請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60652
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 何?芳(Yunn-Fang Ho) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yun-Wen Tang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 唐筠雯 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T10:24:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-24 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-09-24 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 蕭美玲:健全社區藥局,改善藥政管理。景福醫訊1990;7: 2-3.
2. 王光昭:臨床執業藥師養成之藥學教育。醫學教育通訊2000;7: 130-133. 3. 李水盛、林慧玲:臺大藥學系籌劃增設之六年制藥學教育。藥學雜誌2009;98: 3-7. 4. 顧記華:臺大藥學系六年制藥學教育。景福醫訊 2013;30: 6-12. 5. 何藴芳、孔繁璐、林振順、唐筠雯、陳瓊雪:近年國內社區藥局實習教學之推動。藥學雜誌 2013;29: 2-7. 6. 簡素玉、陳瓊雪、王惠珀、蔡義弘、林振順、何藴芳:訂定社區藥局實習相關規範。行政院衛生署補助科技發展計畫成果報告;社團法人臺灣臨床藥學會執行。98年12月。 7. 高純琇、何藴芳、李穎華:社區藥局實習制度推廣試辦計畫。行政院衛生署補助科技發展計畫研究報告;99年2月~100年11月。 8. 何藴芳、孔繁璐、林振順:推廣社區藥局實習計畫。行政院衛生署委託業務計畫研究報告;101年5月~101年12月。 9. Nemire RE, Meyer SM. Educating students for practice: educational outcomes and community experience. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(1): Article 20. 10. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree. Available at: https://www.acpeaccredit.org/pdf/FinalS2007Guidelines2.0.pdf (cited: 2012/2/22) 11. ACPE/APhA-ASP Open Forum on the Quality of Pharmacy Education. Available at: https://www.acpeaccredit.org/pdf/Presentations/2013APhA_ASPPresentationSlides.pdf (cited: 2012/3/21) 12. Stevenson TL, Hornsby LB, Phillippe HM, Keeley K, McDonough S. A quality improvement course review of advanced pharmacy practice experiences. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(6): 116. 13. Dugan BD. Enhancing community pharmacy through advanced pharmacy practice experiences. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006; 70(1): Article 19. 14. Haase KK, S.M., Orlando PL, Resman-Targoff BH, Smith SL. ACCP position statement: ensuring quality experiential education. Pharmacotherapy. 2008; 28(12): 1548–1551. 15. Burgett NE, Dennis VC, Wideman SD, Kirkpatrick AE, Randall DL. Pharmacy preceptors' views on the value and optimal frequency of quality assurance visits to advanced pharmacy practice experience sites. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(3): Article 48. 16. Zarembski DG, Boyer JG, Vlasses PH. A survey of advanced community pharmacy practice experiences in the final year of the PharmD curriculum at US colleges and schools of pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ, 2005;69(1): Article 2. 17. Mersfelder TL, Bouthillier MJ. Value of the student pharmacist to experiential practice sites: a review of the literature. Ann Pharmacother. 2012;46(4): 541-548. 18. Sweeney MA. Mauro VF, Cable GL, Rudnicki BM, Wall AL, Murphy CC, Makarich JA, Kahaleh AA. Community pharmacists and Colleges of Pharmacy: the Ohio partnership. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2005;45(1): 82-87. 19. Calis KA, Hutchison LC, Elliott ME, Ives TJ, Zillich AJ, Poirier T, Townsend KA, Woodall B, Feldman S, Raebel MA. Healthy People 2010: challenges, opportunities, and a call to action for America's pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy. 2004;24(9): 1241-1294. 20. Koenigsfeld CF, Tice AL. Organizing a community advanced pharmacy practice experience. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(1): Article 22. 21. Thomas RA. Developing structured-learning exercises for a community advanced pharmacy practice experience. Am J Pharm Educ.2006;70(1): Article 23. 22. Patterson BY. An advanced pharmacy practice experience in public health. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(5): 125. 23. 日本薬剤師会・日本薬学会:藥學生實務實習指導手冊(薬局薬剤師のための薬学生実務実習指導の手引き;2007-2009)。 24. 日本薬剤師会:日本薬剤師会の現況; 2008-2009. 25. Eickhoff C, Schulz M. Pharmaceutical care in community pharmacies: practice and research in Germany. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40(4): 729-735. 26. Bourdon O, Ekeland C, Brion B. Pharmacy education in france. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(6): Article132. 27. 廖育蓮、許宮銓、曾纓閔、林景星、王四切:嘉南藥理科技大學社區藥局實習之推動。藥學雜誌2013;29(2): 10-15. 28. 何藴芳、林慧玲、陳瓊雪:社區藥局實習之教學演進。醫學教育2002;6: 62-72. 29. 何藴芳主編:社區藥局實習手冊 (第三版)。台北市:國立臺大醫學院藥學系;2013年5月。 30. 何藴芳、黃彥銘、謝玲玲、鄒依庭、陳瓊雪:臺大社區藥局實習教學歷程與近況。藥學雜誌2013;29(2): 2-9. 31. 中華民國藥師公會全國聯合會:社區藥局藥事教學指導試辦計畫。行政院衛生署補助計畫成果報告;98年12月。 32. 國立臺灣大學之教學評鑑制度,2013年。取自:http://amaaa.nsysu.edu.tw/ezfiles/258/ 1258/img/1547/125611666.pdf(cited:2013/6/25) 33. 彭森明主編:大學生學習成果評量─理論、實務與應用。高等教育;2010年。 34. American Association for Higher Education. Principles of good practices for assessing student learning. Washington, DC: AAHE,1992. 35. Hubball H, Burt H. Learning outcomes and program-level evaluation in a four-year undergraduate pharmacy curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(5): Article 90. 36. 梁繼權主編:Problem based learning教師手冊。台北市:國立臺灣大學醫學院;2008年。 37. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. Preceptor survey national summary report 2012. Available at: http://www.aacp.org/resources/research/institutionalresearch/ Pages/PreceptorSurveyInformationandSummaryReports.aspx. (cited: 2012/2/22) 38. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. Pharmacy graduating student survey summary report 2012. Available at: http://www.aacp.org/resources/research/institutionalresearch/Pages/GraduatingStudentSurvey.aspx. (cited: 2012/2/22) 39. Perraudin C, Brion F, Bourdon O, Pelletier-Fleury N. The future of pharmaceutical care in France: a survey of final-year pharmacy students' opinions. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2011;11:6. 40. Ryan Haddad AM, Coover KL, Begley KJ, Tilleman JA. An advanced pharmacy practice experience in community engagement. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(5):Article 90. 41. Hardin JW, Hilbe JM. Generalized estimating equations. Boca Raton : Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2003. 42. 林慧玲、沈麗娟主編:非處方藥─自我照顧用藥(第二版)。台北市:健康文化;2011年8月。 43. Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(4): 387-396. 44. 朱宗信、陳祖裕、劉茂森、蘇裕謀、高芷華、林育志、黃曉峰、林曉娟、陳偉德主編:住院醫師教育的六大核心能力。台灣醫學教育學會;2009年3月。 45. 陳慶餘主編:社區醫學訓練手冊。台北縣:財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會;2009年6月。 46. 謝博生:台灣醫師培育模式的發展歷程。景福醫訊2012;29: 2-7. 47. Anderson HM, Moore DL, Anaya G, Bird E. Student learning outcomes assessment: a component of program assessment. Am J Pharm Educ. 2005;69(2): 256-268. 48. Hays R. Assessment in medical education: roles for clinical teachers. The clinical teacher. 2008;5: 23-27. 49. 顏志和、陳秀美、劉媖媚、吳明芬、湯念胡、陳本源:建立多元化評估方式於實習藥學生之學習成效。台灣臨床藥學雜誌2012;20(2): 81-102. 50. 陳筱華、林家五、陳欽洲:連結專業實習成效評估與教學改善。卓越教學學術研討會,宜蘭市,臺灣,2010年。 51. Lee KW, Machado MR, Wenzel MM, Gagnon JM, Calomo JM. An advanced professional pharmacy experience in a community setting using an experiential manual. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(2): Article 42. 52. Krueger JL. Pharmacy students' application of knowledge from the classroom to introductory pharmacy practice experiences. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(2): Article 31. 53. 中華民國藥師公會全國聯合會:藥學倫理規範。衛生署/內政部准許核備;2004年。 54. Cuellar LM, Ginsburg DB. Preceptor’s handbook for pharmacists. Bethesda, Maryland: American Society of Health-system Pharmacists, 2009. 55. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. Principles of good use for the AACP curriculum quality preception surveys. Available at: http://www.aacp.org/resources/research/institutionalresearch/Documents/guide2013.pdf. (cited: 2012/3/31) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60652 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 研究背景:
先進國家之藥學經驗學習課程,係專業養成教育重要一環,涵蓋初階藥學經驗學習(introductory pharmacy practice experiences,IPPEs)與進階藥學經驗學習(advanced pharmacy practice experiences,APPEs),提供藥學生執業場所實務訓練之機會並引導主動學習。國立臺灣大學醫學院藥學系社區藥局實習之授課始自民國81年,歷經持續性教學經驗累積與改進,逐年考量社區執業實況與教學資源而適時調整教學計畫;迄今所開授社區藥局實習課程定位為「初階─中階」程度之社區執業經驗學習﹝大四上(暑期先修)、選修、2學分﹞,而對於98學年度新增之六年學制生則屬必修課程;社區藥局實習相關教育制度、實施辦法與實習場所或指導師資之遴選仍待推廣,藉深化教學課程,以期培育高素質社區執業人才。 研究目的: 本研究擬依歷年教學資料及99-101學年度間進行發展階段之教學評估問卷調查,探討社區藥局實習課程之教學演進並分析教學成效及其影響因子;期待研究成果,茲供進階社區藥局實習課程推動之參考。 研究方法: 回溯性分析社區藥局實習課程99-101學年度資料,研究對象納入實習學生及指導藥師,自變項包括課程參與指導藥師、實習學生之特質及教學藥局之特性,而學生實習評量之評值與其對課程回饋意見為依變項,以線性複迴歸模型進行分析。問卷分兩類、三式:實習學生與指導藥師雙向評估(兩式)及實習學生對課程之回饋意見(一式);99-101學年度雙向評估,即實習學生對藥局或藥師之回饋(14項指標)、指導藥師對學生表現之綜合評量(20項指標,分專業素養與執業技能),評值採1-3分制(尚待改進、符合要求、表現優異)。而100-101學年度實習生對課程之回饋意見則包括課程安排(6項指標)、指導藥師(10項指標)、實習藥局(4項指標)、學習自我評估(22項指標)等四面向之滿意度調查,共42項指標,評值採1-5分制(極不同意、不同意、普通、同意、非常同意)。問卷回收後經匿名處理並彙整建檔,使用R 2.15.2統計軟體進行敘述性統計與迴歸分析,進而探討教學成效與其影響因子。本研究經臺大醫院倫理委員會審查通過。 研究結果: 研究之三學年期間共有105位學生修習社區藥局實習,曾參與實習指導之藥師34位及社區藥局34家。有關99-101學年度社區藥局實習之實習學生與指導藥師雙向評估計連鎖體系1家(11處)、多店體系3家(13處)與自營藥局(10處)參與教學,依學年度分別有14、20、25位藥師,指導23、41、41位實習學生;而有關100、101學年度實習學生對課程之回饋意見調查,則共有82位學生修課並受施測。99-101學年度指導藥師對實習生專業素養表現評量近乎優異(評值2.7 ± 0.5),尤以學習態度表現最為突出(2.8 ± 0.5),惟「與民眾溝通能自信表達」項目,在100、101兩學年度評為優異(評值3分)者比例偏低(分別為48.7% 與47.5%);執業技能表現以「明瞭調劑作業流程與應用」為最佳(2.8 ± 0.4),而「藥品或醫材之資訊諮詢」(2.5 ± 0.6)與「全民健保藥品給付申報」(2.5 ± 0.6)兩項待加強。99學年度實習學生對實習藥局之「地點便利性」與其「空間與設備適當性」,認為尚待改進者分別佔13.0%、4.4%,觀諸其他學年度此兩項指標滿意度評值均偏低(2.3 ± 0.7、2.5 ± 0.6);各學年間實習場所內工作人員,配合接納實習學生之評值屬良好或優異者介於82.1%~94.7%,學生多數認同其所實習之場所值得推薦予學弟妹(65.2%~84.2%);指導藥師多數能給予實習學生學習所需之協助並給予適當指導與監督,且指導藥師是多數實習學生心目中值得民眾信賴的角色(82.6%~97.4%)。進而以迴歸分析探討,得知實習學生綜合表現評值、指導藥師教學與課程成效評估等,與地區別、指導藥師執業經驗或指導方式、學生先修課程經驗等有關;而實習學生對實習藥局或指導藥師之教學成效回饋評估,則與藥局經營型態及指導藥師執業背景與指導方式有關。 而有關100-101學年度課程,學生對學習成效之自我評估(5分制),以「認識藥局內處方藥及非處方藥品項」(4.0 ± 0.6)與「調劑作業流程」(4.4 ± 0.7)兩項為佳,但「評估處方合理性」(3.5 ± 0.8)與「藥局財務管理與會計作業」(3.2 ± 0.9)兩指標待加強;101學年度學生實習前、後之自我評估,以「認識藥局內處方藥及非處方藥品項」、「調劑作業相關資訊系統應用」以及「管制藥品相關規定」等項目,自認學習有收穫,達統計上顯著差異(p值依序為0.001、0.001、0.004),另以「調劑作業流程」與「處方箋保存與歸檔規定」兩項目最佳(p < 0.001)。 結論: 現階段社區藥局實習課程能提供藥學生將專業知能應用於實務之訓練機會,學生於實習過程中得以陶冶專業素養、培養學習態度與精進執業技能;而實習教學成效則與課程安排、實習場所、指導藥師資歷、實習學生特質等因素息息相關。實習場所與指導藥師之遴選至為重要,而實習學生如能安排適當之先修課程,加強處方評估、經營管理或溝通諮詢技巧等執業技能,將更能結合藥學專業課程與實務執業應用,如假以時日持續進行學習成果評量研究,相信社區藥局實習課程之精進與深化指日可待。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background
Pharmacy practice experiential programs, whether introductory or advanced, is essential for pharmacy education. The Introductory Community Pharmacy Practice Experiences (ICPPE; elective, two credits) course at National Taiwan University has been developed and offered without interruption for each academic year since 1992. The continuation of existing educational collaboration and the recruitment of preceptors and search for new experiential sites for the course have been unremittingly carried out over the years. Objective The study aimed to document the progress of ICPPE development, to explore factors involved in educational outcomes, and to assess the impacts on both students and preceptors involved in the ICPPE course during 2010-2012. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of 105 students and 34 pharmacist preceptors in 34 experiential sites. Three types of questionnaires were administered, including (1) the evaluation of students by preceptors (categorized as professionalism and knowledge/skills, 20 items, 3-point scale; 2010-2012), (2) the evaluation of experiential sites and preceptors by students (14 items, 3-point scale; 2010-2012), (3) overall evaluation of course design (6 items), experiential sites (4 items), preceptors (10 items), and self-assessment (22 items) by students (5-point Likert scale; 2011-2012). The ICPPE outcomes and student-learning performance were analyzed by multiple marginal regression model for repeatedly measured response variables using the generalized estimating equations (GEE) method. Regression diagnostics was used to assure the quality of the statistical outputs. To compare the score differences between years, a non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted. These analyses were performed using R 2.15.2 software. Two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The study received Institutional Review Board approval. Results The annual participants of students and pharmacist preceptors ranged from 23 to 41 and 14 to 25, respectively. Response rate achieved 80% and higher. The experiential sites consisted of one nationwide chain pharmacy (11 sites), three pharmacy alliances (13 sites), and ten independent retail pharmacies. Preceptors’ evaluation of students’ performance in professionalism were with high satisfaction (2.7 ± 0.5), except being confident in communicating with patients (2.5 ± 0.5). Regarding students’ performance in knowledge and skills, understanding and application of good dispensing practices were ranked the highest (2.8 ± 0.4); whereas skills in consultation services and reimbursement claims needed to be strengthened (2.5 ± 0.6). Students’ evaluation of experiential sites indicated locale convenience and teaching facilities were of lower satisfaction. Most students agreed that their experiential sites were recommendable (65.2%~84.2%). Preceptors were acknowledged highly by providing customized instructions to meet students’ needs and by serving as a dependable professional (82.6%~97.4%). The multiple linear regression analysis found that the experiential sites, the practice or teaching experiences of the preceptors, and students’ educational profiles were important factors to the evaluation of students-learning and course outcomes (p < 0.001). As for students’ self-assessment performed during 2011-2012, high satisfaction was observed in questionnaire items such as products recognition (4.0 ± 0.6) and process of dispensing practice (4.4 ± 0.7); whereas, verification of prescriptions (3.5 ± 0.8) and financial management (3.2 ± 0.9). Thirty-seven students filled out pre- and post- ICPPE self-assessment questionnaires (22 items) in 2012. Questionnaire items such as products recognition, application of pharmacoinformatics in dispensing, and understanding of laws and regulations regarding controlled substances differed significantly (p = 0.001, 0.001, 0.004). Conclusions The current ICPPE course provides students with opportunities to acquaint themselves in applying knowledge and skills in real practice settings. Student-learning outcomes and curricular effectiveness are related to relevant characteristics of students, course design, experiential sites, and preceptors. The appropriate recruitment of sites and preceptors is pivotal to the success of the course. Arranging relevant pre-requisite or simulation courses would also help students benefiting from experiential learning. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T10:24:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R00451010-1.pdf: 8294059 bytes, checksum: 1af2372a202a312b2c2ce00359e71044 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝................................................................................................i
摘要................................................................................................iii Abstract..........................................................................................vii 目錄................................................................................................xi 圖目錄.............................................................................................xiv 表目錄.............................................................................................xv 第一章 緒論...................................................................................................1 第一節 研究背景.............................................................................................1 第二節 研究目的.............................................................................................3 第二章 文獻探討.............................................................................................5 第一節 國際間藥學教育發展概況......................................................................5 壹、美國藥學經驗學習....................................................................................5 貳、日本藥學經驗學習....................................................................................9 參、各國藥學經驗學習概況.............................................................................10 第二節 臺灣藥學經驗學習發展.........................................................................11 壹、各藥學校社區藥局經驗學習.......................................................................11 貳、臺大社區藥局實習教學歷程.......................................................................11 第三節 國內外教學成效評估學理與實務............................................................19 壹、學習成果評量...........................................................................................19 貳、經驗學習成效評估.....................................................................................20 參、國際間藥學經驗學習成效相關研究..............................................................21 第三章 研究方法..............................................................................................23 第一節 研究設計..............................................................................................23 第二節 研究架構..............................................................................................23 壹、架構圖......................................................................................................23 貳、變項定義..................................................................................................24 第三節 研究對象..............................................................................................26 壹、納入條件..................................................................................................26 貳、排除條件..................................................................................................26 第四節 問卷工具..............................................................................................27 壹、問卷內容..................................................................................................27 貳、問卷發放與回收流程.................................................................................28 參、問卷調查執行時間.....................................................................................29 第五節 資料整理與統計分析.............................................................................29 壹、作業軟體..................................................................................................29 貳、統計方法..................................................................................................29 第四章 研究結果..............................................................................................31 