請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/625
標題: | 能源政策的管制科學分析—2018年深澳電廠之個案研究 An Analysis of Regulatory Science in Energy Policy: a Case Study of The Shenao Power Plant (2018) |
作者: | Wei Chen 陳瑋 |
指導教授: | 周桂田 |
關鍵字: | 深澳電廠,風險社會,專家政治,管制科學,科學民主化社運, The Shenao Power Plant,Risk Society,Technocracy,Regulatory Science,Democratizing Science Movements, |
出版年 : | 2019 |
學位: | 碩士 |
摘要: | 深澳電廠一案作為2018年台灣眾所關心並具相當爭議的科技政策,本文呈現各陣營行動者間的需求歧異、價值落差、與知識宣稱。透過文獻分析法與深度訪談法,首先,綜理出爭議點,再來透過訪談,一方面針對執政當局,探究該政策脈絡是來自甚麼價值、機制、法規、科學、科層,另一方面針對異議行動者,為何、如何、與憑藉甚麼,去挑戰官方科學。最後,綜合討論上述兩造陣營知識競爭與價值落差中,所反映的公民社會之願景、還有政策與民意間代溝。
本文發現,第一,公民社會進入風險社會(Risk Society ),中央政府仍於中心式決策機制、和管制科學(Regulatory Science);第二,中央政府對環境與健康的風險意識,仍路徑依賴於實證過去經驗、予以回應公民社會對未來與未知的風險感知;第三,上述情境導致政策與民意間鴻溝,甚而從政策路線之辯、上綱到恐引爆政府失靈之信任危機,終而迫使社會啟動非體制內的科學民主化社運去翻轉政策。 The Shenao Power Plant as a technology policy but yet controversial attracted great public concern in 2018. This study is to present the differences of opinions, value proposition and discourses between different camps of supporters. Through document analysis and in-depth interview methodologies, firstly, this study sorted out the controversial points to start the research. On the one hand, the study analyzed the administration’s policy background by assessing its value, mechanism, regulation and bureaucratical culture. On the other, the study also reviewed the opposition’s opinions, why and how the authority’s scientific proof is challenged. The study concluded by summarizing the above mentioned knowledge competition and value gap which reflected the differences between the public opinion’s and the policy, and civil society ’s vision. This study reviled, firstly, while a civil society enters into a risk society, the central government is still accustomed to adopt central decision making method and regulatory science. Secondly, the central government’s environmental and health risk consciences still rely on the empirical experiences to reply civil society’s risk awareness towards future and unknown. Thirdly, the above scenarios cause great divide between the policy and the general public which sometimes lead to policy debate and even more seriously credibility risk of the government. Eventually, the society is forced to initiate anti-establishment democratizing science movements to overturn the policy. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/625 |
DOI: | 10.6342/NTU201903861 |
全文授權: | 同意授權(全球公開) |
顯示於系所單位: | 國家發展研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf | 2.05 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。