請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63687
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張文貞(Wen-Chen Chang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hui-Ling Hung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 洪彗玲 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T17:16:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
中文專書 俞寬賜 (2005)。《國際法新論》。台北:啟英文化。 姜皇池 (2006)。《國際公法導論》。台北:新學林。 廖福特 (2007)。《人權法論叢》。台北:廖福特。 廖福特 (2005)。《國際人權法─議題分析與國內實踐,聯合國對國家人權委員會之推動與實踐》。台北:元照出版。 廖福特 (2011)。《國家人權委員會》。台北:五南。 期刊論文與專書論文 高涌誠 (2012)。〈《兩公約民間社團影子報告》序二─以光映照出政府幽暗的人權侵害〉,廖福特主編:《2011年台灣人權報告:兩公約民間社團影子報告》,頁1-2,台北:台灣人權促進會、兩公約施行監督聯盟。 張文貞 (2009)。〈憲法與國際人權法的匯流──兼論我國大法官解釋之實踐〉,《憲法解釋之理論與實務第六輯(上冊)》,頁225-230,台北:中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處。 張文貞 (2010)。〈大法官不受理死刑釋憲之評析〉,《大法官,給個說法!3》,頁356-357,台北:新學林出版。 張文貞 (2010)。〈國際人權法與內國憲法的匯流:台灣施行兩大人權公約之後〉,《台灣法學新課題〈八〉》,頁1-26,台北:元照出版。 張文貞 (2012),〈演進中的法:一般性意見作為國際人權公約的權威解釋〉,《台灣人權學刊》,第1卷第2期,頁38-41,台北:東吳大學張佛泉人權研究中心。 許宏迪 (2005),全球人權治理的啟示:以台灣設立國家人權委員會為中心,台灣大學:碩士論文。 陳怡凱 (2010),〈國際人權公約之內國效力─以公民與政治權公約暨經濟社會文化權公約施行法為例〉,《台灣法學新課題〈八〉》,頁27-68,台北:元照出版。 黃文雄 (2012),〈《兩公約民間社團影子報告》序一─如果你想知道這究竟是怎麼一回事?〉,廖福特主編:《2011年台灣人權報告:兩公約民間社團影子報告》,初版,頁III-VIII,台北:台灣人權促進會、兩公約施行監督聯盟。 廖福特 (2008),〈聯合國與人權保護〉,陳隆志等編,《聯合國:體制、功能,與發展》,頁339-368,台北:新學林。 廖福特(2010),〈不受酷刑作為權利──以國際標準建構我國憲法規範〉,《憲法解釋之理論與實務第七輯》,頁441-481,台北:中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處。 廖福特 (2012),〈《兩公約民間社團影子報告》導讀〉,廖福特主編:《2011年台灣人權報告:兩公約民間社團影子報告》,初版,頁3-6,台北:台灣人權促進會、兩公約施行監督聯盟。 司法院大法官解釋 司法院大法官解釋釋字第392號解釋。 司法院大法官解釋釋字第582號解釋。 其他 立法院公報,98卷14期 中華民國作為簽約國報告組成部分的核心文件 《公民與政治權利國際公約》執行情形─簽約國根據《公約》第40條提交的初次報告 法務部委託研究:國際公約內國法化研究報告 《經濟社會文化權利國際公約》執行情形─簽約國根據《公約》第16條及第17條提交的初次報告 聯合國官方文獻 U.N. Human Rights Comm., Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant, Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Comm.: Japan, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/JPN/CO/5 (Oct. 30, 2008) U.N. Human Rights Comm., Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant, Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Comm.: Japan, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.28 (Nov. 5, 1993). U.N. Human Rights Comm., Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant, Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Comm.: Japan, U.N. Doc. A/43/40 (Sep. 28, 1988) U.N. Human Rights Comm., Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant, Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Comm.: Japan, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.102 (Nov. 19, 1998); U.N. Human Rights Comm., Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant, Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Comm.: Republic of Korea, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/KOR/CO/3 (Nov. 28, 2006). U.N. Human Rights Comm., Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant, Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Comm.: Republic of Korea, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.6 (Oct. 9, 1992) U.N. Human Rights Comm., Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant, Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Comm.: Republic of Korea, 22, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.114 (Nov. 1, 1999) U.N. Human Rights Comm., Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant, Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Comm.: China, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/HKG/CO/2 (Apr. 21, 2006) U.N. Human Rights Comm., Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant, Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Comm.: China, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.117 (Nov. 12, 