請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63259
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 於幼華 | |
dc.contributor.author | LI-WEN LI | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李麗雯 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T16:31:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-01-16 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-01-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-12-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Adams, Michelle, David Wheeler, and Genna Woolston. 2011. A participatory approach to sustainable energy strategy development in a carbon-intensive jurisdiction: The case of Nova Scotia. Energy Policy 39 (5):2550-2559.
Alexander, Roy, Max Hope, and Martin Degg. 2007. Mainstreaming Sustainable Development–A Case Study: Ashton Hayes is going Carbon Neutral. Local Economy 22 (1):62-74. Balachandra, P., Hippu Salk Kristle Nathan, and B. Sudhakara Reddy. 2010. Commercialization of sustainable energy technologies. Renewable Energy 35 (8):1842-1851. Bodorkós, Barbara, and György Pataki. 2009. Linking academic and local knowledge: community-based research and service learning for sustainable rural development in Hungary. Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (12):1123-1131. Burch, Sarah. 2010. In pursuit of resilient, low carbon communities: An examination of barriers to action in three Canadian cities. Energy Policy 38 (12):7575-7585. Chapin, F. Stuart, Carl Folke, and Gary Kofinas. 2009. Adaptive Stewardship in a Changing World. 1 ed. New York, NY: Springer New York. Cheng, Su ling. 2004. The Research of Local Democracy in Taiwan-A Case of Ping-lin Township of Taipei County Government, Political Science, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung. Doublet, Geneviève, and Niels Jungbluth. 2010. Life cycle assessment of drinking Darjeeling tea. Eigner, Swantje, and Peter Schmuck. 2002. Motivating collective action: Converting to sustainable energy sources in a Germany community. In Psychology of Sustainable Development edited by P. Schmuck and W. P. Schultz. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. EPA. 2010. Towards Low Carbon Cities in Taiwan. edited by E. P. Administration. Taipei. Eric, Johnson. 2009. Charcoal versus LPG grilling: A carbon-footprint comparison. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 29 (6):370-378. Fleeger, William E., and Mimi L. Becker. 2008. Creating and sustaining community capacity for ecosystem-based management: Is local government the key? Journal of Environmental Management 88 (4):1396–1405. Fraser, Evan D. G., Andrew J. Dougill, Warren E. Mabee, Mark Reed, and Patrick McAlpine. 2006. Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 78 (2):114-127. Hain, J. J., G. W. Ault, S. J. Galloway, A. Cruden, and J. R. McDonald. 2005. Additional renewable energy growth through small-scale community orientated energy policies. Energy Policy 33 (9):1199-1212. Harper, Michael. 1993. Planning to make the future renewable. The role of local authorities in renewable energy resource assessments. Renewable Energy 3 (2-3):217-220. Hoffman, Steven M., and Angela High-Pippert. 2010. From private lives to collective action: Recruitment and participation incentives for a community energy program. Energy Policy 38 (12):7567-7574. Hwang, Jenn Jiang. 2010. Promotional policy for renewable energy development in Taiwan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 (3):1079-1087. IEE. 2006. Sustainable energy communities - 8 innovative projects for an energy intelligent Europe Brussels, Belgium: Intelligent Energy Europe Innes, Judith E., and David E. Booher. 2000. Indicators for Sustainable Communities: A Strategy Building on Complexity Theory and Distributed Intelligence. Planning Theory & Practice 1 (2):173–186. John, DeWitt. 2008. Opportunities for Economic and Community Development in Energy and Climate Change. Economic Development Quarterly 22 (2):107-111. John, DeWiu, and Matian Mlay. 1999. Community-Based Environmental Protection: Encouraging Civic Environmentalism. In Better environmental decisions, edited by K. Sexton, A. A. Marcus, K. W. Easter and T. D. Burkhardt. Washington, DC: Island Press. Kellett, Jon. 2007. Community-Based Energy Policy: A Practical Approach to Carbon Reduction. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50 (3):381-396. Lee, Shun-Chung, and Li-Hsing Shih. 2010. Renewable energy policy evaluation using real option model -- The case of Taiwan. Energy Economics 32 (Supplement 1):S67-S78. Li, Li Wen, Janine Birmele, Harald Schaich, and Werner Konold. 2012. Transitioning to community-owned renewable energy: Lessons from Germany. In The 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Future for Human Security (SUSTAIN 2012). Kyoto: Kyoto University. Macaulay, Ann C, Laura E Commanda, William L Freeman, Nancy Gibson, Melvina L McCabe, Carolyn M Robbins, and Peter L Twohig. 1999. Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement. BMJ 319 (7212):774-778. Mark, Roseland. 2000. Sustainable community development: integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives. Progress in Planning 54 (2):73-132. McFarland, Andrew S. 2007. Neopluralism. Annual Review of Political Science 10 (1):45-66. MEA. 2009. Renewable Energy Development Act. edited by B. o. Energy. Taipei: Ministry of Economic Affairs. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth, Monica DiGregorio, and Nancy McCarthy. 2004. Methods for studying collective action in rural development. Agricultural Systems 82 (3):197-214. Middlemiss, Lucie. 2008. Influencing individual sustainability: a review of the evidence on the role of community-based organisations. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 7 (1):78-93. Moloney, Susie, Ralph E. Horne, and John Fien. 2009. Transitioning to low carbon communities--from behaviour change to systemic change: Lessons from Australia. Energy Policy In Press, Corrected Proof. Nigim, K., N. Munier, and J. Green. 2004. Pre-feasibility MCDM tools to aid communities in prioritizing local viable renewable energy sources. Renewable Energy 29 (11):1775-1791. Nilsson, J. Stenlund, and A. Mårtensson. 2002. Municipal energy-planning and development of local energy-systems. Applied Energy 76 (1-3):179-187. Pawson, Ray, and Nick Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage. Peters, Michael, Shane Fudge, and Philip Sinclair. 2010. Mobilising community action towards a low-carbon future: Opportunities and challenges for local government in the UK. Energy Policy 38 (12):7596-7603. Pichierri, Angelo. 2002. Concertation and local development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 26 (4):689-706. Rogers, J. C., E. A. Simmons, I. Convery, and A. Weatherall. 2008. Public perceptions of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects. Energy Policy 36 (11):4217-4226. Scheuermann, M. 2012. Ökopioniere - Die Strombauern aus dem Schwarzwald 2007 [cited 04.27 2012]. Available from http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/oekopioniere-die-strombauern-aus-dem-schwarzwald-a-475513.html. Schweitzer, Lisa A., Eric J. Howard, and Ian Doran. 2008. Planners Learning and Creating Power: A Community of Practice Approach. Journal of Planning Education and Research 28 (1):50-60. Schweizer-Ries, Petra. 2008. Energy sustainable communities: Environmental psychological investigations. Energy Policy 36 (11):4126-4135. Seyfang, Gill. 2010. Community action for sustainable housing: Building a low-carbon future. Energy Policy 38 (12):7624-7633. Soini, Katriina, Eija Pouta, Maija Salmiovirta, Marja Uusitalo, and Tapani Kivinen. 2011. Local residents’ perceptions of energy landscape: the case of transmission lines. Land Use Policy 28 (1):294-305. St. Denis, Genevieve, and Paul Parker. 2009. Community energy planning in Canada: The role of renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (8):2088–2095. Udo de Haes, Helias A., and Reinout Heijungs. 2007. Life-cycle assessment for energy analysis and management. Applied Energy 84 (7–8):817-827. UNECE. 2008. Guidebook on Promoting Good Governance in Public-Private Partnerships. New York: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Walker, Gordon. 2008. What are the barriers and incentives for community-owned means of energy production and use? Energy Policy 36 (12):4401-4405. Walker, Gordon, and Patrick Devine-Wright. 2008. Community renewable energy: What should it mean? Energy Policy 36 (2):497-500. Walker, Gordon, Patrick Devine-Wright, Sue Hunter, Helen High, and Bob Evans. 2010. Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy 38 (6):2655-2663. Walker, Gordon, Sue Hunter, Patrick Devine-Wright, Bob Evans, and Helen Fay. 2007. Harnessing Community Energies: Explaining and Evaluating Community-Based Localism in Renewable Energy Policy in the UK. Global Environmental Politics 7 (2):64-82. Warren, Charles R., and Malcolm McFadyen. 2010. Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy 27 (2):204-213. Weidema, Bo P., Mikkel Thrane, Per Christensen, Jannick Schmidt, and Søren Løkke. 2008. Carbon Footprint. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12 (1):3-6. Wiedmann, T. and Minx, J. . 2008. A Definition of 'Carbon Footprint'. In Ecological Economics Research Trends, edited by C. C. Pertsova. Hauppauge NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers. Zhang, Ming, Hailin Mu, and Yadong Ning. 2009. Accounting for energy-related CO2 emission in China, 1991-2006. Energy Policy 37 (3):767-773. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63259 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 地方行動與公私部門合作自建自營再生能源社區逐漸在2000年初展開,而在地價值(value)、能力(capacity)及智慧(knowledge)的指認與整合也逐漸視為國家能源安全政策的關鍵。換句話說,社區永續能源的發展規劃與經營管理,除了能源及財務政策框架健全外,在地的行動力與能力養成,將成為社區可自主永續經營的成功關鍵。
然而傳統規劃理論方法,不論是由上而下或草根行動應用在再生能源與低碳技術科技已逐漸浮現問題:單一專業知識侷限性、個人行動力薄弱、資源分散易後繼無力。為此本研究假設有二:透過公私部門伙伴關係培力參與社區的減碳行動,可協力社區建立長期性的自我可持續經營管理的能源永續社區。再者一套完整的整合環境規劃及評估管理的方法將有助於社區發展初期奠定可自主永續能源管理的基礎。並利用行動研究之參與式規劃,透過實際主持參與新北市坪林區低碳社區推動的規劃設計案,從社區培力參與經營、再生能源技術實踐及規劃評估方法應用等三個面向探討永續能源社區發展的關鍵影響因子。 過程中,與當地居民、政府及技術廠商深入當地生活景況針對再生能源、水資源、農業及食物、廢棄物、低碳交通及生態遊憩等五大系統提出三階段的低碳社區系統規劃藍圖。進一步配合在地價值與能力,提出三環社區永續能源學習過程及績效管理的模式,並將之應用在示範社區三種情境模擬上。Scenario 1:再生能源系統安裝,維持的能源使用行為模式,可100%供給全社區總電力152kWh容量需求,以光水風多元的再生能源設備結合低碳環境教育中心的構想,降低興建成本、運作風險、視覺衝擊及土地利用,更也降低社區每年78.4 ton CO2 e的碳量,但因涉及高成本與保育地土地使用變更程序等。Scenario 2: 介入現有農業生活模式,藉由公共環境的減碳改善而進行微小的行為模式改變,調適雖緩但可藉示範功效建構居民的信心並同時建立能源使用的自主管理系統。Scenario 3:永續產業關鍵減碳,若將社區10公頃的農耕地輔導轉作有機製茶,每年可減少原慣性製茶6倍的碳排放量,而家戶生計上的收入亦提高,唯因需三年的轉型期,現階段居民接受度不高。 研究結果發現分述如下三個向: 培力坪林地方參與,其影響關鍵在於一、熟知、認可及採納居民的偏好,也就是所謂的在地價值;及二、藉由公私伙伴到社區自主的長期關係建立可建立信任與社區能力養成。製茶是勞力密集且家庭動員的家戶自主產業,因此個人在利益與生計的考量上往往大於對公共建設的關心。再因保育地的土地使用管制導致居民慣於被動接收與觀察政府施為的心態。反之,若將參與公共事務的效益彰顯在個人利基上的價值鍊結,在關係建立的過程中,權力關係者的介入與領頭人的行動所帶起的集體意識,自組社區組織媒合居民與政府的關係則是社區化被動轉自願參與的關鍵所在。 再生能源及節能技術在臺灣的社區落實的影響關鍵主要:一、能源價格、社區型技術的成熟度及財務系統;及二、政府政策及部門對新能源科技的變革能力(Transformative capacity):現行的官僚科層體制與本位主義,導致對新的業務多採保守及謹慎的態度,對此則仰賴執政者的決心與魄力。另外跨部門的聯繫與競合,若能建立網絡協商平台將是可影響政策決策及媒合制度轉變學習的關鍵。三、土地使用及開發限制:因受限台北水源特定區的法令管制,新設建築及公共設施需進行都市計畫變更,然面臨程序繁瑣與風險規避,雖主管單位認同再生能源低碳教育解說中心的設置必要性,然在此僵硬的法令管制下,低碳與環境教育推廣的的美意亦無法有突破推展之機。 有效整合規劃及評估管理方法的關鍵在於:一、微尺度透明化資訊及靈活的方法應用:數據分析與評估在社區能源規劃中扮演重要的角色,然當前臺灣微尺度的資料缺乏。因此具有溝通及教育工具的碳足跡盤查的工作,除作未來減碳規劃及績效管理的基線設定依據,更積累國家、區域及社區能源用量及類型統計的資訊及效度。 二、適當長時間的技術及財力挹注是有其必要性。集眾人之力、公私部門伙伴關係建立取代傳統僵硬的合約對價關係,是邁向永續能源集體行動的第一步。 因此,永續能源社區的發展,技術問題或可在試誤的過程中得改善,而政府有力及長期承諾的財政誘因是促進整個體制改變是關鍵驅使力,但社區透過集體行動的培力與賦權的學習過程,孕育的綠色經濟利基意識才是引領之鑰。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In the knowledge of planning low carbon communities, it is still a challenge to find a discussion of how to systematize and establish planning and management methods. How to plan an exploratory, qualitative and interdisciplinary research, for generation of planning and management methods is the focus of this work. The participatory action research and case study are methods that were used to produce sequences of planning and managerial steps for building future sustainable energy communities. This research presents the key findings of a planning and design project aimed at building the first Taiwanese low carbon community in Pinglin District, where there has been long-term conflict over the Feitsui Reservoir Watershed protected area. Developing a sustainable energy community however has a gap and barriers related to empowering community self-sustaining energy management by external public and private sectors supports at the initial planning phase. To demonstrate this, a participatory action research method with (our) recommended five preliminary planning principles was applied in the first Taiwanese low carbon community project-Pinglin. It is also used to explore the critical success factors in building capacities for community empowerment and green technologies development of Taiwanese existing polices. The findings indicate that supporting factors may involve 1) preferences of residents; 2) trust and capacity through partnership to ownership; 3) energy price, the maturity of community-scale technologies and the financial systems; 4) land use and planning permission 5) transparent information and flexible approaches in micro data; and 6) the availability of appropriate technical support and institutional change. The authors are also aware and strongly emphasise that the success of the planning process and outcomes will depend on building trust and niche initiatives which are appropriate and relevant within a 3R management system - reduce, renew and recheck. Taking this approach will help to contribute to a financially successful and eco-friendly project. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T16:31:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-D96541010-1.pdf: 1899516 bytes, checksum: ea73af4c99b65ffe6de9964de8cc9b4b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 序 I
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS III 中文摘要 IV ABSTRACT VII CONTENTS IX LIST OF FIGURES XII CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 RESEARCH BACKGROUND AND PROBLEMS 2 1.2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES AND DEFINING THE SYSTEM BOUNDARY 4 1.3 OVERVIEW OF THE RESEARCH PROCESS 5 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 6 2.1 CURRENT INSTITUTIONS IN SEC DEVELOPMENT 6 2.1.1 CENTRAL GOVERNMENT 6 2.2.2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT 6 2.2.3 NGOS AND PROFESSIONALS 7 2.2.4 RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES MARKET 8 2.2 LOCAL ACTION IN GERMANY AND KEY SUCCESS FACTORS 8 2.3 INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION 11 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH MODEL AND PRINCIPLES DEVELOPMENT 15 3.1 PARTICIPATORY PLANNING PRINCIPLES 15 PRINCIPLE 1. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT-BASED COMMUNITY ACTION 15 PRINCIPLE 2. FLEXIBLE STEP-BY-STEP STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS 16 3.2 INTEGRATING 3E ASSESSMENTS INTO PLANNING PROCESSES 17 PRINCIPLE 3. MINIMISATION OF THE CARBON FOOTPRINT BY BASELINE SETTING AND LONG-TERM MEASUREMENT 18 PRINCIPLE 4. ASSESSING BENEFITS AND OPTIMISING A WELL-BALANCED COMBINATION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES 19 PRINCIPLE 5. IDENTIFYING 3E PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 20 CHAPTER 4 METHODS AND MATERIALS 21 4.1 ACTION RESEARCH AND PARTICIPATORY PLANNING 21 4.2 BACKGROUND OF PINGLIN LOW-CARBON COMMUNITIES 24 4.2.1 THE POLICY FRAMEWORKS OF LCC DEVELOPMENT IN TAIWAN 24 4.2.2 PINGLIN LOCAL CONTEXT AND INITIATION OF RELEVANT PROJECTS 26 4.3 PLANNING PROCESS AND OUTCOME 28 4.3.1 MODEL PLCC SELECTION AND OBJECTIVES 28 4.3.2 INTEGRATED ASSESSMENTS AND PLANNING 29 4.3.3 ACTIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION 33 CHAPTER 5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION OF ENERGY DEMANDS 37 5.1 IDENTIFYING THE TARGET ENERGY IMPACT HOUSEHOLDS 37 5.1.1 BY COMMUNITY LEVEL 38 5.1.2 BY HOUSEHOLD LEVEL 39 5.2 ENERGY CONSUMPTION PATTERNS OF MAJOR-INFLUENCE ACTIVITIES 41 5.2.1 PINGLIN TEA-MAKING AND TEA PRODUCTS 41 5.2.2 PINGLIN TOURISM AND TOURIST ACTIVITIES 44 5.3 SCENARIOS AND ASSUMPTIONS FOR DAIYUJUE LCC 46 5.3.1 SCENARIOS FOR PLANNING DAIYUJUE LOW-CARBON COMMUNITY 46 5.3.2 SCENARIOS FOR PLANNING LOW-CARBON TOURISM 48 5.3.3 SCENARIOS FOR PLANNING ECO FARM SETTLEMENT-ORGANIC TEA PLANTING 49 CHAPTER 6 DISCUSSIONS AND IMPLICATION 51 6.1 WHAT DRIVES COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT AND HOW CAN IT BE INFLUENCED? 51 6.2 WHAT DRIVE THE FEASIBILITY OF RE DEVELOPMENT AND EE DEPLOYMENT IN PINGLIN? 54 6.3 WHAT DRIVES EFFECTIVE WORK ON INTEGRATED 3E ASSESSMENT INTO PLANNING AN REC? 57 6.4 METHODS DEVELOPMENT FOR PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT OF LCC 58 6.4.1 GENERAL APPLICABILITY OF COLLECTIVE ACTION IN SEC PARTICIPATORY PLANNING 58 6.4.2 A SELF-SUSTAINING ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 61 6.4.3 OPPORTUNITIES AND TRANSITION TIMING FOR DEVELOPING LCC 62 CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 65 7.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 65 7.2 SUGGESTIONS 66 REFERENCES 68 PUBLICATION LIST 72 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 以參與式規劃探討低碳社區之永續管理方法 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Toward a Self-sustaining Energy Management Future: Participatory Planning for Low Carbon Communities | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李鴻源,夏鑄九,馬鴻文,郭乃文 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 能源政策,社區營造,碳足跡盤查,集體行動理論,行動研究, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | energy policy,carbon footprint inventory,community development,collective action,action research, | en |
dc.relation.page | 72 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-12-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.85 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。