請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/62002完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 闕蓓德(Pei-Te Chiueh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Xing-Jia Gan | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 甘幸佳 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T13:22:40Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-08-29 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-29 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-07-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abelard (2003) Energyeconomics and fossil fuels - how long do we have?. http://www.abelard.org/briefings/energy-economics.asp
Alsema, E. (2003) Practical Handbook of Photovoltaics. Tom, M. and Luis, C. (eds), pp. 869-886, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. Arvesen, A., Birkeland, C. and Hertwich, E.G. (2013) The Importance of Ships and Spare Parts in LCAs of Offshore Wind Power. Environmental Science & Technology 47(6), 2948-2956. Arvesen, A. and Hertwich, E.G. (2012) Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of wind power: A review of present knowledge and research needs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16(8), 5994-6006. Battisti, R. and Corrado, A. (2005) Evaluation of technical improvements of photovoltaic systems through life cycle assessment methodology. Energy 30(7), 952-967. Bullard, C.W., Penner, P.S. and Pilati, D.A. (1978) Net energy analysis: Handbook for combining process and input-output analysis. Resources and Energy 1(3), 267-313. Cleveland, C.J. (2005) Net energy from the extraction of oil and gas in the United States. Energy 30(5), 769-782. Cleveland, C.J. (2006) Energy from wind: A Discussion of the EROI Research. The Oil Drum. Cleveland, C.J. (2008) Ten fundamental principles of net energy. The Encyclopedia of earth. Cleveland, C.J. and Costanza, R. (1983) Developments in Environmental Modelling. William K. Lauenroth, G.V.S. and Marshall, F. (eds), pp. 889-899, Elsevier. Cleveland, C.J., Costanza, R., Hall, C.A.S. and Kaufmann, R. (1984) Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective. Science 225(4665), 890-897. Cockerill, T.T., Kuhn, M., van Bussel, G.J.W., Bierbooms, W. and Harrison, R. (2001) Combined technical and economic evaluation of the Northern European offshore wind resource. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 89(7–8), 689-711. David J. Murphy, C.A.S.H. (2010) Year in review--EROI or energy return on (energy) invested. Annals of the New York academy of sciences (Ecological Economics Reviews). European Wind Energy Association (2009) The Economics of Wind Energy. Farrell, A.E., Plevin, R.J., Turner, B.T., Jones, A.D., O'Hare, M. and Kammen, D.M. (2006) Ethanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals. Science 311(5760), 506-508. Fridley, D. (2010) Nine challenges of alternative energy, The post carbon reader series: Energy, post carbon institute, California. Gagnon, L., Belanger, C. and Uchiyama, Y. (2002) Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation options: The status of research in year 2001. Energy Policy 30(14), 1267-1278. Garrett, P. and Ronde, K. (2013) Life cycle assessment of wind power: comprehensive results from a state-of-the-art approach. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 18(1), 37-48. Gilliland, M.W. (1975) Energy Analysis and Public Policy. Science 189(4208), 1051-1056. Gipe, P. (1995) Wind energy comes of age, Wiley, New York. Gupta, A.K. and Hall, C.A.S. (2011) A Review of the Past and Current State of EROI Data. Sustainability 3(10), 1796-1809. GWEC (2012) Global wind report annual market update 2011, GWEC. Hall, C.A.S., Cleveland, C.J. and Kaufmann, R. (1986) Energy and Resource Quality:The Ecology of the Economic Process, Wiley, New York. Hall, C.A.S., Powers, R. and Schoenberg, W. (2008) Peak oil, EROI, Investments and the Economy in an Uncertain Future, Elsevier, London. Heijungs, R., Suh, S. and Kleijn, R. (2005) Numerical Approaches to Life Cycle Interpretation - The case of the Ecoinvent’96 database (10 pp). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(2), 103-112. Huijbregts, M.A.J. (1998) Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 3(5), 273-280. IEA (2012) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion highlights, International Energy Agency. ISO (2006) ISO 14040:2006, Environmental management-Life cycle assassment Principles and Framework. Standardization, I.O.f. (ed). Kabir, M.R., Rooke, B., Dassanayake, G.D.M. and Fleck, B.A. (2012) Comparative life cycle energy, emission, and economic analysis of 100 kW nameplate wind power generation. Renewable Energy 37(1), 133-141. Kessides, I.N. and Wade, D.C. (2011a) Deriving an Improved Dynamic EROI to Provide Better Information for Energy Planners. Sustainability 3(12), 2339-2357. Kessides, I.N. and Wade, D.C. (2011b) Towards a sustainable global energy supply infrastructure: Net energy balance and density considerations. Energy Policy 39(9), 5322-5334. Kivisto, A. (1995) Energy payback period & CO2 emissions in different power generation methods in Finland, International Association of Energy Economics Klassen, G., A. Miketa, K. Larsen, T. Sundqvist (2005) The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics 54, 227-240. Kubiszewski, I., Cleveland, C.J. and Endres, P.K. (2010) Meta-analysis of net energy return for wind power systems. Renewable Energy 35(1), 218-225. Lantz, E., Wiser, R. and Hand, M. (2012) IEA Wind Task 26: The Past and Future Cost of Wind Energy. Lenzen, M. and Munksgaard, J. (2002) Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines—review and applications. Renewable Energy 26(3), 339-362. Lynd, L.R. and Wang., M.Q. (2004) A product-nonspecific framework for evaluating the potential of biomass-based products to displace fossil fuels. Journal of Industrial Ecology 7(3-4), 17-32. Marsh, G. (2007) What Price O&M?: Operation and maintenance costs need to be factored into the project costs of offshore wind farms at an early stage. Refocus 8(3), 22-27. Martinez, E., Sanz, F., Pellegrini, S., Jimenez, E. and Blanco, J. (2009) Life cycle assessment of a multi-megawatt wind turbine. Renewable Energy 34(3), 667-673. Maurice, B., Frischknecht, R., Coelho-Schwirtz, V. and Hungerbuhler, K. (2000) Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory. Application to the production of electricity with French coal power plants. Journal of Cleaner Production 8(2), 95-108. NEEDS (2008) New energy externalities developments for sustainability. RS 1a：Life cycle approaches to assess emerging energy technologies (Final report on offshore wind technology), NEEDS projects, DONG Energy. Negra, N.B., Todorovic, J. and Ackermann, T. (2006) Loss evaluation of HVAC and HVDC transmission solutions for large offshore wind farms. Electric Power Systems Research 76(11), 916-927. PRe Consultants (2008) SimaPro Database Manual Methods library. http://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/manuals/DatabaseManualMethods.pdf Pimentel, D. and Patzek, T.W. (2005) Ethanol production using corn, switchgrass, and wood; biodiesel production using soybean and sunflower. Natural Resources Research 14(1), 65-76. Ramboll (2009) Anholt off shore wind farm. Background memo. Air emissions, Ramboll Olie & Gas, on behalf of Energinet.dk (Danish Ministry of Climate and Energy). Reeves A., B.F., Executive Editor (2003) Wind energy for electric power a REPP issue brief. Renewable Energy Policy Project. Schleisner, L. (2000) Life cycle assessment of a wind farm and related externalities. Renewable Energy 20(3), 279-288. Van Den Berg, G.P. (2004) Effects of the wind profile at night on wind turbine sound. Journal of Sound and Vibration 277(4–5), 955-970. Vestas (2001) Life cycle assessment of turbine PSO 1999, Vestas Wind System A/S of the Tech-wise A/S report 138094, Danish. Vestas (2004) Life cycle assessment of offshore and onshore sited wind farms, Vestas Wind System A/S of the Danish Elsam Engineering report 186768. Vestas (2006) Life cylce assessment of offshore and onshore sited wind power plants bases on Vestas V90-3.0MW turbine, Vestas Wind System A/S of the Tech-wise A/S report 138094, Danish. Wagner, H.-J., Baack, C., Eickelkamp, T., Epe, A., Lohmann, J. and Troy, S. (2011) Life cycle assessment of the offshore wind farm alpha ventus. Energy 36(5), 2459-2464. Wagner, H.J. and Tryfonidou, R. (2005) Wind energy under the aspect of sustainability, Taipei. Wang, Y. and Sun, T. (2012) Life cycle assessment of CO2 emissions from wind power plants: Methodology and case studies. Renewable Energy 43(0), 30-36. Yue, C.-D., Liu, C.-M. and Liou, E.M.L. (2001) A transition toward a sustainable energy future: feasibility assessment and development strategies of wind power in Taiwan. Energy Policy 29(12), 951-963. 刁國樑 (2010) 10仟瓦以下風力發電機性能測試系統研製，逢甲大學，台中市。 中央大學物理所、工研院能資所 (2002) 風況衛星遙測資料。 王景玟 (2005) 結合生命週期評估及生態效益之分析研究－以鋼鐵廠製品為例， 國立成功大學，台南市。 王醴 (2012) 先導型離岸風電場岸上設施與電網併聯。 台灣電力公司 (2005) 風力發電第三期計畫可行性研究報告（修訂本），台灣電力公司。 李奕亨、顏志偉 (2006) 台灣西部離岸風力發電廠址地震條件分析，國立中山大學，高雄市。 李振弘、陳昭榮 (2004) 離岸式風力電廠之發展與基本規劃，第7-4-1~7-4-7頁， 2004能源及冷凍空調學術研討會。 李珮蓓 (2010) 結合IO-LCA與碳足跡評估分析研究：以IC業為例，國立成功大學，台南市。 張純美、陳信宏、楊瑞源、李宗霖、鄭東生 (2008) 台灣離岸風力發電場址評估之研究，國立交通大學，新竹市。 郭世勳 (2008) 台灣地區離岸式風力發電成本效益分析，國立臺北大學，新北市。 曾詠恩 (2006) 台灣地區風力發電之潛力分析與生命週期評估，國立臺北大學， 新北市。 黃勝祿 (2004) 考慮模糊風力發電模型之離島發電成本評估，國立中山大學，高雄市。 楊明浩 (2006) 台灣地區陸上及離岸式風力發電效益之評估，立德管理學院，台南市。 楊英賢 (2008) 生命週期評估與不確定性分析應用於火力電廠與燃料選擇，國立成功大學，台南市。 經濟部能源局 (2007) 第一階段設置離岸式風力發電廠方案。 經濟部能源局 (2012a) 中華民國100年能源統計手冊。 經濟部能源局 (2012b) 我國燃料燃燒二氧化碳排放統計與分析。 經濟部能源局、工業技術研究院 (2012) 千架海陸風力機風力資訊整合平台，http://wind.itri.org.tw/。 葉弘德 (2012) 氣候變遷對台灣西部離岸風能潛勢與發電量之影響評估，國立臺灣大學，台北市。 廖卿惠 (2010) 臺灣永續能源發展之潛勢分析，國立臺灣大學，台北市。 福海風力發電股份有限公司籌備處 (2011) 福海離岸風力發電計畫環境影響說明書。 劉勇、孔祥威、白珂 (2009) 大規模海上風電場建設的技術支撐體系研究，資源科學 31(11)。 蕭嘉豪 (2009) 我國風力發電之環境衝擊與經濟效益評估，國立臺灣大學，台北市。 顏志偉、徐仕昇、呂威賢、翁榮羨 (2003) 我國發展離岸式風力發電之初步研究，國立台灣海洋大學，基隆市。 魏佩如 (2010) 產品碳足跡計算不確定性分析之研究，國立台北科技大學，台北市。 羅時麒 (2005) 以系統性機率模式鑑定量化與整合生命週期評估之不確定性，國立臺灣大學，台北市。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/62002 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 再生能源中的風力發電為世界上發展最快的能源系統，其中離岸式風力發電位於面積廣闊的海域，擁有風期長、平均風速大、風力平穩且不受遮擋等優點，已成為近年來世界各國相當重視的能源開發方案之一。臺灣經濟部能源局也為此積極準備，於2012年公布「風力發電離岸系統示範獎勵辦法」，鼓勵業者進行離岸式風力發電示範開發，期望藉此達成能源多元化、改善環境品質、二氧化碳減量及國家永續發展之目標。
由於臺灣尚未有離岸式風力發電實廠的相關資料，因此本研究參考國內廠商已提交環境影響評估之「福海離岸風力發電計畫」，根據可能選用的電力輸送方式，模擬離岸式風力發電廠，並依照是否裝設海上變壓站，區分兩個案例進行探討，案例一為52部離岸式風力機，以2條32kV海底纜線將電力傳輸至岸上；案例二為52部離岸式風力機，經由海上變壓站後利用150kV海底纜線將電力傳輸至岸上。 研究方法選用生命週期評估軟體SimaPro 7.1，盤查分析使用文獻回顧及軟體內建Ecoinvent資料庫，經由Eco-indicator 99評估模式量化其潛在衝擊，並計算其累積能源需求、能源投資報酬以及能源回收期等淨能源指標。最後針對研究結果進行敏感度分析及蒙地卡羅模擬計算不確定性。 結果顯示，風力機的環境衝擊主要來自鋼鐵材料，以基座採用的鋼筋為主，塔架及機艙使用的鋼材次之，衝擊項目以化石燃料與可吸入無機物最高。比較生命週期各階段的環境衝擊，由大到小依序為組件製造、建造運輸、退役及運轉維修階段。由單項得點結果比較，含有海上變壓站之案例二單項得點(0.00139 Pt)約為案例一(0.00126 Pt)的1.1倍，特別是氣候變遷衝擊項目，案例二約大於案例一29%，其差異來自於海上變壓站大量使用的混凝土材料。 在淨能源計算部分，離岸式風電廠每產出1度電，案例一需要0.192 MJ能源投入，案例二需要0.216 MJ能源投入；案例一EROI為18.7，案例二EROI為16.7；案例一之能源回收期為12.8個月，案例二之能源回收期為14.4個月。若考慮回收階段帶來的效益，整體來說，可為案例一及案例二減少25%環境衝擊，減少約30%的能源耗用，縮短了約4個月的能源回收期。 雖然含有海上變壓站之案例二，不論是環境衝擊或者能源損耗皆大於案例一，但是考慮電力傳輸損失減低之效益，或許不失為可行之方案。最後，若要進一步降低風電廠帶來之環境衝擊，可以針對風力機材料進行改良，特別是鋼鐵材料的部分可尋找更環保的材料替代，或者進行鋼鐵、混凝土製程改善、電力結構調整以及提升建造階段之海上船隻燃油使用效率。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Wind energy is among the fastest growing sources of electricity generation worldwide. Because of optimal wind conditions at sea, long operating times, strong average wind speeds, and unobstructed wind fields, offshore wind power technology has become a focal program of energy development. Taiwan has strong winds, particularly offshore of the west coast. The Energy Bureau is committed to promoting offshore wind energy and propelling Taiwan into a sustainably green era.
To evaluate the environmental burden and energy balance of using wind power technology, this study developed and assessed life cycle inventories for two conceptual offshore wind-power plants that depend on electricity transmission systems. Life cycle assessment software SimaPro 7.1 and Eco-indicator 99 methodology were applied to evaluate functional units of 1 kWh offshore wind power electricity. Furthermore, net energy indicators, such as cumulative energy demand, energy return on investment (EROI), and energy payback time, were calculated. The results indicate that the environmental impact of Vestas V80 wind turbines is mainly due to ferrous metals used in the foundations of wind turbines and towers. The most relevant impact categories are fossil fuels and respiratory inorganics. Regarding the single scores, the environmental impact is derived from production, subsequent installation, end-of-life, and O&M. Regarding Case 2, the impact of an offshore wind-power plant employing an offshore transformer and a 150 kV submarine cable was 1.1 times greater than the impact calculated for Case 1, which involved using an offshore wind-power plant equipped with two 32 kV submarine cables. In the climate change category, Case 2 indicated a 129% greater environmental impact than that of Case 1. Regarding net energy analysis, the energy required was 0.192 MJ/kWh for Case 1 and 0.216 MJ/kWh for Case 2, and the EROI was 18.7 and 16.7, respectively. Moreover, the energy payback time were 12.8 months for Case 1 and 14.4 months for Case 2. For the both cases, considering the recycling benefits can reduce 25% environment impact, 30% energy required and 4 months energy payback time. Case 2 demonstrated environmental and energy impacts that were more significant than those of Case 1. Considering the effectiveness of reducing power transmission loss, Case 2 may be feasible. Overall, to reduce the impact of offshore wind-power plants, the materials of wind turbines can be improved, particularly steel and concrete. In addition, during the installation phase, the electricity structure can be adjusted and the vessel fuel efficiency can be upgraded. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T13:22:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R00541202-1.pdf: 2533912 bytes, checksum: 127afefa18e13d34b14c74c444767489 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
Abstract III 圖目錄 VIII 表目錄 X 第一章 緒論 1 1-1研究動機 1 1-2研究目的 3 1-3研究流程與架構 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 2-1風力發電 6 2-1-1風力發電概述 6 2-1-2全球離岸式風力發電發展概況 14 2-1-3臺灣風力發電發展概況 17 2-1-4臺灣離岸式風力發電發展潛能與開發規劃 21 2-1-5風力發電經濟分析之文獻回顧 28 2-2生命週期評估 31 2-2-1生命週期評估方法簡介 31 2-2-2生命週期環境衝擊評估方法 34 2-2-3生命週期之不確定性分析 37 2-2-4風力發電之生命週期評估 41 2-3淨能源分析 45 2-3-1淨能源分析方法 45 2-3-2淨能源指標 47 2-3-3各能源技術之EROI 50 2-3-4風力發電之淨能源分析 53 第三章 研究方法 57 3-1生命週期評估方法 57 3-1-1目標與範疇界定 57 3-1-2盤查分析 62 3-1-3衝擊評估方法 73 3-1-4不確定性分析 78 3-2淨能源分析 80 第四章 結果與討論 83 4-1生命週期評估結果 83 4-1-1風力發電機評估結果 83 4-1-2案例一評估結果 90 4-1-3案例二評估結果 99 4-1-4綜合討論 108 4-2淨能源分析 110 4-2-1累積能源需求 110 4-2-2能源投資報酬 113 4-2-3能源回收期 114 4-3敏感度分析 115 4-3-1發電量改變 115 4-3-2離岸距離改變 117 4-3-3鋼鐵用量改變 119 4-3-4用電量改變 121 4-4不確定性分析 123 第五章 結論與建議 127 5-1結論 127 5-2建議 130 參考文獻 132 附錄 139 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 淨能源分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 能源投資報酬(EROI) | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 能源投資報酬(EROI) | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 淨能源分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生命週期評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 離岸式風力發電 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 離岸式風力發電 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生命週期評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | life cycle assessment | en |
| dc.subject | offshore wind power | en |
| dc.subject | life cycle assessment | en |
| dc.subject | net energy analysis | en |
| dc.subject | energy return on investment(EROI) | en |
| dc.subject | offshore wind power | en |
| dc.subject | net energy analysis | en |
| dc.subject | energy return on investment(EROI) | en |
| dc.title | 離岸式風力發電系統之生命週期評估與淨能源分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Life Cycle Assessment and Net Energy Analysis of Offshore Wind Power Systems | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李公哲(Kung-Cheh Li),馬鴻文(Hwong-Wen Ma) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 離岸式風力發電,生命週期評估,淨能源分析,能源投資報酬(EROI), | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | offshore wind power,life cycle assessment,net energy analysis,energy return on investment(EROI), | en |
| dc.relation.page | 172 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-07-25 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 環境工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.47 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。