1999) U.N. Human Rights Committee, General Comment 8, Right to liberty and security of persons (article 9), (1982). Retrieved from http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/c4007d6e34e519a1c1256eac002f3173?Opendocument . U.N. Human Rights Committee, General Comment 23, the Rights of minorities (art. 27), U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.5 (1994), Retrieved from http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/0/fb7fb12c2fb8bb21c12563ed004df111?Opendocument . U.N. Human Rights Committee, General Comment 26, Continuity of obligations, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.8/Rev.1 (1997). Retrieved from http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/06b6d70077b4df2c8025655400387939?Opendocument . U.N. Human Rights Committee, General Comment 30, Reporting obligations of States parties (article 40), U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.2/Add.12 (2002). Retrieved from http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/c4007d6e34e519a1c1256eac002f3173?Opendocument . Communication No. 167/1984 (Bernard Ominayak, Chief of the Lubicon Lake Band v. Canada). Communication No. 197/1985 (Kitok v. Sweden). Communication No. 182/1984 (F.H. Zwaan-de Vries v. the Netherlands). Communication No. 220/1987 (T.K. v. France); Communication No. 167/1984 (Bernard Ominayak, Chief of the Lubicon Lake Band v. Canada) 英文參考文獻 Buergenthal T. (2001). The Human Rights Committee, 5 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 341, 347. Byrnes A. (2000). Uses and abuses of the treaty reporting procedure: Hong Kong between two systems. In Alston P. & Crawford J. (Eds.), The future of UN human rights treaty monitoring (p. 288). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Chen A. H. (2009). International Human Rights Law and Domestic Constitutional Law. National Taiwan University Law Review, 4, 237-333. Conte A., Davidson S. & Burchill R. (2004). Defining civil and political rights: the jurisprudence of the United Nations Human Rights Committee. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing. Edward D. (2003), The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Effective Remedies and the Domestic Courts, 33 California Western International Law Journal 137, 160-62. Forsythe D. P. & McMaon P. C. (2003). Rights, practices, and “area studies”. In Forsythe D. P. & McMaon P. C. (Eds.), Human rights and diversity (pp. 304-308). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. Hannum, H. (1996) The Status of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in National and International Law, 25 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 287, 319. Joseph S., Schultz J. & Castan M. (2004). The Intern ational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, materials, and commentary. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press. Kedzia Z. (2003). United Nations mechanisms to promote and protect human rights. In Symonides J. (Eds.), Human rights: international protection, monitoring, enforcement (pp. 3-49). Burlington, USA: UNESCO Publishing. Landman, T. (2005). Protecting Human Rights: A Comparative Study. Georgetown, Tex.: Georgetown University Press. Lillich R. B., Hannum H., Anaya J. & Shelton D. L. (2006). International human rights: problems of law, policy, and practice. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers. Louis Henkin (1990), The Age of Rights. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Nowak M. (2005). Covenant on civil and political rights: CCPR commentary. Arlington, VA: N.P. Engel, Publisher. Onuf, N. (2008). International Legal Theory: Essays and Engagements, New York, NY: Routledge-Cavendish Rodley N. (2004). United Nations human rights treaty bodies and special procedures of the commission on human rights- complementarity or competition? In Ando N. (Eds.), Towards implementing universal human rights (pp. 3-24). Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Scheinin M. (2004). The human rights committee’s pronouncements on the right to an effective remedy- an illustration of the legal nature of the committee’s work under the optional protocol. In Ando N. (Eds.), Towards implementing universal human rights (pp. 101-115). Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Shaw, M. (2003). International Law. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Slyz, G. (1995-1996) International Law in National Courts. 28 New York University Journal of International Law and Policy 65, 67-71. Steiner, H. J., Alston, P. & Goodman, R. (2008). International human rights in context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. TYAGI, Y. (2011). The UN Human Rights Committee. Cambridge, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Yeh, J. R. and Chang, W. C., The Emergence of East Asian Constitutionalism: Features in Comparison, 59 American Journal of Comparative LAW 805, 805-833. 網路資源 人權事務高級專員辦事處:世界人權文書http://www.ohchr.org/CH/Issues/Pages/UniversalHumanRightsInstruments.aspx (2012/07/14) 中華民國總統府:總統府上午召開人權議題工作會議新聞稿http://www.president.gov.tw/Default.aspx?tabid=131&itemid=19532 (2012/07/18) 法務部:人權大步走計畫http://www.humanrights.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=231678&CtNode=30510&mp=200 (2012/7/31) 法務部:公民與政治權利國際公約與經濟社會文化權利國際公約國家人權報告http://www.humanrights.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=267054&ctNode=30551&mp=200 (2012/07/14) 香港特別行政區政府:香港警務處http://www.police.gov.hk/ppp_tc/11_useful_info/cap.html (2012/07/17) 香港人權法條例http://www.youngthinker.net/wiki/index.php?doc-view-1018 (2012/07/17) 中華民國第十任總統陳水扁宣示就職演說全文〈台灣站起來─迎接向上提升的新時代〉http://www.taiwan-panorama.com/show_issue.php?id=200068906078c.txt&table=0&h1=%A5x%C6W%BCg%AFu&h2=%ACF%AAv(2012/07/17) 外交部通訊第27卷第1期:鑑往知來─我國退出聯合國之回顧與展望特展http://multilingual.mofa.gov.tw/web/web_UTF-8/out/2701/domestic02.html(2012/07/18) 香港申訴專員公署http://www.ombudsman.hk/index.shtml(2012/07/18) 獨立監察警方處理投訴委員會http://www.ipcc.gov.hk/ (2012/07/16) 臺灣國際勞工協會http://www.tiwa.org.tw/index.php?itemid=221 (2012/07/11) Anti Death Penalty Asia Network. Retrieved from http://adpan.net/facts-figures/abolitionist-in-practice/south-korea/ (2012/07/31) Daiyo kangoku. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daiyo_kangoku (2012/07/15) Human Rights Committee: General Comment. Retrieved from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/comments.htm (2012/04/08) Human Rights Committee: Sessions and the Follow-up to Concluding Observations. Retrieved from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/sessions.htm (2012/07/18) International Labour Organization. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/global/standards/subjects-covered-by-international-labour-standards/migrant-workers/lang--en/index.htm (2012/07/16) Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved from http://tb.ohchr.org/default.aspx?ConvType=12&docType=36 (2012/07/18) Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights: International Law. Retrieved from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/index.htm (2012/07/14) United Nations Treaty Collection: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Retrieved from http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&lang=en (2012/04/09) United Nations Treaty Collection: Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Retrieved from http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-5&chapter=4&lang=en (2012/04/09) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63687 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 於兩公約自1976年施行的三十四年後,我國立法院終於在2009年3月31日以條約案方式批准《兩公約》、制定《兩公約施行法》,兩公約並於同年12月10日正式施行。2012年4月,我國作出了初次報告書,民間團體立即於同年5月作成影子報告,由此可看出我國未來的人權法發展將與《兩公約》緊密結合,我國欲實踐《兩公約》,則必須關注人權事務委員近來功能演進情形,以及委員會針對締約國落實《兩公約》之相關建議與要求。
