請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61371完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 江宜樺 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ching-I Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳靜儀 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T13:01:46Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2013-08-14 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-14 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-07 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部分
王甫昌 2003 〈社會運動〉，瞿海源、王振寰（編），《社會學與台灣社會》，台北：巨流。 江宜樺 1998 《自由主義、民族主義與國家認同》，台北：揚智文化。 2001 《自由民主的理路》，台北：聯經。 1998 〈公共領域中理性溝通的可能性〉，許紀霖（編），《公共性與公共知識分子》，南京：江蘇人民。 朱若蘭 2006 〈婦團：種族歧視 廖應道歉氣憤難消〉，聯合報，4/1，A3版。 何明修 2005 《社會運動概論》，台北：三民書局。 李樹山 2004 《瞧與橋：審議式民主與激進民主的想像連結》，台北：台灣大學政治學系所碩士論文。 林火旺 1998 〈公民身分：認同和差異〉，蕭高彥、蘇文劉（編），《多元主義》，台北：中央研究院人文與社會科學研究所。 金聖峰 2010 《哈伯瑪斯的審議民主理論》，桃園：中央大學哲學系碩士論文。 孟 樊 2001 《後現代的認同政治》，台北：揚智文化。 俞可平 1998 《社群主義》，北京：中國社會科學。 莊宗勳 2011 〈羞辱身障 台鐵要他道歉 副站長：門都沒有〉，聯合報，4/3，A12版。 莊國銘 2008 《多元文化國家的公民教育──兼論台灣原住民族公民教育的困境》，台北：台灣大學政治學系博士論文。 陳煥民 2010 《當代自由主義談容忍》，台北：台灣大學哲學系碩士論文。 陳毓麟 2006 《多元文化社會中的團體權利》，台北：台灣大學政治學系碩士論文。 郭秋永 2001 《當代三大民主理論》，台北：聯經。 2007 〈多元民主理論──公民審議的一個理論基礎〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，4(3)：63-107。 張培倫 2002 《族群差異權利之道德證成──秦力克自由主義多元文化論之可能性》，台北：台灣大學哲學系博士論文。 張譽馨 2008 《從被納入到被聽見：由審議會議看青年女性的公共參與》，新竹：清華大學社會學系碩士論文。 黃競涓 2008 〈女性主義對審議式民主之支持與批判〉，《台灣民主季刊》，5(3)：33-69。 詹郁萱 2010 《新移民子女教育政策文本分析──Iris M.Young差異政治觀點》，高雄：高雄教育大學師範學系碩士論文。 董和銳 2004 〈族群與臺灣老年人之日常生活障礙與功能限制〉，《身心障礙研究》，2(3)：160-175。 楊深坑 2008 〈社會公義、差異政治與教育機會均等的新視野〉，《當代教育研究》，16(4)：1-37。 廖元豪 2006 〈該矯正的是歧視現象〉，中國時報，8/27，時論廣場。 劉俊言 2004 〈別生太多？外籍配偶火大〉，聯合晚報，7/12，4版。 劉惠敏 2011 〈別當成藉口 翹腿姊自稱躁鬱 康盟：不應汙名化精神疾病〉，聯合報，6/17，A8版。 蕭高彥 1996 〈共同體的理念：一個思想史之考察〉，《台灣政治學刊》，1(1)：257-295。 1998 〈多元文化與承認政治論〉，蕭高彥、蘇文劉（編），《多元主義》，台北：中央研究院人文與社會科學研究所。 蕭新煌 2011 〈序：社會運動和社會運動研究的辯證〉，何明修、林秀幸（編），《社會運動的年代──晚近二十年來的台灣行動主義》，台北：群學。 嚴若瑾 2010 〈海巡少將譏諷原住民 陳瑩：種族歧視〉，自由時報，8/30，A5版。 貳、西文部分 Barber, Benjamin R. 1984 Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press. Barry, Brian 2001 Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge: Polity Press and Blackwell Publishers. Benhabib, Seyla 1996 “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy.” In Democracy and Difference : Contesting Boundaries of the Political, ed. S. Benhabib. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2006 “In Memoriam Iris Young 1949-2006.” Constellations 13(4): 441-443. Blau, Peter 1977 Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press. Bourdieu, Pierre 1980 The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Bromell, David 2008 Ethnicity, Identity and Public Policy: Critical Perspectives on Multiculturalism. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington Press. Card, Claudia 2009 “Injustice, Evil, and Oppression.” In Dancing with Iris, ed. Ferguson, A. & M. Nagel. New York: Oxford University Press. Dietz, Mary G. 2002 Turning Operations: Feminism, Arendt, and Politics. New York: Routledge Press. Dryzek, John S. 2000 Deliberative Democracy and Beyond : Liberals, Critics, Contestations.Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dworkin, Ronald 2000 Sovereign Virtue:The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Elshtain, Jean B. 1995 Democracy on Trial. New York: Basic Books Press. Falbo, Marina 2008 “On Iris Young’s Subject of Inclusion: Rethinking Political Inclusion.”Philosophy & Social Criticism 34(9): 963-986. Forst, Rainer 2007 “Radical Justice: On Iris Marion Young’s Critique of the ‘Distributive Paradigm’.” Constellations 14(2): 260-265. Fraser, Nancy 1997 “Culture, Political Economy and Difference: On Iris Young’s Justice and the Politics of Difference.”In Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge Press. Frye, Marilyn 1983 The Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist Theory. Trumansburg: Crossing Press. Giddens, Anthony 1984 The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press. Gitlin, Todd 1995 Twilight of Common Dreams. New York: Metropolitan Books Press. Gutmann, Amy 1994 “Introduction.” In Multiculturalism, ed. Amy Gutmann. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Gutmann, A. & D.Thompson 2005 Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press. Harvey, David 1996 Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell Press. Heater, Derek 1990 Citizenship: The Civic Ideal in World History, Politics, and Education. London: Longman. Jaggar, Alison M. 2009 “L’Imagination au pouvoir: Comparing John Rawls’s Method of Ideal Theory with Iris Young’s Method of Critical Theory.” In Dancing with Iris, ed. Ferguson, A. & M. Nagel. New York: Oxford University Press. Jecker, Nancy S. 2007 “The Role of Standpoint in Justice Theory.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 41(2-4):165-182. Kelly, Paul 2002 “Introduction: Between Cultural and Equality.” In Multiculturalism Reconsidered ed. P. Kelly. Malden: Blackwell Publishing Press. Kymlicka, Will 1995 Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 2002 Contemporary Political Philosophy : an Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. Kymlicka, W. & W. Norman 1995 “Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory.”In Theorizing Citizenship ed. R. Beiner. New York: State University of New York Press. Levy, Jacob T. 2000 The Multiculturalism of Fear. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Macedo, Stephen 1995 “Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism: The Case of God v. John Rawls?”Ethics 105(3): 468-496. Markell, Patchen 2007 “Iris Marion Young, 1949-2006.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 80(5): 184-185. May, Larry 1992 Sharing Responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. McDonald, Bronwyn P. 2011 “The Political Legacy of Iris Marion Young: Situating Responsibility for Justice.” Paper presented at the Australian Political Science Association Conference, September 26-28, Canberra, AUS. Miller, David 1995 On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mouffe, Chantal 1993a The Return of the Political. London: Verso Press. 1993b “Liberalism Socialism and Pluralism: Which Citizenship?” In Principled Positions: Postmodernism and the Rediscovery of Value, ed. J. Squires. London: Lawrence & Wishart Press. Mulhall, S. & A. Swift 1996 Liberals and Communitarians. Oxford; Malden: Blackwell Publishing Press. Murphy, Jeffrie G. 1991 “Injustice and Misfortune.” Law and Philosophy 10(4): 433-446. Nash, Kate 1998 “Beyond Liberalism? Feminist Theory of Democracy.” In Gender, Politics and the State, ed. Randall V. & G. Waylen. London: Routledge Press. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2007 “Iris Marion Young.” Political Science and Politics 40(1):168-170. 2011 “Foreword.” In Responsibility for Justice, ed. M. C. Nussbaum. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Okin, Susan M. 1989 Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books Press. O’Neill, Onora 1996 Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Parekh, Bhikhu 2000 Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. London: Macmillan Press. Rawls, John 1971 A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 1980 “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 77(9): 515-572. 1993 Political Liberalism. New York : Columbia University Press. 1999 The Law of Peoples : With “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Risse, Mathias 2011 “Review of Iris Marion Young, Responsibility for Justice.” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews: http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=22789. Sadoč M. & M. F.Shaughnessy 2001 “An Interview with Iris Marion Young.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 33(1): 95-101. Sandel, Michael 1984 “Moralty and the Liberal Ideal.” New Republic 190:15-17. Sartre, Jean-Paul 1976 Critique of Dialectical Reason. Trans. Alan Sheridan-Smith. London: New Left Books Press. Shapiro, Ian 1999 “Enough of Deliberation.” In Deliberative Politics, ed. S. Macedo. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Shklar, Judith N. 1990 The Faces of Injustice. New Haven: Yale University Press. Simpson, Lorenzo C. 2000 “Communication and the Politics of Difference: Reading Iris Young.”Constellations 7(3):430-442. Squires, Judith 2002 “Deliberation and Decision Making: Discontinuity in the Two-Track Model.” In Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives, ed. M. P. d'Entreves. New York : Manchester University Press. Taylor, Charles 1985 “Alternative Futures: Legitimacy, Identity and Alienation in Late Twentieth Century Canada.” In Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada, ed. Cairns, A. & C. Williams. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Tebble, Adam J. 2001 “What is the Politics of Difference?” Political Theory 30(2): 259-281. Walzer, Michael 1999 “Deliberation, and What Else?” In Deliberative Politics, ed. S. Macedo. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Weldon, Laurel 2007 “Difference and Social Structure: Iris Young’s Critical Social Theory of Gender.” Constellations 14(2):280-288. Young, Iris M. 1986 “The Ideal of Community and the Politics of Difference.” Social Theory and Practice 12(1): 1-26. 1989 “Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship.” Ethics 99(2): 250-274. 1990a “Throwing Like a Girl” and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1990b Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1993 “Justice and Communicative Democracy.” In Radical Philosophy: Traditions, Counter-Traditions, Politics, ed. R. Gottlieb. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. 1996 “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting Boundaries of the Political, ed. S. Benhabib. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1997a Intersecting Voice: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Pres. 1997b “Unruly Categories: A Critique of Nancy Fraser’s Dual Systems Theory.”New Left Review I/222: 147-160. 1997c “A Multicultural Continuum: A Critique of Will Kymlicka’s Ethnic-Nation Dichotomy.” Constellations 4(1): 48-53. 2000 Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2001a “Equality of Whom? Social Group and Judgments of Injustice.” Journal of Political Philosophy 9(1): 1-18. 2001b “Thoughts on Multicultural Dialogue.” Ethnicities 1(1): 116-122. 2001c “Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 29(5):670-690. 2005 On Female Body Experience: “Throwing Like a Girl” and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2006 “Taking the Basic Structure Seriously.”Perspectives on Politics. Cambridge Journals 4(1): 91-97. 2007a Global Challenges: War, Self-determination, and Responsibility for justice. Cambridge: Polity Press. 2007b “Structural Injustice and the Politics of Difference.” In Multiculturalism and Political Theory, ed. A. S. Laden and Owen D. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2011 Responsibility for Justice, ed. M. C. Nussbaum. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61371 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文企圖以當代極具影響力的美國政治哲學家Iris M. Young對於社會結構的批判視角為主軸，探究她如何以具體改善弱勢群體的處境為核心關懷，建立起一套直接面對社會結構的政治思想。本文所持的論點在於：Young雖然以差異政治聞名學界，然而其政治思想卻與同樣關注社會群體及群體差異的認同政治或多元文化主義有所不同。最大的差別在於，Young政治思想著眼於探究社會中潛藏的支配性規範如何透過社會結構的運作，使某些個人或群體遭受壓迫和支配。她將這樣的現象稱為結構性不正義，進而提倡以正視群體差異為核心的差異政治、涵容式民主與對正義的責任，作為矯正結構性不正義的實踐策略，並以此建構理想的新社會關係。相較於此，認同政治與多元文化主義則聚焦於文化性不正義議題，並主張以承認群體認同和少數文化作為主要的矯正策略。然而，近來學術界經常將Young政治思想與認同政治或多元文化主義混為一談，進而誤解其核心關懷與終極目標。因此，本文在透過直接面對社會結構之理解途徑重新詮釋Young政治思想的同時，也試圖替她澄清若干誤解，以還原其思想原本的面貌。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The central purpose of this thesis is to explore the political philosophy of Iris M. Young, one of the most influential contemporary American philosophers, and to point out that her main idea and core concern were quite different from identity politics or multiculturalism. Young’s political philosophy concerned about improving the situation of disadvantaged groups from a critical perspective on social structures. To remedy the structural injustice, Young conceived and advocated politics of difference, inclusive democracy and responsibility for justice, and thereby constructed the image of ideal social relationships. These remedies requested to attend and affirm group differences which had been ignored even suppressed by the ruling norms. By contrast, identity politics and multiculturalism were focus on cultural injustice issues, and claimed for recognizing group identities and minority cultures. However, recent studies tend to confuse the distinction between Young’s political philosophy and identity politics or multiculturalism, which brings about many misunderstandings and incorrect criticisms. Therefore, this thesis attempts not only to reinterpret Young’s political philosophy but also to clarify certain misunderstandings. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T13:01:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R97322001-1.pdf: 2240846 bytes, checksum: 0066e4eed2ef5d0a120e3f6c5f7f6b72 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書.............................i
誌 謝....................................iii 中文摘要..................................vii 英文摘要...................................ix 目 次.....................................xi 說 明...................................xiii 緒 論......................................1 第一節 問題意識與研究對象......................1 第二節 文獻檢閱與研究主旨......................7 第三節 章節安排.............................13 第一章 社會結構與結構性不正義..................17 第一節 何謂結構性不正義.......................17 第二節 檢視結構性不正義的三個軸線...............26 第三節 對分配典範正義觀之批判..................32 第二章 差異政治.............................39 第一節 基本概念.............................39 第二節 差異政治之核心主張.....................63 第三節 作為分析工具的社會群體..................78 第四節 澄清誤解.............................89 第三章 涵容式民主...........................101 第一節 當代民主理論與民主實踐之缺失............101 第二節 以差異政治擴大民主之涵蓋性..............113 第三節 涵容式民主之超越性....................121 第四節 民主、自我決定與社會正義...............127 第四章 對正義的責任與新社會關係...............135 第一節 結構關係與責任.......................135 第二節 社會連結模式.........................141 第三節 「對正義的責任」之具體要求.............148 第四節 新社會關係想像.......................156 結 論....................................165 參考文獻..................................173 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | Iris M. Young論差異政治、民主與社會正義 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Iris M. Young on Politics of Difference, Democracy and Social Justice | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蕭高彥,陳嘉銘 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 社會結構,差異政治,民主,責任,社會正義, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Iris M. Young,social structure,politics of difference,democracy,responsibility,social justice, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 183 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-07 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.19 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。