Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 農業經濟學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64389
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor雷立芬
dc.contributor.authorTzu-Hsuan Shenen
dc.contributor.author沈子軒zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T17:44:24Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-16
dc.date.copyright2012-08-16
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.submitted2012-08-14
dc.identifier.citation行政院農業委員會,1948-2010,《農業統計年報》。
朱鴻鈞,2010。「全球漁業發展現況及未來趨勢分析-兼論台灣漁業發展現況」,《台灣生技產業季刊》。6-10。
卓佳慶,2011。「以方向性距離函數法衡量本國銀行業之效率與生產力-考慮逾放比率」,《臺灣銀行季刊》。62(1),26-41。
徐世勳、游明敏,2001。「考慮航空噪音下國內機場經營績效及投入擁擠現象之研究」,《台灣經濟學會年會論文集》。121-149。
沈大焜、洪柏懿(編),2011。《耕耘台灣 農業大世紀-漁業風華》。台北:行政院農業委員會。
陳柏琪、張靜貞、徐世勳、游明敏,2009。「台灣地區農會經營績效之評估-多部門資料包絡法之應用」,《經濟論文叢刊》。37(4),415-453。
國立海洋生物博物館,2006。「台灣漁業現況」。(http://seafood.nmmba.gov.tw/ExtendStudy-1.aspx)。
游明敏,2005。「非意欲產出對國內機場經營效率及產出損失之影響」,《管理學報》。22(2),241-259。
楊志慶,2006。「台灣養豬示範戶生產效率及環境績效衡量之研究」。博士論文,國立中興大學應用經濟學系。
蘇偉成、周耀烋,2002。《台灣漁具漁法》。台北:行政院農業委員會漁業署。
Ali, A. I., and L. Seiford, 1990.“Translation Ivariance in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Operations Research Letters.9:403-405.
Andersen, J. L., and Bogetoft, P., 2007.“Gains from Quota Trade: Theoretical Models and an Application to the Danish Fishery,” European Review of Agricultural Economics. 34: 105-127.
Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper, 1984.“Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science.30: 1078-1092.
Banker, R. D., and R. C. Morey, 1986.“Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs,” Operations Research.34: 513-521.
Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R. G. and E. Thanassoulis, 1991.“Applied data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research. 52(1): 1-15.
Cave, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and W. E. Diewert, 1982.“Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input, and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers,” The Economic Journal.92: 73-86.
Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, 1978.“Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operations Research. 2:429-444.
Coelli, T. J., D. S. Prasada Rao, and G. E. Battese, 1998. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dyckhoff, H., and K. Allen, 2001.“Measuring Ecological Efficiency with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA),” European Journal of Operational Research. 132:312-325.
Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations(FAO), 2012.The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Rome:FAO.
Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations(FAO), 2009. Climate Chang Implications for Fisheries and Aquaculture. Rome:FAO.
Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations(FAO), 2009. Fisheries and Aquaculture Statistics. Rome:FAO.
Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations(FAO), FishStat Plus, (http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstat/en).
Farrell, M. J., 1957.“The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 129: 253-351.
Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, and C. A. K. Lovell, 1985. The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, C. A. K. Lovell, and C. Pasurka, 1989.“Multilateral Productivity Comparisons when Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach,” The Review of Economics and Statistics. 71: 90-98.
Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris, and Z. Zhang, 1994.“Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries,” American Economic Review. 84: 66-83.
Fare, R., and S. Grosskopf, 2004.“Modeling Undesirable Factors in Efficiency Evaluation: Comment,” European Journal of Operational Research. 157: 242-245.
Felthoven, R. G., 2002.“Effects of the American Fisheries Act on Capacity Utilization and Technical Efficiency,” Marine Resource Economics . 17: 181-205.
Golany, B., and Y. Roll, 1989. “An Application Procedure for DEA,” OMEGA. 17(3): 237-250.
Hadi-Vencheh, A., R. Kazemi-Matin, and M. Tavassoli-Kajani, 2005. “Undesirable Factors in Efficiency Measurement,” Applied Mathematics and Computation. 163: 547-552.
Haynes, K. E., S. Ratick, and J. Cummings-Saxton, 1994.“Toward a Pollution Abatement Monitoring Policy: Measurements, Model Mechanics, and Data Requirements,” The Environmental Professional. 16: 292-303.
Herrero, I., 2005.“Different Approaches to Efficiency Analysis. An Application to the Spanish Trawl Fleet Operating in Moroccan Waters,” European Journal of Operational Research. 167: 257-271.
Hoff, A., 2006.“Bootstrapping Malmquist Indices for Danish Seiners in the North Sea and Skagerrak,” Journal of Applied Statistics. 33: 891-907.
Hoff, A., 2007.“Second Stage DEA: Comparison of Approaches for Model the DEA Score,” European Journal of Operational Research. 181: 425-435.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., A. Hadi-Vencheh, A. A. Foroughi, and R. Kazemi-Matin, 2004,“Inputs/Outputs Estimation in DEA when Some Factors are Undesirable,” Applied Mathematics and Computation. 156: 19-23.
Kirkley, J. E., and D. Squires, 1999. Capacity and Capacity Utilization in Fishing Industries. San Diego: Department of Economics, UCSD, UC San Diego.
Kjaersgaard, J., 2010.“Quest for Appropriate Overcapacity in the Fisheries Industry,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 44: 141-150.
Lewis, H. F. and T. R. Sexton, 2004a.“Data Envelopment Analysis with Reverse Inputs and Outputs,” Journal of Productivity Analysis. 21: 113-132.
Lewis, H. F. and T. R. Sexton, 2004b.“Network DEA: Efficiency Analysis of Organizations with Complex Internal Structure,” Computers and Operations Research. 31: 1365-1410.
Lindebo, E., A. Hoff, and N. Vestergaard, 2007.“Revenue-Based Capacity Utilization Measures and Decomposition: The case of Danish North Sea Trawlers,” European Journal of Operational Research. 180: 215-227.
Lovell, C. A. K., J. T. Pastor, and J. A. Turner, 1995.“Measuring Macroeconomic Performance in the OECD:A Comparison of European and non-European Countries,” European Journal of Operational Research. 87: 507-518.
Oliveira, M. M., A. S. Camanho, and M. B. Gaspar, 2010.“Technical and Economic Efficiency Analysis of the Portuguese Artisanal Dredge Fleet. ICES,” Journal of Marine Science. 67: 1811-1821.
Pascoe, S., 2007.“Estimation of Cost Functions in Data Poor Environment: the Case of Capacity Estimation if Fisheries,” Applied Economics. 39: 2643-2654.
Pittman, R. W., 1983.“Multilateral Productivity Comparisons with Undesirable Outputs,” The Economic Journal. 93: 883-891.
Seiford, L. M., and J. Zhu, 2002.“Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation,” European Journal of Operational Research. 142: 16-20.
Tingley, D., and S. Pascoe, 2003. Estimating the Level of Excess Capacity in the Scottish Fishing Fleet: Final Report, UK: CEMARE Report 66, University of Portsmouth.
Tingley, D., S. Pascoe, and L. Coglan, 2005.“Factors Affecting Technical Efficiency in Fisheries: Stochastic Production Frontier Versus Data Envelopment Analysis Approaches,” Fisheries Research. 73: 363-376.
Zheng, Y., and Y. Q. Zhou, 2005.“Measures of the Fishing Capacity of Chinese Marine Fleets and Discussion of the Methods,” Journal of Oceanography. 61: 623-630
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64389-
dc.description.abstract本研究採用資料包絡法為效率評估模型,納入非經濟漁獲和超時工作問題,以Fa ̈re et al.(1989)所提出的拋物線距離函數為基礎,構建投入、產出不同比例型拋物線模式。研究樣本為「台灣底魚漁獲統計年報」所彙整之1976至1987年台灣單、雙船拖網漁船漁獲資料,探討各年度拖網漁船之平均效率,並分別計算當管制「非意欲產出」而造成之意欲產出損失及因雇用過多「擁擠投入」所排擠之投入浪費。
在本文實證結果發現,即使是台灣拖網漁船全盛時期(1976~1987年),每年平均仍存在著14%的改善空間,「潛在產能」達86,221公斤漁獲。同期間,未達整體效率的台灣拖網漁船占全體61%(212艘),其中包括76%(161艘)未達技術效率、46%(98艘)未達擁擠效率、70%(149艘)未達規模效率,其中有35艘處於規模報酬遞增下、114艘處於規模報酬遞減下。顯示導致漁船無效率之肇因,其最嚴重為資源配置不當,規模不當問題次之,擁擠現象最低。最後,本研究計算若政府管制非經濟魚類的數量,使非經濟魚類不再是自由處置的,將會造成經濟魚類達12,576公斤(2.13%)的損失。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn this research, the methodology of the efficiency-evaluate model is DEA, including none-economic fish catch mode and overtime working problem. Basing on hyperbolic distance function which disserted by Fare et al. in 1989, each parabola model be presented into varied ratio. In order to explore the average efficiency of trawler annually and calculate the loss by undesirable outputs and congestion inputs, I apply 「Statistical Yearbook of Taiwan bottom fish catch」 as the sample of this research, archiving data of fish catch from single trawler and double trawler during 1976 to 1987 in Taiwan.
According to the outcome of this dissertation, even though in the heyday (1976~1987), there is still a room to improve the Taiwan trawl fishery. To be more precisely, Taiwan trawl fishery has 14% potential improvement each year with 86,221KG potential output. In the same period, the Taiwan trawlers which did not reach the overall efficiency account for 61%(212 ships)of the total number. Specifically, percentages of the Taiwan trawler which could not reach the technical efficiency, congestion efficiency and scale efficiency are 76%(161 ships)、46%(98 ships)and 70%(149 ships)individually with 35 ships below IRS and 114 ships under DRS. As shown from the data, three main reasons for the low efficiency of fish boat are misallocation of resources, inappropriate scale and congestion. In the end, this research also demonstrates that if government regulate the number of none-economic fish, it may cause 12576kg(2.13%) loss of economic fish.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T17:44:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-101-R99627009-1.pdf: 1493186 bytes, checksum: 0f8c9bd8116fe9c45087ac7b2971cdee (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012
en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要 i
Abstract ii
第壹章 緒論 1
第貳章 文獻整理與回顧 7
第一節 台灣漁業概況 7
第二節 衡量漁業效率文獻 13
第三節 非意欲產出模型 17
第四節 本章摘要 21
第參章 理論模型與實證方法 23
第一節 建構效率模型 23
第二節 產出損失及投入浪費 29
第三節 資料來源與變數設定 31
第四節 環境變數 34
第肆章 實證結果與分析 39
第一節 資料分析與整理 39
第二節 效率分析與改善 41
第三節 產出損失及投入浪費 47
第四節 環境變數分析 48
第伍章 結論 51
參考文獻 53
附錄一:不同目標式模型比較 57
附錄二:各年度拖網漁船潛在產能、產出損失及投入浪費 63
附錄三:不同可拋性之生產集合推導 78
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject拖網漁船zh_TW
dc.subject非意欲產出zh_TW
dc.subject擁擠投入zh_TW
dc.subject弱可拋zh_TW
dc.subject資料包絡法zh_TW
dc.subjectWeak disposabilityen
dc.subjectUndesirable outputsen
dc.subjectTrawleren
dc.subjectCongestion inputsen
dc.subjectDEAen
dc.title台灣拖網漁業之效率評估─資料包絡分析法之應用zh_TW
dc.titleEfficiency Evaluation of Trawl Fishery in Taiwan
─An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear100-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee黃美瑛,莊慶達
dc.subject.keyword拖網漁船,非意欲產出,擁擠投入,弱可拋,資料包絡法,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordTrawler,Undesirable outputs,Congestion inputs,Weak disposability,DEA,en
dc.relation.page81
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2012-08-14
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept農業經濟學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:農業經濟學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-101-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.46 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved