請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63649完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳正興 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Ching Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡煜青 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T17:15:39Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2012-08-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.AASHTO, “Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. (2009).
2.ACI Committee 318, “Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-05) and commentary (ACI 318-05),” American (2005). 3.American Petroleum Institute, “API Recommended Practice for Planning, Design, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms-working Stress Design,” Report RP-2A-WSD Report RP 2A (2000). 4.Applied Technology Council ATC-32, “Improved Seismic Design Criteria for California Bridges: Provisional Recommendations,” Redwood City, California (1996). 5.Applied Technology Council (ATC), “ Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings,” ATC-40 Report, Redwood City, California (1996). 6.Banerjee, S., Stanton, J. F. and Hawkins, N. M., “Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Bridge Piles,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 113, pp. 381−396 (1987). 7.Bhushan, K., Haley, S. C. and Fong, P. T., “Lateral Load Tests on Drilled Piers in Stiff Clays,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 105, GT8, pp. 969−985 (1979). 8.Budek, A. M., “The Inelastic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Piles and Pile Shafts,” PhD thesis, Univ. of California, San Diego (1997). 9.Budek, A. M., Pristley, M. J. N. and Benzoni, G., “Inelastic Seismic Response of Bridge Drilled- Shaft RC Pile/Columns,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 126, pp. 510−517 (2000). 10.Budek, A. M. and Benzoni, G., “Obtaining Ductile Performance from Precast, Prestressed Concrete Piles,” PCI Journal, 54, pp. 64−80 (2009). 11.Budek, A.M., and Benzoni, G. “Rational Seismic Design of Precast, Prestressed Concrete Piles,” PCI Journal, 53(5), 40-53 (2008). 12.Chai, Y. H., “Flexural Strength and Ductility of Extended Pile-Shafts. I: Analytical Model,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 128, pp. 586−594 (2002). 13.Chai, Y. H. and Hutchinson, T. C., “Flexural Strength and Ductility of Extended Pile-Shafts. II: Experimental Study,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 128, pp. 595−602 (2002). 14.Chai, Y.H. and Song, S.T., “Assessment of Seismic Performance of Extended Pile-shafts.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(12), 1937-1954 (2003). 15.Chang, Y.L., “ Discussion on Lateral Pile-loading Test by Feagin,” Transaction, ASCE (1937). 16.Chang, W.F. and Chen, A.C.T., “Strength of Laterally Loaded Reinforced Concrete Columns,” IABSE Symposium on Design and Safety of Reinforced Concrete Compression Members, Quebec, Preliminary Publication, pp. 315-322 (1974). 17.Chiou, J.S., and Chen, C.H, “ Displacement Ductility Capacity of Fixed-head Piles,” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, San Diego, Calif., 24–29 May 2010. Edited by S. Prakash. Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, Mo. Paper No. 9-10 (2010). 18.Chiou, J.S., Yang, H.H., and Chen, C.H., “Use of Plastic Hinge Model in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of a Pile.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineeering, 135(9), 1341-1346 (2009). 19.Chiou, J.S. and Chen, C.H., “Exact Equivalent Model for a Laterally-loaded Linear Pile-soil System,” Soils and foundations, 47(6), 1053-1061 (2007). 20.Gere, J.M. and Timoshenko S.P., “Mechanics of Materials,” Wadsworth, Inc., California (1984). 21.International Navigation Association, “Seismic Design Guidelines for Port Structures,” A.A. Balkema, Tokyo (2001). 22.Joen, P.H., and Park, R., “Flexural Strength and Ductility Analysis of Spirally Reinforced Prestressed Concrete Piles. PCI Journal,” 35 (4): 64–83 (1990). 23.Kowalsky, M.J. , “Deformation Limit States for Circular Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(8): 869–878 (2000). 24.Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N., and Park, R.. 'Theoretical Stress-strain Model for Confined Concrete.' Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 114(8), pp. 1804-1826 (1988). 25.Mario Paz, “Structure Dynamics Theory and Computation,” (1985). 26.Matlock, H., “Correlations for Design of Laterally Loaded Piles in Clay,” Proc. 2nd Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, (OTC 1204), pp. 577−594 (1970). 27.Park, R. and Falconer, T. J., “Ductility of Prestressed Concrete Piles Subjected to Simulated Seismic Loading,” PCI Journal, 28, pp. 112−144 (1983). 28.Park, R. and Sampson, R.A., “Ductility of Reinforced Concrete Column Sections in Seismic Design, ” Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 69(9): 543–551 (1972). 29.Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F., and Calvi, G.M., “Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, ” Wiley-Interscience, New York (1996). 30.Reese, L. C. and Welch, R. C., “Lateral Loading of Deep Foundations in Stiff Clay,” Proceedings, ASCE, 101, GT7, pp. 633−649 (1975). 31.Reese, L. C., Isenhower, W. M., and Wang, S. T., “Analysis and Design of Shallow and Deep Foundations,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (2006). 32.SAP2000 Version 8. Basic Analysis Reference, Computers & Structures, Inc., Berkeley, California, USA (2002). 33.Song, S. T., Chai, Y. H. and Hale, T. H., “Analytical Model for Ductility Assessment of Fixed-Head Concrete Piles,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 131, pp. 1051−1059 (2005). 34.Song, S.T., Chai, Y.H., and Budek, A.M., “Methodology for Preliminary Seismic Design of Extended Pile-shafts for Bridge Structures.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35, 1721-1738 (2006). 35.XTRACT v3.0.1. Cross-sectional X Structural Analysis of Components, Imbsen Software Systems, Sacramento, CA, USA (2004). 36.Watson, S., Zahn, F.A., and Park, R., “Confining Reinforcement for Concrete Columns,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 120(6): 1798–1824 (1994). 37.三浦房紀、宮坂享明、宋裕祺、陳正興,「基樁耐震設計新概念-高韌性基樁」,地工技術,第101期,第5-14頁 (2004)。 38.日本地盤工學會,「地盤及基礎結構物的耐震設計」,東京,(2001)。 39.日本鐵道綜合技術研究所,「鐵道構造物等設計標準同解說-耐震設計」,東京(1999)。 40.日本道路協會,「道路橋示方書•同解說-V耐震設計編」,東京(2002)。 41.日本道路協會,「道路橋示方書•同解說-Ⅳ下部構造編」,東京(2002)。 42.交通部,「公路橋梁耐震設計規範」(2008)。 43.李景亮、梁英文,「結構耐震設計」,文生書局 (1997)。 44.邱俊翔,「樁頭受側向力作用之側推分析模式」,國家地震工程研究中心報告 (2007)。 45.邱俊翔,「基椿側向荷載行為之研究」,國立台灣大學博士論文 (2001)。 46.邱俊翔、陳正興、楊鶴雄,「樁基礎非線性側推分析之樁材塑鉸設定方法」,國家地震工程研究中心報告 (2008)。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63649 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 樁基礎在耐震設計上通常會被設計為彈性結構物,然而對於固定樁頭樁,其樁頭受到樁帽或基礎版束制之影響,在地震下不免會發生損害,此時基礎若採韌性設計,允許基礎在高強度地震下有非彈性反應,將可使基礎設計更為合理可行。當耐震設計時考量樁之韌性消能行為,其位移韌性容量會是個設計所需之重要參數,其代表樁之非彈性變形能力。為探討樁基礎之位移韌性容量,本研究透過參數研究,以固定樁頭單樁為研究標的,探討其韌性容量之影響因子,並利用理論分析針對凝聚性與非凝聚性土層中樁基礎之位移韌性容量發展簡易評估公式,並以一壁式橋墩群樁基礎耐震設計為示範例,示範此簡易評估公式於樁基礎韌性設計之應用,並進一步探討基樁韌性設計對基礎設計結果之影響。
由參數研究結果發現基樁位移韌性容量與斷面過強度比之間成顯著正相關。除曲率韌性容量外,斷面之過強度比在固定樁頭樁之位移韌性容量上亦扮演相當重要的角色。此參數研究結果亦可從理論推導所發展的簡易公式獲得到驗證。由簡易評估公式可知固定樁頭樁之位移韌性在線性土壤之情況下,直接係樁斷面之過強度比與曲率韌性容量之函數,可作為韌性容量之下限值,而在土壤為非線性的情況下,因土壤之非線性行為之參與,可使得樁之位移韌性容量更為加大。本研究進一步提出的類壁式橋墩群樁基礎耐震韌性設計流程,並利用所發展之簡易評估公式於設計流程中以估算結構系統之韌性容量,以展現基礎韌性設計之適用性與影響。此設計流程簡單,適合於工程初步設計使用。 另一方面,由於基樁斷面強度常有弱化現象,本論文專章討論斷面撓曲強度產生弱化現象之機制,並進一步探討其對韌性容量之影響。經參數研究發現斷面產生弱化現象係因混凝土在達尖峰強度後強度下降所致,其中以軸壓力大小所造成之影響最為顯著。具弱化現象之斷面,其斷面過強度比因在高軸壓力下相當小,使樁所能發揮之位移韌性容量也相對有限。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | For fixed-head piles subjected to seismic loading, they usually sustain large flexure curvature demands at the pile heads when the pile cap undergoes a horizontal displacement. For this type of pile, it is cost effective to design the piles as ductile members to absorb the earthquake energy, instead of elastic ones, which are normally adopted in conventional seismic design. Consequently, the displacement ductility capacity of a pile is an important concern when the ductile design is applied to piles under seismic loading. This study performs parametric analysis to investigate the influencing factors of the displacement ductility capacity of a fixed-head pile. In addition to the curvature ductility, the results of the parametric analysis show that the over-strength ratio of the pile section is another important factor that influences the displacement ductility capacity of the pile. Furthermore, this study develops simple formulae to estimate the displacement ductility capacity of a fixed-head pile in cohesive and cohesionless soils. The formulae have three parameters: the sectional over-strength ratio, curvature ductility capacity, and a modification factor considered for soil nonlinearity. For demonstrating the applicability of the proposed formulae, this study further applies them to seismic design of the pile foundation of wall piers.
On the other hand, the softening in flexural strength of a RC pile is commonly observed in either experiments or numerical analysis. This study performs a parametric study on its mechanism. The results show that the softening in flexural strength of pile sections is due to the loss of concrete strength and the softening degree of flexural strength is significantly influenced by the axial force level on the pile section. For this type of pile section, its sectional over-strength ratio is small and the displacement ductility capacity of the pile is accordingly small. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T17:15:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-D95521012-1.pdf: 2314050 bytes, checksum: 8fc366472130f166b69cc525d24bf9a4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝…………………………………………………………………………………….I
摘要…………………………………………………………………………………...II Abstract……………………………………………………………...……………….III 目錄…………………………………………………………………………………..IV 圖目錄………………………………………………………………..………………IX 表目錄………………………………………………………………………….…..XIV 第一章 緒論…………………………………….…………………………………...1 1.1 研究動機與目的…..………………………………………………………...1 1.2 研究範圍與方法…………………………………………………………….2 1.3 研究內容………………………………………………………………….…2 第二章 文獻回顧........................................................................................................4 2.1 樁基礎韌性行為相關研究………………………………………………….4 2.2 樁基礎韌性行為之模擬…………………………………………………….8 2.3 分析程式介紹………………………………………………………...……12 2.4 國內外設計規範…………………………………………………………...13 2.4.1 國內公路橋梁耐震設計規範……………………………………...….13 2.4.2 國外橋梁耐震設計規範……………………………………………....15 2.5 橋梁樁基礎耐震韌性設計相關研究…………………………………...…17 第三章 固定樁頭單樁韌性容量之參數研究……………………………………..25 3.1 側推分析模式……………………………………………………………...25 3.2 分析參數…………………………………………………………………...28 3.3 樁斷面之非線性特性……………………………………………………...29 3.3.1 損害控制之限度狀態…………………………………………………29 3.3.2 彎矩-曲率關係之特性………………………………………………...30 3.4 側推曲線與位移韌性容量………………………………………………...34 3.5 討論………………………………………………………………………...37 3.6 小結………………………………………………………………………...39 第四章 凝聚性土層固定樁頭單樁韌性容量之簡易評估法……………………..55 4.1 均勻線彈性土壤中長樁之韌性容量……………………………………...55 4.1.1 理想模型………………………………………………………………55 4.1.2 降伏位移Δy……………………………………………………………56 4.1.3 極限位移Δu……………………………………………………………56 4.1.4 位移韌性容量μΔ………………………………………………………57 4.1.5 塑性轉角θp與塑鉸長度Lp……………………………………………57 4.1.6 式(4-18)之化簡………………………………………………………..60 4.2 非線性土壤中長樁之韌性容量…………………………………………...61 4.2.1 樁頭降伏位移式(4-4)之修正…………………………………………61 4.2.2 樁頭塑性位移式(4-7)之修正…………………………………………61 4.2.3 極限位移式(4-8)之修正………………………………………………62 4.2.4 樁頭極限剪力與水平力比值之特徵係數式(4-16)之修正…………..62 4.2.5 位移韌性容量是(4-18)之修正………………………………………..62 4.2.6 土壤非線性修正因子α……………………………………………….63 4.3 簡易評估公式之驗證……………………………………………………...63 4.3.1 分析模式與參數………………………………………………………64 4.3.2 側推分析結果…………………………………………………………66 4.3.3 參數α之決定…………………………………………………………69 4.3.4 位移韌性容量式(4-25)與式(4-32)之適用性…………………………70 4.3.5 塑性區範圍(塑鉸長度Lp)之檢核……………………………………71 4.4 小結………………………………………………………………………...72 第五章 非凝聚性土層固定樁頭單樁韌性容量之簡易評估法…………………..86 5.1 均勻線彈性土壤中長樁之韌性容量……………………………………...86 5.1.1 理想模型………………………………………………………………86 5.1.2 降伏位移Δy……………………………………………………………87 5.1.3 極限位移Δu……………………………………………………………87 5.1.4 位移韌性容量μΔ………………………………………………………88 5.1.5 塑性轉角θp與塑鉸長度Lp…………………………………………...88 5.1.6 式(4-18)之化簡………………………………………………………..91 5.2 非線性土壤中長樁之韌性容量…………………………………………...92 5.2.1 樁頭降伏位移式(4-4)之修正…………………………………………92 5.2.2 樁頭塑性位移式(4-7)之修正…………………………………………93 5.2.3 極限位移式(4-8)之修正………………………………………………93 5.2.4 樁頭極限剪力與水平力比值之特徵係數式(4-16)之修正…………..93 5.2.5 位移韌性容量式(4-18)之修正………………………………………..94 5.2.6 土壤非線性修正因子α……………………………………………….94 5.3 簡易評估公式之驗證……………………………………………………...95 5.3.1 分析模式與參數………………………………………………………95 5.3.2 側推分析結果…………………………………………………………98 5.3.3 參數α之決定………………………………………………………..101 5.3.4 位移韌性容量式(4-25)與式(4-32)之適用性………………………..102 5.3.5 塑性區範圍(塑鉸長度Lp)之檢核…………………………………..103 5.4 討論…………………………………………………………………….....103 5.5 小結……………………………………………………………………….104 第六章 簡易評估公式於橋梁樁基礎耐震韌性設計之應用……………………119 6.1 橋梁耐震設計…………………………………………………………….119 6.1.1 橋梁耐震韌性消能機制……………………………………………..120 6.1.2 橋梁結構系統地震力折減係數……………………………………..121 6.1.3 容量保護構材之設計………………………………………………..122 6.2 壁式橋墩樁基礎韌性設計……………………………………………….122 6.2.1 基本構想……………………………………………………………..122 6.2.2 設計反應譜..........................................................................................123 6.2.3 水平地震力需求……………………………………………………..124 6.2.4 鋼筋混凝土樁基礎之構材設計……………………………………..126 6.2.5 耐震韌性設計流程…………………………………………………..129 6.3 示範例…………………………………………………………………….131 6.3.1 橋梁基本設計資料…………………………………………………..131 6.3.2 樁基礎耐震韌性設計………………………………………………..132 6.3.3 傳統樁基礎設計……………………………………………………..139 6.4 討論……………………………………………………………………….141 第七章 樁斷面撓曲強度之弱化機制及其韌性容量之探討……………………151 7.1 樁斷面弱化機制之探討………………………………………………….151 7.1.1 等效降伏雙線性化之彎矩-曲率關係……………………………….152 7.1.2 參數分析……………………………………………………………..152 7.2 弱化斷面單樁之非線性側推分析……………………………………….155 7.2.1 分析模型……………………………………………………………..155 7.2.1.1 土壤非線性參數與模擬...............................................................155 7.2.1.2 樁材非線性參數與模擬...............................................................156 7.2.2 分析比較……………………………………………………………..157 7.2.2.1 凝聚性土層中固定樁頭樁之韌性容量………………………...157 7.2.2.2 非凝聚性土層中固定樁頭樁之韌性容量……………………...158 7.3 小結……………………………………………………………………….159 第八章 結論與建議………………………………………………………………170 8.1 結論……………………………………………………………………….170 8.2 建議……………………………………………………………………….171 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………172 附錄A 固有週期計算方法……………………………………………...…………175 附錄B 基樁位移韌性容量估算輔助圖…………………………...………………179 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 耐震設計 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 位移韌性容量 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 樁基礎 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 簡易公式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 塑鉸 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Piles | en |
| dc.subject | Plastic hinge | en |
| dc.subject | Seismic design | en |
| dc.subject | Displacement ductility capacity | en |
| dc.subject | Simple formulae | en |
| dc.title | 固定樁頭樁韌性行為之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Study on the Ductile Behavior of Fixed-head Piles | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李崇正,黃俊鴻,林宏達,謝旭昇,邱俊翔 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 位移韌性容量,樁基礎,簡易公式,塑鉸,耐震設計, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Displacement ductility capacity,Piles,Simple formulae,Plastic hinge,Seismic design, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 182 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.26 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
