Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60110
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor王泰昌(Tay-Chang Wang),劉嘉雯(Chia-Wen Liu)
dc.contributor.authorShen-Hua Hungen
dc.contributor.author洪申樺zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T09:56:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-16
dc.date.copyright2017-02-16
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016-12-24
dc.identifier.citationAdmati, A. and P. Pfleiderer. 1988. A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability. Review of Financial Studies 1 (1): 3–40.
Amihud, Y. and H. Mendelson. 1986. Liquidity and Stock Returns. Financial Analysts Journal 42 (3): 43–48.
Amihud, Y. and H. Mendelson. 1989. The Effects Of Beta, Bid-Ask Spread, Residual Risk, and Size of Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance 44 (2): 479–486.
Amihud, Y., H. Mendelson 1980. Dealership Market: Market-Making with Inventory. Journal of Financial Economics 8 (1): 31–53.
Asness, C. S. 1995. The Power of Past Stock Returns to Explain Future stock Returns. Working Paper. Goldman Sachs Asset Management. NY.
Baker, M. and J. C. Stein. 2002. Market Liquidity as a Sentiment Indicator. Journal of Financial Markets 7 (3): 271–299.
Banz, R. W. 1981. The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks. Journal of Financial Economics 9 (1): 3–18.
Basu, S. 1983. The Relationship between Earnings Yield, Market Value, and Return for NYSE Common Stocks: Further Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 12 (1): 129–156.
Bernstein, P. L. 1987. Liquidity, Stock Markets, and Market Makers. Financial Management 16 (2): 54–62.
Bhandari, L. C. 1988. Debt/Equity Ratio and Expected Common Stock Returns: Empirical Evidence. The Journal of Finance 43 (2): 507–528.
Black, F. 1972. Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing. Fischer Black. The Journal of Business 45 (3): 444–455. 
Black, F., M. C. Jensen, and M. Scholes. 1972. The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests. In: M. Jensen, ed.: Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets (Praeger).
Brennan, M. J. and A. Subrahmanyam. 1996. Market Microstructure and Asset Pricing: On the Compensation for Illiquidity in Stock Returns. Journal of Financial Economics 41 (3): 441–464.
Carhart, M. M. 1997. On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Finance 52 (1): 57–82.
Chalmers, J. M. R. and G. B. Kadlec. 1998. An Empirical Examination of the Amortized Spread. Journal of Financial Economics 48 (2): 159–188.
Chan, L. K., Y. Hamao, and J. Lakonishok. 1991. Fundamentals and stock returns in Japan. Journal of Finance 46 (5): 1739–1789.
Christie, W. G. and R. D. Huang. 1994. Market Structure and Liquidity: A Transaction Data Study of Exchange Listings. Journal of Financial Intermediation 3 (3): 300–326.
Coello, A. C., A. B. Aquiar, and A. B. Lopes. 2011. Relationship between Abnormal Earnings Persistence, Industry Structure, and Market Share in Brazilian Public Firms. Brazilian Administrative Review 8 (1): 48–67.
Cooper, S. K., J. C. Groth, and W. E. Avera. 1985. Liquidity, Exchange Listing, and Common Stock Performance. Journal of Economics and Business 37 (1): 19–33.
Copeland, T. E. and D. Galai. 1983. Information Effects on the Bid-Ask Spread. The Journal of Finance 38 (5): 1457–1469.
Datar, V. T., N. Y. Naik, and R. Radcliffe. 1998. Liquidity and stock returns: An alternative test. Journal of Financial Markets 1 (2): 203–219.
Demsetz, H. 1968. The Cost of Transacting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 82 (1): 33–53.
Fama, E. F., and K. R. French. 1992. The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance 47 (2): 427–465.
Fama, E. F., and K. R. French. 1993. Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33 (1): 3–56.
Fama, E. F., and K. R. French. 1996. Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies. The Journal of Finance 51 (1): 55–84.
Fama, E. F., K. R. French. 2015. A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics 116 (1): 1–22.
Garrod, N., W. Rees. 1998. International Diversification and Firm Value. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 25 (9)–(10): 1255–1281.
Gordon, M. J. 1959. Dividends, Earnings, and Stock Prices. The Review of Economics and Statistics 41 (2):99–105.
Hahn, J. and H. Lee. 2006. Yield Spreads as Alternative Risk Factors for Size and Book-to-Market. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 41 (2): 245–269.
Hasbrouck, J. 2009. Trading Costs and Returns for U.S. Equities: Estimating Effective Costs from Daily Data. Journal of Finance 64 (3): 1445–1477.
Ho, T. and H. R. Stoll. 1981. Optimal Dealer Pricing under Transaction Costs and Return Uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics 9 (1): 47–73.
Huang, R. D., H. R. Stoll. 1996. Dealer Versus Auction Markets: A Paired Comparison of Execution Costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE. Journal of Financial Economics 41 (3): 313–357.
Jegadeesh, N., and S. Titman. 1993. Returns to Buying Winners and Selling. Losers: Implications for. Stock Market Efficiency. Journal of Finance 48 (1): 65–91.
