請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64271完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王榮麟 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guoliang Lan | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 藍國亮 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T17:38:00Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-03-05 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-03-05 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-02-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. R. Tuck (Ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Pufendorf, S. (1672). On the law of nature and of nations. (C. H. Oldfather & W. A. Oldfather, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pufendorf, S. (1673). On the duty of man and citizen according to natural law. (M. Silverthorne, Tran.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Clarke, S. (1705). A discourse concerning the unchangeable obligations of natural religion, and the truth and certainty of the christian revelation: the Boyle lectures. Hutcheson, F. (1728). Illustrations on the moral sense. B. Peach (Ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Hume, D. (1739-1740). A treatise of human nature. L. A. Selby-Bigge & P. H. Nidditch (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hume, D. (1748). Enquiry concerning human understanding. L. A. Selby-Bigge & P. H. Nidditch (Eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hume, D. (1751). Enquiry concerning the principles of morals. L. A. Selby-Bigge & P. H. Nidditch (Eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Price, R. (1758). A review of the principal questions in morals. D. D. Raphael (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Kant, I. (1785). Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. (L. W. Beck, Tran.). New York: Macmillan Library of Liberals Arts. Kant, I. (1788). Critique of practical reason. (L. W. Beck, Tran.). New York: Macmillan Library of Liberal Arts. Kant, I. (1797). The metaphysics of morals. (M. Gregor, Tran.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism. G. Sher (Ed.). Indianapolis: Hachett Publishing Company. Moore, G. E. (1903). Principia Ethica. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Ross, W. D. (1930). The right and the good. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Tran.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd. Prichard, H. A. (1968). Moral obligation and duty and interest. essays and lectures by H. A. Prichard. W. D. Ross & J. O. Urmson (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nagel, T. (1970). The possibility of altruism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Korsgaard, C. M. (1995). Creating the kingdom of ends. New York: Cambridge University Press. Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). The sources of normativity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Skorupski, J. (1998). Rescuing moral obligation. European Journal of Philosophy 6: 335-55. Skidmore, J. (2002). Skepticism about practical reason: transcendental arguments and their limits. Philosophical Studies 109: 121-41. Korsgaard, C. M. (2008). The constitution of agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stern, R. (2011). The value of humanity: reflections on Korsgaard’s transcendental argument. In J. Smith & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Transcendental philosophy and naturalism (pp. 74-95). Oxford: Oxford University Press. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64271 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 我的目的在這篇論文中是去證明柯斯嘉德的論證是成功的。為了達到我的目的，我主要是直接闡釋柯斯嘉德的論證以討論她的論證自身是否成功地帶領我們從自由能動性走向道德律。同時，我考慮了一些對柯斯嘉德的論證的批評並且給出了我的回應以支持柯斯嘉德的論證。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | My aim in this thesis is to prove that Korsgaard’s project works. To achieve my goal, I mainly interpreted Korsgaard’s work directly in details to inspect whether her work itself succeeds in getting us from free agency to the moral law. At the same time, I considered some objections from Skorupski and gave my replies to them. In doing so, I took myself to be able to back up Korsgaard’s project. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T17:38:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-R03124013-1.pdf: 5601294 bytes, checksum: 239f387e6047d0ed4b654d4db7ef375a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………… i
中文摘要…………………………………………………………… ii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………. iii 第一章 Introduction……………………………………………….. 1 第二章 From Free Agency to the Categorical Imperative……….. 13 第三章 From the Categorical Imperative to the Moral Law （Step 1: The Value of Your Own Humanity）….………………………….. 22 第四章 From the Categorical Imperative to the Moral Law （Step 2: The Value of Humanity in General）……………………………….. 27 第五章 Conclusion……………………………………………….. 38 參考文獻……………………………………………………….…… 40 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 柯斯嘉德論規範性的來源 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Korsgaard on the Source of Normativity | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王華,祖旭華 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 柯斯嘉德,規範性,理性運作,道德律,構成論, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Korsgaard,normativity,reasoning,the moral law,constitutivism, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 42 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202000652 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-02-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 哲學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-109-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 5.47 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。