本論文自委員會的權限出發,以觀察委員會之功能演變,先依委員會作成國家報告審查意見之權限,隨著時間推移是否擴張、或創設更多的權限,使得委員會於作成審查意見之方式更多元、更能有效率地要求締約國提交國家報告等;再以同樣之切入角度討論委員會作成一般性意見、及個人申訴案之審查意見之權限演變。最後,則嘗試歸納委員會作成各文件之權限演變流程,並以時間作為委員會功能演進之決定性因素,區分出三段時期,以說明委員會作成三種文件之權限於各個階段皆表現出何種特色,以及三段時期間的演進是否有共同之方向,乃「有意識地」朝功能擴張之演變邁進。 由於我國國家無法接受人權事務委員會的官方審查,故僅能仰賴委員會與其他締約國間的互動作為我國的啟示。其中,東亞締約國與我國間歷史、文化背景的相似性,且因我國與東亞締約國間立法上常有所參照,具有學習、比較上的實用性,因此以人權事務委員會與東亞締約國間的互動作為本論文的觀察重點。首先將觀察委員會針對東亞締約國提交之國家報告,所作成之審查意見是否依前述的功能演進各個時期,針對締約國做出不同程度之要求;再歸納出委員會於針對各國作成之審查意見中,相同之演進趨勢、同樣重視之議題、建議等,亦與委員會功能演進之過程有所關聯,則可發現,委員會功能擴張的歷程中,東亞締約國亦受有越來越多來自委員會的要求及壓力。此外,儘管東亞締約國批准、加入《公民與政治權利國際公約》的時點不一,然可發現委員會於同一時期中對待東亞各締約國的態度並無二致,亦即委員會面對締約國的態度乃取決於其所屬之功能演進時期,而非取決於締約國批准、加入《公約》之先後。此外,並可發現委員會功能擴張的進程中,影響所及並非只是委員會的單方作為,更影響東亞締約國的回應模式,亦即東亞締約國亦因委員會越發活絡、動態的發展,而更加正面、積極地回應委員會建議,並歸納出東亞締約國於選擇回應模式上的共通發展。 最後,本論文將重心置於我國於今年4月、及5月新作成之初次報告書、及影子報告,先說明我國簽署及批准《公民與政治權利國際公約》之過程,再分別說明我國初次報告書及影子報告,並對照兩者之差異。最後,本論文將東亞國家與委員會互動共通處的觀察成果,作為檢討我國初次報告書之基準,說明依照委員會歷來審查國家報告之經驗,其所期待締約國實踐人權之情形為何,以及我國應如何加以改善。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Since the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (hereafter “the ICCPR”) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (hereafter “the ICESCR”) came into force in 1976, it took 34 years for the Legislative Yuan of Republic of China to finally ratify the two Covenants in March 2009, and legislate the Act to Implement the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economics, Social and Cultural Rights. Both of the Covenants came into force on December 2009. Also, initial report of Republic of China has been submitted in April 2012, and the NGOs immediately submitted shadow reports in the very next month. It is obvious that the future of our domestic human rights law is connected to both of the ICCPR and the ICESCR. Therefore for us to implement the Covenants, it is necessary to focus on the functional developments of Human Rights Committee (hereafter “the Committee”), and the suggestions which the Committee gave to the State Parties.
This thesis will first look into the provisions of the ICCPR concerning the Committee, then observing the functional developments of the Committee until now. By analyzing the three instruments made by the Committee, which are concluding observation, general comment, and the consideration of the communication, this thesis would like to pinpoint that the functions of the ICCPR has been expanded as time passed. The attitude of the Committee has been reconstructed from passive toward active and ever dynamic. Also, this thesis would like to divide the functional developments of the Committee into three periods to tell the transition of the Committee. Moreover, by pinpointing the feature of each period, this thesis would like to prove that the Committee is knowingly expanding its functions through each period. Since Taiwan cannot submit the initial report to the Committee, and can never receive an official concluding observation from the Committee, it is significant to look into the interactions between the Committee and the State Parties as implications. This thesis would like to focus on the interactions between the Committee and the State Parties in East Asia for the similarity to Taiwan in history, culture, and legislation. First, this thesis would like to find the differences between the suggestions made by the