請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60830完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 洪一薰(I-Hsuan Hong) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guillermo Alfonso Napoles Rodriguez | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林莫凡 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T10:32:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-08-28 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-28 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Anger, N., & Oberndorfer, U. (2008). Firm performance and employment in the EU emissions trading scheme: An empirical assessment for Germany. Energy Policy, 36 (1), 12-22.
Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Evaluating sustainability: a need for Standards China. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, Vol 2, No. 1, pp. 19-35. Aronsson, T., Backlund, K., & Sahlen, L. (2010). Technology transfers and the clean development mechanism. Resource and Energy Economics, 32 (1), 292-309. Bao & Zuo, J. (2012). Pricing mechanism on carbon under CDM. Journal of the & Waist Management Association, 62 (3), 299-306. Blyth, W., Bradley, R., Bunn, D., Clarke, C., Wilson, T., & Ming, Y. (2007). Investment risk under certain climatic change policy. Energy Policy. 35 (1), 5766-5773. Benecke, G., Friberg, L., Lederer, M., & Schroder, M. (2006). From PPP to market: The Clean development Mechanism (CDM) as new mode of governance in climate protection. Paper presented at 2007 Amsterdam conference human dimensions of global environmental change. Boyd, E., Gutierrez, M., & Chang, M. (2007). Small-scale forest carbon projects: Adapting CDM to low-income communities. Global Environmental Change, 17 (1), 250-259. Brechet, T., & Lussis, B. (2012). The contribution of the clean development mechanism to national climate policies. Journal of Policy Modeling, 28 (1), 981-994. doi: Doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2006.01.006 Brent, A. (2005). Evaluating projects that are potentially eligible for the clean development mechanism (CDM) funding in the South African context: a case study to establish weighting values for sustainable development criteria certain climatic change policy. Environmental and Developmental Economics. 10 (1), 631-649 Buccholz, T., & Volk, T. (2012). Considerations of project scale and sustainability of modern bioenergy systems in Uganda, Sustainable Forestry, 31 (1), 154-173. doi: DOI: 10.1080/10549811.2011.566540 Carbon Trade Watch.(2011). Key Arguments Against Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+). www.carbontradewatch.com. Casillas, C.E., & Kammen, D.M. (2012). Quantifying the social equity of carbon mitigation strategies. Climate Policy, 12 (1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org.10.1080/14693092.2012.669097 Castro, P. (2012). Does the CDM discourage emission reduction targets in advanced developing countries? Sustainability indicators for clean development mechanisms options theory. Climate Policy, 12 (2), 198-218. doi: DOI: 10.1007/s10668-0099211-6 Chadwick, B. (2006). Transaction costs and the clean development mechanism. Natural Resources Forum, 30 (1), 256-271. Corbera, E., & Brown, K. (2003). Exploring equity and sustainable development in the new carbon economy, Climate Policy, 3(1), 41-56 Corbera, E., & Brown, K. (2009). Building institutions to trade ecosystem services: Marketing forest carbon in Mexico, World Development, 36 (10),1956-1979. Covery, F., Ellerman, D., & Perthius, C. (2008). The European carbon market inaction lessons from the first trading period. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 5 (2), 215-233. doi: DOI: 10.1163/ 161372708x324213 Das, D., & Segunpta, P. (2011). Social cost of environmental pollution and application of counter measures through clean development mechanism: in the context of developing countries. Environ Dev Sustain, 13 (1), 833-844. Dechezlepetre, A., Glachant, M., & Meniere, Y. (2008). The clean development mechanism and the international diffusion of technologies: An empirical study. Energy Policy, 36 (1), 1273-1283 Deolalikar, A. B., Alex, B., Brillantes, Jr., Raghav G., Pernia, E. Racelis, M. Castro-Guevara C.G., Lim, L., & Quising, P. Poverty reduction and the role of institutions in developing. Working Paper # 2002-10. Deutz, P. (2012) A classed- bassed analysis of sustainable development: Developing a radical perspective of environmental justice. Sustainable Development, doi: DOI: 10.1002/sd.1528 Dietz, S., & Neumayer, E. (2006). Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurements, Ecological Economics, 617-628. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.07 Doranova, A., Costa, L., & Duysters, G. Absorvative capacity in technological learning in clean development mechanism projects, Working Paper # 2011-010. Doranova, A., Costa, L., & Duysters, G. (2010). Knowledge base determinants of technology sourcing in clean development mechanism projects. Energy Policy, 38 (1), 5550-5559. FAO. 2005. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005, Progress towards sustainable forest management. Vol. 147 of FAO Forestry Paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Feng, D., & Springer, U., Geng, Q. (2010). Study of carbon based on options theory. Feng, G. (2011). The financing model innovation in clean development mechanism (CDM) project. doi: Doi: 10.1109/CSO.2011.268 Fichtnera, W., Graehla, S., & Rentza, O. (2003). The impact of private investor’s transaction costs on the cost effectiveness of project-based Kyoto mechanisms. Climate Policy, 3 (1), 249–259. Fankhauser, S., & Martint, N. (2010). The economics of the CDM levy: Revenue potential, tax incidence and distortionary effects. Energy Policy, 38 (1), 357-36. Gireg-Gran, M., Porras, I., & Wunder, S.E. (2005). How can market mechanism for forests environmental services help the poor in? preliminary lessons from Latin America. Ecological Economics, 33(9), 617-628. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.05.002 Grubb, M., Laing, Tim., Counsell, T., & Willan, C. (2011). Global carbon mechanisms: lessons and implications. Climatic Change, 3 (4), 539-573. Gunawansa, Asanga., & Kua, H.W. (2011). Some key barriers to technology transfer under the clean developmente mechanism. Int J. Technology Transfer and Comercialisation, 10 (1), 63-78 Gundimeda, H. (2004). How 'sustainable' is the sustainable objective' CDM in developing countries like India? Forest Policy and Economics, 329-343. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.008 Gupta, J., & Hisschemoller, M. (1999). Problem-solving Through International Environmental Agreements: the Issue of Regimen Effectiveness. International Political Science Review. 2 (20), 151-174. Gutierrez V., Zapata M., Sierra, C., Laguado, W., & Santacruz, A. (2006). Maximizing the profitability of forestry projects under the clean development mechanism using a forest management optimization model. Journal of the & Forestry Ecology and Management, 226 (1), 341-350. Guzman, M. (2006). Estado actual y perspectivas futuras del manejo de la Sigatoka negra en America Latina. In: XVII Reunion ACORBAT. Santa Catarina, Brazil. Volume. 1, p.p. 83-91. Hagem, C. (2009). The clean development mechanism versus international permit trading: The effect on technological change. Resource and Energy Economics. 31 (1), 1-12. Helgason, Marie (2010), Institutional Quality and Economic Growth: A Comparison across Development Stages. Department of Economics, Lund University. Hepburn, C. (2007). Carbon Trading A Review of the Kyoto Mechanism. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, Oxford University, United Kingdom. Hepburn, C. (2009). International Carbon Finance and the CDM. 1-23. Hiramatsu, A., Kesuske, H., & Aramaki, T. (2003). Options and greenhouse gas emission reduction of clean development mechanism project in urban solid waste management. Mitigation and Adaption Strategies for Global Change. 8 (1), 293-310. Huge, J., Le, H, Hoang, P., & Kuilman, J. (2010). Sustainability indicators for clean development mechanisms options theory. Environ Dev Sustain, 12 (1), 561-571. doi: DOI: 10.1007/s10668-0099211-6 Hamilton, K., Chokkalingam, U., & Bendana, M. (2010). State of the Forest Carbon Markets 2009:Taking Root & Branching Out. Ecosystems Marketplace. Available: http://www.foresttrends.org/documents/files/doc_2384.pdf. Hultman, N., Pulver, S., Guimaraes, L., Deshmuckh, R., & Kane, J. (2012). Carbon market risks and rewards: Firm perception of CDM investment in India and Brazil. Energy Policy, 40 , 90-102. Jackson M., Joy, S., Heller, T., & Victor, D. (2006). Greenhouse gas implications in large scale infrastructure investments in developing countries: examples from China and India. Program on Energy and Sustainable Development, Work Paper #54 Kara, M., Syri, S., Lehtila, A., Helynen, S., Kekkonen, V., Ruska, M. & Forsstrom, J. (2008). The impacts of EU CO2 emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland. Energy Economics, 30 (2), 193–211. Klepper, G., & Peterson, S. (2006). Emissions trading, CDM, JI, and more: the climate strategy of the EU. Energy, 27 (1), 1–26. Krey, M. (2005). Transaction costs of unilateral CDM projects in India-results from an empirical survey. Energy Policy, 33 (1), 2385–2397. Kollmuss, A., Zink, H., & Polycarp, C. (2008). Making Sense of the Voluntary Carbon Market: A Comparison of Carbon Offset Standards. WWF Germany, 1-23. Linacre, N., Kossoy, A., & Ambrosi, P. (2011). State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2011. World Bank. Lloyd, Bob., & Subbarao, S. (2007). Development challenges under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Can renewable energy initiatives be put in place before peak oil?. Energy Policy, 37 (1), 237–245. Locatelli, B., & Pedroni, L. (2004). Accounting methods for carbon credits: impacts on the minimum area of CDM forestry projects. Climate Policy, 4 (1), 193‐204. Lund, E. (2010).“Dysfunctional delegation: why the design of the CDM supervisory system is fundamentally flawed”. Climate Policy. 10 (3) , 277- 288. Ma, L., Zhang, W., & Xiao, M. (2012). system and supporting policies under an emission reduction framework. 1 (1), 97-218. doi: Doi: 10.1007/s10479-012-1152-z Matsusashi, R., Fujisawa, S., Mitamura, W., Momobayashi, Y., & Yoshida, Y. (2004). Clean development mechanism projects and portfolio risks. Energy, 29 (1), 1579- 1588 doi: DOI 10.1016/j.energy.200403.060 Michaelowa, A., Stronzikb, M., Eckermannc, F., & Huntd, A. (2003). Transaction costs of the Kyoto Mechanisms. Climate Policy, 3 (1), 261–278. Michaelowa, A., & Sugiyama, T. (2011). Reconciling the design of CDM with inborn paradox of additionality concept. Climate Policy, 1 (1), 75-83. Michaelowa, A., & Jotzo, F. (2005). Transaction costs, institutional rigidities and the size of the clean development mechanism. Energy Policy, 33 (1), 511–523. Munoz, J. I., Sanchez, A., Contreras, J., & Bernal-Agustin, J. (2012). Optimal investment portfolio in renewable energy: The Spanish case, Energy Policy, 37 (1), 5273-5284. Munda, G. (2003). Measuring sustainability a multi-criterion framework. Universita Autonoma de Barcelona, Dept. of economics. Nazifi, F. (2010). The price impacts of linking the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme to the Clean Development. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 12(1), 164–186. Nelson, K., & De Jong, B. (2003). Making global initiatives local realities: carbon mitigation projects in Chiapas, Mexico. Global Environment Change, 13 (1),19-30. New York Times. (2012). 'Climate talks yield commitment to ambitious, but unclear, actions', http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/09/science/earth/talks-on-climate-produce-promises-and-complaints.html?_r=0 Newell, P. (2009) Varieties of CDM governance: Some reflections. The Journal of Environment Development, 18 (4), 425-435. Nhan, T.N., Minh, H. D., Greiner, S., & Mehling, M. (2010). Improving the Clean Development Mechanism post – 2012: development country perspective. 1-11. Nussbaumer, P. (2009). On the contribution of labeled certified emission reductions to sustainable development: a multi-criteria–evaluation of CDM Projects. Energy Policy, 37(1), 91-101. Olsen, K. (2007). The clean development mechanism’s contribution to sustainable development: a review of the literature. Climatic Change, 84 (1), 59-73. Oleshak, R., & Springer, U. (2007). Measuring host country risk in CDM and JI projects: a composite indicator. Climate Policy, 7 (6), 470-487. Owens, J. (1997). Life cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1 (1). Paulson, E. (2009) A review of the CDM literature: from fine-tuning to critical scrutiny?. Int Environmental Agreements, 9 (1), 63-80 . Perez, C., Roncoli, C., Neely, C., & Steiner, J. (2007). Can carbon sequestration markets benefit low-income in semiarid Africa? potentials and challenges. Agricultural Systems, 94Purohit, P. (2009). CO2 emissions mitigation potential of solar home systems under clean development mechanism in India, Energy, 34 (1), 1014-1023. Renat, H., Brent, A., Santos, L., Sutter, C., & Imboden, D. (2006). CMD projects under the Kyoto protocol: A methodology for sustainability assessment-experiences from South Africa and Uruguay. Environmental Development and Sustainability, 9 (1), 33-48. Roggera, C., Beaurainb, F., & Schmidta, T. (2011). Composting projects under the Clean Development Mechanism: Sustainable contribution to mitigate climate change. Waste Management, 31 (1), 138–146. Rong, F., Lan, Y., & Yu, H. (2012). Climate change mitigation and international finance: the effectiveness of the clean development mechanism and the global environment facility in India and Brazil , Mitig Adapt Stateg Glob Change, doi: DOI: Rong, F., Lan, Y., & Yu, H. (2012). Waste Energy Recovery CDM projects in China: status, challenges and suggestions, Resource and Energy Economics, 32 (1), 98-114. Rowlands, I. (2001). The Kyoto Protocol's 'Clean Development Mechanism: A Sustainability Assessment. Thirdly World Quarterly. 22 (5), 795-811. doi: DOI:10.1080/01436590120084601 Sadegheih, A. (2011). Optimal design methodologies under the carbon program using MIP, GA, SA and TS. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15 (1), 504-513. doi: DOI: 10.1016.j.rser.2010.07.035 Serra, L., & Elizalde, M. (2004). Aspectos legales del mercado de carbono de desarrollo limpio-contratos de carbono. 1-21. Shao H., & Rao, X. (2010, 7-9 Nov 2010). The role of commercial bank in promoting carbon market development in China. Paper presented at E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment (ICEEE), 2010 International Conference on. Schneider, L. (2011). Assessing the additionality of CDM projects: practical experiences and lessons learned. Climate Policy, 9 (3), 242-254. Schneider, L. (2009) A clean development mechanism with global atmospheric benefits for a post-2012 climate regime. Int Envirn Agreements, 9 (1), 95-111. doi: DOI: 10.1007/s10784-009-9095-9 Schneider, L., Lazarus, M., & Kollmus, Anja. Industrial N20 projects under the CDM: Adipic acid-A case of carbon lekeage? Energy Policy. 35 (1), 5766-5773. Work Paper # us-1006 Shresta, R.M., & Shresta, R. (2004). Economics of clean development mechanism power projects under alternative approaches: An empirical study. Energy Policy, 32 (1),1363-1374. Springer, U. (2003). Can the risk of Kyoto mechanism trough portfolio diversification? evidence from the Swedish AIJ program. Environmental and Resource Economics. 25(1), 501-513. Stehr, H. (2009). Does the CDM need an institutional reform? 59-70. Strand, J., & Einar, K. (2012). Global emissions effects of CDM projects with relative s. Resource and Energy Economics, 34 (4), 533-548. Strand, J., & Einar, K. (2009). Simple Model Framework for explaining inefficiency of the clean development mechanism. The World Bank development research group, Work Paper # 4931. Svendsen, T., Gert, & Steiner, U. (2010). Green Gold: the clean development mechanism and agricultural projects. http://orgprints.org/17500 Sutter, C., & Parreno J.C. (2008). Does the current clean development mechanism (CDM) deliver sustainable development claim? An analysis of officially registered CDM projects. Climatic Change Environmental & Planning Law, 84 (1), 75-90. doi: Doi: 10.1007/s10584-007-9269-9 Tanwar, N. (2006). Clean development mechanism and off-grid small-scale hydropower projects: Evaluation of additionality. Energy Policy, 35 (1), 714–721. Thomas, S., Dargush, P., & Harrison S., & Herbon, J. (2010).Why are there so few afforestation and reforestation clean development mechanism projects?: An empirical study. Land Use Policy, 27 (1), 880-887. Tolis, A., Rentizelas, A., Aravossis, K., & Tatsiopoulos, I. (2012). Decisions under uncertainty in municipal solid waste cogeneration investments. Waste to Energy Green Energy and Technology, pp.197-218. UNCTAD (2008). World Investment Report, TNCs and the Infrastructural Challenge. http://unctad.org/en/Docs/wir2008_en.pdf UNFCCC. (2012). http://unfccc.int/ Van der Gaast, W., Begg, K., & Flamos, A. (2009). Promoting sustainable energy technology transfers to developing countries through the CDM. Applied Energy, 2 (86), 230–236. Valeriani, E., Peluso, S., & Reggio, E. (2011). The Impact of Institutional Quality on Economic Growth and Development: An Empirical Study. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 1(6), 1-25. Vlastelica, R. (2010). The CDM project Cycle, 129-134. [DOI 10.1007/978-90-3392-_9] Victor, D. G., Raustiala, K., & Skolnikkoff, E. B. (1998). The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Luxemburg. Voight, C. (2008). Is the clean development mechanism sustainable?. Sustainable Dev. L. & Pol'y, 15 (1). Wang, H. (2010). Reducing GHG mitigation costs in the shipping industry using the clean development mechanism. Management of Environmental Quality, 4 (1), 452-463. Wara, M. 2008. Measuring the Clean Development Mechanism's Performance and Potential. UCLA Law Review, 55, 1759-1759. Winkelman, A., & Moore, M. (2011). Explaining the differential distribution of clean development mechanism projects across host countries. Energy Policy, 39 (3), 1132-1143. Winkler, H., & Thorne, S. (2002). Baselines for Suppressed Demand: CDM Projects Contribution to Poverty Alleviation. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 5 (2), 413–429. Wysham, D. Grist Magazine.(2005). Critics question World Bank’s role as carbon trader, fossil-fuel funder. Wolfkang, S., & Wittneben, B. (2006). Enhancing the clean development mechanism trough sectoral approaches: definitions an ways forward. Int Environ Agreements. 6 (1), 271-287. doi: DOI: 10.1007/s10784-006-9009-z World Bank. (2012). http://www.worldbank.org/ Zegras. (2007). As if Kyoto Mattered: The clean development mechanism and transportation. Paper presented at the World Conference on Transportation Research (WCTR). Zhang, J., & Wang, R. (2011). Co-benefits and additionality of the clean development mechanism. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62 (1), 140-154. Zhang, X., Shen, Yaojie., & Li, Z. (2011). Risk Assessment and avoidance strategies research for garbage disposal power generation CDM project. paper presented at International Conference on Informatics, Cybernetics, and Computer Engineering (ICCE2011) from November 19-20, 2011, Melbourne, Australia. Zhao, W., Van der Voet, E., Zhang, Y., & Huppes, G. (2008). Llife cycle assesment of municipal soilid waste management with regard to green house emissions: Case study of Tianjin, China. Science of the Total Environment, 7 (1), 1517-1526. Zhong, A., Kun, L., & Dejuan, L. (2007). Research on risk of clean technologies introduction under CDM mechanism. Management Science Engineering, 35, 5766-5773. Vol, 5 No. 3, 2011 pp. 27-31. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60830 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 清潔發展機制（簡稱“CDM”）是《京都協議書》（簡稱“KP”）的其中一項政策工具，其執行旨在控制全球暖化的影響。該項政策工具意味著某些運用於具體生產活動的投資項目的科學技術將被取代。 CDM的目標是同時使不同的參與者實現其各自不同的目的。這些目的是：減少溫室氣體，保護環境；協議參與國的可持續性發展；減排過程中投資者的成本效益等。因此，必須權衡每一目的的輕重。然而，自從開始執行之日起，CDM從未能按設計初衷成功地扮演其應有的角色。從某些方面來看，投資者的決策對這種局面的形成，起了顯著的作用。 而投資者的決策取決於各種因素諸如技術、當局體制、以及排污量交易規模等等。基於這個原因，我們通過對文獻的綜合回顧，對近年來CDM活動的貢獻進行定性分析。本研究的主要發現：一、CDM在同時滿足參與各方利益時的缺陷；二、在未來改善CDM作用時，執行者所需要注意的一些關鍵因素；最後，我們提供了一些建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is one of the Kyoto Protocol (KP) policy tools implemented to stabilize the impact on Global Warming. This tool implies the replacement of technology that is conducted through investment projects concerning specific productive activities. The aim of the CDM is to simultaneously fulfill different purposes for different participants. These purposes are: GHG reductions for environmental integrity, sustainability for host countries, and cost-effective mitigation for investors. Therefore, the level of importance of each purpose must be balanced. However, since its first implementations, the CDM has been unable to succeed the role for which it was created. In some way, this situation has been presented due the significant effect on investors’ decision–making process derived from issues belonging to technical, institutional authorities and emission trading dimensions. For this reason, through a comprehensive review of literature, we qualitatively analyze the contribution of CDM activities in recent years. The main findings in this study are, firstly, the weakness of the CDM to simultaneously provide benefits among participants. Secondly, the key elements in which practitioners should pay attention to improve the role of the CDM in the upcoming future. Finally, recommendations are suggested. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T10:32:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R98546039-1.pdf: 1059952 bytes, checksum: 2ab457456674f5c7ac2ae5eb5b9d53bc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | List of Contents
Oral Defense Committee Members’ Signature i Acknowledgement ii Abstract iv Chinese Abstract v List of Contents vi List of Figures viii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 The Functionality of the Clean Development Mechanism 14 2.1 EU ETS Tool 14 2.1.1 National Allocation Plan 14 2.1.2 Mitigation Units Supply 16 2.1.3 Linking Regulation 18 2.2 JI Tool 18 2.3 CDM Tool 19 2.3.1 Origin of the GHG Reductions Purpose 21 2.3.1 Origin of the Sustainability Purpose 22 2.3.3 Origin of the Cost-effectiveness Mitigation Purpose 24 2.4 CDM Tool Dimensions 25 Chapter 3 CDM Technical Dimension 27 3.1 CDM Projects Baseline Manipulation 27 3.2 Additionality 30 3.3 GHG Reductions as an Indicator of Sustainability 32 3.4 Transaction Costs 35 3.5 Other Factors 39 Chapter 4 CDM Institutional Authorities Dimension 42 4.1 International Authorities 42 4.1.1 The EB Inefficacy Perspective 45 4.1.2 The Positive Effect of the EB Inefficacy 48 4.2 Host Country Authority 49 4.2.1 Sustainability Criteria Evaluation 51 4.2.2 Institutional Quality Impact on Investments 53 Chapter 5 CDM Emission Trading Dimension 56 5.1 CER’s Price 56 5.2 Competition betweeen the CDM and VCS 57 Chapter 6 Summary and Conclusions 60 Reference 65 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 影響Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)不同目標間平衡之面向探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Aspects Affecting the Balance among the Purposes of
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM): A Review | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳政鴻(Cheng-Hung Wu),陳文智(Wen-Chih Chen),黃奎隆(Kwei-Long Huang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 清潔發展機制,減少溫室氣體,可持續性發展,有成本效益地減排, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Clean Development Mechanism,GHG reductions,sustainability,cost-effective mitigation, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 65 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-14 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 工業工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 工業工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.04 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。