請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63849完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王淑美(Shu-Mei Wang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Hsiu Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡宜修 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T17:20:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-02-22 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-22 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-02-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 天下雜誌(2017)。你不知道的高麗菜身世之謎。檢自:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5081728?template=fashion 自由時報(2017)。十大神農種高麗菜年獲利百萬。檢自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/local/paper/1075380 自由時報(2020)。高麗菜栽種紫爆台南農改場端出高麗菜特色料理促銷。檢自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/3354057 行政院農業委員會(2007)。初識甘藍。檢自:https://kmweb.coa.gov.tw/subject/subject.php?id=13322 余舜德(2019)。人類學家為何關心高麗菜的甜與脆。人文社會科學, 漫步科研科普專欄,中央研究院,民族研究所。 林克憲、翁振隆(2016)。高麗菜有這麼多種?口感特色一次看懂!食譜自由配。檢自:https://food.ltn.com.tw/article/1243 林建煌(2019)。消費者行為六版。華泰文化事業股份有限公司,台北,台灣。 洪泰雄(2019)。那些吃東西教我的事。原水文化事業有限公司,台北,台灣。 風傳媒(2018)。吃高麗菜能防心血管疾病、抗大腸癌,低卡又健康!營養師教你「這樣煮」留住營養。檢自:https://www.storm.mg/lifestyle/711157 曹幸之、廖芳心、李阿嬌、許家言、王自存、黃益田(2020)。譯自Vegetable Production and Practices, Gregory E. Welbaum,蔬菜學Vegetable Production and Practices。五南文化事業機構,台北,台灣。 陳葦玲(2017)。美國加州蔬菜及其種苗產業現況。豐年,67,100-107。 黃惠鈴(2020)。高麗菜將盛產專家教挑選3方法1錯誤觀念。檢自:https://udn.com/news/story/7266/5023729。 農產品批發市場交易行情站。檢自:http://amis.afa.gov.tw/veg/VegChartProdTransPriceVolumeTrend.aspx 農傳媒(2019)。臺灣高麗菜啟動銷加農糧署:產季出口目標逾500噸。檢自:https://www.agriharvest.tw/archives/6224 農業兒童網(2015)。生物、環境、人文主體探索館:蔬菜。檢自:https://kids.coa.gov.tw/view.php?func=knowledge subfunc=kids_knowledge category=A13 id=57 蔡本原(2017)。甘藍產品交易價量之分析。臺中區農業專訊,96,1-2。 鄭尚騏(2020)。利用資訊科技輔助台灣農產品生產者調節供需知研究─以甘藍菜為例。國立政治大學商學院經營管理碩士學程,碩士學位論文。 蕭政弘(2017)。甘藍產業特性與品種類型。臺中區農業專訊,96,3-5。 蕭政弘、陳葦玲(2013)。甘藍新品種台中2號育成簡介。農情與農政,256,93-94。 Bhuian, S. N. (1997). Marketing cues and perceived quality: Perceptions of Saudi consumers toward products of the US, Japan, Germany, Italy, UK and France. Journal of Quality management, 2(2), 217-234. Bolton, R. N., Lemon, K. N. (1999). A dynamic model of customers’ usage of services: Usage as an antecedent and consequence of satisfaction. Journal of marketing research, 36(2), 171-186. Chen, K.Y. (2011). Effects of servicescape, waiting experiences and price rationality onconsumers’ behavioral intentions in scenery restaurants. African Journal of Business Management , 5(11): 4476-4484. Cooper, D. R., Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods(12th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Espejel, J.B., Fandos, C., Flavián, C. (2007). The role of intrinsic and extrinsic qualityattributes on consumers’behaviour for traditional food products. Managing Service Quality, 17(6): 681-701. Fan, X., Gómez, M. I., Coles, P. S. (2019). Willingness to Pay, Quality Perception, and Local Foods: The Case of Broccoli. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 48(3), 414-432. Grunert, K. G. (2005). Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand. European review of agricultural economics, 32(3), 369-391. Ha, J., Jang, S. S. (2010). Effects of service quality and food quality: The moderating role of atmospherics in an ethnic restaurant segment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(3), 520-529. Hanna, N., Wozniak, R. (2001). Consumer behavior: An applied approach (Doctoral dissertation, Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta). Horska, E., Ürgeová, J., Prokeinova, R. (2011). Consumers’ food choice and quality perception: Comparative analysis of selected Central European countries. Agricultural Economics, 57(10), 493-499. Kader, A. A., Kosmire, K. F., Mitchell, F. G., Reid, M. S., Sommer, N. F., Thompson, J. F. (1985). Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops.* Coop. Ext. Univ. of California Div. of Agriculture and Natural Resources*. 192, 58-64. Keraita, B., Drechsel, P. (2015). Consumer perceptions of fruit and vegetable quality: certification and other options for safeguarding public health in West Africa. (Vol. 164). International Water Management Institute (IWMI). López Camelo, A. F. L. (2004). Manual for the preparation and sale of fruits and vegetables: from field to market (Vol. 151). Food Agriculture Org.. Madichie, N. O. (2012). Consumer Perception, in book Consumer Behaviour: Text Cases (pp.153-174). Publisher: Tata McGraw Hill. Magistris, T., Gracia, A. (2008). The decision to buy organic food products in SouthernItaly. British Food Journal, 110(9): 929–947. Moslehpour, M., Aulia, C. K., Masarie, C. E. (2015). Bakery product perception and purchase intention of Indonesian consumers in Taiwan. International Journal of Business Information, 10(1), 63-94. Yano, Y., Blandford, D., Maruyama, A., Nakamura, T. (2018). Consumer perceptions of fresh leafy vegetables in Japan, An application of word co-occurrence network analysis. British Food Journal, 120 (11), 2554-2568. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end modeland synthesis of evidences. Journal of Marketing, 52 (3), 2-22. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63849 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究從研究動機開始就鎖定高麗菜做為研究標的,並探討高麗菜最終消費者(非購買者)、高麗菜最終消費者(購買者)、批發商和生產者對高麗菜的品質認知,鑑於任何知覺的形成,均必須先經由感官來感受刺激,每一種感官都有其獨特性,因此,本研究係以五種感官作為探討的基礎,並透過問卷調查來探詢高麗菜最終消費者(非購買者)、高麗菜最終消費者(購買者)、批發商和生產者對高麗菜的品質認知。並試圖達到左列各項目的:探討高麗菜最終消費者(非購買者)品質認知、探討高麗菜最終消費者(購買者)品質認知、探討高麗菜批發商購買高麗菜的品質認知、探討高麗菜生產者的品質認知、以及進行利害關係人對高麗菜品質認知差異性之比較。 透過問卷調查收集資料,總回收之有效樣本數為820份,其中高麗菜最終消費者(非購買者)有353份,高麗菜最終消費者(購買者)有331份,高麗菜批發商有59份,高麗菜生產者有77份,並利用SPSS統計軟體進行資料分析。 利用單因子變異數分析比較高麗菜產銷鏈中利害關係人對五個感知的差異性,發現四類族群對五個感知的評分有顯著的差異,尤其是視覺和味覺更呈現極顯著的差異。經事後檢定發現在視覺和味覺認知中,高麗菜批發商顯著的高於高麗菜最終消費者(非購買者)和高麗菜最終消費者(購買者),在視覺認知中亦呈現生產者顯著的高於消費者。在聽覺認知中批發商顯著的高於生產者。若將問卷採正確與否之二分法來分,高麗菜最終消費者(非購買者)與高麗菜最終消費者(購買者)對高麗菜的嗅覺最為正確與了解。但高麗菜批發商在整體問卷量表正確率確實優於其他三型接觸者,此代表批發商在採購上具有專業的判斷能力。 本研究之重要貢獻在於將高麗菜產銷鏈上的參與者做一整體性的盤點。另外,上述各項發現,更證實高麗菜產銷鏈上的參與者對品質認知確實存在顯著的差異,尤其是處於最前端的批發商是各項認知的啟動者,此亦是本研究在實務上的一大貢獻。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study has focused on cabbage as a research target on the beginning of the research motivation, to explore the quality perception of cabbage end consumers (non-purchasers), cabbage end consumers (buyers), wholesalers and producers. Based on the formation of any perception, the stimulation must be felt through the senses. Each sense organ has its own uniqueness. Therefore, this study uses the five senses as a basis for exploring, and uses questionnaires to inquire about cabbage quality perception of end consumers (non-purchasers), cabbage end consumers (purchasers), wholesalers and producers. The purposes of this study are to explore the quality perceptions of cabbage on consumers, wholesalers and producers, and try to achieve the following objectives: to explore the quality perceptions of cabbage in end consumer (non-purchasers), to explore the quality perception of cabbage in end consumers (purchasers), to explore the quality perception of cabbage on wholesalers, and to compare the quality perception of cabbage among different participation entities on cabbage marketing. Collecting data through questionnaire surveys, the number of effective samples is 820, of which 353 were consumers who did not purchase cabbage, 331 were consumers who bought cabbage, 59 were from wholesalers, and 77 were from cabbage producers and using SPSS statistical software for data analysis, the important findings are as follows: Using one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) to compare the differences in five -perception among different participants in the cabbage production and marketing chain. It is found that the scores of the five-perception among the four participation entities indicate significant differences, especially the visual and taste perceptions. With the post hoc tests, it is found that wholesalers of cabbage are significantly higher than consumers and cabbage purchasers in visual and taste perception. It also shows that producers are significantly higher than consumers. In the auditory perception, the wholesalers are significantly higher than the producers. The important contribution of this study lies in the overall inspection of the participants in the cabbage production and marketing chain. The findings from the empirical results further confirm that participants in the cabbage production and marketing chain do have significant differences in their perceptions of quality. Especially the wholesalers at the forefront are the initiators of various perceptions. This is a major contribution of this study in practice. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T17:20:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0202202122034100.pdf: 2359653 bytes, checksum: 6eeb15a9982caa9e86e071cfa8f21bab (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i 誌謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract v 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 x 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 高麗菜產業現況 5 一、高麗菜的介紹 5 二、高麗菜產地與品種 11 第二節 高麗菜的品質認知 13 第三章 研究方法 16 第一節 研究架構與假設 16 第二節 問卷設計 17 一、個人基本資料 17 二、消費者對高麗菜品質認知題項 17 第三節 資料收集與分析方法 21 一、資料收集方法 21 二、研究方法 21 第四章 實證結果與分析 22 第一節 基本資料描述性統計 22 第二節 高麗菜各利害關係人題項之描述性統計 33 一、高麗菜最終消費者(非購買者) 33 二、高麗菜最終消費者(購買者)對五個構面之描述性統計 35 三、高麗菜批發商 38 四、高麗菜生產者 41 第三節 高麗菜四個利害關係人之比較 44 一、高麗菜不同利害關係人對五個感知之綜合評分 44 二、不同類型高麗菜利害關係人對五個感知的比較 46 三、不同高麗菜利害關係人對問卷題項之比較 46 四、實證結果與研究假設之檢視 49 第五章 結論與建議 52 第一節 結論 52 第二節 建議 54 參考文獻 57 附錄 61 消費者、批發商與生產者對高麗菜的品質認知之研究 61 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 產銷鏈 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高麗菜利害關係人 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 五個感知 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 品質認知 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高麗菜 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Cabbage | en |
| dc.subject | Quality perceptions | en |
| dc.subject | Participation entities in cabbage marketing | en |
| dc.subject | Production and marketing chain | en |
| dc.subject | Five-perception | en |
| dc.title | 消費者、批發商與生產者對高麗菜品質之五感認知研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on the Five-Perception of Cabbage Quality in Consumers,Wholesalers, and Farmers | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王俊豪(Jiun-Hao Wang),黃昱凱(Yu-Kai Huang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 高麗菜,品質認知,五個感知,產銷鏈,高麗菜利害關係人, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Cabbage,Quality perceptions,Five-perception,Production and marketing chain,Participation entities in cabbage marketing, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 63 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100414 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-02-04 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0202202122034100.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.3 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