Committee under each functional development period; also, to conclude the common issues, and the common developing trend between each State Parties in East Asia. Last but not least, this thesis would find that the more active the Committee is, the more positive the State Parties in East Asia would be in responding suggestions in concluding observations. The last part of this thesis would focus on the initial report of Taiwan. First, introduce the initial report and the shadow report, and compare the differences between them. Then, based on the conclusion of the common parts of the interactions between the State Parties in East Asia and the Committee, pinpoint the parts of the initial reports which would fulfill the requirements of the Committee, and the parts which needs to be proved, and shed some implications to the implementation of the ICCPR in Taiwan. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T17:16:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R98a21031-1.pdf: 1387215 bytes, checksum: 060f59f8e9fe2943dd8b08caaf7c7f1d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
1. 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究範圍 3 1.3 研究方法 4 1.4 名詞定義 5 1.5 論文架構 6 2. 人權事務委員會之功能演進 8 2.1 人權事務委員會之設立緣起 8 2.2 人權事務委員會之權限 11 2.2.1 國家報告 13 2.2.2 一般性意見 15 2.2.3 個人申訴 16 2.3 人權事務委員會之功能演進 18 2.3.1 國家報告 18 2.3.1.1 固守文義時期(1977年至1987年) 19 2.3.1.2 積極適用時期(1987年至2001年) 20 2.3.1.3 動態擴張時期(2001年至今) 23 2.3.2 一般性意見 25 2.3.2.1 協助國家報告撰寫時期(1981年至1986年) 25 2.3.2.2 解釋公約時期(1988年至1993年) 25 2.3.2.3 公約體系化時期(1994年至今) 26 2.3.3 個人申訴案 27 2.3.3.1 登記之個人申訴案趨勢 27 2.3.3.2 受理案件趨勢 29 2.4 本章結論 32 3. 人權事務委員會與東亞國家報告之互動 34 3.1 東亞各國簽署《公民與政治權利國際公約》之情形 35 3.2 簡述東亞各締約國國家報告之審查意見 36 3.2.1 日本 37 3.2.2 南韓 37 3.3 審查意見之演進 39 3.3.1 形式之演進 40 3.3.1.1 回文形式 40 3.3.1.2 架構 44 3.3.1.3 篇幅 47 3.3.1.4 建議形式 48 3.3.2 實質之演進 50 3.3.2.1人權相關訓練 51 3.3.2.2公開國家報告與審查意見 52 3.3.2.3援引委員會作成之其他文件 54 3.3.2.4建立內國人權機制 54 3.3.2.5後續報告 55 3.3.2.6簽署其他人權公約 56 3.4 委員會與東亞各締約國之議題互動 58 3.4.1 共通關注之議題 58 3.4.1.1 性別平等 59 3.4.1.2 家庭暴力 61 3.4.1.3 少數民族 63 3.4.1.4 外國人 65 3.4.1.5 刑事人權 68 3.4.1.6 死刑 72 3.4.2 東亞締約國之回應模式 74 3.5 本章結論 79 4. 公民與政治權利公約在臺灣之實踐 83 4.1 公民與政治權利公約之簽署及生效 83 4.2 觀察我國初次報告書與影子報告 86 4.2.1 我國初次報告書 86 4.2.2 影子報告 88 4.2.3 初次報告書與影子報告之對照 89 4.2.3.1 形式差異 90 4.2.3.2 實質差異 91 4.3 以東亞締約國之審查經驗檢討我國初次報告書 91 4.3.1 依委員會之「整體建議」檢討我國初次報告書 92 4.3.1.1 人權相關訓練 92 4.3.1.2 公開國家報告 93 4.3.1.3 援引委員會作成之其他文件 94 4.3.1.4 建立內國人權機制 95 4.3.1.5 簽署其他人權公約 97 4.3.1.6 個人申訴案 99 4.3.1.7 小結 100 4.3.2 依東亞共通議題檢討我國初次報告書 101 4.3.2.1 性別平等 102 4.3.2.1.1 公部門、企業之性別比例 102 4.3.2.1.2 性別平等相關立法 104 4.3.2.2 家庭暴力 106 4.3.2.3 少數民族 107 4.3.2.4 外國人 107 4.3.2.4.1 外國人驅逐之相關規範 108 4.3.2.4.2 對外國勞工之歧視 109 4.3.2.5 刑事人權 112 4.3.2.5.1 防免、追究酷刑加害人之法律責任 113 4.3.2.5.2 關於拘禁被告人身自由之限制 115 4.3.2.5.3 懲處受刑人之相關要求 118 4.3.2.5.4 被告之接見通信權與閱卷權 118 4.3.2.6 死刑 120 4.3.2.7 小結 124 4.4 本章結論 125 5. 結論 127 參考文獻 129 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 人權事務委員會之功能演進:以其與東亞締約國的互動為中心 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Functional Developments of the Human Rights Committee: With a Special Focus on Its Interactions with the State Parties in East Asia | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉俊榮(Jiunn-Rong Yeh),廖福特(Fu-Te Liao) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 國際人權法,人權事務委員會,《公民與政治權利國際公約》,東亞共通人權議題,國家報告,一般性意見,個人申訴案, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | International Human Rights,Human Rights Committee,the ICCPR,the common issues of State Parties in East Asia,concluding observation,general comment,communication, | en |
dc.relation.page | 137 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 法律學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.35 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。