請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6103
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周雍強 | |
dc.contributor.author | Wen-Tsan Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳文燦 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-16T16:20:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-06 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-16T16:20:57Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-06 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-07-31 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Blevins, J., “Buyer- Supplier Relationships,” Thesis (Undergraduate), Bowling Green State University, Available from:
http://apicstoledo.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Buyer-Supplier-Relationships.pdf 2. Chou, Y.C., Chung, H.J., 2009, “Service-based capacity strategy for manufacturing service duopoly of differentiated prices and lognormal random demand,” International Journal of Production Economics, 121, pp. 162-175. 3. Dadde, L., Hakansson, H., 2001, “Supply Network Strategies,” England: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 75-77. 4. Dubois, A., Fredriksson, P., 2008, “Cooperating and competing in supply networks: Making sense of a triadic sourcing strategy,” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14, pp.170-179. 5. Elmaghraby, W.J., 2000, “Supply Contract Competition and Sourcing Policies,” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 350-371. 6. Fisher, M., 1997,”What is the right supply chain for your products? Harvard Business Review,” March-April. 7. Fleuren, B., 2011, “Bensaou’s buyer-supplier relationships,” Open University of the Netherlands., Available from : http://dspace.ou.nl/bitstream/1820/3545/1/MWBHMJFleurenmei2011.pdf 8. Fredriksson, P., Gadde, L., 2005, “Flexibility and rigidity in customization and build-to-order production,” Industrial Marketing Management 34, pp. 695– 705. 9. Ganeshan, R., 2010, “The i-Phone 4 Supply Chain,” [online] Available from: http://operationsbuzz.com/2010/11/the-iphone-4-supply-chain/ 10. Lee, H.L, 2002, “Aligning Supply Chain Strategies with Product Uncertainties,” California Management Review, Vol. 44, No. 3. 11. Li, C., 2012, “Sourcing for Supplier Effort and Competition: Design of the Supply Base and Pricing Mechanism,” Forthcoming in Management Science, Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1489101 12. Li , C., Debo, L., 2009, “Strategic Dynamic Sourcing from Competing Suppliers with Transferable Capacity Investment,” Naval Research Logistics 56(6) 540-562. 13. Li, C., Debo, L., 2009, “Second Sourcing versus Sole Sourcing with Capacity Investment and Asymmetric Information,” Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 11(3), pp. 448-470. 14. Pollard, D., Chuo, S., Lee, B., 2008, “Strategies for Mass Customization,” Journal of Business & Economics Research, Vol. 6, pp. 77-86. 15. Piller, F., Moeslein K., Stotko, C.M., 2004, “Does mass customization pay? An economic approach to evaluate customer integration,” Production Planning & Control, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 435-444. 16. Richardson, J., 1993, “Parallel sourcing and supplier performance in the Japanese automobile industry,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, pp.339-350. 17. Richardson, J., Roumasset, J., 1995, “Sole sourcing, competitive sourcing, parallel sourcing: Mechanism for supplier performance,” Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 16, pp. 71-84. 18. Tage, S.L., 2007, “Managing the Global Supply,” Chain 3rd edition, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press. 19. Wind, J., Rangaswamy, A., 2001, “Customerization: The next revolution in mass customization,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 15, No. 1. 20. Yang, B., Burns, N., 2003, “Implications of postponement for the supply chain,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 41, No. 9, pp. 2075–2090. 21. Zipkin, P., 2001, “The Limits of Mass Customization,” MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring 22. 陳春霖, 2011, “iPad 2訂單2700億 台廠供應鏈分食,” 理財周刊, 550期, 9 March | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6103 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 雙供應源是現代採購策略的潮流,在執行層面上,採購商需擘畫完整的供應鏈管理政策,訂單額度分配為左右供應商行為的關鍵要素,訂單額度分配計畫應涵蓋兩部份:擬訂一採購專案初期名目需求分配比例與執行期間必要之訂單轉移原則,適時執行必要之訂單轉移措施,可以彌補供應商不均衡的產能儲備水準所造成單一供應商產能無法滿足需求之狀況。訂單分配比例與轉移可作為對供應商獎勵與懲罰的手段,但訂單轉移在不同的合作模式與產品屬性下有其限制條件,採購商經常需處理一個問題;在相應的限制條件下規劃適切的分配與轉移原則。本研究首先探討訂單轉移限制發生之架構,再以情境模擬進一步瞭解名目分配比例之設定與移轉限制對供應商產能準備水準之影響,採購商之目標為利用分配比例與轉移規模獲得最佳之產能供給,供應商之目標是在採購商設定的條件下獲得最佳之利潤。本文所推導之結論可做為雙供應源策略下採購商之執行準則。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Firms increasingly adopt the approach of dual sourcing to manage their supply chain. It requires concrete action plan to implement the approach effectively. Demand allocation is the critical factor that dominates suppliers’ behaviors. A complete plan of demand allocation includes two items: the ratio of nominal allocation and the criteria of the allocation transfer. The scale of allocation transfer is based on the ratio of nominal allocation, transfer restriction, and the scale of supply capacity available. Allocation transfer is a measure to mitigate the impact from the supply discontinuity of one of the suppliers when demand is beyond a certain level. However, the practice of allocation transfer is subject to product characteristic and business terms. Firms should manage their supply chain on the condition of transfer restriction. This study starts with an investigation on the structure of the allocation restriction. With the understanding of allocation restriction, scenario simulation is introduced to evaluate how suppliers respond to the ratio of nominal allocation and the criteria of the allocation transfer defined. The conclusion of this study offers practical criteria for firms to manage their suppliers under the approach of dual sourcing. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-16T16:20:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R98546041-1.pdf: 5107589 bytes, checksum: 61be94b8c730d3bc1ca35a53686683ca (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究目的 1 1.2研究動機 1 1.3問題背景 2 1.4研究問題定義 5 1.5論文架構 7 第二章 文獻回顧 8 2.1供應商與採購商互動關係 8 2.1.1採購商與供應商之交易類型分析 8 2.1.2商品採購行為下各方參與者相依關係之架構分析 10 2.1.3採購商與供應商之權力結構 13 2.2雙供應源策略演進之思維與運作模式 15 2.2.1單一供應源、多重供應源與並行供應源採購策略 15 2.2.2並行供應源 (parallel sourcing) 17 2.2.3 三方一體雙供應源 (triadic sourcing) 19 2.3產品屬性之研究 21 2.3.1產品屬性與供應鏈策略 21 2.3.2產品屬性與適用之供應鏈型態 24 2.3.3大量客製化 26 第三章 採購商與供應商之互動模式與行為分析 29 3.1雙供應源實務操作之探討 29 3.1.1雙供應源採購操作的基本型式 29 3.1.2 不同產品間共用資源或共用料件之雙供應源模型(單一產品之供給) 30 3.1.3 同產品間共用資源或共用料件之雙供應源模型(多項產品之供給) 32 3.2 訂單轉移調整之限制 33 3.2.1產品屬性 34 3.2.2生產作業流程與資源分配 36 3.2.3 契約條款與政策 36 3.3模擬分析模型 36 3.3.1情境模擬之基本概念 39 3.3.2訂單轉移限制分析 40 3.4訂單轉移之情境模擬與決策分析 43 3.4.1 情境一 無最小轉移批量限制 (b=0) 45 3.4.2 情境二 較小額度之轉移批量限制 (b<b) 48 3.4.3 情境三 較大額度之轉移批量限制考量(b≥b) 51 3.5反應函數之分析 55 第四章 管理意涵分析 58 4.1採購商與供應商之目標函數 58 4.2 管理意涵分析 60 第五章 總結 66 5.1 研究結論 66 5.2 未來研究之建議 66 參考文獻 67 附錄 69 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 雙供應源採購策略下訂單分配與轉移限制之探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Analysis of Demand Allocation and Transfer Restriction under Dual Sourcing | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許錫美,黃奎隆,蔣明晃 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 雙供應源,需求分配,轉移限制, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Dual sourcing, Demand allocation,Allocation transfer,Transfer restriction, | en |
dc.relation.page | 82 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-07-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 工業工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 工業工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf | 4.99 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。