies and Programmes for Canadians with Disabilities. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 25, 215-224. Dybwad, G.(1996). Setting the Stage Historically. In Dybwad, G. & Bersani, H.(Eds.), New Voices: Self-Advocacy by People with Disabilities (pp. 1-18). Massachusetts: Brookline Books. Gilmartin, A. & Slevin, E. (2009). Being a member of a Self-advocacy group: Experiences of Intellectually Disabled People. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 152-159. Hayden, M. F.(2009). Internal and External Dangers Within the Self-Advocacy Movement: An Advisor's Perspective. Mental Retardation,36(6), 499-503. Hersov, J.(1996). The Rise of Self-Advocacy in Great Britain. In Dybwad, G. & Bersani, H.(Eds.), New Voices: Self-Advocacy by People with Disabilities (pp. 130-139). Massachusetts: Brookline Books. Kappel, B.(1996). A History of People First in Canada. In Dybwad, G. & Bersani, H.(Eds.), New Voices: Self-Advocacy by People with Disabilities (pp. 93-129). Massachusetts: Brookline Books. Ledger, S. & Tilley, L. (2006). The history of self-advocacy for people with learning difficulties: international comparisons. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 129-130. Liewellyn, P. & Northway, R. (2008). The Views and Experiences of People with Intellectual Disabilities Concerning Advocacy. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 12(3), 213-228. McNally, S. (2002). A Survey of Self-advocacy Groups for People with Learning Disabilities in an English Region. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6(2), 185-199. McNally, S. (2003). A Survey of Self-advocacy Groups for People with Learning Disabilities in an English Region Part II. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(3), 231-250. Miller, A. B. & Keys, C. B. (1996). Awareness, Action, and Collaboration: How the Self-Advocacy Movement Is Empowering for Persons with Developmental Disabilities. Mental Retardation, 34(5), 312-319. Morris, J.(2004). Independent living and community care: a disempower framework. Disability & Society, 19(5), 427-442. Moore, M., Beazley, S. & Maelzer, J. (1998). Researching Disability Issues. England, Berkshire: Open University Press. Payne, M.(2005). Modern Social Work Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Pedlar, A., Haworth, L., Hutchison, P., Taylor, A. & Dunn, P. (1999). A Texured Life Empowerment and Adults with Developmental Disabilities. Canada, Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press. Romeo, L.(1996). The Wheels of Self-Advocacy in Australia. In Dybwad, G. & Bersani, H.(Eds.), New Voices: Self-Advocacy by People with Disabilities (pp. 140-168). Massachusetts: Brookline Books. Schwartz, C. & Rabinovitz, S. (2003). Life Satisfaction of People with Intellectual Disability Living in Community Residences: Perceptions of the Residents, Their Parents and Staff Members. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47(2), 75-84. Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and Wrongs. England, London: Routledge. Šiška, J. (2006). A New Movement in an Old Bureaucracy: the Development of Self-advocacy in the Czech Republic. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(3),146-150. Sutcliffe, J. & Simons, K. (1993).Self Advocacy and Adults with Learning Difficulties : Contexts and Debates. England, Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education. Szymanski, C. M. (2006). A model self-advocacy curriculum for students with disabilities, in Obiakor, F. E., Rotatori, A. F., Burkhardt, S.(ed.) Current Perspectives in Special Education Administration (Advances in Special Education, Volume 17), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 155-179. Test, D. W., Fowler, C. H. , Wood, W. M., Brewer, D. M. & Eddy, S. (2005). A Conceptual Framework of Self-advocacy for Students with Disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 26(1), 43-54. Traustadóttir, R.(2006). Learning about self-advocacy from life history: a case study from the United States. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 175-180. Tsuda, E. & Smith, J. G. (2004). Defining and organizing self-advocate centered groups: Implications of survey research on self-advocacy group in Japan. Disability & Society, 19(6), 627-646. Tsuda, E. (2006). Japanese Culture and the Philosophy of Self-advocacy: the Importance of Interdependence in Community Living. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(3), 151-156. 三. 網路引用部分 台灣自我倡導部落格(2010)。自我倡導是?。取自http://blog.xuite.net/peoplefirst.taiwan/0001/34105625 香港弱智人士資訊網(2005)。We are People First!。取自 http://www.hkmh2005.org/en_peoplefirst.htm 孫一信(2006)。台灣的智障者人權現況與反省。取自http://www.isu.edu.tw/upload/25/6/files/dept_6_lv_3_3931.doc 教育部重編國語辭典修訂本(1994),民國一○二年五月十二日,取自: http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/newDict/dict.sh?cond=%B8%C0%C5%DC&pieceLen=50&fld=1&cat=&ukey=-251230280&serial=1&recNo=1&op=f&imgFont=1 陳弘中(2009)。台灣的People First運動。取自http://disable.yam.org.tw/book/export/html/3213 韓福榮(2011)。聽覺障礙者休閒融合自我倡導與臺北市健康運動中心資源應用。取自:http://twapa100.blogspot.com/2011/05/blog-post_3488.html SABE(1996)。Definition and Declaration of Self-Determination。取自http://www.sabeusa.org/user_storage/File/sabeusa/Position%20Statements/39_%20Self-Determination.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6446 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 1974年美國奧勒岡成立世界第一個自我倡導團體,在那之後,強調障礙者為自己發聲的自我倡導理念,逐漸傳播到了歐洲各國、亞洲各國、加拿大及澳洲,而台灣在近幾年也開始嘗試推展自我倡導,有愈來愈多的團體投入,對照國外障礙運動的發展脈絡,雖然台灣起步較晚,但也走出由「專業倡導」、「家長倡導」再到「自我倡導」的相似軌跡,然而台灣的自我倡導經驗卻鮮為人知,為了解智青實際參與自我倡導的經驗,本研究採用深度訪談法,訪談10位智青及7位助理,研究目的有三:1.描繪智青參與自我倡導經驗的樣貌。2.瞭解參與自我倡導經驗對於智青的意義。3.以智青及助理參與自我倡導經驗探討台灣未來自我倡導推展的可能性。研究結果發現,自我倡導的參與過程中,智青有許多機會擔任「重要角色」,智青能從中學習和成長,以及智青與智青之間的「夥.伴」關係及助理的「後援」角色,使智青在「內在態度及信念」和「外在行為」上產生了蛻變。但在這些經驗背後,助理扮演了關鍵的角色,包含製造機會和允許犯錯的空間、提供個別化的支持,然而卻也面臨來自助理角色本身及外部環境的難為處境,使得助理這份工作更具挑戰。依據研究發現,我更進一步地去討論自我倡導理念得以運作的條件,以及自我倡導的經驗能否延伸到日常生活?最後,本研究亦針對未來研究及實務提出建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In 1974, the first self-advocacy group was formed in Oregon in the United States. After that, the idea of encouraging the disabilities to claim for their own rights has disseminated to European countries, Asian countries, Canada, and Australia. In recent years, Taiwan has also put effort in developing self-advocacy, which attracts more and more groups to join in. Though Taiwan had a late start when compared with the context of disability movements in western countries, its development history is quite similar to them. It also started with “professional advocacy,” then took up with “parental advocacy,” and finally succeeded in “self-advocacy.” However, few studies have examined the self-advocacy experiences in Taiwan. This thesis endeavored to present the experiences of people with intellectual disabilities who have participated in self-advocacy activities. Data were collected by In-depth interviews with ten people with intellectual disabilities and seven supporters. There are three purposes of this research: 1. To portray the experiences of people with intellectual disabilities who participated in self-advocacy activities. 2. To find out what the experiences of participating in self-advocacy activities means to people with intellectual disabilities. 3. To explore the possibilities of promoting self-advocacy in Taiwan via the experiences of people with intellectual disabilities and the supporters. The results of this analysis are listed below: People with intellectual disabilities have attained more opportunities to be “important roles,” and have learned a lot from that during the process of participating in self-advocacy activities. The partnership between people with intellectual disabilities and supporters who serve as the backup role also makes internal and external changes on the former, including their attitudes, faith and behavior. Behind these experiences, the supporter plays a key role. He or she not only creates opportunities and space for people with intellectual disabilities to make mistakes, but also provides individual supports. Nevertheless, the supporter also has to deal with the dilemmas from his or her own roles and the environments, which makes it a challenging job. According to the findings, this study discussed the conditions which would make the idea of self-advocacy more practical. It also discussed whether the experiences of participating in self-advocacy can benefit people with intellectual disabilities on a daily basis. In the end, this thesis provided suggestions for future research and practice as well. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-16T16:29:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R98330011-1.pdf: 2014687 bytes, checksum: c3c8d2304532938a82797cbe942ccc91 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………………… i
誌謝……………………………………………………………………………… ii 中文摘要………………………………………………………………………… iii 英文摘要………………………………………………………………………… iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究背景 3 第三節 名詞解釋 7 第二章 文獻回顧 9 第一節 自我倡導的背景 9 第二節 自我倡導的內涵 13 第三節 國外的自我倡導發展 17 第四節 智能障礙者自我倡導的相關研究 20 第三章 研究方法 25 第一節 研究目的 25 第二節 研究方法 25 第三節 研究過程 27 第四節 資料分析 35 第四章 研究發現 37 第一節 十位智青的圖像 37 第二節 智青眼中的風景 44 第三節 蛻變 59 第四節 關鍵的助理角色 64 第五章 討論與建議 73 第一節 由智青的經驗看自我倡導 73 第二節 建議 79 第三節 研究者現身 82 參考文獻 83 附錄 90 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 台灣成年智能障礙者的「自我倡導」經驗初探 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Exploring the Self-advocacy Experiences of People with Intellectual Disabilities in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 余漢儀(Hon-Yei Yu),王育瑜(Yu-Yu Wang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 自我倡導,智能障礙者,助理,自我決定,經驗學習,充權, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | self-advocacy,people with intellectual disabilities,supporter,self-determination,experiential learning,empowerment, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 95 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 社會工作學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf | 1.97 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
