請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6076
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳玲玲 | |
dc.contributor.author | Lynne Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李藍瑜 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-16T16:20:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-09 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-16T16:20:29Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-09 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | References
Ackerman, D., MacInnis, D., & Folkes, V. 2000. Social Comparisons of Possessions: When It Feels Good and When It Feels Bad, Advances in consumer research, 27, pp. 173-178. Amatulli, C., & Guido, G. 2011. Determinants of Purchasing Intention for Fashion Luxury Goods in the Italian Market: A Laddering Approach, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 15(1), pp. 123-136. Anderson, C. 2006. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More, New York, NY: Hyperion. Anderson, L. R, and Holt, C., A. 1996. Classroom Games: Information Cascades, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), pp. 187-93. Anderson, L. R, and Holt, C., A. 1997. Information Cascades in the Laboratory, American Economic Review, 87(5), pp. 847–862. Bandura, A. (1971). Psychological Modeling. New York. Bickart, B., & Schindler, R. M. 2001. Internet Forums as Influential Sources of Consumer Information. Journal of interactive marketing, 15(3), pp. 31-40. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., Welch, I. 1992. Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades, Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), pp.992–1026. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., Welch, I. 1998. Learning From the Behaviour of Others( Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), pp.161–170. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., Welch, I. 2005. Information Cascades and Observational Learning, in Durlauf, S. N. and Blume, L. E. (eds). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan. Brynjolfsson, E. and Smith, M. 2000. Frictionless Commerce? A comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers, Management Science, 46, pp. 563-585. Brown, D. J., Ferris, D. L., Heller, D., and Keeping, L. M. 2007. Antecedents and Consequences of the Frequency of Upward and Downward Social Comparisons at Work, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, pp. 59–75. Buunk, A. P, and Gibbons, F. X. 2007. Social Comparison: The End of a Theory and the Emergence of a Field, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 102), pp. 3-21. Buunk, B.P. 1995. Comparison Direction and Comparison Dimension Among Disabled Individuals: Toward a Refined Conceptualization of Social Comparison under Stress, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), pp. 316. Buunk, B.P., Collins, R.L., Taylor, S.E., VanYperen, N.W., and Dakof, G.A. 1990. The Affective Consequences of Social Comparison: Either Direction Has Its Ups and Downs, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), pp. 1238-1249. Buunk, A.P., and Gibbons, F.X. 2007. Social Comparison: The End of a Theory and the Emergence of a Field, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(1), pp. 3–21. Cai, H., Chen, Y., and Fang, H. 2008. Observational Learning: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Field Experiment, American Economic Review. American Economic Association, 99(3), pp. 864-82. Calder, B.J., and Burnkrant, R.E. 1977. Interpersonal Influence on Consumer Behavior: An Attribution Theory Approach, Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), pp.29. Celen, B., and Kariv, S. 2004. Observational Learning under Imperfect Information, Games and Economic Behavior, 47(1), pp. 72–86. Chen, L. 2010. Social Influence of Product Popularity on Consumer Decisions: Usability Study of Flickr Camera Finder, In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 297-300. Chen, Y. F. 2008. Herd Behavior in Purchasing Books Online, Computers in Human Behavior, 24), pp. 1977–1992. Chen, Y. F. 2011. Auction Fever: Exploring Informational Social Influences on Bidder Choices, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(7-8), pp. 411-416. Chen Y., Wang, Q., Xie, J. 2010. Online Social Interactions: A Natural Experiment on Word of Mouth versus Observational Learning, Journal of Marketing Research, 48(2), pp. 238-254. Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. 2003. The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews, No. w10148. National Bureau of Economic Research. Corneo, G, and Jeanne, O. 1997. Conspicuous Consumption, Snobbism, and Conformism, Journal of Public Economics, 66, pp. 55–71. Duflo, E. 2006. Field Experiments in Development Economics, Econometric Society Monographs, 42, pp. 322. Duflo, E., Kremer, M., & Robinson, J. 2004. Understanding Technology Adoption: Fertilizer in Western Kenya, preliminary results from field experiments, Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Festinger, L. 1954. A Theory of Social Comparison Processes, Human Relations, 7(2), pp. 117. Gammoh, B. S., Voss, K. E., & Chakraborty, G. 2006. Consumer Evaluation of Brand Alliance Signals, Psychology & Marketing, 23(6), pp. 465-486. Gibbons, F. X. 1999. Social Comparison as a Mediator of Response Shift, Social Science and Medicine, 48, pp. 1517–1530. Grunert, K. G., & Ramus, K. 2005. Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Food Through the Internet: A Review of the Literature and a Model for Future Research, British Food Journal, 107(6), pp. 381-403. Hoch, S.J., and Loewenstein, G.F. 1991. Time-Inconsistent Preferences and Consumer Self-Control, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), pp. 492. Hongbin, C., Chen, Y., and Fang, H. 2009. Observational Learning: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Field Experiment, American Economic Review, 99(33), pp. 864-882. Karlsson, N., Garling, T., Dellgran, P, and Klingander, B. 2005. Social Comparison and Consumer Behavior: When Feeling Richer or Poorer than Others is More Important than Being So, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(6), pp. 1206–1222. Khan, G., and Khan, N. 2005. Susceptibility to Informational Social Influence on Purchase Decisions of Designer Label Apparel: The Mediating Role of Gender, The Business Review, Cambridge, 4(1), pp. 32. Kirmani, A. 1990. The Effect of Perceived Advertising Costs on Brand Perceptions, Journal of Consumer Research, pp. 160-171. Kirmani, A., & Rao, A. R. 2000. No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality, The Journal of Marketing, pp. 66-79. Kruger, J., Windschitl, P. D., Burrus, J., Fessel, F., and Chambers, J. R. 2008. On the Rational Side of Egocentrism in Social Comparisons, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44), pp. 220–232. Iyengar, R., Van den Bulte, C., & Valente, T. W. 2011. Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion. Marketing Science, 30(2), pp. 195-212. Lim, K., Sia, C., Lee, M., and Benbasat, I. 2006. Do I Trust You Online, and If So, Will I buy? An Empirical Study of Two Trust-Building Strategies, Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), pp. 233–266. Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. 1997. Superstars and Me: Predicting the Impact of Role Models on the Self, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), pp. 91. Loewenstein, G. F. 1988. Frames of Mind in Inter-Temporal Choice, Management Science, 34(2), pp.200-214. Luo, X. 2005. How does shopping with others influence impulsive purchasing? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), pp. 288-294. Lynch Jr, J. G. 1982. On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research, pp. 225-239. Lynch, P.D., Kent, R.J., and Srinivasan, S.S. 2001. The Global Internet Shopper: Evidence From Shopping Tasks in Twelve Countries, Journal of Advertising Research, pp. 15–23. Mussweiler, T. 2001. Focus of Comparison as a Determinant of Assimilation versus Contrast in Social Comparison, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(1), pp. 38. Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F. 2000. Consequences of Social Comparison: Selective Accessibility, Assimilation, and Contrast, Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research, pp. 253–270. Ofcom. 2008. The communications market 2008. Online: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/research/cm/cmr08 Olson, J. M., Herman, C. P. and Zanna, M. P. 1986. Relative Deprivation and Social Comparison, The Ontario Symposium, 4, Psychology Press. Pavlou, P.A., Liang, H., and Xue, Y. 2007. Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Environments: An Agency Theory Perspective, MIS Quarterly, 31(1), pp. 105–136. Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. 1977. Students and Housewives: Differences in Susceptibility to Reference Group Influence, Journal of Consumer Research, pp. 102-110. Rook, D. W. 1987. The Buying Impulse, Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), pp. 189. Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., and Watts, D. J., 2006. Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market, Science, 311, pp. 854–56. Schiffman, L.G., and Kanuk, L.L. 2000. Consumer Behavior, 7th: Prentice Hall, Inc. Shepherd, M. M., Briggs, R. O., Reinig, B. A., Yen, J., and Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. 1996. Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity, Journal of Management Information Systems, 12), pp. 155–170. Sridhar, S., & Srinivasan, R. 2012. Social Influence Effects in Online Product Ratings, Journal of Marketing, 76(5), pp. 70-88. Spence, M. 2002. Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets, American Economic Review, 92), pp. 434-459. Suls, J., Rene M., and Wheeler, L. 2002. Social Comparison: Why, with Whom, and with What Effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, pp. 159–163. Suls, J., and Wheeler, L., (Eds). 2000. Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. Taylor, S. E., and Lobel, M. 1989. Social Comparison Activity under Threat: Downward Evaluation and Upward Contacts, Psychological Review, 96(4), pp. 569–575. Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. 2003. Inspiration as a Psychological Construct, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), pp. 871. Tucker, C, and Zhang, J. 2011. How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment, Management Science, 57(5), pp. 828–842. Tucker, C. and Zhang, J. 2007. Long Tail or Steep Tail? A Field Investigation into How Online Popularity Information Affects the Distribution of Customer Choices, MIT Sloan School Working Paper 4655-07. TWNIC: Taiwan Network Information Center 2012. A survey of broadband usage in Taiwan. Retrieved from: http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/200307index.shtml Wei, P. S., & Lu, H. P. 2013. An Examination of the Celebrity Endorsements and Online Customer Reviews Influence Female Consumers’ Shopping Behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 29), pp. 193 – 201 Wills, T. A. 1981. Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology, Psychological Bulletin, 90), pp. 245–271. Wood, J. V. 1996. What is Social Comparison and How Should We Study It, Society for Personality and Social psychology, 22(5), pp. 520–537. Wood, J. V. 1989. Theory and Research Concerning Social Comparisons of Personal Attributes, Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), pp. 231–248. Wu, L.L., and Lee, L. 2008a. Effects of Social Comparison on Online Purchasing Behavior, International Conference on Decision Sciences and Technology for Globalization. Wu, L.L., and Lee, L. 2008b. Online Social Comparison: Implications Induced from Web 2.0, Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. Yoo, B., & Kim, K. 2012. Does popularity decide rankings or do rankings decide popularity? An investigation of ranking mechanism design. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 11(2), 180-191. Zhang, J. 2010. The Sound of Silence: Observational Learning from the U.S. Kidney Market, Marketing Science, 29(2), pp. 315–335. Zhang, X., Prybutok, V. R., Koh, C. E. 2006. The role of impulsiveness in a TAM-based online purchasing behavior model, Information Resources Management Journal, 19(2), pp. 54. Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. 2010. Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Sales: The Moderating Role of Product and Consumer Characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), pp. 133-148. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6076 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 當消費者面臨購買決策時,產品的受歡迎與否,往往是一個可以幫助消費者做決策的重要指標。這種資訊在網路上尤其普及,因為它可以不受限制的即時受到更新。最常見的兩種產品受歡迎資訊為: 1 ) 產品市場: 反映產品在市場上的需求量。可以是個擁有大市場的大眾產品 (例如: 劇情型電影),或者可以是個針對特定市場的小眾產品 (例如: 紀錄片)。 2 ) 產品銷售量: 反映產品自身的銷售數量。總括來說,大眾產品的銷售量高於小眾產品的銷售量時,這表示銷售量與市場大小所傳達的訊息是處於一致的狀況。但是當小眾產品的銷售量相同或超過大眾產品的銷售量時,這表示銷售量與市場大小所傳達的訊息是處於不一致的狀況。以往的研究指出,當小眾產品的銷售量與大眾產品的銷售量相同時,大多消費者會把這種訊息解讀為產品品質的指標,認為小眾產品的品質較好。然而,同樣的資訊也可以被解讀為潮流的指標,會吸引消費者去跟其他消費者做比較,而且覺得自己應該要得到那些消費者所擁有的東西。這種比較的過程,就是所謂的社會比較。在這種狀況下,很多人會受到小眾產品高銷售量的影響,認為這是當下的購買潮流,因而決定跟著這群小眾客群的購買決策。但是這種購買力量,並不如當消費者把資訊解讀為產品品質時來得高。所以這篇研究假設,當產品的市場大小與銷售量是不一致時 (例如: 小眾產品的銷售量大過於大眾產品時),購買小眾產品的機率會比當產品的市場大小與銷售量是一致的狀況下來得高,而其增加的量是以用產品品質為聯想的狀況高過於以社會比較為聯想的狀況。這個實驗是以實驗法,讓200位受試者在網路上進行實驗。最後的實證結果強烈支持我們的假設,而且對電子商務提供了許多實質的意涵。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Popularity information of products, frequently consulted by consumers for making purchase decisions, has become even more prevalant online, where such information is readily updated. Two kinds of popularity information can be identified: (1) market size, referring to a product’s potential demand in the market, can be either hit (e.g. drama movie) or niche (e.g. documentary movie) (2) sales volume, which refers to the actual purchase of products. Typically, sales volume is congruent with maket size where hit products have a higher sales than niche products; however, sales volume can be incongruent with market size where niche products have equal or higher sales than hit products. Past research has suggested that a niche product with an equally high sales volume as hit products signals a higher level of product quality. However, popularity information can also signal a social trend, which may induce consumers to compare themselves with other consumers and feel entitled to own what other consumers own. This process illustrates the phenomenon of social comparison. As such, a higher sales volume of a niche product may tempt some consumers to follow the trend of a limited number of people with special preferences, but the boost of purchases in this case might not be as high as that for the consumers who interpret sales volume as product quality. Therefore, it is hypothesized that when a product’s market size and sales volume are incongruent (i.e. a higher sales volume for niche products than for hit products), the probability of purchasing a niche product increases compared to the condition of congruence and that the magnitude of increase is higher for consumers with the inference of quality evaluation than with the inference of social comparison. The method of online experiment was adopted, with 200 participants, in this study. The empirical results strongly supported the proposed hypotheses and provided practical implications for e-commerce. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-16T16:20:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-D93725010-1.pdf: 1519970 bytes, checksum: 2b03b65bcdbb6f325070aeec7fda5ea1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
口試委員會審定書 i 謝 詞 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract iv Table of Contents v List of Figures vi List of Tables vii List of Appendixes viii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Literature Review 5 2.1. Observational Learning and Signaling Effect 5 2.2. Popularity Information and Quality Inference (Quality Evaluation) 7 2.3. Popularity Information and Social Inference (Social Comparison) 8 2.4. Inferences of Quality Evaluation and Social Comparison 11 Chapter 3: Methodology 16 3.1. Experimental Design 16 3.2. Stimulus Materials 18 3.3. Pilot Test 21 3.4. Experimental Procedure 22 3.5. Participants 22 Chapter 4: Results and Discussion 25 Chapter 5: Conclusions 29 5.1. Conclusions 29 5.2. Theoretical Implications 30 5.3. Managerial Implications 32 5.4. Limitations 34 5.5. Future Research 35 References 37 List of Figures Figure 1: Research Model 18 List of Tables Table 1: Descriptive Analysis of Average Percentages of Purchase Decisions 12 Table 2: Consumers’ Interpretations and Purchase Decisions under the Condition of Incongruence 15 Table 3: Average Percentages of Purchase Decisions for Four Conditions 28 Table 4: Average Percentages of Purchase Decisions for Baseline 28 List of Appendixes Appendix A: Norming Test for Product Selections 45 Appendix B: Questions and Scenario for Conditions of Quality Evaluation and Social Comparison 46 Appendix C: Questions for Manipulation Check 52 Appendix D: Analysis of Demographic Information and Online Purchase Experience 53 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 產品受歡迎資訊對消費者網路購物之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Impact of Popularity Information
on Consumers’ Online Purchases | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 翁崇雄,陳靜枝,嚴秀茹,汪志堅 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 產品受歡迎資訊,社會比較,產品品質,訊號,網路購物行為, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | popularity information,social comparison,product quality,signal,online purchase behavior, | en |
dc.relation.page | 56 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-05 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 資訊管理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf | 1.48 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。