第一節 母體資料..............................................................................................31 壹、雙向評估..................................................................................................31 貳、對課程回饋意見........................................................................................31 第二節 回收樣本組成特性................................................................................32 壹、實習學生樣本基本資料..............................................................................32 貳、指導藥師樣本基本資料..............................................................................32 第三節 實習教學成效分析................................................................................34 壹、實習學生與指導藥師雙向評估....................................................................34 貳、實習學生對課程之回饋意見........................................................................44 第五章 討論.....................................................................................................61 第一節 資料品質..............................................................................................61 壹、研究樣本...................................................................................................61 貳、問卷回覆與填答情形..................................................................................61 第二節 量化研究之探討.....................................................................................61 壹、指導藥師與實習學生雙向評估分析..................................................................................................................62 貳、實習學生對課程回饋意見之探討..................................................................................................................63 第三節 經驗學習之發展(以醫學教育為例)................................................................................................................65 壹、醫學教育之實務訓練..................................................................................65 貳、經驗學習成效評估.....................................................................................65 參、專業實習成效評估研究...............................................................................66 第四節 進階社區藥局實習課程規劃探討...................................................................................................................67 壹、藥學經驗學習課程展望..............................................................................67 貳、社區藥局實習先修課程與經驗學習之課程設計.............................................68 參、實習場所之拓展與指導藥師培訓認證..........................................................68 第五節 心得與建議..........................................................................................70 第六節 研究限制.............................................................................................71 第七節 未來發展方向......................................................................................72 第六章 結論....................................................................................................73 參考文獻 .......................................................................................................75 附錄一 社區藥局實習教學實施辦法..................................................................81 二 臺大藥學系社區藥局實習教學執行要點........................................................86 三 問卷─臺大社區藥局實習學生問卷調查.........................................................88 四 臺大社區藥局實習修課學生滿意度統計(91-98學年度)..............................................................................................................89 五 問卷─臺大實習學生與指導藥師雙向評估.................................................................................................................90 六 問卷─臺大實習學生對課程之回饋意見........................................................93 七 學生學習評量準則(美國高等教育學會制訂).............................................................................................................95 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 臺大社區藥局實習教學成效探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Evaluation of Introductory Community Pharmacy Practice Experiences Course at National Taiwan University | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳瓊雪(Chiung-Sheue Chen),孔繁璐(Fan-Lu Kung),謝玲玲(Ling-Ling Hsieh) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 社區藥局,實習教學,經驗學習,教學成效, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | community pharmacy,experiential education,curriculum,assessment, | en |
dc.relation.page | 95 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床藥學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床藥學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 8.1 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。