請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59978
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳雅美(Ya-Mei Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Jian-Sian Li | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李建賢 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T09:48:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-03-01 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-01-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Bergman M. Hearing and aging. Implications of recent research findings. Audiology. 1971;10(3):164-171.
2. Popelka MM, Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, Klein BE, Klein R. Low prevalence of hearing aid use among older adults with hearing loss: the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46(9):1075-1078. 3. Aging TNCot. The Consequences of Untreated Hearing Loss in Older Persons. Washington, DC: The National Council on the Aging; 1999. 4. Ries PW. Prevalence and characteristics of persons with hearing trouble: United States, 1990-91. Vital Health Stat 10. 1994(188):1-75. 5. Ciorba A, Bianchini C, Pelucchi S, Pastore A. The impact of hearing loss on the quality of life of elderly adults. Clin Interv Aging. 2012;7:159-163. 6. Chang HP, Ho CY, Chou P. The factors associated with a self-perceived hearing handicap in elderly people with hearing impairment--results from a community-based study. Ear Hear. 2009;30(5):576-583. 7. Heine C, Browning CJ. Communication and psychosocial consequences of sensory loss in older adults: overview and rehabilitation directions. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(15):763-773. 8. Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist. 2003;43(5):661-668. 9. Gates GA, Mills JH. Presbycusis. Lancet. 2005;366(9491):1111-1120. 10. Vuorialho A, Karinen P, Sorri M. Effect of hearing aids on hearing disability and quality of life in the elderly. Int J Audiol. 2006;45(7):400-405. 11. Mulrow CD, Aguilar C, Endicott JE, et al. Quality-of-life changes and hearing impairment. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(3):188-194. 12. Joore MA, Brunenberg DE, Chenault MN, Anteunis LJ. Societal effects of hearing aid fitting among the moderately hearing impaired. Int J Audiol. 2003;42(3):152-160. 13. Stark P, Hickson L. Outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older people with hearing impairment and their significant others. Int J Audiol. 2004;43(7):390-398. 14. Bess FH. The role of generic health-related quality of life measures in establishing audiological rehabilitation outcomes. Ear Hear. 2000;21(4 Suppl):74S-79S. 15. 張維修. 老年人使用現代化數位助聽器的結果測量與其決定因素之研究. 國立臺灣大學. 2010;職業醫學與工業衛生研究所(碩士). 16. 朱思盈. 聽覺缺損對台灣老年男性榮家住民生活品質的影響. 國立成功大學. 2011;老年學研究所(碩士). 17. 王榮德. 流行病學方法論. 台大醫學叢書. 2010. 18. Huang Q, Tang J. Age-related hearing loss or presbycusis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267(8):1179-1191. 19. Speech understanding and aging. Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988;83(3):859-895. 20. Hall JW. Audiologists' Desk Reference. Singular Publishing Group. 1996;I. 21. Clark JG. Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. ASHA. 1981;23(7):493-500. 22. Pacala JT, Yueh B. Hearing deficits in the older patient: 'I didn't notice anything'. JAMA. 2012;307(11):1185-1194. 23. Bagai A, Thavendiranathan P, Detsky AS. Does this patient have hearing impairment? JAMA. 2006;295(4):416-428. 24. Assessment APoA. Guidelines for Audiologic Screening. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 1997. 25. 行政院衛生署. 身心障礙等級. 2008. 26. Brainerd SH, Frankel BG. The Relationship between Audiometric and Self-Report Measures of Hearing Handicap. Ear Hearing. 