請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61844完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李蘭 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Yun Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳佳韻 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T13:15:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-09-24 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-09-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-07-29 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
王文玲，王琪珍，董旭英，彭若瑄：從Pender健康促進模式探討青少年避二手菸行為之研究。實證護理2007；3(4)：280-288。 江宜珍、李蘭：社會網絡與社會支持。李蘭等：健康行為與健康教育。初版。台北：巨流圖書，2010；123-140。 江宜珍、李蘭：社會認知理論。李蘭等：健康行為與健康教育。初版。台北：巨流圖書，2010；103-122。 行政院衛生署國民健康局。民國97年青少年吸菸行為調查資料庫問卷，2008。 引自 http://tobacco.bhp.doh.gov.tw/Upload/FTB/UpFiles/2012 02 吸菸行為調查/97GYTS.pdf。引用2012/12/10。 行政院衛生署國民健康局。99年度成人吸菸行為調查摘要報告，2011。引自http://tobacco.bhp.doh.gov.tw/Show.aspx?MenuId=581。引用2012/03/29。 行政院衛生署國民健康局。99年度國中學生吸菸行為調查摘要報告，2011。引自 http://tobacco.bhp.doh.gov.tw/Show.aspx?MenuId=582。引用2012/03/29。 行政院衛生署國民健康局。100年青少年學生吸菸行為調查結果，2012。引自 http://www.bhp.doh.gov.tw/bhpnet/portal/PressShow.aspx?No=201203290001引用2012/09/12。 李蘭、孫亦君、翁慧卿：台北市國中生物質濫用行為之預測因子。醫學教育1998；2(4)；420-428。 李蘭、潘怜燕、晏涵文、李隆安：台灣地區成年人之吸菸現況：盛行率及危險因子。中華衛誌1994，13；371-80。 李蘭、潘怜燕：台灣地區成年人之吸菸率與吸菸行為：八十八年度之全國性調查。中華衛誌2000，19(6)；423-436。 周思源、李玫姿、梁文敏、郭憲華、張麗惠、賴璟賢、朱日橋，郭憲文：台灣地區在校青少年吸菸、喝酒及嚼食檳榔與藥物使用之盛行率。中台灣醫誌2006，11；117-186。 周碧瑟、劉美媛、張鴻仁：台灣在校青少年生活人權的認知與行為現況以及與抽菸、喝酒的相關之探討。中華衛誌1998，17(4)；303-316。 涂金堂 ：量表編製與SPSS。初版。台北：五南，2012；86-143。 陳宙珍、李蘭、趙坤郁：門診戒菸治療之成效及其相關因素探討。臺灣公共衛生雜誌2008，27(1)；44-56。 陸玓玲、李蘭：健康信念模式。李蘭等：健康行為與健康教育。初版。台北：巨流圖書，2010a；41-61。 陸玓玲、李蘭：理性行動論與計劃行為論。李蘭等：健康行為與健康教育。初版。台北：巨流圖書，2010b；64-80。 葉淑杏、曾弘富、楊淑帆、黃怡棻、趙雅琪、蔡宜珊、李淑宜：高雄市青少年吸菸行為及其相關因素之探討。福爾摩莎醫務管理雜誌2005，1(1)；76-86。 潘怜燕、李蘭：台灣地區成年人吸菸盛行率及其與教育和職業之關係：菸害防制法時施前的狀況(1993~1996)。中華衛誌1999，18，199-208。 英文部分 Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 1977;84:191-215. Bandura A. Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of control over AIDS infection. Evaluation and Program Planning 1990;13:9-17. Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In: Ramachandran V S, eds. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1994;71-81. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: WHFree-man, 1997. Belle D. Gender differences in the social moderators of stress. New York: The Free Press, 1987. Campbell R, Starkey F, Holliday J, Audrey S, Bloom M, Parry-Langdon N, Hughes R, Moore L. An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): a cluster randomised trial. Lancet 2008; 371:1595–1602. Carlson L E, Goodey E, Bennett M H, Taenzer P, Koopmans J. The addition of social support to a community-based large-group behavioral smoking cessation intervention: improved cessation rates and gender differences. Addictive Behaviors 2002:27(4):547-59. Casses J. The contribution of the social environment to host resistance. American Journal of Epidemiology 1976;104:107-123. Champion V L, Skinner C S. The Health Belief Model. In: Glanz k, Rimer B K, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4 ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008;41-66. Chang H Y, Wu W C, Wu C C, Cheng J Y, Hurng B S, Yen L L. The Incidence of Experimental smoking in school children: an 8-year follow-up of the child and adolescent behaviors in long-term evalution (CABLE) study. BMC Public Health 2011;11:844. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-844. Chase C I. Measurement for educational evaluation. 2 ed., Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1978;140. Chen P L, Huang W, Chuang Y L, Warren C W, Jones N R, Asma S. Prevalence of Tobacco use among junior high and senior high school students in Taiwan. Journal of School Health 2008;78(12):649-654. Chen P L, Huang W, Chuang Y L, Warren C W, Jones N R, Lee J. Exposure to and attitudes regarding secondhand smoke among secondary students in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 2009;21:259-267. Chen P L, Huang W G, Chao K Y. Factors associated with Taiwanese junior high school personnel advising students to quit smoking. Journal of School Health 2011; 81(2):91-99. Chou K L. Assessing Chinese adolescents' social support: the multidimentsional scale of perceived social support. Personality and Individual Differences 2000;28: 299-307. Crone M R, Reijneveld S A, Burgmeijer R J, Hirasing R A. Factors that influence passive smoking in infancy: a study among mothers of newborn babies in The Netherlands. Preventive medicine 2001;32(3):209-217. Dahlem N W, Zimet G D, Walker R R. The Multidimensional scale of perceived social support: a confirmation study. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1991;47(6): 756-761. Ding D, Wahlgren D R, Liles S, Jones J A, Hughes S C, Hovell M F. Second smoke avoidance by preteens living with smokers: to leave or stay? Adductive Behavior 2010;35(11):989-94. Ennett S T, Faris R, Hipp H, Foshee V A, Bauman K E, Hussong A, Cai L. Peer smoking, other peer attributes, and adolescent cigarette smoking: a social network analysis. Prevention Science 2008;9(2),88-98. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Preceding and changing behavior- the reasoned action approach. 1st ed., USA: Psychology Press, 2009;20-27. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Preceding and changing behavior- the reasoned action approach. 1st ed., USA: Psychology Press, 2009;449-463. Germain D, Wakefield M, Durkin S. Non-smokers' responses when smokers light up: A population-based study. Preventive Medicine 2007;45:21-25. Gottlieb N H, Eriksen M P, Lovato C Y, Weinstein R P, Green L W. Impact of a restrictive worksite smoking policy on smoking behavior, attitudes and norms. J. Occupational Medicine 1990; 32:16-23. Gregory D Z, Nancy W D, Sara G Z, Gordon K F. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment 1988;52(1):30-41. Hazemba A, Siziya S, Muula A S, Rudatsikira E. Gender specific factors associated with having stopped smoking among in-school adolescents in Ukraine: results from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey 2005. BMC Research Notes 2010;3:76. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-76. Heaney C A, Israel B A. Social networks and social support. In: Glanz k, Rimer B K, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4 ed., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008;189-210. House J S. Work Stress and social support. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley,1981. James S H, Karl R L, Debra U. Social Relation ships and Health. Science 1988;241: 540-545. Kulbok P A, Rhee H, Botchwey N, Hinton I, Bovberg V, Anderson N L R. Factors influencing adolescents' decision not to smoke. Public Health Nursing 2008; 25(6):505-515. Laurie C, Clark C P, Steven J S. Cognitive and social influence factors in adolescent smoking cessation. Addictive Behavior 1984;9:383-390. Lawrance L, Rubinson L. Self-efficacy as a predictor of smoking behavior in young adolescents. Addictive Behavior 1986; 11(4):367-382. Li M F, Wang R H. Factors related to avoidance of environmental tobacco smoke among adolescents in southern Taiwan. The Journal of Nursing Research 2006; 14(2):103-12. Liao Y, Huang Z, Huh J, Pentz MA, Chou C P. Changes in Friends' and Parental Influences on Cigarette Smoking From Early Through Late Adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health 2013;xxx:1-7. Lin P L, Huang H L, Lu K Y, Chen T, Lin W T, Hsu H M. Second-hand smoke exposure and the factors associated with avoidance behavior among the mothers of pre-school children: a school-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2010;10: 606. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-606. Malcolm R L, Allan K H. Environmental tobacco smoke. Britishi Medicine Bulletin 1996;52(1):22-34. McBride P E. The health consequences of smoking. Cardiovascular disease. The Medical Clinics of North America 1992;76(2):333-353. Mercken L, Moore L, Crone M R, De Vries H, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Lien N, Fagiano F, Vitória P D, Van Lenthe F J. The effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention interventions among low- and high-SES European teenagers. Health Education Research 2012;37(3):459-469. Michael P E, Charles A L, Guy R N. Health Hazards of Passive Smoking. Annual Review of Public Health 1988;9:47-70. Morin P, Demers K, Turcotte S, Mongeau L. Association between perceived self-efficacy related to meal management and food coping strategies among working parents with preschool children. Appetite 2013;65:43-50. Noll V H, Scannell D P, Craig R C. Introduction to educational measurement. 4 ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979;210. Pamela A K, Hyekyun R, Nisha B, Ivy H, Viktor B, Nancy L R A. Factors influencing adolescents' decision not to smoke. Public Health Nursing 2008;25(6):505-515. Parkin D M. Tobacco-attributable cancer burden in the UK in 2010. British Journal of Cancer 2011;05: s6-s13. Sarna L, Brown J K, Lillington L, Wewers M E, Brecht M L.Tobacco-control attitudes, advocacy, and smoking behaviors of oncology nurses. Oncology Nursing Forum 2000;27(10):1519-1528. Sasco A J, Secretan M B, Straif K. Tobacco smoking and cancer: a brief review of recent epidemiological evidence. Lung Cancer 2004;45:S3-S9. Taylor S E, Klein L C, Lewis B P, Gruenewald T L, Gurung R A R,Updegraff J A. Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review 2000;107:411-429 Thoits P A.Stress, coping, and social support processes: Where are we? What next? Journal of Health and Social Behavior1995;35:53-79. Victor J S, Brenda M D, Marshall H B, Irwin M R. The Role of Self-Efficacy in Achieving Health Behavior Change. Health Education & Behavior 1986;13(1): 73-92. Wang W L, Herting J R, Tung Y Y. Adolescents' avoidance of secondhand smoke exposure: model testing.Western Journal of nursing research 2008;30:836-851. Wen C P, Tsai S P, Cheng T Y, Hsu C C, Chen T, Lin H S. Role of parents and peers in influencing the smoking status of high school students in Taiwan. Tobacco Control 2005;14(1):i10-i15. WHO. Tobacco. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs339/en/index.html. Access at September 12,2012. Wilkinson A V, Shete S, Prokhorov A V. The moderating role of parental smoking on their children's attitudes toward smoking among a predominantly minority sample: a cross-sectional analysis. Substance Abuse Treatment, Preveniton, and Policy 2008; 3:18. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-3-18. Willemsen M C, De Vries H. Saying 'No' to environmental tobacco smoke: Determinants of assertiveness among nonsmoking employees. Preventive Medicine 1996;25: 575-582. Zaloudíková I, Hrubá D, Samara I. Parental education and family status-- association with children's cigarette smoking. Central European Journal of Public Health 2012;20(1):38-44. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61844 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 目的：瞭解國中學生勸父母與朋友之勸誡效能，並進一步找出影響勸誡效能之相關因素。
方法：採立意取樣之方式選取台北市一所國中進行調查，再透過隨機取向之方式抽選七、八、九年級各三分之一的班級共827位學生進行問卷調查，扣除填寫不完整之問卷後，有效問卷共741份。透過問卷的方式，瞭解學生設想在遇見家人與同學吸菸的情形下，會勸這些人不吸菸之把握程度，並透過多元羅吉斯迴歸找出影響勸誡效能之相關因素。 結果：將741份問卷統計後顯示：若勸誡對象為父母，拒菸態度、勸誡經驗、父親教育程度、母親教育程度、父親支持程度與母親支持程度是影響研究樣本勸誡父母不吸菸效能之因子；若勸誡對象為朋友，則性別、拒菸態度、勸誡經驗、父親教育程度、父親吸菸與父親支持是影響研究樣本勸朋友不吸菸效能之因子。 建議：1.將勸誡行為納入衛教課程中，並透過實際演練提升學生的勸誡效能；2.對吸菸父親進行的戒菸教育中，強調父親之吸菸行為對兒女帶來的負向影響；3.親職教育中，加強教導父母給予孩子支持的重要性及其對國中生勸誡效能的影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To understand the efficacy of junior high school students toward advising their parents or friends not to smoke, and to explore the factors associated with the advising efficacy.
Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used in this study. Sampling techniques were purposive and random. We chose a junior high school in Taipei purposively, and selected one third classes from grade 7 to grade 9 in a randomized trial. 827 students were invited to finish an anonymous questionnaire, which was designed to measure the advising efficacy by asking how sure they would advise their parents/ friends if they see them smoking, and 741 students complete the questionnaire. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the outcome, trying to find out the factors associated with the advising efficacy. Results: When it comes to advise junior high school students’ parents, attitude toward anti-smoking, advising experience, father's educational attainment, mother's educational attainment, support from parents are factors which will influence the efficacy of advising their parent. When it comes to advise junior high school students’ friends, gender, attitude toward anti- smoking, advising experience, father's educational attainment, father’s smoking status, support from father are the factors which are associate with efficacy of advising smoking friends. Recommendation: 1.In order to enhance the efficacy of junior high school students, health educators should put advising others not to smoke in to regular class, and take the techniques of advising in to practice. 2. Put emphasis on how fathers' smoking behavior would influence their children not only on health but also advising others not to smoke during the smoking cessation classes. 3. In parent education, put more emphasis on the importance of parents support toward their children and how it would influence the efficacy of their children to advise others not to smoke. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T13:15:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R00848025-1.pdf: 843514 bytes, checksum: e2883e837ea0933864b7d168d381907f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景............................................1 第二節 研究目的............................................3 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 國人吸菸情況........................................4 第二節 社會支持與吸菸的關係................................7 第三節 勸誡行為及勸誡不吸菸行為............................9 第四節 勸誡不吸菸之效能...................................12 第五節 文獻小結...........................................15 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構...........................................16 第二節 資料來源...........................................17 第三節 研究變項...........................................21 第四節 資料分析...........................................24 第四章 結果 第一節 研究樣本之背景因素與環境因素的分佈.................25 第二節 研究樣本的勸誡效能.................................28 第三節 研究樣本勸誡父母不吸菸效能的影響因素...............29 第四節 研究樣本勸誡朋友不吸菸效能的影響因素...............31 第五章 討論 第一節 國中生的勸誡效能及其影響因素因對象不同而有差異.....32 第二節 研究限制...........................................37 第六章 結論與建議 第一節 結論...............................................39 第二節 建議...............................................40 參考文獻...................................................43 附錄一 國中生勸誡不吸菸行為調查初試問卷...................48 附錄二 初試問卷分析結果...................................54 附錄三 國中生勸誡不吸菸行為調查問卷.......................55 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 勸誡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會支持 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 效能 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 吸菸 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國中生 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | advice | en |
| dc.subject | junior high school students | en |
| dc.subject | social support | en |
| dc.subject | smoking | en |
| dc.subject | efficacy | en |
| dc.title | 台北市某校國中生之勸誡不吸菸效能及相關因素探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Junior High School Students Advising Smokers 'Not to Smoke' | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳富莉,吳文琪 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 勸誡,效能,吸菸,社會支持,國中生, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | advice,efficacy,smoking,social support,junior high school students, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 60 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-07-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 健康政策與管理研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 823.74 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。