請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6081完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李蘭(Lee-Lan Yen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chi-Jui Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李琪瑞 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-16T16:20:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-09-24 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-16T16:20:34Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-09-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-02 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
內政部。兒童、青少年檳榔防制工作計畫。取自：www.moi.gov.tw/files/civil_download_file/工作計畫書.pdf。引用2012/05/14。 王榮德：追蹤研究法。國立台灣大學醫學院出版委員會主編：流行病學方法論。第二版。臺北市：健康文化，2010；169-83。 行政院衛生署。100年國人主要死因統計（以ICD-10編碼）。取自： http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DM/DM2_p01.aspx?class_no=25&level_no=1&doc_no=84788。引用2012/12/31。 行政院衛生署國民健康局。青少年學子嚼檳榔，健康令人憂。取自：http://health99.doh.gov.tw/Hot_News/h_NewsDetailN.aspx?TopIcNo=5658。引用2010/10/20。 行政院衛生署國民健康局。比塑化劑更毒！！全國超過5萬名學子嚼檳榔。取自：http://health99.doh.gov.tw/Hot_News/h_NewsDetailN.aspx?TopIcNo=6243。引用2011/10/20。 行政院衛生署國民健康局。101年度青少年吸菸行為調查結果。取自：http://www.bhp.doh.gov.tw/BHPNet/Web/Column/ColumnContent.aspx?id=201304290001。引用2013/5/26。 吳齊殷、張明宜、陳怡蒨：尋找機制與過程：長期追蹤研究的功用。αβγ量化研究學刊2008；2：1-26。 李景美、張鳳琴、賴香如等人：台北縣市高職學生開始使用成癮物質之危險與保護因子追蹤研究。臺灣衛誌2008；27：399-410。 李燕鳴、張慈桂：原住民與漢族青少年之身心症狀和不利健康生活型態的差異。慈濟醫學1999；11：237-45。 李燕鳴、蔡宗漢、蕭正光、陳競華：花蓮市高中、高職學生與健康相關行為之調查。臺灣醫誌1995；94(suppl 2)：81-6。 李蘭、林慧宜、晏涵文：預防國中生嚼檳榔之教育效果。醫學教育1998；2：49-64。 李蘭、孫亦君、翁慧卿：台北市國中生物質濫用行為之預測因子。醫學教育1998；2：420-8。 李蘭、晏涵文、劉潔心、關學婉、季瑋珠、林瑞雄：嚼檳榔預防教育先驅研究(Ⅰ)-國中生嚼檳榔現況及影響因素之初探。中華衛誌1992；11：285-94。 李蘭、翁慧卿、曾東松、孫亦君：青少年危害健康行為研究：八十六學年度臺北市國中生之現況。公共衛生1999；26：75-90。 李蘭、潘怜燕、陳秀熙：成年人嚼食檳榔與戒嚼檳榔的相關因子。醫學教育2001；5：312-23。 周思源、李玫姿、梁文敏等人：台灣地區在校青少年吸菸、喝酒及嚼食檳榔與藥物使用之盛行率。Mid Taiwan J Med 2006;11: 177-86. 林吟霞、陳漢瑛。臺北市國小高年級學童成癮物質知識、態度與行爲之研究。生命教育與健康促進學術論文研討會，2010，國立台北教育大學。 國立臺灣大學健康政策與管理研究所、國家衛生研究院。兒童與青少年行為之長期發展研究計畫。取自：http://cable.nhri.org.tw/。引用2012/08/30。 張奕涵、李蘭、張新儀、吳文琪：男女學生四至十一年級之社交焦慮發展軌跡研究。臺灣衛誌2010；29：465-76。 張齡尹、李蘭、張新儀：學生的攻擊行為與其初次使用菸和酒時間之關係。臺灣衛誌2008；27：530-42。 教育部體育司。修正後「教育部兒童、青少年檳榔防制工作計畫」。取自：http://140.122.72.62/healthedu/?id=f56758f5a2a49c2eb2c118c31d9bb3584fb61dce4c244。引用2013/05/14。 郭彥斌：有關檳榔嚼塊引發口腔疾病的研究。韓良俊主編：檳榔的健康危害。第一版。臺北市: 健康文化，2000；53-61。 郭淑珍：健康行為形成的生命歷程探討：以計程車司機嚼檳榔行為為例。臺灣衛誌2008；27：385-98。 郭淑珍、丁志音：嚼檳榔計程車司機的健康生活型態：社會脈絡觀點的初探。臺灣衛誌2008；27：67-80。 陸玓玲、吳文琪、吳其臻、李蘭、張新儀：兒童與青少年長期追蹤研究之未回應趨勢及其社會人口學因素。臺灣衛誌2013；32：129-39。 黃振勳：嚼食檳榔行為之預防與戒斷。論壇健康促進與疾病預防委員會主編：第三期文獻回顧研析計畫套書。第一版。臺北市：國家衛生研究院，2003；1-108。 楊奕馨、陳鴻榮、曾筑瑄、謝天渝：台灣地區各縣市檳榔嚼食率調查報告。Taiwan J Oral Med Health Sci 2002; 18: 1-16. 溫啟邦、鄭秋汶、鄭丁元等人：國人嚼檳榔的現況與變化－探討嚼檳榔與吸菸之關係。臺灣衛誌2009；28：407-419。 葉美玉：青少年之物質濫用戒治計畫。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌2000；20：67-73。 劉美媛、周碧瑟：台灣地區在校青少年嚼檳榔的流行病學研究。中華衛誌2000；19：42-9。 鄭斐芬、李景美：屏東縣國中學生對嚼檳榔之知識、態度及嚼食行為研究。衛生教育學報2002；18：167-83。 盧怡吟、嚴雅音、蔡文玲等人：生活壓力、偏差行為與父母管教方式對國小學童吸菸、飲酒、嚼食檳榔行為之相關研究。The Taiwan J Oral Med Sci 2010;26: 21-40. 薛玲。台灣檳榔業引發之社會問題與因應可行之道。檳榔問題研討會，1998，中央研究院。 謝秀芬等：家庭支持服務 。第一版。臺北縣：國立空中大學，2008。 魏麗敏：青少年嚼食檳榔之心理歷程與行為之分析。諮商與輔導2009；288：39-43。 英文部分 Anderson KG, Tomlinson K, Robinson JM, Brown SA. Friends or foes: social anxiety, peer affiliation, and drinking in middle school. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2011;72: 61-9. Bandura A, Walters RH. Social Learning and Personality Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1963. Blumenthal H, Leen-Feldner EW, Frala JL, Badour CL, Ham LS. Social anxiety and motives for alcohol use among adolescents. Psycho Addict Behav 2010;24: 529-34.Jones BL, Nagin DS. Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and an SAS procedure for estimating them. Sociological Methods & Research 2007;35: 542-71. Chen YT, Chen CY, Chen WJ. Comparative epidemiology of betel nut use versus ecstasy use among Taiwanese adolescents: findings from a national survey. Drug & Alcohol Dependence 2011;113: 177-83. Cote SM, Boivin M, Liu X, Nagin DS, Zoccolillo M, Tremblay RE. Depression and anxiety symptoms: onset, developmental course and risk factors during early childhood. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discipl 2009;50: 1201-8. DiClemente RJ, Santelli JS, Crosby RA. Adolescent Health : Understanding and Preventing Risk Behaviors . 1st ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2009. DiClemente RJ, Hansen WB, Ponton LE. Handbook of Adolescent Health Risk Behavior. New York: Plenum press, 1996. Flory K, Lynam D, Milich R, Leukefeld C, Clayton R. Early adolescent through young adult alcohol and marijuana use trajectories: early predictors, young adult outcomes, and predictive utility. Development and Psychopathology 2004;16: 193-213. Gruber E, DiClemente RJ, Anderson MM, Lodico M. Early drinking onset and its association with alcohol use and problem behavior in late adolescence. Preventive Medicine 1996;25: 293-300. Gupta PC, Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of areca nut usage. Addiction Biology 2002;7: 77-83. Harrel F, Lee K. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1986. Hawkins JD, Graham JW, Maguin E, Abbott R, Hill KG, Catalano RF. Exploring the effects of age of alcohol use initiation and psychosocial risk factors on subsequent alcohol misuse. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 1997;58: 280-90. Henry SL, Jamner LD, Whalen CK. I (should) need a cigarette: adolescent social anxiety and cigarette smoking. Ann Behav Med 2012;43: 383-93. Hill KG, White HR, Chung IJ, Hawkins JD, Catalano RF. Early adult outcomes of adolescent binge drinking: person- and variable-centered analyses of binge drinking trajectories. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2000;24: 892-901. Ho CS, Gee MJ, Tsai CC, Lo CI, Hwang MN. Factors related to betel chewing among junior high school students in Taiwan. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000;28: 150-4. Ho CS, Gee MJ, Tsai CC, Lo CI, Wang SC. The prevalence of betel chewing among the students of the different senior high schools in southern Taiwan. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2000;16: 32-8. Hsu HC. Trajectories and covariates of life satisfaction among older adults in Taiwan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2012;55: 210-6. Huang HL, Lee CH, Yen YY, et al. School-level contextual factors associated with betel quid chewing among schoolchildren in Taiwan. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2009;37: 58-67. Jones BL, Nagin DS, Roeder K. A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods & Research 2001; 29: 374-93. Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text. 2nd ed., New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2005. Ko YC, Chiang TA, Chang SJ, Hsieh SF. Prevalence of betel quid chewing habit in Taiwan and related sociodemographic factors. J Oral Pathol Med 1992;21: 261-4. Li SM, Yu SRL, Hu HC, Huang JS. Areca quid chewing by Taiwanese adolescents: application of the attitudes social influence self-efficacy (ASE) model. Addiction 2003;98: 1723-9. Lu CT, Lan SJ, Hsieh CC, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of areca nut chewers among junior high school students in Changhua county, Taiwan. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993;21: 370-3. Marmorstein NR, White HR, Loeber R, Stouthamer-Loeber M. Anxiety as a predictor of age at first use of substances and progression to substance use problems among boys. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2010;38: 211-24. Mason WA, Toumbourou JW, Herrenkohl TI, Hemphill SA, Catalano RF, Patton GC. Early age alcohol use and later alcohol problems in adolescents: individual and peer mediators in a bi-national study. Psychol Addict Behav 2011;25: 625-33. Murphy DA, Brecht ML, Herbeck DM, Huang D. Trajectories of HIV risk behavior from age 15 to 25 in the national longitudinal survey of youth sample. Journal of Youth & Adolescence 2009;38: 1226-39. Nagin DS. Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods 1999;4: 139-57. Nagin DS. Group-Based Modeling of Development. London: Harvard University Press, 2005. Nagin DS. Group-based modeling: an overview. In Krohn MD, Lizotte AJ, Hall GP. eds. Handbook on Crime and Deviance. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2009; 59-73. Nagin DS, Odgers CL. Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2010;6: 109-38. Nagin DS, Tremblay RE. Trajectories of boys' physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency. Child Development 1999;70: 1181-96. Nagin DS, Tremblay RE. What has been learned from group-based trajectory modeling? examples from physical aggression and other problem behaviors. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 2005;602: 82-117. Raudenbush SW. Comparing personal trajectories and drawing causal inferences from longitudinal data. Annu Rev Psychol 2001;52: 501. Shi L. Health Services Research Methods. 2nd ed., Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Cengage Learning, 2008. Sullivan RJ, Hagen EH. Psychotropic substance-seeking: evolutionary pathology or adaptation? Addiction 2002;97: 389-400. Szapocznik J, Tolan P, Sambrano S, Schwartz SJ. Preventing youth substance abuse: an overview. In Tolan P, Szapocznik J, Sambrano S. eds. Preventing Youth Substance Abuse, 1st ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2007; 3-17. Tsai YF, Wong TKS, Chen SC. Prevalence and related risk factors of areca quid chewing among junior high students in eastern Taiwan. Public Health 2002;116: 190-4. Wang SC, Tsai CC, Huang ST, Hong YJ. Betel nut chewing and related factors in adolescent students in Taiwan. Public Health 2003;117: 339-45. Wang SC, Tsai CC, Huang ST, Hong YJ. Betel nut chewing: the prevalence and the intergenerational effect of parental behavior on adolescent students. J Adolesc Health 2004;34: 244-9. Yang MS, Su IH, Wen JK, Ko YC. Prevalence and related risk factors of betel quid chewing by adolescent students in southern Taiwan. J Oral Pathol Med 1996;25: 69-71. Yang YH, Lee HY, Tung S, Shieh TY. Epidemiological survey of oral submucous fibrosis and leukoplakia in aborigines of Taiwan. J Oral Pathol Med 2001;30: 213-9. Yen LL, Chen L, Lee SH, et al. Child and Adolescent Behaviors in Long-Term Evolution (CABLE): A School-Based Health Lifestyle Study. CABLE ANNUAL REPORT 2001. ROC: Division of Health Policy Research, National Health Research Institutes, 2001. Yen CF, Yang MS, Su YC, Wang MH, Lan CM. Effect of the number of risk factors on betel quid chewing in adolescents living in rural Taiwan. Public Health 2009;123: 66-8. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6081 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 目的：探討學生四至十二年級嚼檳榔行為的發展軌跡類型及初次嚼檳榔時間，並進一步找出影響因素。
方法：以兒童與青少年行為之長期發展研究計畫，2001年就讀國小四年級學生2687人中，選取2001至2009年間完整回答嚼檳榔、吸菸、飲酒行為或重要自變項題組，可納入軌跡類型分析的研究樣本共2295人，從個人、環境與其他行為層面，探討影響四至十二年級嚼檳榔行為發展軌跡類型的因素，運用群體基礎軌跡模型與羅吉斯迴歸模型進行統計分析。為探討初次嚼檳榔時間及其相關因素，將四年級已嚼檳榔者排除後，進行存活分析的研究樣本共2043人。 結果：1.研究樣本各年級有嚼檳榔的比率，以十二年級時最高（3.46%），六年級時最低（0.29%）。嚼檳榔的發生率以十一及十二年級0.02最高，初次嚼檳榔之風險機率以十一年級0.02最高，五至十二年級從未嚼檳榔的機率為0.93（累積初次嚼檳榔機率為0.07）。2.嚼檳榔的發展軌跡類型共有兩類，「持續不嚼組」佔總樣本93.90%；「明顯上升組」佔6.10%。3.相較於「持續不嚼組」，男性、居住於新竹縣、家庭支持下降、國或高中同儕有嚼檳榔、吸菸機率上升、飲酒機率持續中度或上升者，較可能成為嚼檳榔之「明顯上升組」。4.男性、居住於新竹縣、同儕有嚼檳榔、有吸菸、飲酒行為者，較早初次嚼檳榔的可能性較高。 結論：嚼檳榔比率隨年級增加而上升，十一年級為四至十二年級學生初次嚼檳榔時間之關鍵年級。男性、居住於新竹縣、有同儕嚼檳榔、吸菸、飲酒行為，為嚼檳榔機率明顯上升及較早初次嚼檳榔的顯著影響因素。建議國小階段即開始預防，將男性、有吸菸或飲酒行為、學業表現不好與家庭支持呈下降趨勢的學生納入考量，並且營造不嚼檳榔的支持環境。政策上重視吸菸、飲酒與嚼檳榔的群聚效應，進行檳榔防制工作。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: To investigate behavior patterns, onset of betel nut chewing, and the influential factors among students from 4th to 12th Grade.
Methods: Data was obtained from the second cohort of the Children and Adolescent Behaviors in Long-term Evolution project. The original sample numbers were 2,687 students on 4th Grade. Participants included 2,295 students who were followed from 4th to 12th Grade(2001-2009) and completely answered specific items for group-based trajectory model and logistic regression analysis. On the other hand, after excluding the missing values and already had chewed betel nuts on 4th Grade, 2,043 participants for survival analysis. 5 individual-level factors, 6 environmental-level factors, and other 2 behavior-level factors were studied the relation to the behavior patterns and onset of betel nut chewing. Results: 1.The highest proportion of betel nut chewing among nine grades was on 12th Grade(3.46%), and the lowest proportion was on 6th Grade(0.29%). The highest incident rate of betel nut chewing was 0.02 on 11th and 12th Grade. Besides, the highest hazard rate of beginning betel nut chewing was 0.02 on 11th Grade. During nine years, the cumulative proportion of never chewing was 0.93. 2.There were 2 trajectory patterns of betel nut chewing, including 'continuing not chewing'(93.90%) and 'the chewing probability obviously increasing'(6.10%). 3.Male, living in Hsinchu County, having had experiences on smoking or drinking, and surrounding peers or friends chewing betel nuts, which caused the increasing chewing probability and earlier onset of betel nut chewing. Conclusion: The proportion of betel nut chewing increased with time going by, and 11th Grade might be the critical time of onset among students from 4th to 12th Grade. Based on the findings we recommend that the betel nut prevention should start from the elementary-school stage, construct supportive environment without betel nuts, and consider male students with having had smoking or drinking experiences, poor course performance, or poor family support to educate. On political aspect, we should place importance on the cluster effect between smoking, drinking, and chewing betel nuts together when progressing betel nut prevention programs. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-16T16:20:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R99848002-1.pdf: 8500387 bytes, checksum: a72315f24a660a90defa48a916f3f0e6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書......................... i
誌謝........................................ ii 摘要....................................... iii Abstract................................... iv 第一章 緒論.............................. 1 第一節 研究動機.................... 1 第二節 研究目的................ 4 第二章 文獻探討..................... 5 第一節 國內學生嚼檳榔的情形............... 5 第二節 影響學生嚼檳榔及初次嚼檳榔時間的因素.. 12 第三節 長期追蹤研究的特性..... 16 第四節 發展軌跡之應用與分析................. 18 第三章 研究方法...................... 23 第一節 研究架構..................... 23 第二節 研究樣本........................... 27 第三節 研究變項............................. 30 第四節 資料分析................... 43 第四章 結果....................... 46 第一節 樣本之個人、環境與行為因素的分佈.. 46 第二節 樣本四至十二年級嚼檳榔比率、發生率與軌跡類型 54 第三節 影響樣本四至十二年級嚼檳榔軌跡類型的因素. 58 第四節 影響樣本四至十二年級初次嚼檳榔時間的因素..... 63 第五章 討論.................... 66 第一節 學生四至十二年級嚼檳榔比率與發生率隨時間上升 66 第二節 學生四至十二年級嚼檳榔行為的發展軌跡類型 67 第三節 學生四至十二年級嚼檳榔軌跡類型的影響因素 68 第四節 學生四至十二年級初次嚼檳榔時間的影響因素.. 70 第五節 本研究的限制........... 72 第六章 結論與建議............... 74 第一節 結論....................... 74 第二節 建議 75 參考文獻...................... 77 附錄一 社交焦慮、家庭支持、同儕支持、吸菸及飲酒的軌跡類型適合度指標與潛在類型事後機率...................... 84 附錄二 2009年CABLE自填問卷（學生版）............... 87 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 存活分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 檳榔 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 學生 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 長期追蹤 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 群體基礎軌跡模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | survival analysis | en |
| dc.subject | betel nut | en |
| dc.subject | student | en |
| dc.subject | longitudinal research | en |
| dc.subject | group-based trajectory model | en |
| dc.title | 學生四至十二年級嚼檳榔行為之變化研究：軌跡類型及初次嚼檳榔時間 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Changes of Betel Nut Chewing among Students from 4th to 12th Grade: Behavior Patterns and Onset of Betel Nut Chewing | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張新儀,吳文琪 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 檳榔,學生,長期追蹤,群體基礎軌跡模型,存活分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | betel nut,student,longitudinal research,group-based trajectory model,survival analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 102 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-02 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 健康政策與管理研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf | 8.3 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。