1985;6(2):89-92. 27. Guide for the Evaluation of Hearing Handicap. Jama-J Am Med Assoc. 1979;241(19):2055-2059. 28. On the definition of hearing handicap. ASHA. 1981;23(4):293-297. 29. Humes LE. Understanding the speech-understanding problems of the hearing impaired. J Am Acad Audiol. 1991;2(2):59-69. 30. Holcomb LM, Nerbonne MA, Konkle DF. Articulation index and hearing handicap. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11(4):224-229. 31. O’Neill G. Hearing loss –a growing problem that affects quality of life. National Academy on an Aging Society. 1999;December. 32. Monzani D, Galeazzi GM, Genovese E, Marrara A, Martini A. Psychological profile and social behaviour of working adults with mild or moderate hearing loss. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008;28(2):61-66. 33. Tomioka K, Ikeda H, Hanaie K, et al. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) versus a single question: reliability, validity, and relations with quality of life measures in the elderly community, Japan. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(5):1151-1159. 34. Wong LL, Cheng LK. Quality of life in older Chinese-speaking adults with hearing impairment. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(8):655-664. 35. Felce D, Perry J. Quality of life: its definition and measurement. Res Dev Disabil. 1995;16(1):51-74. 36. Kuyken W, Orley J. Development of the Whoqol - Rationale and Current Status. Int J Ment Health. 1994;23(3):24-56. 37. Yao KP. Introduction to the Development of the WHOQOL-Taiwan Version. Chinese Journal of Public Health. 2000;19(4):315-324. 38. 姚開屏. 簡介與評論常用的一般性健康相關生活質量表兼談對未來研究的建議. 測驗年刊 2000;47(2):111-138. 39. Wiley TL, Cruickshanks KJ, Nondahl DM, Tweed TS. Self-reported hearing handicap and audiometric measures in older adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11(2):67-75. 40. Joore MA, Potjewijd J, Timmerman AA, Anteunis LJ. Response shift in the measurement of quality of life in hearing impaired adults after hearing aid fitting. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(4):299-307. 41. Chisolm TH, Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, et al. A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force On the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(2):151-183. 42. 劉殿楨. 數位式助聽器的最新進展. 健康世界. 2004;220:50-52. 43. Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VI: 10-Year Customer Satisfaction Trends in the US Hearing Instrument Market. The Hearing Review. 2002;9(10):14-25. 44. Kumar SG, Majumdar A, G P. Quality of Life (QOL) and Its Associated Factors Using WHOQOL-BREF Among Elderly in Urban Puducherry, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(1):54-57. 45. Poljicanin T, Ajdukovic D, Sekerija M, Pibernik-Okanovic M, Metelko Z, Vuletic Mavrinac G. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension have comparable adverse effects on health-related quality of life. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:12. 46. Lichtenstein MJ, Bess FH, Logan SA. Diagnostic performance of the hearing handicap inventory for the elderly (screening version) against differing definitions of hearing loss. Ear Hear. 1988;9(4):208-211. 47. Yang CL. The investigation in estimating the severity of hearing handicap for elders with presbycusis. Bulletin of sepcial education. 2005;28:215-238. 48. 汪國慶. 篩選型老年聽力障礙量表的研譯及其信度和效度評價. 聽力學及言語疾病雜誌. 2014;6:568-572. 49. 邱韻寧. 世界衛生組織生活品質問卷台灣簡明版在社區老人族群的適用性. 臺北醫學大學. 2003;傷害防治學研究所(碩士). 50. 姚開屏. 台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊. 2005. 51. Valadares AL, Carvalho ED, Costa-Paiva LH, Morais SS, Pinto-Neto AM. Association between different types of physical activities and quality of life in women aged 60 years or over. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2011;57(4):450-455. 52. 游曉微. 臺灣老人失能趨勢之回顧. 長期照護雜誌. 2015;19(2):157-186. 53. WHO. Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. Madrid, Spain: Ageing and Life Course Program,Second United Nations World Assembly on Ageing Press. 2002. 54. Fox KR, Hillsdon M, Sharp D, et al. Neighbourhood deprivation and physical activity in UK older adults. Health Place. 2011;17(2):633-640. 55. Franke T, Tong C, Ashe MC, McKay H, Sims-Gould J, Walk The Talk T. The secrets of highly active older adults. J Aging Stud. 2013;27(4):398-409. 56. Kowalska M, Danso F, Humeniuk M, Kulak E, Arasiewicz H. Determinants of environmental domain of quality of life in economically active population living in Silesian agglomeration, Poland. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2013;26(1):132-143. 57. Jakobsson U, Hallberg IR. Loneliness, fear, and quality of life among elderly in Sweden: a gender perspective. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005;17(6):494-501. 58. 內政部. 身心障礙者輔具費用補助基準表. 2012. 59. 衛福部護理及健康照護司. 新制身心障礙鑑定. 2014. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59978 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景:聽覺損傷是中老年族群中常見的感官障礙與生活品質及身心健康有負向關係,並會使中老年人容易產生社會隔離、憂鬱、焦慮甚至導致日常生活功能下降。台灣聽覺損傷的盛行率隨人口結構的老化而逐漸上升,約四成的老年人有足以影響溝通的聽力障礙。而本研究目的是希望由國內常見聽覺復健模式探討數位式助聽器使用與中老年聽覺損傷者生活品質間之關係。
方法:本研究是採橫斷式研究方式,在2016年4月29日至11月10日間,以北部區域教學醫院及其合作助聽器中心之聽覺損傷中老年患者為取樣對象,透過台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷與老年人聽覺表現(HHIE-S)量表來收集中老年聽覺損傷患者之資料。使用SPSS 18版統計軟體進行資料分析,對於社會人口學資料、聽力損傷狀況、HHIE-S量表與生活品質各範疇分數採描述性統計分析,進一步使用雙變項分析探討與生活品質相關之重要因子,最後採迴歸模式分析數位式助聽器使用在各生活品質範疇內之關係。 結果:總共有效問卷57份(佔回收問卷76.9%),有配戴數位式助聽器者佔21位(36.8%)。有佩戴助聽器者其HHIE-S量表分數顯著低於無配戴助聽器之族群,且助聽器使用與環境及本土化環境範疇生活品質有正向相關。在數位式助聽器使用下,中老年聽覺損傷患者對於居住安全及家居品質有較佳的正向感受且自覺參與休閒活動機會較高,此外有配戴助聽器者亦較能獲得與享受個人所期待的飲食。在考量相關影響因子下,助聽器配戴變項對本土化環境範疇生活品質分數有顯著正向關係。 結論:數位式助聽器的使用有助於提升中老年聽覺損傷者之環境範疇生活品質有高度相關。特別重要的是老年人的環境範疇生活品質的增加有助於維持老年人生理活動及社會參與,進而提升活躍老化之機會。台灣面對快速人口老化,聽覺損傷相關問題將會增加。助聽器的使用對中老年聽覺損傷族群的環境親和力在健康老化過程中所扮演的角色應是未來重要探索的議題。另外,本研究亦建議未來使用台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷來評估中老年聽覺損傷者助聽器使用與生活品質之間的關係,透過此量表可作為未來聽覺損傷患者在比較跨疾病治療時成本效益的評估工具。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Hearing impairment is common in the middle-aged and older adults. It has negative relationships with the quality of life (QOL) and physical-mental health, and makes older adults vulnerable to social isolation, depression, anxiety and even leads to decreased activities of daily living. The prevalence of hearing impairment in Taiwan is gradually increasing, about 40% of the elderly have hearing impairment affecting the communication. The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between the digital hearing aid fitting and the QOL of the middle-aged and older hearing-impaired adults through the domestic common hearing rehabilitation model.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we sampled the middle-aged and older patients with hearing impairment in a regional hospital and cooperative auditory centers during April 29 to November 10, 2016. We use the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale BREF Taiwan version (WHOQOL-BREF) and Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening Version (HHIE-S) to collect data. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 18 software. Descriptive analysis was used for sociodemographic data, hearing status, HHIE-S scale, and quality of life. Further, bivariate analysis was used to explore the factors related with the QOL. Finally, the regression model was used to analyze the relationship between digital hearing aid fitting and QOL in each domain. Results: A total of 57 valid questionnaires (76.9%) were collected and 21 (36.8%) wearing digital hearing aids. The HHIE-S scale was significantly lower in those who wearing hearing aids, and the hearing aids fitting has positive correlation with the environment and environment (TW) domains QOL. Under digital hearing aid fitting, middle-aged and older adults with hearing impairment perceive better residential safety, home environment quality and chance for participating in leisure activities. They also have better access to enjoy the desirable food. After controlling all the relevant factors, the hearing aid fitting has significant positive correlation with the QOL in environment (TW) domain. Conclusions: The digital hearing aid fittig could improve the environment domain QOL among the middle-aged and older adults with hearing impairment. Environment domain QOL are especially important for promoting older adults’ maintaining physical activities, social participation, and the chance of active ageing. Thus, while facing the challenge of fast population ageing, which envision high level of hearing-related problems and associated disaiblities in Taiwan, exploratiing the role of hearing aids fitting for the environmental accecibilities in the process of healthy ageing is warrented . In addition, this study also proposed to use the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version to assess the QOL and hearing aids fitting effect in the middle-aged and older adults with hearing impairment. This scale could be used as future cross-disease cost-effective assessment tools. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:48:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R03847037-1.pdf: 982199 bytes, checksum: 218c6f7a58dc53209bc273f0ec7c6b35 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 I
中文摘要 II ABSTRACT IV 目錄 VI 圖目錄 VIII 表目錄 IX 第一章 前言 1 第一節 實習單位與簡介 1 第二節 研究背景與動機 2 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 老年性聽覺損傷 4 第二節 中老年人聽覺損傷的評估 4 第三節 老年人聽覺損傷對生活品質之影響 6 第四節 生活品質意涵與評估方式 7 第五節 助聽器使用對聽覺損傷族群生活品質之影響 9 第六節 數位式助聽器的進展 10 第七節 生活品質相關的其他非聽力相關因素 11 第八節 研究目的 11 第三章 研究方法 12 第一節 研究設計與對象 12 一、 研究設計 12 二、 研究架構 12 三、 研究對象 13 四、 研究流程 14 第二節 研究工具與測量 14 一、 結構式問卷測量 14 二、 客觀聽力評估 16 三、 操作型定義 17 第三節 預定收案樣本數估算 21 第四節 分析方法 21 一、 描述性統計分析 21 二、 推論性統計分析 21 第五節 倫理考量 22 第四章 研究結果 23 第一節 描述性統計分析結果 23 一、 問卷收集狀況 23 二、 社會及人口學分布 23 三、 中老年聽力損傷患者之聽力相關特性 26 四、 中老年聽覺損傷者之生活品質評估 28 第二節 推論性統計分析結果 32 一、 中老年聽力損傷者之雙變項分析 32 二、 影響中老年聽力損傷者生活品質之因子 41 第五章 討論 50 第一節 研究結果討論 50 一、 數位式助聽器使用與中老年聽力損傷者生活品質之關係 50 二、 中老年聽力損傷者生活品質之重要預測因子 52 三、 中老年聽力損傷者之社會人口學狀況與生活品質之關係 53 四、 中老年聽力損傷者之聽力狀況與生活品質之關係 54 五、 中老年聽力損傷者相關政策探討 54 第二節 研究限制 57 第三節 結論與建議 57 第六章 參考文獻 59 第七章 附錄 63 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 數位式助聽器使用與中老年聽覺損傷族群之生活品質關係探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Relationship between Digital Hearing Aid Fitting and Quality of Life in the Middle-Aged and Older Adults with Hearing Impairment | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳正蔚(Cheng-Wei Chen),程蘊菁 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 聽覺損傷,中老年人,數位式助聽器,生活品質,台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Hearing Impairment,Middle-aged and Older Adults,Digital Hearing Aids,Quality of Life,the Taiwan Version of WHOQOL-BREF, | en |
dc.relation.page | 67 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201700185 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-01-23 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 959.18 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。