Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 工業工程學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59699
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃奎隆
dc.contributor.authorSheng-Szu Liuen
dc.contributor.author劉聖慈zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T09:33:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-17
dc.date.copyright2017-02-17
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2017-02-14
dc.identifier.citationAltman, E., Bernhard, P., Caron, S., Kesidis, G., Rojas-Mora, J., & Wong, S. (2013). A model of network neutrality with usage-based prices. Telecommunication Systems, 52, 601-609.
Balasubramanian, S., Bhattacharya, S., & Krishnan, V. V. (2015). Pricing information goods: A strategic analysis of the selling and pay-per-use mechanisms. Marketing Science, 34(2), 218-234.
Boussion, F., Maille, P., & Tuffin, B. (2012). Net Neutrality Debate: Impact of Competition among ISPs. International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks.
Cachon, G. P., & Lariviere, M. A. (2005). Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations. Management Science, 51, 30-44.
Coucheney, P., Maille, P., & Tuffin, B. (2013). Impact of Competition Between ISPs on the Network Neutrality Debate. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 10.
Ericsson. (2015a). Ericsson Mobility Report February.
Ericsson. (2015b). Ericsson Mobility Report June.
Gans, J. S. (2014). Weak versus strong net neutrality. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 47(2), 183-200.
Gao, L., Iosifidis, G., Huang, J., & L., T. (2014). Hybrid data pricing for network assisted user provided connectivity. Proceedings - IEEE INFOCOM, 682 - 690.
Gharakheili, H. H., Vishwanath, A., & Sivaraman, V. (2015). Pricing User-Sanctioned Dynamic Fast-Lanes Driven by Content Providers. IEEE Workshop on Smart Data Pricing.
Hande, P., Chiang, M., Calderbank, R., & Rangan, S. (2009). Network Pricing and Rate Allocation with Content provider Participation. Proceedings - IEEE INFOCOM.
Hande, P., Chiang, M., Calderbank, R., & Zhang, J. (2010). Pricing under constraints in access networks: Revenue maximization and congestion management. Proceedings - IEEE INFOCOM, 1-9.
Inaltekin, H., Wexler, T., & Wicker, S. B. (2007). A Duopoly Pricing Game for Wireless IP Services. IEEE.
Krämer, J., Wiewiorra, L., & Weinhardt, C. (2013). Net neutrality: A progress report. Telecommunications Policy, 37(9), 794-813.
Lee, D., J., M., Jin, G., & Park, J. (2012). Price of Simplicity under Congestion. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 30, 2158-2168.
Li, X., & Wang, Q. (2007). Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 179(1), 1-16.
Ma, R. T. B. (2015). Usage-Based Pricing and Competition in Congestible Network Service Markets. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking(99), 1-11.
Mingming, L., & Mahmut, P. (2010). Game-theoretic analyses of decentralized assembly supply chains: Non-cooperative equilibria vs. coordination with cost-sharing contracts. European Journal of Operational Research, 204(1), 96-104.
Musacchio, J., Walrand, J., & Schwartz, G. (2010). Net Neutrality and Investment Incentives. The RAND Journal of Economics, 41(3), 446-471.
Musacchio, J., Walrand, J., & Wu, S. (2006). A Game Theoretic Model for Network Upgrade Decisions. 44th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, 1, 191-200.
Odlyzko, A. (2001). Internet pricing and the history of communications. Computer Networks, 36(5-6), 493-517.
Park, J., Im, N., & Mo, J. (2014). ISP and CP Collaboration with Content Piracy. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE, 172-176.
Pasternack, B. A. (2008). Optimal Pricing and Return Policies for Perishable Commodities. Marketing Science, 27(1), 133-140.
Sen, S., Joe-Wong, C., Ha, S., & Chiang, M. (2013). A survey of smart data pricing: Past proposals, current plans, and future trends. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(2), 1-37.
Shetty, N., Schwartz, G., & Walrand, J. (2010). Internet QoS and Regulations. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 18(6), 1725 - 1737.
Wu, Y., Kim, H., Hande, P. H., Chiang, M., & Tsang, D. H. K. (2011). Revenue Sharing among ISPs in Two-Sided Markets. INFOCOM, 2011 Proceedings IEEE, 596 - 600.
Yu, S. M., & Kim, S. L. (2014). Game-Theoretic Understanding of Price Dynamics in Mobile Communication Services. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(9), 5120-5131.
Zha, Y., Zhang, J., Yue, X., & Hua, Z. (2015). Service supply chain coordination with platform effort-induced demand. Annals of Operations Research, 235(1), 785-806.
Zhang, L., & Wang, D. (2014). Sponsoring content: Motivation and pitfalls for content service providers. IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops, 577-582.
Zhang, L., Wu, W., & Wang, D. (2014). Time Dependent Pricing in Wireless Data Networks: Flat Rate vs. Usaged Based Schemes. Proceedings- IEEE INFOCOM.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59699-
dc.description.abstract隨著全球行動網路數據流量不斷成長,網路壅塞發生的發生頻率增加,造成服務品質下降,大眾不斷要求電信商擴建網路設備以因應需求,卻也同時讓提供使用者內容服務之內容提供者受到矚目,本研究在考慮服務品質下,討論設備維護成本的成本分配合約對於電信商與內容提供者雙方效益的影響。
本研究以斯塔克柏格賽局模型為基礎,首先建立電信商與內容提供者合作前之數學模型,作為雙方合作後結果之比較基準,利用逆向歸納法求得電信商最適設備規模與內容提供者最適內容訂閱價之解析解。接著討論電信商與內容提供者在分別擁有不同決策權力的多種合作情境下將如何制定決策,而其決策將如何影響其餘相關參數。
當內容提供者協助負擔網路設備維護成本時,將提供電信商誘因擴建網路設備規模。雙方合作後能讓更多使用者使用內容,服務品質亦可提升。而在內容提供者合作後會改變內容訂閱價的情境下,內容提供者不會將其所需負擔的成本轉嫁至使用者上,反而會調降內容訂閱價,此時能有更多使用者以較低的價格體驗到更好的服務品質。透過成本分配合約,電信商可在不影響內容提供者效益的前提下追求自身利益,同時為大眾帶來益處。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWith the popularity of smart devices and the convenience of the internet, global mobile data keeps growing. As network congestion occurs more frequently, users experience internet service with lower quality and start complaining of internet providers. Internet service provider will have higher reputation if service quality is improved, but the maintenance cost of network infrastructure will increase as well. However, content provider will gain more benefits without paying additional cost after infrastructure expansion. Therefore, internet service provider has no incentive to expand the scale of capacity. In this research, we consider a cost-sharing contract between internet service provider and content provider, and analyze the problem by backward induction. In basic model, content provider decides the subscription price of content after internet service provider decides the scale of capacity provided to users for connecting to the internet. This research considers different cooperation scenario, in which content provider and internet service provider are able to make different decisions, that is, the scale of capacity or the proportion of maintenance cost shared by content provider. Through numerical analysis, we show that internet service provider will have incentive to expand the scale of infrastructure capacity without sacrificing content provider’s utility through cost-sharing contract, and more users can experience internet service with better quality at the same time.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:33:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-105-R03546002-1.pdf: 1785683 bytes, checksum: d59a9494e8c22b1eba47be5b45096e1e (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
致謝 ii
摘要 iii
ABSTRACT iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 ix
第1章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機與目的 5
1.3 研究範圍與架構 6
第2章 文獻探討 9
2.1 電信商因應網路需求增加之策略 9
2.2 內容提供者之參與 12
2.3 合約設計 15
第3章 問題描述與模型建構 17
3.1 問題描述及定義 17
3.1.1 電信商設定 19
3.1.2 內容提供者設定 20
3.1.3 使用者設定 20
3.2 參數設定與合作前之基本模型建構 21
3.2.1 基本模型之推導與求解 21
3.2.2 模型定理推導 24
3.3 合作後之模型建構與求解─電信商全權決定合約內容 27
3.3.1 電信商全權決定合約內容,內容提供者考慮公平性 28
3.3.2 電信商全權決定合約內容,內容提供者不考慮公平性 31
3.3.3 模型定理 33
3.4 合作後之模型建構─內容提供者參與合約設計 34
3.4.1 電信商決定成本分配比例,內容提供者決定設備規模 35
3.4.2 電信商決定設備規模,內容提供者決定成本分配比例 36
3.4.3 模型定理 36
第4章 數值分析 38
4.1 情境分析 38
4.1.1 電信商全權決定合約內容,內容提供者考慮公平性(情境一) 39
4.1.2 電信商全權決定合約內容,內容提供者不考慮公平性(情境二) 40
4.1.3 內容提供者參與合約設計,決定設備規模(情境三) 41
4.2 廣告效益參數對電信商決策之影響 42
4.2.1 合作前 43
4.2.2 高單位維護成本下不同合作情境之比較 46
4.2.3 低單位維護成本下不同合作情境之比較 50
第5章 結論 57
參考文獻 60
附錄1:Proposition推導 63
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject內容提供者zh_TW
dc.subject服務品質zh_TW
dc.subject內容提供者zh_TW
dc.subject電信商zh_TW
dc.subject合約設計zh_TW
dc.subject成本分配zh_TW
dc.subject服務品質zh_TW
dc.subject成本分配zh_TW
dc.subject合約設計zh_TW
dc.subject電信商zh_TW
dc.subjectInternet Service Provideren
dc.subjectInternet Service Provideren
dc.subjectContract Designen
dc.subjectContract Designen
dc.subjectCost-Sharingen
dc.subjectQuality of Serviceen
dc.subjectContent Provideren
dc.subjectCost-Sharingen
dc.subjectContent Provideren
dc.subjectQuality of Serviceen
dc.title考量網路服務品質下電信商與內容提供者之合作模式研究zh_TW
dc.titleCost-Sharing Contract in Consideration of Network Service Quality between Internet Service Provider and Content Provideren
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear105-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee孔令傑,陳文智,郭佳瑋
dc.subject.keyword成本分配,合約設計,電信商,內容提供者,服務品質,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCost-Sharing,Contract Design,Internet Service Provider,Content Provider,Quality of Service,en
dc.relation.page74
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201700585
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2017-02-14
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept工業工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:工業工程學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-105-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.74 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved