請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64313
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張育森 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yen-Jung Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃妍容 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T17:40:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-14 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻(Reference)
才淑英. 1998. 園林花木扦插育苗技術. 中國林業出版社. 王金祥、嚴小龍、潘瑞熾. 2005. 不定根形成與植物激素的關係. 植物生理學通訊. 41:133-142. 王華芳、孟慶英、田硯亭. 1987. 人工合成植物生長調節劑促進插條生根的研究現況. 北京林業大學學報. 9:425-432. 王濤、胡德焜、高崇明. 2009. ABT系列及其成果轉化系統工程的研究. p.10. 中國科學技術出版社. 北京. 史玉群. 2001. 全光照噴霧嫩枝扦插育苗技術. 中國林業出版社. 北京. 江玲、管曉春. 2000. 植物激素與不定根的形成. 生物學通報. 35:17-19. 朱建鏞. 1997. 品種、小葉數以及季節對玫瑰花單節扦插繁殖之影響. 中國園藝. 43:29-40. 朱蕙香、張宗儉、陳虎保. 2004. 常用植物生長調節劑應用指南. p. 91-92. 化學工業出版社. 北京. 李東川、孫長忠. 2010. 水楊酸對油松苗木根系活力及根系發育的影響. 西北林學院學報. 25:82-85. 張玉武、楊紅萍. 1998. ABT生根粉在刺梨扦插育苗中的應用. 貴州林業科技. 2:45-47. 陳昌岑、朱建鏞. 1996. 不同季節中IBA對迷你玫瑰不同節位之單節插穗發育的影響. 中國園藝. 42:204-216. 陳慧菁、張育森. 1999. 插穗直徑、發根劑以及扦插時期對九重葛插穗生長之影響. 中國園藝. 45:417-426. 劉文和. 2001. ABT生根粉與NAA, IAA, IBA在扦插育苗中的效果比較. 江蘇林業科技. 28:22-24. 賴允慧. 2004. 扶桑花扦插繁殖技術之研究. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 韓延禧. 2008. 植物扦插繁殖新技術. 廣西科學技術出版社. 南寧. 譚宏超、尹芳. 1997. ABT生根粉在龍眼和荔枝扦插育苗中應用技術研究. 林業科技通訊. 2:10-14. Aberg, B. 1961. Vitamins as growth factors in higher plants. Encycl. Plant Physiol. 14:418-449. Al-Obeed, R. S. 2000. The effect of growth regulators, phenolic compounds and time of propagation on the rooting of guava stem cuttings. Agr. Res. 45:189-199. Al-Obeed, R. S. and S. M. Sabbah. 2001. The effect of some growth regulators, phenolic acids and time of propagation on the rhizogenesis of olive semi-hardwood cuttings. Agr. Sci. 13:137-146. Amri, E., H. V. M. Lyaruu, A. S. Nyomora, and Z. L. Kanyeka. 2010. Vegetative propagation of African Blackwood (Dalbergia melanoxylon Guill. & Perr.): effects of age of donor plant, IBA treatment and cutting position on rooting ability of stem cuttings. New For. 39:183-194. Ansari, S. A., S. Sharma, N. C. Pant, and A. K. Mandal. 2002. Synergism between IBA and thiamine for induction and growth of adventitious roots in Tectona grandis. Sustainable For. 15:99-112. Athar, H. R., A. Khan, M. Ashraf. 2008. Exogenously applied ascorbic acid alleviates salt-induced oxidative stress in wheat. Environ. Expt. Bot. 63:224-231. Awad, A. E., A. Kamel Dawh, and M. A. Attya. 1988. Cutting thickness and auxin affecting the rooting and consequently the growth, and flowering of Bougainvillea glabra L. Acta Hort. 226: 445-454. Basak, U. C., A. B. Das, and P. Das. 1995. Metabolic changes during rooting in stem cuttings of five mangrove species. Plant Growth Regul. 17: 141-148. Bhardwaj, D. R. and V. K. Mishra. 2005. Vegetative propagation of Ulmus villosa: effects of plant growth regulators, collection time, type of donor and position of shoot on adventitious root formation in stem cuttings. New For. 29:105-116. Cordoba-Pedregosa, M. C., J. A. Gonzalez-Reyes, M. S. Canadillas, P. Navas, and F. Cordoba. 1996. Role of apoplastic and cell-wall peroxidases on the stimulation of root elongation by ascorbate. Plant Physiol. 112:1119-1125. Cordoba-Pedregosa, M. C., J. M. Villalba, F. Cordoba, and J. A. Gonzalez-Reyes. 2005. Changes in intracellular and apoplastic peroxidase activity, ascorbate redox status, and root elongation induced by enhanced ascorbate content in Allium cepa L. Expt. Bot. 56:685-694. Cristofori, V., Y. Rouphael, and E. Rugini. 2010. Collection time, cutting age, IBA and putrescine effects on root formation in Corylus avellana L. cuttings. Scientia Hort. 124: 189-194. Davey, M., W. M. V. Montagu, D. Inze, M. Sanmartin, A. Kanellis, N. Smirnoff, I. J. J. Benzie, J. J. Strain, D. Favell, and J. Fletcher. 2000. Plant L-ascorbic acid: chemistry, function, metabolism, bioavailability and effects of processing. J. Sci. Food Agr. 80:825-860. Davies, F. T., Jr., J. E. Lazarte, and J. N. Joiner. 1982. Initiation and development of roots in juvenile and mature leaf bud cuttings of Ficus pumila L.. Amer. J. Bot. 69:804-811. De Klerk, G. J., H. Guan, P. Huisman, and S. Marinova. 2011. Effects of phenolic compounds on adventitious root formation and oxidative decarboxylation of applied indoleacetic acid in Malus ‘Jork 9’. Plant Growth Regul. 63:175-185. De Klerk, G. J., J. Ter Brugge, and S. Marinova. 1997. Effectiveness of indoleacetic acid, indolebutyric acid and naphthaleneacetic acid during adventitious root formation in vitro in Malus ‘Jork 9’. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult. 49:39-44. Dhillon, R. S., M. S. Hooda, J. S. Pundeer, K. S. Ahlawat, and I. Chopra. 2011. Effects of auxins and thiamine on the efficacy of techniques of clonal propagation in Jatropha curcas L. Biomass Bioenerg. 35:1502-1510. Druege, U. and R. Kadner. 2008. Response of post-storage carbohydrate levels in pelargonium cuttings to reduced air temperature during rooting and the relationship with leaf senescence and adventitious root formation. Post. Biol. and Technol. 47:126-135. Girouard, R. M. 1969. Physiological and biochemical studies of adventitious root formation. Extractable rooting co-factor from Hedera halix. Can. J. Bot. 47:687-699. Gutierrez-Coronado, M. A., C. Trejo-Lopez, and A. Larque-Saavedra. 1998. Effects of salicylic acid on the growth of roots and shoots in soybean. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 36(8): 563-565. Hambrick, C. E., F. T. Davies Jr, and H. B. Pemberton. 1991. Seasonal changes in carbohydrate/ nitrogen levels during field rooting of Rosa multiflora‘Brooks 56’hardwood cuttings. Scientia Hort. 46:137-146. Hartmann, H. T., D. E. Kester, F. T. Davies, JR., and R. L. Geneve. 2009. Plant propagation principles and practices. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, USA. p. 280-331. Henrique, A., E. N. Campinhos, E. O.Ono, and S.Z.Pinho. 2006. Effect of plant growth regulators in the rooting of Pinus cuttings. Biol. and Technol. 49(2): 189-196. Husen, A. and M. Pal. 2006. Variation in shoot anatomy and rooting behavior of stem cuttings in relation to age of donor plants in teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.). New For. 31:57-73. Husen, A. and M. Pal. 2007. Metabolic changes during adventitious root primordium development in Tectona grandis Linn. f. (teak) cuttings as affected by age of donor plants and auxin (IBA and NAA) treatment. New For. 33:309-323. Liu, J. H. and D. M. Reid. 1992. Auxin and ethylene-stimulated adventitious rooting in relation to tissue sensitivity to auxin and ethylene production in sunflower hypocotyls. Exp. Bot. 43:1191-1198. Middleton, W., B. C. Jarvis, and A. Booth. 1980. The role of leaves in auxin and boron depending rooting of stem cuttings of Phaseolus aureus Roxb. New Phytol. 84:251–259. Mori, Y., F. Miyahara, Y. Tsutsumi, and R. Kondo. 2011. Effects of combinational treatment with ethephon and indole-3-butyric acid on adventitious rooting of Pinus thunbergii cuttings. Plant Growth Regul. 63: 271-278. Nag, S., K. Saha, and M. A. Choudhuri. 2001. Role of auxin and polyamines in adventitious root formation in relation to changes in compounds involved in rooting. Plant Growth Regul. 20: 182-194. Oertli, J. J. 1987. Exogenous application of vitamins as regulators for growth and development of plants – a review. Bodenk. 150:375-391. Opuni-Frimpong, E., D. F. Karnosky, A. J. Storer, and J. R. Cobbinah. 2008. Key roles of leaves, stockplant age, and auxin concentration in vegetative propagation of two African mahoganies: Khaya anthotheca Welw. and Khaya ivorensis A. Chev. New For. 36:115-123. Palanisamy, K. and P. Kumar. 1997. Effect of position, size of cuttings and environmental factors on adventitious roting in neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss). For. Ecol. and Mgt. 98:277-280. Palanisamy, K., S. A. Ansari, P. Kumar, and B. N. Gupta. 1998. Adventitious rooting in shoot cuttings of Azadirachta indica and Pongamia pinnata. New For. 16:81-88. Peer, W. A. and A. S. Murphy. 2007. Flavonoids and auxin transport: modulators or regulators? Plant Sci. 12:556-563. Sajid, Z. A. and F. Aftab. 2009. Amelioration of salinity tolerance in Solanum tuberosum L. by exogenous application of ascorbic acid. Cell Dev. Biol. 45:540-549. Singh, S., P. Kumar, S. A. Ansari. 2005. Clonal multiplication of teak (Tectona grandis) by composite treatment of auxin with thiamine. Ind. J. For. 28:108-111. Stefancic, M., F. Stampar, and G. Osterc. 2005. Influence of IAA and IBA on root development and quality of Prunus ‘GiSelA 5’ leafy cuttings. HortScience 40:2052-2055. Sutter, J. C. 1988. Effect of ethylene treatment on polar IAA transport, net IAA uptake and specific binding of N-1-naphtylphtalamic acid in tissue and microsomes in isolated. Plant Physiol. 88:795-799. Swamy, S. L., S. Puri, and A. K. Singh. 2002. Effect of auxins (IBA and NAA) and season on rooting of juvenile and mature hardwood cuttings of Robinia pseudoacacia and Grewia optiva. New For. 23:143-157. Tarrago, J., P. Sansberro, R. Filip, P. Lopez, A. Gonzalez, C. Luna, and L. Mroginski. 2005. Effect of leaf retention and flavonoids on rooting of Ilex paraguariensis cuttings. Scientia Hort. 103: 479-488. Tchoundjeu, Z., M. L. Avana, R. R. B. Leakey, A. J. Simons, E. Asaah, B. Duguma, and J. M. Bell. 2002. Vegetative propagation of Prunus africana: effects of rooting medium auxin concentrations and leaf area. Agrofor. Syst. 54:183-192. Trobec, M., F. Stampar, R. Veberic, and G. Osterc. 2005. Fluctuations of different endogenous phenolic compounds and cinnamic acid in the first days of the rooting process of cherry rootstock ‘GiSelA 5’ leafy cuttings. Plant Physiol. 162:589-597. Wiesman, Z. and S. Lavee. 1995. Enhancement of IBA stimulatory effect on rooting of olive cultivar stem cuttings. Scientia Hort. 62: 189-198. Wilson, P. J. and J. V. Staden. 1990. Rhizocaline, rooting co-factors, and the concept of promoters and inhibitors of adventitious rooting-a review. Ann. Bot. 66:479-490. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64313 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 摘要
花木類植物扦插繁殖作業中,插穗本身條件和發根促進物質為影響插穗發根的重要因子。本論文探討插穗的葉色濃綠度(chlorophyll meter reading, CMR)與葉片植生指數(vegetation index, VI)、兩種植物荷爾蒙(plant hormone)處理濃度、三種發根輔助物質(rooting cofactors)處理濃度、高效複合發根劑根旺發(NTU Rooting Inducer),對金露華(Duranta repens)、矮仙丹(Ixora williamsii)、艷紫杜鵑(Rhododendron pulchrum)與山茶(Camellia japonica)四種花木類植物插穗發根之影響。 在插穗本身條件方面,以葉綠素計SPAD-502測量插穗葉片之葉綠素計讀值(chlorophyll meter reading;CMR),另以簡易光譜計NDVI 300 (740 nm~660 nm)測量插穗葉片之植生指數。結果顯示插穗葉片葉綠素計讀值較高的插穗組,艷紫杜鵑插穗發根數較多且最大根長較長,而山茶插穗發根率及發根階段數值皆較高。插穗葉片葉綠素計讀值高低則對矮仙丹插穗發根則無顯著影響。此外,插穗葉片植生指數較高的插穗組,矮仙丹與平戶杜鵑插穗的發根階段數值較高、發根數較多且最大根長較長,山茶插穗則是發根率及發根階段數值較高。 在發根促進物質方面,以3-吲哚丁酸(indole-3-butyric acid, IBA)2000 mg•L-1、1-萘乙酸(1-naphthalene acetic acid, NAA)2000 mg•L-1、水楊酸10-6 M、10-4 M、10-2 M等不同藥劑處理。結果顯示單用2000 mg•L-1 NAA液劑金露華插穗發根數較多,金露華與矮仙丹插穗最大根長較長,且金露華根乾重也較重。2000 mg•L-1 IBA+2000 mg•L-1 NAA複合藥劑處理,矮仙丹插穗發根階段數值最大且發根率最高,且矮仙丹與艷紫杜鵑插穗發根數最多。另在水楊酸濃度試驗中,單用水楊酸有增加插穗發根數之作用,但處理劑量會因植物種類不同而有所差異。而以2000 mg•L-1 IBA+10-4 M水楊酸複合藥劑處理,金露華、矮仙丹與艷紫杜鵑插穗發根數最多,且矮仙丹插穗最大根長最長,根乾重也最重。 在發根輔助物質方面,硫胺素(T)三種濃度400、800、1000 mg•L-1與2000 mg•L-1 IBA+800 mg•L-1 T複合藥劑處理,除了山茶單用1000 mg•L-1 T,插穗可得到最多的發根數外,其餘三種植物以1000 mg•L-1 IBA+800 mg•L-1 T複合藥劑處理,插穗之發根數最多。其次,2000 mg•L-1 IBA加入不同濃度抗壞血酸(AA)100、1000、10000 mg•L-1,除了矮仙丹插穗單用2000 mg•L-1 IBA發根情況較佳,其餘三種植物均以2000 mg•L-1 IBA+1000 mg•L-1 AA複合藥劑處理,插穗可得到最多的發根數及根乾重。而2000 mg•L-1 IBA加入兒茶素(C)50、100、200 mg•L-1三種濃度,均以2000 mg•L-1 IBA+50 mg•L-1 C複合藥劑處理,插穗可得到最多的發根數。 在根旺發粉劑與液劑試驗中,根旺發粉劑與液劑處理插穗發根表現都較IBA處理與未處理藥劑之插穗為佳。其中並以根旺發液劑處理對矮仙丹、艷紫杜鵑及山茶插穗發根表現最好。而與複合型植物生長調節劑ABT生根粉比較促進發根之效果,同樣是以根旺發液劑處理,金露華與矮仙丹插穗的發根情況最佳。艷紫杜鵑則是以根旺發粉劑與液劑處理,插穗可得到最多的發根數及最長的最大根長。而山茶以根旺發2號粉劑處理,插穗發根表現最佳。 綜合上述,在插穗本身條件方面,插穗葉片植生指數可做為剪取插穗的指標。而在發根促進物質方面,以單一藥劑如IBA、NAA或水楊酸處理插穗,發根表現皆較未處理藥劑之插穗為佳。若將生長素與水楊酸這兩種藥劑混合施用,或是添加發根輔助物質如硫胺素、抗壞血酸與兒茶素,以複合型藥劑處理插穗,促進插穗發根的效果更佳。這樣的複合藥劑在產業應用上,具有很大的潛力。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract
For cutting propagation of ornameantal plants, cutting internal conditions and rooting promoters are most important factors which affect rooting of cuttings. This study investigated the effects of cutting conditions, rooting promoters (IBA, NAA and salicylic acid), rooting cofactors (thiamine, ascorbic acid and catechol) and a complex rooting promoter (NTU Rooting Inducer) on the rooting of cuttings in four ornamental shrubs (Duranta repens ‘Golden Leaves’, Ixora williamsii, Rhododendron pulchrum, and Camellia japonica). On the effects of cutting internal conditions, SPAD 502 and NDVI 300 (740 nm~660 nm) were used to measure chlorophyll meter reading (CMR) and leaf vegetation index (VI) of cutting leaves. Rhododendron pulchrum cuttings with higher CMR had more root numbers and longer maximum root length. Camellia japonica cuttings with higher CMR had higher rooting percentage and higher rooting stage. Various CMR of cutting leaves had no effect on rooting of Ixora williamsii cuttings. In addition, Ixora williamsii and Rhododendron pulchrum cuttings with higher VI had higher rooting stage, and also had more root numbers and longer maximum root length. Camellia japonica cuttings with higher VI had higher rooting percentage and higher rooting stage. On the effects of rooting promoters, various chemical treatments were 2000 mg•L-1 IBA, 2000 mg•L-1 NAA and salicylic acid (10-6 M, 10-4 M and 10-2 M). The treatment of 2000 mg•L-1 NAA gave more root numbers, longer maximum root length and more root dry weight of Duranta repens‘Golden Leaves’ cuttings, and had longer maximum root length of Ixora williamsii cuttings. The treatment of 2000 mg•L-1 IBA+2000 mg•L-1 NAA gave higher rooting percentage and higher rooting stage of Ixora williamsii cuttings, and had more root numbers of both Ixora williamsii and Rhododendron pulchrum cuttings. In addituon, salicylic acid increased root numbers in cuttings, but its effect changes as plants species. Treatment of 2000 mg•L-1 IBA+10-4 M salicylic acid promoted more root numbers in Duranta repens ‘Golden Leaves’, Ixora williamsii and Rhododendron pulchrum cuttings, and gave longer maximum root length and more root dry weight of Ixora williamsii cuttings. On the effects of rooting cofactors, thiamine (T) treatments showed that except treatment of 1000 mg•L-1 thiamine had more root numbers in Camellia japonica cuttings, treatment of 2000 mg•L-1 IBA+800 mg•L-1 T had more root numbers in Duranta repens, Ixora williamsii and Rhododendron pulchrum cuttings. The ascorbic acid (AA) treatments indicated that treatment of 2000 mg•L-1 IBA+1000 mg•L-1 AA gave more root numbers and higher root dry weight in Duranta repens, Rhododendron pulchrumi and Camellia japonica cuttings. The catechol (C) treatments showed that treatment of 2000 mg•L-1 IBA+50 mg•L-1 C had more root numbers in all four tested plant cuttings. On the effects of NTU Rooting Inducer, cuttings treated with NTU Rooting Inducer powder and solution had better rooting ability than those treated with IBA and the control. And cuttings treated with NTU Rooting Inducer solution had best rooting ability than the other treatments in Ixora williamsii, Rhododendron pulchrum, and Camellia japonica. Comparing the effect of ABT rooting powder and NTU Rooting Inducer indicated that NTU Rooting Inducer solution had better rooting ability in Duranta repens‘Golden Leaves’ and Ixora williamsii cuttings. And NTU Rooting Inducer powder and solution had more root numbers and longer maximum root length in Rhododendron pulchrum cuttings. In addition, NTU Rooting InducerⅡ had better rooting ability in Camellia japonica cuttings. In conclusion, on cutting internal factors, leaf vegetation index could be a useful index for cutting quality. On rooting promoters, cuttings treated with IBA, NAA, or salicylic acid alone, had better rooting ability than those did not be treated with any rooting promoters. The combinations of auxin and salicylic acid, or plus some rooting cofactors (such as thiamine, ascorbic acid or catechol) indicated that the combinations often had better rooting ability than single chemical. This phenomenon showed complex rooting promoter has great potential in commercial application. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T17:40:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99628134-1.pdf: 3310085 bytes, checksum: 483520331abb82f3bd90647db2653a1f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
目錄...................................................................................................................................i 表目錄..............................................................................................................................iii 圖目錄..............................................................................................................................iv 摘要.................................................................................................................................vi Abstrct...........................................................................................................................viii 第一章 前言(Introduction).............................................................................................1 第二章 前人研究(Literature Review)..........................................................................3 一、 植物扦插繁殖定義...........................................................................................3 二、 扦插繁殖原理...................................................................................................3 (一) 不定根型態...........................................................................................3 (二) 不定根形成過程...................................................................................4 三、 影響植物扦插繁殖之因子...............................................................................5 (一) 插穗本身條件對插穗發根之影響.......................................................5 (二) 扦插環境對插穗發根之影響...............................................................7 (三) 扦插前處理對插穗發根之影響...........................................................8 第三章 插穗葉色濃綠度與葉片植生指數對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.......11 一、 前言(Introduction)......................................................................................12 二、 材料與方法(Materials and Methods).........................................................13 (一)試驗一 插穗葉色濃綠度對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.........13 (二)試驗二 插穗葉片植生指數對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.....14 (三)調查紀錄標準......................................................................................14 (四)碳水化合物分析..................................................................................15 (五)試驗設計與統計分析..........................................................................16 三、 結果(Results)..............................................................................................17 (一) 插穗葉色濃綠度對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.....................17 (二) 插穗葉片植生指數對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.................17 四、 討論(Discussion)........................................................................................17 五、 結論(Conclusion).......................................................................................18 第四章 生長素與水楊酸對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響...................................24 一、 前言(Introduction).........................................................................................25 二、 材料與方法(Materials and Methods)..........................................................27 (一) 試驗一 生長素對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.......................27 (二) 試驗二 水楊酸對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.......................28 (三) 調查紀錄標準.....................................................................................28 (四) 試驗設計與統計分析.........................................................................29 三、 結果(Results)..............................................................................................30 (一) 生長素對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.....................................30 (二) 水楊酸對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.....................................31 四、 討論(Discussion)........................................................................................31 (一) 生長素對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.....................................31 (二) 水楊酸對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.....................................32 五、 結論(Conclusion).......................................................................................33 第五章 三種發根輔助物質對四種花木類植物插穗發根之影響...............................42 一、 前言(Introduction)......................................................................................43 二、 材料與方法(Materials and Methods)..........................................................44 (一) 試驗一 硫胺素對四種花木類植物插穗發根之影響......................44 (二) 試驗二 抗壞血酸對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響..................45 (三) 試驗三 兒茶素對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響......................45 (四) 調查紀錄標準.....................................................................................46 (五) 試驗設計與統計分析.........................................................................47 三、 結果(Results)..............................................................................................48 (一) 硫胺素對四種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.....................................48 (二) 抗壞血酸對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.................................49 (三) 兒茶素對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.....................................49 四、 討論(Discussion)........................................................................................50 (一) 硫胺素對四種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.....................................50 (二) 抗壞血酸對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.................................51 (三) 兒茶素對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.....................................52 五、 結論(Conclusion).......................................................................................52 第六章 複合發根劑對四種花木類植物插穗發根之影響...........................................68 一、 前言(Introduction)......................................................................................69 二、 材料與方法(Materials and Methods)..........................................................70 (一) 試驗一 根旺發粉劑與液劑處理對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影 響.........................................................................................................70 (二) 試驗二 根旺發與ABT生根粉促進插穗發根效果之比較..............71 (三) 調查紀錄標準.....................................................................................71 (四) 試驗設計與統計分析.........................................................................72 三、 結果(Results)..............................................................................................74 (一) 根旺發粉劑與液劑處理對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.........74 (二) 根旺發與ABT生根粉促進插穗發根效果之比較...........................74 四、 討論(Discussion)........................................................................................75 (一) 根旺發粉劑與液劑處理對三種花木類植物插穗發根之影響.........75 (二) 根旺發與ABT生根粉促進插穗發根效果之比較...........................76 五、 結論(Conclusion).......................................................................................77 參考文獻(Reference).................................................................................................86 附錄.................................................................................................................................93 表目錄 表3.1. 插穗葉片葉綠素計讀值對平戶杜鵑、矮仙丹及山茶插穗發根之影響..........19 表3.2. 插穗葉片植生指數對平戶杜鵑、矮仙丹及山茶插穗發根之影響.................20 表4.1. 生長素不同濃度對金露華插穗發根之影響.....................................................34 表4.2. 生長素不同濃度對矮仙丹插穗發根之影響.....................................................35 表4.3. 生長素不同濃度對艷紫杜鵑插穗發根之影響.................................................36 表4.4. 水楊酸不同濃度對金露華插穗發根之影響.....................................................37 表4.5. 水楊酸不同濃度對矮仙丹插穗發根之影響.....................................................38 表4.6. 水楊酸不同濃度對艷紫杜鵑插穗發根之影響.................................................39 表5.1. 硫胺素不同濃度對金露華插穗發根之影響.....................................................53 表5.2. 硫胺素不同濃度對矮仙丹插穗發根之影響.....................................................54 表5.3. 硫胺素不同濃度對艷紫杜鵑插穗發根之影響.................................................55 表5.4. 硫胺素不同濃度對山茶插穗發根之影響.........................................................56 表5.5. 抗壞血酸不同濃度對金露華插穗發根之影響.................................................57 表5.6. 抗壞血酸不同濃度對矮仙丹插穗發根之影響.................................................58 表5.7. 抗壞血酸不同濃度對艷紫杜鵑插穗發根之影響.............................................59 表5.8. 抗壞血酸不同濃度對山茶插穗發根之影響.....................................................60 表5.9. 兒茶素不同濃度對金露華插穗發根之影響.....................................................61 表5.10. 兒茶素不同濃度對矮仙丹插穗發根之影響...................................................62 表5.11. 兒茶素不同濃度對艷紫杜鵑插穗發根之影響...............................................63 表5.12. 兒茶素不同濃度對山茶插穗發根之影響.......................................................64 表6.1. 根旺發粉劑與液劑對矮仙丹插穗發根之影響.................................................78 表6.2. 根旺發粉劑與液劑對艷紫杜鵑插穗發根之影響.............................................79 表6.3. 根旺發粉劑與液劑對山茶插穗發根之影響.....................................................80 表6.4. 根旺發與ABT對金露華插穗發根之影響.......................................................81 表6.5. 根旺發與ABT對矮仙丹插穗發根之影響.......................................................82 表6.6. 根旺發與ABT對艷紫杜鵑插穗發根之影響....................................................83 表6.7. 根旺發與ABT對山茶插穗發根之影響...........................................................84 圖目錄 圖3.1. 插穗葉片植生指數對矮仙丹、平戶杜鵑與山茶插穗全可溶性糖含量的影響.................................................................................................................................21 圖3.2. 插穗葉片植生指數對矮仙丹、平戶杜鵑與山茶插穗澱粉含量的影響.........22 圖3.3. 插穗葉片葉綠素計讀值與植生指數對艷紫杜鵑插穗發根之影響.................23 圖4.1. 生長素不同濃度對金露華插穗發根之影響.....................................................40 圖4.2. 水楊酸不同濃度對矮仙丹插穗發根之影響.....................................................41 圖5.1. 硫胺素不同濃度對金露華插穗發根之影響.....................................................65 圖5.2. 抗壞血酸不同濃度對山茶插穗發根之影響.....................................................66 圖5.3. 兒茶素不同濃度對矮仙丹插穗發根之影響.....................................................67 圖6.1. 根旺發粉劑與液劑對山茶插穗發根之影響.....................................................85 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 插穗狀態與化學藥劑對花木類植物插穗發根之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Effects of Cutting Status and Chemical Treatments on the Rooting of Cuttings in Some Ornamental Shrubs | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃光亮,林瑞松,張祖亮 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 插穗,化學藥劑,花木類植物, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | cutting,chemical treatments,ornamental shrubs, | en |
dc.relation.page | 96 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.23 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。