Jones, C. M. 2002. A Century of Stock Market Liquidity and Trading Costs SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=313681.
Karathanassis, G., S. Spilioti. 2003. En Empirical Investigation of the Traditional and the Clean Surplus Valuation Model. Managerial Finance 29 (9): 55–66.
Kwon, G.J. 2009. The Value Relevance of Book Values, Earnings and Cash flows: Evidence from South Korea. International Journal of Business and Management 4 (10): 28–42.
Kyle, A. S. 1985. Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading. Econometrica 53 (6): 1315–1335.
Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1994. Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk. Journal of Finance 49 (5): 1541–1578.
Lesmond, D. A., J. P. Ogden, and C. A. Trzcinka. 1999. A New Estimate of Transaction Costs. Review of Financial Studies 12 (5): 1113–1141.
Liew, J. and M. Vassalou. 2000. Can Book-to-Market, Size and Momentum be Risk Factors that Predict Economic Growth? Journal of Financial Economics 57 (2): 221–245.
Lintner, J. 1965. The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics 47 (1): 13–37.
Markowitz, H. M. 1959. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: Wiley.
Merton, R. C. 1973. An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model. Econometrica 41 (5): 867–887. 
Milunovich, G. and A. Tan. 2013. Testing for Contagion in US Industry Portfolios - a Four-Factor Pricing Approach. Applied Financial Economics 23 (1): 15–26.
Ohlson, J. 1995. Earnings Book Values and Dividends in Security Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 661–687.
Pagano, M. 1989. Trading Volume and Asset Liquidity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 (2): 255–274.
Pastor, L., R. F. Stambaugh. 2003. Liquidity Risk and Expect Stock Returns. Journal of Political Economy 111 (3): 642–685.
Petkova, R. 2006. Do the Fama-French Factors Proxy for Innovations in Predictive Variables? The Journal of Finance 61 (2): 581–612.
Roll, R. 1984. A Simple Implicit Measure of the Effective Bid-Ask Spread in an Efficient Market. The Journal of Finance 34 (4): 1127–1139.
Roll, R. 1984. A Simple Implicit Measure of the Effective Bid-Ask Spread in an Efficient Market. The Journal of Finance 39 (4): 1127–1139.
Rosenberg, B., K. Reid, and R. Lanstein. 1985. Persuasive Evidence of Market Inefficiency. Journal of Portfolio Management 11 (3): 9–16.
Ross, S. A. 1976. The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing. Journal of Economic Theory 13 (3): 341–360.
Sharpe, W. F. 1964. Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance 19 (3): 425–442.
Simpson, M. W. and S. Ramchander. 2008. An Inquiry into the Economic Fundamentals of the Fama and French Equity Factors. Journal of Empirical Finance 15 (5): 801–815.
Stattman, D. 1980. Book Values and Stock Returns. The Chicago MBA: A Journal of Selected Papers 4: 25–45. 
Stoll, H. 1989. Inferring the Components of the Bid-Ask spread: Theory and Empirical Tests. The Journal of Finance 44 (1): 115–134.
Swartz, G., M. Negash. 2006. An Empirical Examination of the Ohlson (1995) Model. SA Journal of Accounting Research 20 (1): 67–82.
Yang, H. L., S. Chen. 2009. The Measure of Intrisic Value and Bubble: Application of an Improved Ohlson LIM model to Chinese A-Stock. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organizations 6 (4): 404–417.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60110-
dc.description.abstract本文嘗試藉由上市櫃與興櫃公司資料,推估股票流動性與股價之關係,並使用財務資料估計股票流動性,欲藉以估算未上市櫃未興櫃公司股票之流動性,並進一步推估未上市櫃未興櫃公司股票價格。本文以Ohlson(1995)模型為基礎,加入報價價差、成交值比重以及Amihud(2002)等三種流動性指標,實證結果顯示此等流動性指標對股價具有一定程度解釋能力。而本文所建立估計流動性之模型約有3%~20%之誤差,估計股價之模型則約有13%~16%之誤差,結合兩模型以估計未上市櫃未興櫃公司股票之最大誤差期望值約為15.6%~19.2%。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this paper is twofold. First, I add three liquidity measures into Ohlson (2005) model trying to find out how liquidity affects stock price. The three liquidity measures I add are quoted spread, individual dollar volume normalized by aggregate market dollar volume and Amihud (2002) liquidity measure. Second, I try using financial data that private companies can easily obtain to estimate the three liquidity measures of there own. Then anyone can use the estimated liquidity of private companies to estimate the stock price of private companies. Models used to estimate liquidity in this paper have mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) range from 3% to 20%. Models used to estimate stock price in this paper have MAPE range from 13% to 16%. Using two models together has a expected maximum MAPE range from 15.6% to 19.2%.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:56:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-105-R03722017-1.pdf: 4790434 bytes, checksum: 8fba5c51a257272e6948538816cc682f (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
致謝 i
摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 v
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究架構 2
第二章 文獻回顧 3
第一節 傳統資產定價模型 3
第二節 流動性之衡量指標與股票報酬率 7
第三節 Ohlson評價模型 10
第三章 研究方法 11
第一節 樣本選取 11
第二節 模型尋找與設定 14
第四章 實證結果 19
第一節 敘述性統計 19
第二節 被解釋變數為股價:式(0)、式(1)a、式(2)a 23
第三節 被解釋變數為流動性指標:式(4)、式(5)、式(6) 35
第五章 結論與限制 43
第一節 研究結論 43
第二節 研究限制 44
附件 45
參考文獻 107

表目錄
表1、初步樣本篩選 11
表2、各模型實際使用之樣本數 12
表3、各年各產業樣本分佈情形 13
表4、敘述性統計-式(1)a、式(2)a 20
表5、敘述性統計-式(4)、式(5)、式(6) 20
表6、相關係數-式(1)a、式(2)a 21
表7、相關係數-式(4)、式(5)、式(6) 22
表8、式(0)-1994年至2014年、產業虛擬變數 23
表9、式(0)-不篩選股價、1994年至2014年、產業虛擬變數 24
表10、式(1)a-無財務資料、1994年至2014年、產業虛擬變數 25
表11、式(2)a-無財務資料、1994年至2014年、產業虛擬變數 25
表12、式(1)a-1994年至2014年、產業虛擬變數 27
表13、式(2)a-1994年至2014年、產業虛擬變數 29
表14、式(1)a與式(2)a-殘差佔比彙總 30
表15、式(0)-1995年至2014年、產業虛擬變數、加前一年資料 30
表16、式(1)a-1995年至2014年、產業虛擬變數、加前一年資料 31
表17、式(2)a-1995年至2014年、產業虛擬變數、加前一年資料 32
表18、式(1)a與式(2)a-殘差佔比彙總(加前一年資料) 33
表19、式(1)a與式(2)a-殘差佔比彙總(加前一年資料與產業交乘項) 33
表20、式(4)-1994年至2014年、產業虛擬變數 36
表21、式(5)-1994年至2014年、產業虛擬變數 38
表22、式(6)-1994年至2014年、產業虛擬變數 40
表23、式(4)、式(5)與式(6)-殘差佔比彙總 41
表24、式(4)、式(5)與式(6)-殘差佔比彙總、刪1%極端值 42
表25、式(4)、式(5)與式(6)-殘差佔比彙總、刪3%極端值 42
表26、式(4)、式(5)與式(6)-殘差佔比彙總、刪5%極端值 42
表27、解釋變數測試範圍 45
表28、測試範圍解釋變數之說明 49
表29、測試範圍解釋變數原始值之敘述性統計 59
表30、式(0)-其他樣本期間與虛擬變數搭配組合 63
表31、式(1)a與式(2)a-單一流動性指標、無財務資料、1994年至2014年、產業虛擬變數 64
表32、式(1)a-其他樣本期間與虛擬變數搭配組合 65
表33、式(2)a-其他樣本期間與虛擬變數搭配組合 67
表34、式(1)a-其他樣本期間與虛擬變數搭配組合、加前一年資料 69
表35、式(2)a-其他樣本期間與虛擬變數搭配組合、加前一年資料 73
表36、式(1)a-2014年、產業虛擬變數、加前一年資料、電子業交乘項 77
表37、式(1)a-全期間、產業虛擬變數、加前一年資料、電子業交乘項 78
表38、式(1)a-全期間、產業虛擬變數、加前一年資料、全產業交乘項 79
表39、式(2)a-2014年、產業虛擬變數、加前一年資料、電子業交乘項 88
表40、式(2)a-全期間、產業虛擬變數、加前一年資料、電子業交乘項 89
表41、式(2)a-全期間、產業虛擬變數、加前一年資料、全產業交乘項 90
表42、式(4)-其他樣本期間、產業虛擬變數 100
表43、式(5)-其他樣本期間、產業虛擬變數 101
表44、式(6)-其他樣本期間、產業虛擬變數 102
 
圖目錄
圖2、散佈圖-式(1)a未篩選股價 103
圖1、散佈圖-LIQ_Amih與LIQ_W 103
圖3、散佈圖-P/BV與FIN_Ints 104
圖4、散佈圖-P與FIN_Ints 104
圖5、散佈圖-被解釋變數與殘差佔比 105
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject評價zh_TW
dc.subject股價zh_TW
dc.subject流動性zh_TW
dc.subjectStock Priceen
dc.subjectLiquidityen
dc.subjectValuationen
dc.title未上市櫃未興櫃公司股票評價:Ohlson模型之延伸應用zh_TW
dc.titleValuation of Private Company Stock: an Extended Application of
Ohlson Model
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear105-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林瑞青(Lin)
dc.subject.keyword股價,流動性,評價,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordStock Price,Liquidity,Valuation,en
dc.relation.page112
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201603823
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2016-12-25
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-105-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
4.68 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved