請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61583完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃恆獎(Heng-Chiang Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ling-Yen Pan | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 潘令妍 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T13:06:30Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-24 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-07-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-06-24 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] C.M. Chiu, M.H. Hsu, E.T.G. Wang, Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories, Decision Support Systems 42 (3) (2006) 1872–1888, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001. [2] M. Sharratt, A. Usoro, Understanding knowledge-sharing in online communities of practice, Electronic Journal on Knowledge Management 1 (2) (2003) 187–196, http://www.ejkm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=32. [3] D. Andrews, J. Preece, M. Turoff, A conceptual framework for demographic groups resistant to on-line community interaction, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6 (3) (2002) 9–24, https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2002.11044239. [4] A.J. Kim, Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2000. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=518514. [5] J. Preece, Sociability and usability in online communities: determining and measuring success, Behaviors Information Technology 20 (5) (2001) 347–356, https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110084683. [6] Y. Ren, R. Kraut, S. Kiesler, Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities, Organization Studies 28 (3) (2007) 377–408, https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076007. [7] J. Bishop, Increasing participation in online communities: a framework for human-computer interaction, Computers in Human Behavior 23 (4) (2007) 1881–1893, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.004. [8] B. Nonnecke, D. Andrews, J. Preece, Non-public and public online community participation: needs, attitudes and behavior, Electronic Commerce Research 6 (1) (2006) 7–20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-006-5985-x. [9] N.B. Ellison, C. Steinfield, C. Lampe, The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (4) (2007) 1143–1168, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x. [10] T. Zhou, Understanding online community user participation: a social influence perspective, Internet Research 21 (1) (2011) 67–81, https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241111104884. [11] J. Koh, Y.G. Kim, B. Butler, G.W. Bock, Encouraging participation in virtual communities, Communications of the ACM 50 (2) (2007) 68–73, https://doi.org/10.1145/1216016.1216023. [12] H.H. Teo, H.C. Chan, K.K. Wei, Z. Zhang, Evaluating information accessibility and community adaptivity features for sustaining virtual learning communities, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (5) (2003) 671–697, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00087-9. [13] P.J. Bateman, P.H. Gray, B.S. Butler, Research note–the impact of community commitment on participation in online communities, Information Systems Research 22 (4) (2011) 841–854, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0265. [14] H. Jang, L. Olfman, I. Ko, J. Koh, K. Kim, The influence of on-line brand community characteristics on community commitment and brand loyalty, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 12 (3) (2008) 57–80, https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415120304. [15] C.E. Porter, N. Donthu, Cultivating trust and harvesting value in virtual communities, Management Science 54 (1) (2008) 113–128, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0765. [16] J.J. Wu, Y.H. Chen, Y.S. Chung, Trust factors influencing virtual community members: a study of transaction communities, Journal of Business Research 63 (9) (2010) 1025–1032, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.022. [17] C.L. Hsu, H.P. Lu, Consumer behavior in online game communities: a motivational factor perspective, Computers in Human Behavior 23 (3) (2007) 1642–1659, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.09.001. [18] C. Wiertz, K. de Ruyter, Beyond the call of duty: why customers contribute to firm-hosted commercial online communities, Organization Studies 28 (3) (2007) 347–376, https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076003. [19] M.R. Martínez-Torres, S.L. Toral, F. Barrero, F. Cortés, The role of Internet in the development of future software projects, Internet Research 20 (1) (2010) 72–86, https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241011020842. [20] S.L. Toral, M. Rocío Martínez-Torres, F. Barrero, F. Cortés, An empirical study of the driving forces behind online communities, Internet Research 19 (4) (2009) 378–392, https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240910981353. [21] S. Goss, Making Local Governance Work: Networks, Relationships and the Management of Change, Palgrave, Basingstoke, UK, 2001. [22] L. Dahlander, L. Frederiksen, F. Rullani, Online communities and open innovation, Industry and Innovation 15 (2) (2008) 115–123, https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710801970076. [23] L. Fleming, D.M. Waguespack, Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities, Organization Science 18 (2) (2007) 165–180, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0242. [24] M.L. Markus, The governance of free/open source software projects: monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational?, Journal of Management Governance 11 (2) (2007) 151–163, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-007-9021-x. [25] S. O’Mahony, F. Ferraro, Governance in production communities, Academy of Management Journal 50 (5) (2007) 1079–1106, http://www.academia.edu/download/30702685/Ferraro_GOPC_9-8-06_000.pdf. [26] S.K. Shah, Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development, Management Science 52 (7) (2006) 1000–1014, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553. [27] L. Wu, P. Liu, Y. Lv, X. Chen, F.-S. Tsai, Social co-governance for food safety risks, Sustainability 10 (11) (2018) 4246–4259, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114246. [28] M.N. Kooper, R. Maes, E.R. Lindgreen, On the governance of information: introducing a new concept of governance to support the management of information, International Journal of Information Management 31 (3) (2011), 195–200, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.009. [29] M. Chi, J. Zhao, J.F. George, Y. Li, S. Zhai, The influence of inter-firm IT governance strategies on relational performance: the moderation effect of information technology ambidexterity, International Journal of Information Management 37 (2) (2017) 43–53, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.007. [30] J.G. Röndell, D. Sörhammar, M. Gidhagen, Co-governance in the consumer engagement process: facilitating multi-beneficial value creation, Journal of Strategic Marketing 24 (3-4) (2016) 327–345, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2015.1095221. [31] R. Gorwa, What is platform governance?, Information, Communication Society 22 (6) (2019) 854–871, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914. [32] J. Kooiman, Governing as Governance, Sage, London, UK, 2003, https://sk.sagepub.com/books/governing-as-governance. [33] G. Stoker, Governance as theory: five propositions, International Social Science Journal 50 (155) (1998) 17–28, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00106. [34] E. Swyngedouw, Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state, Urban Studies 42 (11) (2005) 1991–2006, https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279869. [35] M. Taylor, Community participation in the real world: opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces, Urban Studies 44 (2) (2007) 297–317, https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980601074987. [36] K. O’Toole, N. Burdess, New community governance in small rural towns: the Australian experience, Journal of Rural Studies 20 (4) (2004) 433–443, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2004.01.002. [37] J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, The governance perspective, in: J. Kooiman, S. Jentoft, M. Bavinck, R. Pullin (Eds.) Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries, Amsterdam University Press, 2005, pp.11–14, https://doi.org/10.5117/9789053566862. [38] D. Osborne, T. Gaebler, Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming Government, Plume, New York, USA, 1992. [39] J. Murdoch, S. Abram, Defining the limits of community governance, Journal of Rural Studies 14 (1) (1998) 41–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00046-6. [40] R.A.W. Rhodes, The new governance: governing without government, Political studies 44 (4) (1996) 652–667, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x. [41] A. Cornwall, New democratic spaces? The politics and dynamics of institutionalized participation, IDS Bulletin 35 (2) (2004) 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2004.tb00115.x. [42] M. Woods, B. Edwards, J. Anderson, E. Fahmy, Participation, Power and Rural Community Governance. Paper Presented at the Workshop on Democracy, Participation and Political Involvement, Manchester University, 2001, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.583.1168 rep=rep1 type=pdf. [43] M. Clarke, J. Stewart, Community Governance, Community Leadership and the New Local Government, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, UK, 1998. [44] J. Kooiman, Social-political governance: overview, reflections and design, Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory 1 (1) (1999) 67–92, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037800000005. [45] P. Somerville, N. Haines, Prospects for local co-governance, Local Government Studies 34 (1) (2008) 61–79, https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930701770488. [46] C. Johnson, S.P. Osborne, Local strategic partnerships, neighbourhood renewal, and the limits to co-governance, Public Money and Management 23 (3) (2003) 147–154, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00362. [47] P. Le Galès, Regulations and governance in European cities, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22 (3) (1998) 482–506, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00153. [48] M.J. Carter, Microsociologies: social exchange, trust, justice, and legitimacy, in S. Abrutyn (Ed): Handbook of Contemporary Sociological Theory, Springer, Cham, 2016, pp. 369–386, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32250-6_18. [49] J.G. Maurer, Readings in Organizational Theory: Open System Approaches, Random House, New York, USA, 1971. [50] J. Dowling, J. Pfeffer, Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior, Pacific Sociological Review 18 (1) (1975), 122–136, https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226. [51] M.C. Suchman, Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches, Academy of Management Review 20 (3) (1995) 571–610, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331. [52] D.L. Deephouse, S.M. Carter, An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation, Journal of Management Studies 42 (2) (2005) 329–360, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x. [53] J.E. Barbuto, D.W. Wheeler, Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership, Group Organization Management 31 (3) (2006) 300–326, https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106287091. [54] J.W. Graham, Servant-leadership in organizations: inspirational and moral, Leadership Quarterly 2 (2) (1991) 105–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(91)90025-W. [55] L.C. Spears, Reflections on Leadership: How Robert K. Greenleaf’s Theory of Servant Leadership Influenced Today’s Top Management Thinkers, John Wiley, New York, USA, 1995. [56] M.L. Farling, A.G. Stone, B.E. Winston, Servant leadership: setting the stage for empirical research, Journal of Leadership Studies 6 (1-2) (1999) 49–72, https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199900600104. [57] B.M. Bass, The future of leadership in learning organizations, Journal of Leadership Organizational Studies 7 (3) (2000) 18–40, https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190000700302. [58] J. Gillet, E. Cartwright, M. Van Vugt, Selfish or servant leadership? Evolutionary predictions on leadership personalities in coordination games, Personality and Individual Differences 51 (3) (2011) 231–236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.003. [59] V. Venkatesh, J.Y. Thong, F.K. Chan, P.J. Hu, Managing citizens’ uncertainty in e-government services: the mediating and moderating roles of transparency and trust, Information Systems Research 27 (1) (2016) 87–111, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0612. [60] S. Muylle, R. Moenaert, M. Despontin, The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction, Information Management 41 (5) (2004) 543–560, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00089-2. [61] C.A. O’Reilly, K.H. Roberts, Task group structure, communication, and effectiveness in three organizations, Journal of Applied Psychology 62 (6) (1977) 674–681, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.6.674. [62] S. Ghose, W. Dou, Interactive functions and their impacts on the appeal of Internet presence sites, Journal of Advertising Research 38 (2) (1998) 29–43, http://personal.cb.cityu.edu.hk/mkwydou/Interactive%20Functions%20and%20Their%20Impact%20on%20the%20Appeal%20of%20Internet%20Presence%20Sites.pdf. [63] H. Sun, Transfer attributes of e-commerce systems into business benefits: a relationship quality perspective, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 11 (2) (2010) 92–109, http://ojs.jecr.org/jecr/sites/default/files/11_2_p01.pdf. [64] H.F. Lin, Determinants of successful virtual communities: contributions from system characteristics and social factors, Information Management 45 (8) (2008) 522–527, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.08.002. [65] D.L. Hoffman, T.P. Novak, Marketing in hypermedia computer mediated environment: conceptual foundations, Journal of Marketing 60 (3) (1996) 50–68, https://doi.org/10.2307/1251841. [66] H. Wang, Y. Meng, W. Wang, The role of perceived interactivity in virtual communities: building trust and increasing stickiness, Connection Science 25 (1) (2013) 55–73, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2013.824407. [67] A. Bhattacherjee, Individual trust in online firms: scale development and initial test, Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (1) (2002) 211–241, https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045715. [68] J.K. Butler Jr., Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: evolution of a conditions of trust inventory, Journal of Management 17 (3) (1991) 643–663, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700307. [69] R.C. Mayer, J.H. Davis, F.D. Schoorman, An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review 20 (3) (1995) 709–734, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335. [70] J.B. Rotter, Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust, American Psychologist 26 (5) (1971) 443–452, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031464. [71] J.K. Rempel, J.G. Holmes, M.P. Zanna, Trust in close relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (1) (1985) 95–112, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95. [72] P. Keen, G. Ballance, S. Chan, S. Schrump, Electronic Commerce Relationships: Trust by Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1999. [73] D.H. McKnight, N.L. Chervany, What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6 (2) (2001) 35–39, https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2001.11044235. [74] D.H. McKnight, V. Choudhury, C. Kacmar, Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology, Information Systems Research 13 (3) (2002) 334–359, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81. [75] H.W. Kee, R.E. Knox, Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion, Journal of Conflict Resolution 14 (3) (1970) 357–366, https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277001400307. [76] D. Gefen, E. Karahanna, D.W. Straub, Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model, MIS Quarterly 27 (1) (2003) 51–90, https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519. [77] A. Rus, H. Iglič, Trust, governance and performance: the role of institutional and interpersonal trust in SME development, International Sociology 20 (3) (2005) 371–391, https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580905055481. [78] M.S. Clark, J. Mills, The difference between communal and exchange relationships: what it is and is not, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19 (6) (1993) 684–691, https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293196003. [79] C.D. Batson, Communal and exchange relationships: what is the difference?, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19 (6) (1993) 677–683, https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293196002. [80] M.S. Clark, Record keeping in two types of relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 (3) (1984) 549–557, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.3.549. [81] P. Aggarwal, The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior, Journal of Consumer Research 31 (1) (2004) 87–101, https://doi.org/10.1086/383426. [82] B. Garner, Communicating social support during crises at the farmers’ market: a social exchange approach to understanding customer‐farmer communal relationships, International Journal of Consumer Studies 41 (4) (2017) 422–430, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12365. [83] M.S. Clark, R. Ouellette, M.C. Powell, S. Milberg, Recipient’s mood, relationship type, and helping, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (1) (1987) 94–103, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.94. [84] B.M. Le, E.A. Impett, A. Kogan, G.D. Webster, C. Cheng, The personal and interpersonal rewards of communal orientation, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 30 (6) (2013) 694–710, https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512466227. [85] K.A. Hegtvedt, Justice frameworks, in: P.J. Burke (Ed.) Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, Palo Alto, Stanford University Press, 2006, pp. 46–69, https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-07094-003. [86] J.S. Adams, Inequity in social exchange. in: L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2), Academic Press, New York, USA, 1965, pp. 267–299, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2. [87] S. Kassin, S. Fein, H. Markus, Social Psychology (9th ed.), Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California, USA, 2013. [88] E.A. Lind, C.T. Kulik, M. Ambrose, M.V. de Vera Park, Individual and corporate dispute resolution: using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic, Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (2) (1993) 224–251, https://doi.org/10.2307/2393412. [89] R. Cropanzano, J. Greenberg, Progress in organizational justice: tunneling through the maze, in: C.L. Cooper, I. T. Robertso (Eds.) International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 12), Wiley, New York, USA, 1997, pp. 317–372. [90] E.Y. Chou, C.Y. Lin, H.C. Huang, Fairness and devotion go far: integrating online justice and value co-creation in virtual communities, International Journal of Information Management 36 (1) (2016) 60–72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.09.009. [91] M.M. Wasko, S. Faraj, It is what one does: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9 (2) (2000) 155–173, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00045-7. [92] K.A. Hegtvedt, Creating legitimacy: the interrelated roles of justice and trust, in: A.J. Borstein, A.J. Tomkins (Eds.), Motivating Cooperation and Compliance with Authority (Vol. 62), Springer, Cham, 2015, pp. 55–80, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16151-8_4. [93] J. Hawdon, Legitimacy, trust, social capital, and policing styles: a theoretical statement, Police Quarterly 11 (2) (2008) 182–201, https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611107311852. [94] J.E. Barbuto, R.K. Gottfredson, T.P. Searle, An examination of emotional intelligence as an antecedent of servant leadership, Journal of Leadership Organizational Studies 21 (3) (2014) 315–323, https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051814531826. [95] Z. Zhang, J.C.K. Lee, P.H. Wong, Multilevel structural equation modeling analysis of the servant leadership construct and its relation to job satisfaction, Leadership Organization Development Journal 37 (8) (2016) 1147–1167, https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2015-0159. [96] P.B. Lowry, T.L. Roberts, N.C. Romano, P.D. Cheney, R.T. Hightower, The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication does computer-mediated communication make a difference?, Small Group Research 37 (6) (2006) 631–661, https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406294322. [97] Z. Jiang, J. Chan, B.C. Tan, W.S. Chua, Effects of interactivity on website involvement and purchase intention, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 11 (1) (2010) 34–59, https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00218. [98] T. Lee, The impact of perceptions of interactivity on customer trust and transaction intentions in mobile commerce, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 6 (3) (2005) 165–180, http://www.jecr.org/sites/default/files/06_3_p01.pdf. [99] S. Matook, J. Cummings, H. Bala, Are you feeling lonely? The impact of relationship characteristics and online social network features on loneliness, Journal of Management Information Systems 31 (4) (2015) 278–310, https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.1001282. [100] G.A. Churchill Jr., A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs, Journal of Marketing Research 16 (1) (1979) 64–73, https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110. [101] J.R. Rossiter, The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing, International Journal of Research in Marketing 19 (4) (2002) 305–335, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(02)00097-6. [102] T.A. Dyer, P.G. Robinson, The acceptability of care provided by dental auxiliaries: a systematic review, The Journal of the American Dental Association 147 (4) (2016) 244–254, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2015.09.018. [103] J.A. Colyvas, W.W. Powell, Roads to institutionalization: the remaking of boundaries between public and private science, Research in Organizational Behavior 27 (2006) 305–353, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27008-4. [104] X.L. Shen, W.B. Gan, Y. Sun, N. Wang, An empirical investigation of knowledge withholding in virtual community, in: PACIS 2015 proceedings, 2015, pp. 14–31, https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2015/14. [105] S. Peng, S. Pandey, S.K. Pandey, Is there a nonprofit advantage? Examining the impact of institutional context on individual–organizational value congruence, Public Administration Review 75 (4) (2015) 585–596, https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12357. [106] P.M. Podsakoff, S.B. MacKenzie, J.Y. Lee, N.P. Podsakoff, Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5) (2003) 879–903, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879. [107] H.H. Harman, Modern Factor Analysis (2nd ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 1976. [108] R.P. Bagozzi, Y. Yi, L.W. Phillips, Assessing construct validity in organizational research, Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (3) (1991) 421–458, https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203. [109] M.K. Lindell, D.J. Whitney, Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs, Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (1) (2001) 114–121, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114. [110] P.M. Podsakoff, D.W. Organ, Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects, Journal of Management 12 (4) (1986) 531–544, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408. [111] J.F. Hair, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, C. William, Multivariate Data Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 1998. [112] L.J. Cronbach, Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika 16 (3) (1951) 297–334, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555. [113] C. Fornell, D.F. Larcker, Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics, Journal of Marketing Research 18 (3) (1981) 382–388, https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313. [114] R.P. Bagozzi, Y. Yi, On the evaluation of structural equation models, Journal of the Academy of Market Science 16 (1) (1988) 74–94, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327. [115] J. Henseler, M. Sarstedt, Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling, Computational Statistics 28 (2) (2013) 565–580, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-012-0317-1. [116] K.J. Preacher, A.F. Hayes, Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, Behavior Research Methods 40 (3) (2008) 879–891, https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879. [117] A.F. Hayes, PROCESS: a versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper], 2012, http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf. [118] K.J. Preacher, A.F. Hayes, SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, Computers 36 (4) (2004) 717–731, https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553. [119] I. Cuadrado-Gordillo, I. Fernández-Antelo, Adolescents' perception of the characterizing dimensions of cyberbullying: differentiation between bullies' and victims' perceptions, Computers in Human Behavior 55 (2016) 653–663, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.005. [120] E.J. Marsh, S. Rajaram, The digital expansion of the mind: Implications of internet usage for memory and cognition, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 8 (1) (2019) 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.11.001. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61583 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 網路社群共治為影響社群成員參與的重要因素，然而，此研究議題至今仍然尚未被深入探究。本研究在回顧法學、政治學、社會學、心理學與管理學等各個領域相關文獻之後，發現網路社群共治並非僅止於從領導者至社群成員（由上而下）的單向治理關係，它應該囊括多面向之水平與垂直治理關係。為了將網路社群共治此一概念予以量化，本研究首度納入服務型領導、規範的透明度與可理解度、溝通開放性、以及社會互動性等四個不同次構念，進行闡釋與衡量；再者，本研究亦針對網路社群共治與正當性之前因與後果關係加以推論，試圖提出一個較為具體且完整的研究架構與量化基礎。
本研究使用問卷調查法，並透過知名網路社群平台搜集到616筆有效樣本，後續分析則採用結構方程模式來驗證各構念之間的關係，與衍生的假說推論是否成立。研究結論顯示：透過網路社群成員間的知覺信任感、網路共有取向與知覺公平性等構念的中介效果，網路社群共治確實能夠有效造就網路社群正當性。最後，本研究針對主要發現進一步說明本文對於學術理論之貢獻與實務上可應用之價值。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Online community co-governance (OCC) is an important factor affecting members’ community participation, though it remains an under-researched topic. This study reviews extant literature across various disciplines, including law, politics, sociology, psychology, and management, and shows that OCC is characterized by a dyadic (horizontal and vertical) relationship rather than monadic (leader-to-member only) ones. To measure OCC, we first identify its four constituent dimensions (i.e., servant leadership, transparency and comprehensibility of rules, communication openness, and social interactivity). Then, we propose a more holistic framework that incorporates plausible consequents of OCC. Using a survey comprising 616 respondents recruited from well-known online communities and implementing a structural equation modeling approach, we empirically test the hypothesized inter-construct relationships. Our results show that OCC may ultimately lead to online community legitimacy through the mediating effects of members’ perceived trust/justice and online communal orientation. These findings have several implications for theory and practice. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T13:06:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2406202016512300.pdf: 3569055 bytes, checksum: c99edbe6f1d45268a9dcdb3a49a9a029 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i 誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract iv Introduction 1 Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Development 5 Research Methodology 25 Data Analysis and Results 41 Discussion, Implications, and Limitations 47 Conclusions 57 References 58 Appendix – Formal Questionnaire 78 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 網路共有取向 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 知覺信任感 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 網路社群共治 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 知覺公平性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 正當性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Online community co-governance | en |
| dc.subject | Legitimacy | en |
| dc.subject | Perceived justice | en |
| dc.subject | Online communal orientation | en |
| dc.subject | Perceived trust | en |
| dc.title | 從網路社群共治到正當性之路徑：結構方程模型之分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Pathways from Online Community Co-governance to Legitimacy: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.author-orcid | 0000-0002-1218-1254 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林俊昇(Jiun-Sheng Lin),陳聿宏(Yu-Hung Chen),王仕茹(Shih-Ju Wang),蔡顯童(Hsien-Tung Tsai),張嘉雯(Chia-Wen Chang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 網路社群共治,知覺信任感,網路共有取向,知覺公平性,正當性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Online community co-governance,Perceived trust,Online communal orientation,Perceived justice,Legitimacy, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 88 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202001141 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-06-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2406202016512300.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.49 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。