請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/62969
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳耀宗(Yao-Tsung Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Fang Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王怡方 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T16:16:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-04 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-02-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-02-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 英文文獻
Abarbanell, J. S., & Bushee, B. J. (1998). Abnormal returns to a fundamental analysis strategy. Accounting Review, 19-45. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization science, 3(3), 321-341. Argyris, C. (1977). Organizational learning and management information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2(2), 113-123. Baber, W. R., Fairfield, P. M., & Haggard, J. A. (1991). The effect of concern about reported income on discretionary spending decisions: The case of research and development. Accounting Review, 818-829. Bacon, R. (1973). The Theory of Board. Research Management, 29, 133-165. Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2006). The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition. Journal of accounting research, 44(2), 207-242. Barton, J., & Simko, P. J. (2002). The balance sheet as an earnings management constraint. Accounting Review, 1-27. Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review, 443-465. Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting. Accounting horizons, 14(4), 441-455. Bedard, J., Chtourou, S. M., & Courteau, L. (2004). The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing, 23(2), 13-36. Bens, D. A., Nagar, V., & Wong, M. (2002). Real investment implications of employee stock option exercises. Journal of accounting research, 40(2), 359-393. Bitner, L. N., & Dolan, R. (1998). Does Smoothing Earnings Add Value? MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING-NEW YORK-, 80, 44-47. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of management review, 343-378. Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 875-893. Carcello, J., Hollingsworth, C., Klein, A., & Neal, T. (2006). Audit committee financial expertise, competing corporate governance mechanisms, and earnings management: Working Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=887512. Chen, K. Y., Krishnan, G., & Zhou, J. (2010). Is there Less Earnings Management when there Are More Accounting Experts on the Audit Committee? Paper presented at the 2010 American Accounting Association Annual Meeting. Cohen, D., Dey, A., & Lys, T. (2007). Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre-and post-Sarbanes Oxley periods. Accounting Review, 83(3), 757-787. Cohen, D., & Zarowin, P. (2008). Economic consequences of real and accrual-based earnings management activities: Working Paper. Stern School of Business, New York University. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183-199. Dechow, P. M., Kothari, S., & L Watts, R. (1998). The relation between earnings and cash flows. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25(2), 133-168. Dechow, P. M., & Sloan, R. G. (1991). Executive incentives and the horizon problem:: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14(1), 51-89. DeFond, M. L., Hann, R. N., & Hu, X. (2005). Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of accounting research, 43(2), 153-193. DeFond, M. L., & Jiambalvo, J. (1994). Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1-2), 145-176. Denison, D. R., Hart, S. L., & Kahn, J. A. (1996). From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Academy of Management Journal, 1005-1023. Dichev, I., & Dechow, P. (2001). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 35-59. Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization science, 3(2), 179-202. Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. The Journal of Political Economy, 288-307. Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., & Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1), 255-307. Fogarty, T. J., & Kalbers, L. P. (1993). Internal Auditor Performance: A Comparison of Self-ratings and Supervisor Ratings. Managerial Auditing Journal, 8(4), 22-26. Francis, J. R., & Wang, D. (2008). The Joint Effect of Investor Protection and Big 4 Audits on Earnings Quality around the World*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 157-191. Graham, J., Harvey, C., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). Value destruction and financial reporting decisions. Financial Analysts Journal, 27-39. Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1), 3-73. Healy, P., & Wahlen, J. (1998). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting horizons 13(4), 365-383. Huckman, R., & Staats, B. (2009). Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance: Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit Working Paper No. 09-145 Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of accounting research, 29(2), 193-228. Klein, A. (2002). Economic determinants of audit committee independence. Accounting Review, 435-452. Kosnik, R. D. (1987). Greenmail: A study of board performance in corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 163-185. Krishnan, G. V., & Visvanathan, G. (2008). Does the SOX Definition of an Accounting Expert Matter? The Association between Audit Committee Directors' Accounting Expertise and Accounting Conservatism*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(3), 827-858. Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. Accounting Review, 649-675. Levitt, A. (1998). The numbers game. Speech at the NYU Center for Law and Business, New York, NY, September, 28. Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance, A. Bus. Law., 48, 59. Olson, J. F. (1998). How to really make audit committees more effective. Bus. Law., 54, 1097. Osma, B. G. (2008). Board independence and real earnings management: the case of R&D expenditure. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(2), 116-131. Qin, B. (2007). The influence of audit committee financial expertise on earnings quality: US evidence. The Icfai Journal of Audit Practice, 4(3), 8-28. Rahman, R. A., & Ali, F. H. M. (2006). Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(7), 783-804. Rainsbury, E. (2004). Audit committee membership-A New Zealand perspective. Pacific Accounting Review, 16(2), 45-69. Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335-370. Warfield, T. D., Wild, J. J., & Wild, K. L. (1995). Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(1), 61-91. Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. Accounting Review, 112-134. Xie, B., Davidson III, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of corporate finance, 9(3), 295-316. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of financial economics, 40(2), 185-211. Young, S. (1999). Systematic measurement error in the estimation of discretionary accruals: an evaluation of alternative modelling procedures. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26(7‐8), 833-862. Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of management, 15(2), 291-334. 王曉羚. (2006). 審計品質對現金增資公司從事盈餘管理之影響. 成功大學 會計學系 碩士學位論文. 吳欣怡. (2010). 審計委員會會計專家多寡與實質盈餘管理之關聯性研究. 臺灣大學會計學研究所學位論文. 李建然, & 陳政芳. (2004). 審計客戶重要性與盈餘管理: 以五大事務所組別為觀察標的. 會計評論, 38, 59-80. 官月緞, 簡松源, & 徐永檳. (2008). 會計弊案與財務報導保守性-安隆/博達觀察. 當代會計, 9(1), 69-103. 林子淇. (2011). 實質盈餘管理對會計資訊價值攸關性之影響: 國立雲林科技大學 碩士學位論文. 馬瑜霙. (2002). 我國獨立董事與獨立監察人之屬性與盈餘管理之關聯性研究. 國立政治大學 碩士學位論文. 高蘭芬. (2002). 董監事股權質押之代理問題對會計資訊與公司績效之影響. 成功大學 碩士學位論文. 黃柏庭. (2006). 真實營業活動相關之盈餘管理研究. 國立政治大學 碩士學位論文. 趙秉睿. (2009). 董事財會專家與盈餘品質之關聯. 東海大學 碩士學位論文. 盧冠佑. (2011). Audit Committee Financial Expertise and CEO Incentive Pay: The Impact of Firm Performance and Earnings Management. 國立中央大學 碩士學位論文. 羅贊興,陳逸珊,黃書芸,黃馨儀. (2004). 美國企業改革法案(Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)對我國上市公司管理制度適用性之探討(上). 證交資料, 第505期, 8-34. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/62969 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 審計委員會為董事會之功能性委員會中,主要為公司監督財務報表品質之重要機制之一,美國沙賓法案通過後,審計委員會之財務專家更受到矚目,也被期許能夠為審計委員會提升其監督之效能,台灣之證券交易法亦於2006年完成修訂,明定公開上市發行公司必須於審計委員會中聘任至少一名之財務或會計專家,自2007年修訂法正式實施起,陸續有公司在審計委員會中設立兩位以上之會計專家,公司企圖以增加會計專家之人數來提升審計委員會之監督效果,但在提高會計專家席次的同時,代表其他背景之專家人數的減少,因此本文將透過探討會計專家人數的多寡與盈餘管理之關聯性,來分析會計專家是否能夠真實有效強化公司治理之機制。
本文對於審計委員會中財務與會計專家之定義參考DeFond et al. (2005),盈餘管理分別就Ball and Shivakumar (2006)研究中對應計項目盈餘管理之變數衡量,與Roychowdhury (2006)之研究中對於實質盈餘管理之變數衡量方法,作為本文探討盈餘管理活動之主要代理變數,依照公開資訊觀測站所彙整依證交法第14-4設立審計委員會之公司作為研究樣本,以台灣經濟新報所取得之資料庫數據做為資料來源。 實證結果發現,於審計委員會中設置兩位以上會計專家之公司,在抑制裁決性應計項目盈餘管理之面向上,結果不如僅設置一位會計專家之公司;在實質盈餘管理之面向上,審計委員會中僅設置一位會計專家之公司其抑制盈餘管理之效果亦較兩位以上會計專家之公司佳,但可看出兩位以上會計專家之公司,對於實質盈餘管理仍有相當程度之抑制效果。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Audit committee is one of the most important mechanism among all the functional committees of board of directors to supervise the quality of financial statement. After Sarbanes-Oxley Act had been enacted in the United States, the financial experts on audit committee had gained more attentions and also expected to enhance the efficiency of the control function within the audit committee. In 2006, The Securities and Exchange Law was enacted to require at least one financial or accounting expert on the audit committee for all the listed companies. In 2007, several companies have hired more than one accounting experts on the audit committee. This signifies that these companies were attempting to enhance the efficiency of the control function by adding more accounting experts; however, the additional accounting experts was causing a decrease of experts in other fields. This thesis examines the relation between the number of accounting experts in the audit committee and earnings management.
This thesis uses the definitions of financial and accouting experts as in Defond et al. (2005), the accrual earnings management variable measurements as in Ball and Shivakumar (2006) and the real earings management variable measurements as in Roychowdhury (2006). The samples is selected from the companies included on Market Observation Post System. The other financial data were selected from the Taiwan Economic Journal. The empirical results demonstrate that firms having more than one accounting experts on the audit committee constrains less accrual earnings management as compared with firms having only one accounting expert. In addition, firms with only one accounting expert have better performance in constraining real earnings management. However, firms with more than one accounting experts in an audit committee still have some effects on constraining real earnings management. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T16:16:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99722032-1.pdf: 663859 bytes, checksum: c442ef6612a387eec832041b4e1f72b9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 表目錄 v 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 4 第三節 論文架構 5 第二章 文獻探討與假說建立 6 第一節 審計委員會會計專家 6 第二節 盈餘管理 9 第三節 審計委員會財務專家與盈餘管理 11 第四節 假說建立 13 第三章 研究方法與設計 14 第一節 變數衡量 14 第二節 實證模型與主要控制變數 20 第三節 研究期間與樣本選取 26 第四章 實證結果 29 第一節 敘述性統計 29 第二節 相關係數檢定 32 第三節 實證結果 35 第五章 研究結論、限制與研究建議 44 第一節 研究結論 44 第二節 研究限制 45 第三節 研究建議 46 參考文獻 47 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 審計委員會會計專家多寡與盈餘管理之關聯性研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Relation between the Number of Accounting Experts on the Audit Committee and Earnings Management | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 曾智揚(Chih-Yang Tseng),洪聖閔(Shung-Ming Hung) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 審計委員會,盈餘管理,會計專家, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Audit Committee,Earnings Management,Accounting Experts, | en |
dc.relation.page | 51 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-02-05 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 648.3 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。