Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 資訊管理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63177
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor李瑞庭
dc.contributor.authorMeng-Chin Wangen
dc.contributor.author汪孟瑾zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T16:26:32Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-16
dc.date.copyright2013-02-16
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2013-01-20
dc.identifier.citation[1] Acquisti, A., R. Gross. 2006. Imagined communities awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Privacy Enhancing Technologies. 4258 36-58.
[2] Antoci, A., F. Sabatini, M. Sodini. 2011. See you on Facebook! A framework for analyzing the role of computer-mediated interaction in the evolution of social capital. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 41(5) 541–547.
[3] Antoci, A., F. Sabatini, M. Sodini. 2012. The Solaria syndrome: Social capital in a growing hyper-technological economy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 81(3) 802–814.
[4] Bawden, D., and L. Robinson. 2009. The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of Information Science. 35(2) 180-191.
[5] Best, S. J., and B. S. Krueger. 2006. Online interactions and social capital: Distinguishing between newand existing ties. Social Science Computer Review. 24(4) 395-410.
[6] Bilge, L., T. Strufe, D. Balzarotti, E. Kirda. 2009. All your contacts are belong to us: Automated identity theft attacks on social networks. In Proceedings of the 18th World Wide Web Conference. 551-560.
[7] Binder, J., A. Howes, and A. Sutcliffe. 2009. The problem of conflicting social spheres: Effects of network structure on experienced tension in social network sites. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 965-974.
[8] Boyd, d. m., N. B. Ellison. 2007. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 13(1) 210-230.
[9] Brandtzag, P. B., M. Luders, J. H. Skjetne. 2010. Too many Facebook 'friends'? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 26(1) 1006–1030.
[10] Chang, H. H., and S. Chuang. 2011. Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator. Information & Management. 48(1) 9-18.
[11] Chou, Y. K. 2006. Three simple models of social capital and economic growth. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 35(5) 889-912.
[12] Cobb, C. W., P. H. Douglas. 1928. A theory of production. American Economic Review. 18(1) 139–165.
[13] Cohen, D. J., L. Prusak. 2001. In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
[14] Daniel, B. K., J. Zapata-Rivera, G. McCalla. 2003. A bayesian computational model of social capital in virtual communities. In Proceedings of International Conference on Communities and Technologies. 287-306.
[15] Debatin, B., J. P. Lovejoy, A. Horn, B. N. Huges. 2009. Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended Consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 15(1) 83-108.
[16] Ellison, N. B., C. Lampe, C. Steinfield. 2009. Social network sites and society: Current trendsand future possibilities. Interactions Magazine. 16(1) 6-9.
[17] Ellison, N. B., C. Steinfield, C. Lampe. 2007. The benefits of Facebook 'friends:' Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 12(4) 1143-1168.
[18] Ellison, N. B., C. Steinfield, C. Lampe. 2010. Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society. 1-20.
[19] Glaeser, E. L., D. Laibson, B. Sacerdo. 2002. An economic approach to social capital. The Economic Journal. 112(483) 437-458.
[20] Houghton, D. J., A. N. Joinson. 2010. Privacy, social network sites, and social relations. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 28(1-2) 74-94.
[21] Ishise , H., and Y. Sawada. 2009. Aggregate returns to social capital: Estimates based on the augmented augmented-Solow model. Journal of Macroeconomics. 31(3) 376-393.
[22] Kazienko, P., K. Musiał. 2006. Social capital in online Social networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge-Based & Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems. 4252 417-424.
[23] Lampe, C., R. LaRose, C. Steinfield, and K. DeMaagd. 2011. Inherent barriers to the use of social media. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal. 16(1) 1-17.
[24] Lin, H. 2007. Measuring online learning systems success: Applying the updated DeLone and McLean model. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. 10(6) 818-820.
[25] Lin, K., and H. Lu. 2011. Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior. 27(3) 1152-1161.
[26] Livingstone, S. 2008. Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society. 10(3) 393-411.
[27] Marwick, A. E., and D. Boyd. 2010. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society. 13(1) 114-133.
[28] McLaughlin, C., and J. Vitak. 2011. Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society. 14(2) 299-315.
[29] Park, B., K. C. Lee. 2010. Effects of knowledge sharing and social presence on the intention to continuously use social networking sites: The case of Twitter in Korea. U- and E-Service, Science and Technology. 124 60-69.
[30] Phulari, S. S., Dr. S. D. Khamitkar, N. K. Deshmukh, P. U. Bhalchandra, S. N. Lokhande, A. R. Shinde. 2010. Understanding formulation of social capital in online social network sites (SNS). International Journal of Computer Science Issues. 7(1) 92-96.
[31] Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
[32] Rheingold, H. 1994. A slice of life in my virtual community. Global Networks: Computers and International Communication. 57-80.
[33] Sethi, P. S., L. G. Thompson. 2003. Optimal control theory: Applications to management science and economics. Control System Magazine. 23(5) 86-87.
[34] Skeels, M. M., and J. Grudin. 2009. When social networks cross boundaries: A case study of workplace use of Facebook and LinkedIn. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work. 95-104.
[35] Skoric, M. M., and G. Kwan. 2011. Platforms for mediated sociability and online social capital: The role of Facebook and massively multiplayer online games. Asian Journal of Communication. 21(5) 467-484.
[36] Smith, M. S. 2008. Social capital in online communities. In Proceedings of the 2nd PhD Workshop on Information and Knowledge Management. 17-24.
[37] Solove , D. J. 2003. The virtues of knowing less: Justifying privacy protections against disclosure. Duke Law Journal. 53(3) 967-1065.
[38] Steinfield, C., N. B. Ellison, C. Lampe. 2008. Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 29(6) 434-445.
[39] Stutzman, F., J. Vitak, N. B. Ellison, R. Gray, and C. Lampe. 2012. Privacy in interaction: Exploring disclosure and social capital in Facebook. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
[40] Valenzuela, S., N. Park, K. F. Kee. 2009. Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 14(4) 875–901.
[41] Wellman, B., J. Boase, W. Chen. 2002. The networked nature of community: Online and offline. IT & Society. 1(1) 151-165.
[42] Wu, W. 2008. Dimensions of social capital and firm competitiveness improvement: The mediating role of information sharing. Journal of Management Studies. 45(1) 122-146.
[43] Yoder, C., F. Stutzman. 2011. Identifying social capital in the Facebook interface. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 585-588.
[44] Zheng, Y., K. Zhao, A. Stylianou. 2010. Building social capital in online communities: A perspective of information and system quality. In Proceedings of 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems. 481.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63177-
dc.description.abstract社群網站近年來蓬勃發展,和人們的日常生活緊密結合,這種便利的線上服務取代了傳統的分享模式,更改變了我們的生活型態。透過使用社群網站使用者們可以和人群聯繫、獲得大量的即時資訊,許多過去的研究也指出使用社群網站有助提升現實生活的品質;我們可以將這些使用社群網站所獲得的益處統稱為「社會資本」。然而,就我們所知,目前沒有任何研究模型評估社群網站的社會資本。因此,在本篇論文中,我們首先找出影響社會資本的因素,包括使用者在社交活動中的投資、在資訊分享活中的投資、使用者的隱私揭露程度、社交程度和資訊分享程度。接著我們利用最佳控制理論建構一個社會資本評估模型,並分兩種情況分析此模型。首先,先將使用者的隱私揭露變數設為常數,探討使用者在社交和資訊分享兩類活動中的投資如何影響社交程度、資訊分享程度、與社會資本。然後,我們再將隱私揭露設為動態,觀察其變化。在隱私揭露設為常數時,我們發現社交程度衍生的社會資本、隱私揭露的敏感度、累積的社會資本、系統品質皆對社交程度有正向的影響。而資訊分享的程度則與資訊分享衍生的社會資本、隱私揭露的敏感度有著正向的關係,然而太高的系統品質卻會降低初期的資訊分享程度。我們也發現使用者的最佳隱私揭露程度在初期較高而在後半期會快速下降,在這種隱私揭露的策略之下,使用者可以累積更高的社會資本。最後,我們探討其管理意涵,以及它對社群網站上的使用者行為和管理策略的影響。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractSocial network sites (SNSs) have been flourishing for these years and are deeply integrated in people’s daily lives. This kind of online services has substituted traditional sharing ways and is rapidly changing our lifestyles. Through SNSs, users’ can keep contact with others and obtain lots of timely information. Many investigators even have found that using SNSs may create a strong positive effect on one’s real life quality. We can describe this intangible benefit in terms of “social capital.” However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no models dedicated to analyzing the social capital on online social networks. Therefore, in this thesis, we first identify the contributing factors for the social capital on SNSs, namely, the level of sociability, the level of content sharing, the investment level of sociability, the investment level of content sharing and the level of privacy disclosure. Then, we build a social capital valuation model for SNSs based on these factors and utilize the optimal control theory to obtain the optimal solution.
The analysis of our model can be divided into two cases, static and dynamic. In the static case, we analyze the problem by assuming the level of privacy disclosure is constant over time and analyze how the levels of sociability, content sharing and social capital are influenced. We next investigate the results in the case of dynamic privacy disclosure. In the static case, we found that the social capital derived by sociability, the sensitivity to privacy disclosure, the aggregated social capital and the system quality have positive impacts on sociability. And the level of content sharing is positively influenced by that the social capital derived by content sharing and the sensitivity to privacy disclosure. But high system quality will decrease content sharing at early stage. We also found that the optimal privacy disclosure of user will be higher at early stage but dramatically decrease in later period. By conducting this optimal privacy disclosure strategy, user can gain more social capital on social network sites. Finally, we discuss the management insights of the results. Our model can well explain users’ behavior on SNSs and can be used to improve the management strategies of SNSs.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T16:26:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-102-R99725016-1.pdf: 2207310 bytes, checksum: 8b92a273e7e452bf3b0c1ad833eda55c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsTable of Contents i
List of Figures iii
List of Tables v
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Literature Review 5
2.1 Online social capital 5
2.1.1 Social interactions 6
2.1.2 Content sharing activities 6
2.1.3 Privacy concerns 7
2.2 System quality 8
Chapter 3 The Proposed Model 9
3.1 Model parameters and control variables 9
3.2 The change rate of sociability 10
3.3 The change rate of content sharing 11
3.4 Social capital valuation model 11
Chapter 4 Dynamic Investment Level and Static Privacy Disclosure 13
4.1 Solution methodology 13
4.2 Discussions and managerial implications 15
4.2.1 Impact of the rates of social capital derived by sociability and content sharing 17
4.2.2 Impact of the sensitivity to privacy disclosure for sociability and content sharing 18
4.2.3 Impact of the aggregate social capital 19
4.2.4 Impact of the system quality 21
4.2.5 Impact of the sociability and content sharing depreciation rate 22
4.2.6 Impact of the cost rate of investment in sociability and content sharing 23
4.2.7 Impact of the discount rate of social capital 25
Chapter 5 Dynamic Investment Level and Dynamic Privacy Disclosure 27
5.1 Solution methodology 27
5.2 Discussions and managerial implications 28
5.2.1 Impact of the cost for privacy disclosure 31
5.2.2 Impact of the disutility caused by friends’ disgust against TMI 32
Chapter 6 Concluding Remarks and Future Work 36
References 38
Appendix A 43
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title社群網站之社會資本評估模型zh_TW
dc.titleA Social Capital Valuation Model for Social Network Sitesen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear101-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳正綱,李永銘
dc.subject.keyword社會資本,社群網站,最佳控制理論,隱私揭露,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordSocial capital,Social network sites,Optimal control theory,Privacy disclosure,en
dc.relation.page44
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2013-01-21
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept資訊管理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:資訊管理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-102-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
2.16 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved