請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64291
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 羅昌發 | |
dc.contributor.author | Poowadon Jiaviriyaboonya | en |
dc.contributor.author | 謝明山 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T17:39:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-17 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | I. English Books
Atria, Fernando et al. eds. (2003), Law and Legal Interpretation (Ashgate Publishing) Aust, Anthony (2007), Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press). Bederman, David J. (2001), Classical Canons: Rhetoric, Classicism and Treaty Interpretation (Ashgate Publishing). Black, Henry Campbell (1990), Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th ed. (West Group). Cannizzaro, Enzo (2011), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press). Correa, Carlos (2007), Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: A Commentary on the TRIPS Agreement (Oxford University Press). Fitzmaurice, Malgosia (2010), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years on (Martinus Nijhoff). Gardiner, Richard (2008), Treaty Interpretation (Oxford University Press). Grant, J. P. et al. eds., The Harvard Research in International Law: Contemporary Analysis and Appraisal (William S. Hein & Company). Grotius, Hugo (1625), Francis W. Kelsey trans. (1964), De Jure Belli ac Pacis: Libri Tres, Sections I, IV, XVI, and XX. Jackson, John (1997), The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations (The MIT Press). Jennings, Robert et al. eds. (1996), Oppenheim’s International Law, Vol. 2 (Pearson Higher Education). McNair, Arnold Duncan (1961), The Law of Treaties, 2nd ed. (Clarendon Press). Mengozzi, P. ed. (1999), International Trade Law on the 50th Anniversary of the Multilateral Trade System (A. Giuffre). Osech, Matthias (2004), Standards of Review in WTO Dispute Resolution (Oxford University Press). Pauwelyn, Joost (2003), Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press). Qureshi, H. Asif (2006), Interpreting WTO Agreements (Cambridge University Press). Sacerdoti, Giorgio et al. eds., The WTO at Ten – The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System (Cambridge University Press). Sinclair, Ian Robertson (1984), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd ed. (Manchester University Press). Ulf Linderfalk (2007), On the Interpretation of Treaties (Springer). Van Damme, Isabelle (2009), Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body (Oxford University Press). Vattel (1758), The Law of Nations (Carnegie Institution). Villiger , Mark Eugen (2009), Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). Zimmermann, Thomas A. (2006), Negotiating the Review of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding, (Cameron May). II. English Journals Bos, Maarten (1990), Theory and Practice of Treaty Interpretation, Netherlands International Law Review 31. Chang-Fa Lo (2010), Good Faith Use of Dictionary in the Search of Ordinary Meaning under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding, 1 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 444-45. Chang-Fa Lo (2011), A Clearer Rule for Dictionary Use Will Not Affect Holistic Approach and Flexibility of Treaty Interpretation—A Rejoinder to Dr Isabelle Van Damme, Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1. Charnovitz, Steve (2005), The Legal Status of the Doha Declaration, 5(1) JIET 207. D. Mitchell, Andrew (2007), The Legal Basis for Using Principles in WTO Disputes, 10(4) Journal of International Economic Law 813-4. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (1999), Dispute Settlement in International Economic Law – Lessons for Strengthening International Dispute Settlement in Non-Economic Areas, 2 Journal of International Economic Law 189. Grosse Ruse – Khan, Henning (2010), A Real Partnership for Development? Sustainable Development as Treaty Objective in European Economic Partnership Agreements and Beyond, 13 Journal of International Economic Law 163-66. I Buffard and K Zemanek (1998), The “Object and Purpose” of a Treaty: An Enigma?, 3 Austrian Review of International and European Law 326. Joseph Powell, Stephen (2004), The Place of Human Rights Law in World Trade Organization Rules, 16 Florida Journal of International Law 219. K. Yu, Peter (2009), The Objectives and Principles of the TRIPS Agreement, 46 Houston Law Review 28. Lennard, Michael (2002), Navigating by the Stars: Interpreting the WTO Agreements, 5(1) JIEL 17. Lindroos, Anja and Mehling, Michael (2006), Dispelling the Chimera of ‘Self-Contained Regimes’ International Law and the WTO, 16 European Journal of International Law 877. McRae, Donald (1996), The Contribution of International Trade Law to the Development of International Law, 260 Recueil des Cours 111. Ortino, Federico (2006), Treaty Interpretation and the Appellate Body Report in US – Gambling: A Critique, 9(1) JIEL 117. Pauwelyn, Joost (2001), The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?, 95 American Journal of International Law 577. Shankar, Daya (2002), The Dispute Settlement System of the WTO and the Doha Declaration on the Trips Agreement, 36(4) JWT 721. Trachtman, Joel P. (1999), The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution, 40(2) Harv. Int’L L. Journal 333. Van Damme, Isabelle (2011), On ‘Good Faith Use of Dictionary in the Search of Ordinary Meaning under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding’ – A Reply to Professor Chang-Fa Lo, 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 231–9. Waibel, Michael, (2011), International Investment Law and Treaty Interpretation, From Clinical Isolation to Systemic Integration 39. III. WTO Documents Appellate Body Report (Apr. 29, 1996), United States – Standard for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline, WT/DS2/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (Oct. 4, 1996), Japan – Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages, WT/DS8, 10, 11/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (Jan. 16, 1998), European Communities – Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), WT/DS26,48/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (Aug. 2, 1999), Brazil – Export Financing Programme for Aircraft, WT/DS46/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (Dec. 19, 1997), India – Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Chemical Products, WT/DS50/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (Oct. 12, 1998), United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, WT/DS58/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (June 22, 1998), European Communities – Customs Classification of Certain Computer Equipment, WT/DS62,67,68/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (Aug. 2, 1999), Canada – Measures Affecting the Export of Civilian Aircraft, WT/DS70/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (Dec. 14, 1999), Korea – Definitive Safeguard Measure on Imports of Certain Dairy Products, WT/DS98/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (Dec. 14, 1999), Argentina – Safeguard Measures on Imports of Footwear, WT/DS121/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (March. 12, 2001), European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products, WT/DS135/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (Sep. 18, 2000), Canada – Term of Patent Protection, WT/DS170/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (Feb. 15, 2002), United States – Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Circular Welded Carbon Quality Line Pipe from Korea, WT/DS202/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (Sep. 23, 2002), Chile – Price Band System and Safeguard Measures Relating to Certain Agricultural Products, WT/DS207/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (April 7, 2004), European Communities – Conditions for the Granting of Tariff Preferences to Developing Countries, WT/DS246/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (Jan. 19, 2004), United States – Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada, WT/DS257/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (Mar. 3, 2005), United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton, WT/DS267/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (Sep. 12, 2005), European Communities – Customs Classification of Frozen Boneless Chicken Cuts, WT/DS269,286/AB/R. Appellate Body Report (April 7, 2005), United States – Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services, WT/DS285/AB/R. Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (Oct. 9, 2007), Private Voluntary Standards within the WTO Multilateral Framework, G/SPS/GEN/802. Panel Report (Aug. 18, 1997), European Communities – Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), WT/DS26/R/USA. Panel Report (May 15, 1998), United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, WT/DS58/R. Panel Report (Mar. 17, 2000), Canada – Patent Protection of Pharmaceutical Products, WT/DS114/R. Panel Report (July 17, 2000), United States – Import Measures on Certain Products from the European Communities, WT/DS165/R. Panel Report (Dec. 21, 2000), United States – Safeguard Measures on imports of Fresh, Chilled or Frozen Lamb Meat from New Zealand and Australia, WT/DS177/R. Panel Report (April 2, 2004), Mexico – Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services, WT/DS204/R. Panel Report (May 3, 2002), Chile – Price Band System and Safeguard Measures Relating to Certain Agricultural Products, WT/DS207/R. Panel Report (Sep. 29, 2006), European Communities – Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, WT/DS291-3/R. Panel Report (Aug. 16, 2010), European Communities and its Member States – Tariff Treatment of Certain Information Technology Products, WT/DS375-7/R. U.N. Conference on the Law of Treaties Official Records, 1st Session, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.39/11 (1969). Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol.1 (United Nations, 1966). Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol.2 (United Nations, 1996). http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_trips_e.htm. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dda_e/dohaexplained_e.htm. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/disp_settlement_cbt_e/c1s3p2_e.htm. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/public_health_faq_e.htm. IV. Other Materials Agus del Tunari v Bolivia (ICSID ARB/02/03), Award of 21 October 2005. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States of America) (Jurisdiction and Admissibility) [1984] ICJ Reports 420. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Adan [2001] 2 AC 477. SGS Societe Generale de Surveillance SA v. Republic of the Philippines (2004) 8 ICSID Reports 515. Status of Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, treaties.un.org. http://www.e-ir.info/2010/06/08/the-colonial-nature-of-international-law. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64291 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 儘管維也納條約法公約第31條第1項、第33條第4項使用「目的及宗旨」之用語,其特性、角色、及適用仍不確定尚待釐清。本論文著重於條約詮釋之目的解釋方法,換句話說,檢驗世界貿易組織爭端解決小組與上訴機構,在詮釋「目的及宗旨」時,其可被理解、確認、及選擇的範圍。
觀察世界貿易組織法律架構,可以發現由於維也納條約法公約第31條反映了目的論元素,世界貿易組織爭端解決小組與上訴機構必須確認條約的目的及宗旨,然後詮釋之並賦予目的及宗旨效果。的確,法律文義此一最重要的元素,在合於目的及宗旨之詮釋下可以最適當理解。再者,大部分條約沒有唯一的目的及宗旨,適當的目的及宗旨的可以使條約被最有效詮釋。然而,世界貿易組織上訴機構常常需要權衡多種不同價值及利益。 目的及宗旨的角色,在維也納條約法公約第33條第4款世界貿易組織爭端解決機制下仍相當程度受限。儘管如此,在調和語言差異時目的及宗旨仍是重要的工具。在世界貿易組織法律架構下,較寬廣且有彈性的詮釋空間是有需要的。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Although the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) Article 31(1) and 33(4) refer to the “object and purpose”, the precise nature, role, and application of its concept present some uncertainty and enigma. This thesis is focused on teleological approach of treaty interpretation, in other words, an examination on how widely “object and purpose” is to be understood, identified, and selected by the Appellate Body and Panels in interpreting the WTO Agreements.
Observing the WTO jurisprudence leads to the finding that since the VCLT Article 31 reflects the teleological element, the Appellate Body and Panels have to ascertain the object and purpose then interpret so as to give effect to that object and purpose. Indeed, the text, which is the main element, is only properly understood when interpreted in light of the treaty’s object and purpose. Furthermore, most treaties have no single object and purpose; the appropriate one should lead to the interpretation that gives effect to the treaty the most. However, the Appellate Body often balances various values or types of interest. The role of object and purpose in Article 33(4) is still quite limited in WTO dispute settlement; nevertheless it is clear that in case of reconciliation of language differences, the object-and-purpose is the outstanding tool. The jurisprudence of the WTO indicates the need for a broader and flexible interpretation. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T17:39:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99a21122-1.pdf: 516245 bytes, checksum: b1840d3337f8a657b67f2b2049010001 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 摘要 iii CONTENTS v Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Significance………………………………………………………………...1 1.2 Objective…………………………………………………………………...2 1.3 Methods……………………………………………………………………3 Chapter 2 Theory of Treaty Interpretation 4 2.1 Concept and Importance of Treaty Interpretation 4 2.2 Classical Era and Modern Era of Treaty Interpretation 7 Chapter 3 Rules of Treaty Interpretation and WTO Jurisprudence 10 3.1 Rules of Treaty Interpretation in VCLT 10 3.2 Importance of Treaty Interpretation for WTO 23 3.3 Relationship between International Law and WTO……………………….24 3.4 WTO Jurisprudence on Treaty Interpretation……………………………...26 Chapter 4 Role of Object and Purpose in Treaty Interpretation and WTO Jurisprudence 41 4.1 Teleological Interpretation 41 4.2 “object and purpose” in VCLT Article 31(1) 44 4.3 “object and purpose” in VCLT Article 33(4) 45 4.4 WTO Jurisprudence on Teleological Interpretation 46 4.5 Operational Roles of Object and Purpose………………………………… 50 Chapter 5 Proper Selection of Different Object and Purpose Sources 53 5.1 Sources of Object and Purpose in the Interpreted Treaty 53 5.2 Sources of Object and Purpose in the Other Treaties 56 5.3 Discussion of Proper Selection of Different Object and Purpose Sources…58 Chapter 6 Conclusion …………………………………………………………….61 REFERENCE 64 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 論WTO司法實踐之目的解釋-妥善之目的識別 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Teleological Interpretation in the WTO Dispute Settlement – Proper Identification of Object and Purpose | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林彩瑜,楊培侃 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 世界貿易組織,維也納條約法公約,條約解釋,目的,目的解釋, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | World Trade Organization,Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties,VCLT,treaty interpretation,object and purpose,teleological interpretation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 72 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 法律學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 504.15 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。