請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59641完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 許瑋元(Wei-Yuan XU) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gui-Qin Li | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李桂欽 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T09:31:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-06-12 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-06-12 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-02-15 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Aghion, D., Armendáriz, B., & Gollier, C. (2000). Peer group formation in an adverse selection model. The Economic Journal, 110(465), 632-643.
Ahn, J., Weng, C., & Butler, B. S. (2013). The dynamics of open, peer-to-peer learning: what factors influence participation in the P2P University? Paper presented at the System Sciences (HICSS), 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior Action control (pp. 11-39): Springer. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research: Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411. Ashta, A., & Assadi, D. (2009). Do social cause and social technology meet? impact of web 2.0 technologies on peer-to-peer lending transactions. Cahiers du CEREN, 29, 177-192. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94. Barasinska, N. (2009). The role of gender in lending business: Evidence from an online market for peer-to-peer lending. The New York Times, 217266, 1-25. Barasinska, N., & Schäfer, D. (2014). Is Crowdfunding Different? Evidence on the Relation between Gender and Funding Success from a German Peer‐to‐Peer Lending Platform. German Economic Review, 15(4), 436-452. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588. Berger, S. C., & Gleisner, F. (2009). Emergence of financial intermediaries in electronic markets: The case of online P2P lending. BuR-Business Research, 2(1), 39-65. Bhattacherjee, A. (2002). Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 211-241. Bollen, & J, S. (1998). Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136162): Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Briceno Ortega, A. C., & Bell, F. (2008). Online social lending: Borrower-generated content. AMCIS 2008 Proceedings, 380. Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage focus editions, 154, 136-136. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Testing for the factorial validity, replication, and invariance of a measuring instrument: A paradigmatic application based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29(3), 289-311. Cadsby, C. B., Du, N., Song, F., & Yao, L. (2015). Promise keeping, relational closeness, and identifiability: An experimental investigation in China. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 120-133. Cassar, A., Crowley, L., & Wydick, B. (2007). The effect of social capital on group loan repayment: evidence from field experiments. The Economic Journal, 117(517), F85-F106. Ceyhan, S., Shi, X., & Leskovec, J. (2011). Dynamics of bidding in a P2P lending service: effects of herding and predicting loan success. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web. Chen, D., & Han, C. (2015). A Comparative Study of online P2P Lending in the USA and China. The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 2012. Chen, D., Lai, F., & Lin, Z. (2014). A trust model for online peer-to-peer lending: a lender’s perspective. Information Technology and Management, 15(4), 239-254. Chen, D., Li, X., & Lai, F. (2014). Gender Discrimination in Online Peer-to-Peer Credit Lending: Evidence from Lending Platform in China. Paper presented at the PACIS. Collier, B. C., & Hampshire, R. (2010). Sending mixed signals: Multilevel reputation effects in peer-to-peer lending markets. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. Corritore, C. L., Kracher, B., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003). On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 737-758. D Harrison McKnight, N. L. C. (2001). What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 35-59. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003. Dillman, D. (2000). Constructing the questionnaire. Mail and internet surveys. New York. Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601-620. Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2009). Informational cascades and software adoption on the internet: an empirical investigation. MIS quarterly, 23-48. Duarte, J., Siegel, S., & Young, L. (2012). Trust and credit: the role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. Review of Financial Studies, 25(8), 2455-2484. Emekter, R., Tu, Y., Jirasakuldech, B., & Lu, M. (2015). Evaluating credit risk and loan performance in online Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending. Applied Economics, 47(1), 54-70. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50. Freedman, S., & Jin, G. Z. (2008). Do social networks solve information problems for peer-to-peer lending? evidence from prosper. com. Freedman, S., & Jin, G. Z. (2014). The information value of online social networks: Lessons from Peer-to-Peer lending: National Bureau of Economic Research. Freedman, S. M., & Jin, G. Z. (2011). Learning by Doing with Asymmetric Information: evidence from Prosper. com: National Bureau of Economic Research. Funk, B., Bachmann, A., Becker, A., Buerckner, D., Hilker, M., Kock, F., . . . Tiburtius, P. (2015). Online Peer-to-Peer Lending? A Literature Review. The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 2011. Galloway, I. (2009). Peer-to-peer lending and community development finance. Community Investments, 21(3), 19-23. Gambetta, D. (1988). Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Garman, S. R., Hampshire, R. C., & Krishnan, R. (2008). Person-to-person lending: The pursuit of (more) competitive credit markets. ICIS 2008 Proceedings, 160. Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28(6), 725-737. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003a). Inexperience and experience with online stores: The importance of TAM and trust. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 50(3), 307-321. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003b). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS quarterly, 27(1), 51-90. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the association for Information Systems, 1(1), 8. Giffin, K. (1967). The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psychological bulletin, 68(2), 104. Gonzalez, L., & Loureiro, Y. K. (2014). When can a photo increase credit? The impact of lender and borrower profiles on online peer-to-peer loans. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 2, 44-58. Grabner-Kräuter, S., & Kaluscha, E. A. (2008). 1. Consumer trust in electronic commerce: conceptualization and classification of trust building measures. Trust and New Technologies: Marketing and Management on the Internet and Mobile Media, 1. Greiner, M. (2013). Determinants and Consequences of Herding in P2P Lending Markets. Greiner, M. E., & Wang, H. (2009). The role of social capital in people-to-people lending marketplaces. ICIS 2009 Proceedings, 29. Greiner, M. E., & Wang, H. (2010). Building consumer-to-consumer trust in e-finance marketplaces: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(2), 105-136. Guo, Y., Zhou, W., Luo, C., Liu, C., & Xiong, H. (2016). Instance-based credit risk assessment for investment decisions in P2P lending. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(2), 417-426. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. 1998. Upper Saddle River. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6): Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Harrison, R. T., Dibben, M. R., & Mason, C. M. (1997). The role of trust in the informal investor's investment decision: An exploratory analysis. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 21(4), 63-82. Herrero-Lopez, S. (2009). Social interactions in P2P lending. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis. Herzenstein, M., Andrews, R. L., Dholakia, U. M., & Lyandres, E. (2008). The democratization of personal consumer loans? Determinants of success in online peer-to-peer lending communities. Boston University School of Management Research Paper, 14(6). Herzenstein, M., Dholakia, U. M., & Andrews, R. L. (2011). Strategic herding behavior in peer-to-peer loan auctions. Journal of interactive marketing, 25(1), 27-36. Herzenstein, M., Sonenshein, S., & Dholakia, U. M. (2011). Tell me a good story and I may lend you money: The role of narratives in peer-to-peer lending decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(SPL), S138-S149. Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. The Journal of Marketing, 50-68. Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379-403. Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. Hu, R., & Lei, J. (2009). Analysis for Online P2P Lending Auction. Paper presented at the Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, 2009. CiSE 2009. International Conference on. Hui, L., & Qingjie, S. (2015). International Experience and Enlightenment for China on Peer-to-Peer Network Lending Supervision. Iyer, R., Khwaja, A. I., Luttmer, E. F., & Shue, K. (2009). Screening in new credit markets: Can individual lenders infer borrower creditworthiness in peer-to-peer lending? Paper presented at the AFA 2011 Denver meetings paper. Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). Efficient estimation in image factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(1), 51-75. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide: Scientific Software International. Janda, S., Trocchia, P. J., & Gwinner, K. P. (2002). Consumer perceptions of Internet retail service quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(5), 412-431. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Saarinen, L. (1999). Consumer trust in an internet store: a cross‐cultural validation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 5(2), 0-0. Johnk, D. W. (2012). : can lenders really expect high returns? International Journal of Services and Standards, 8(2), 133-156. Johnson, S., Ashta, A., & Assadi, D. (2010). Online or Offline?: The Rise of “Peer-to-Peer” Lending in Microfinance. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), 8(3), 26-37. Jones, K., & Leonard, L. N. (2008). Trust in consumer-to-consumer electronic commerce. Information & Management, 45(2), 88-95. Khadraoui, M., & Gharbi, J.-E. (2013). Initial trust toward an unknown website. Paper presented at the Computer and Information Technology (WCCIT), 2013 World Congress on. Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544-564. Kim, D. J., Song, Y. I., Braynov, S. B., & Rao, H. R. (2005). A multidimensional trust formation model in B-to-C e-commerce: a conceptual framework and content analyses of academia/practitioner perspectives. Decision Support Systems, 40(2), 143-165. Kim, E., & Tadisina, S. (2005). Factors impacting customers' initial trust in e-businesses: an empirical study. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Kim, K. K., & Prabhakar, B. (2004). Initial trust and the adoption of B2C e-commerce: The case of internet banking. ACM sigmis database, 35(2), 50-64. Kini, A., & Choobineh, J. (1998). Trust in electronic commerce: definition and theoretical considerations. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 1998., Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on. Klafft, M. (2008). Online peer-to-peer lending: a lenders' perspective. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the international conference on E-learning, E-business, enterprise information systems, and E-government, EEE. Koufaris, M., & Hampton-Sosa, W. (2004). The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers. Information & Management, 41(3), 377-397. Krumme, K. A., & Herrero, S. (2009). Lending behavior and community structure in an online peer-to-peer economic network. Paper presented at the Computational Science and Engineering, 2009. CSE'09. International Conference on. Kumar, S. (2007). Bank of one: Empirical analysis of peer-to-peer financial marketplaces. AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, 305. Larrimore, L., Jiang, L., Larrimore, J., Markowitz, D., & Gorski, S. (2011). Peer to peer lending: The relationship between language features, trustworthiness, and persuasion success. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39(1), 19-37. Lee, E., & Lee, B. (2012). Herding behavior in online P2P lending: An empirical investigation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(5), 495-503. Lee, M. K., & Turban, E. (2001). A trust model for consumer internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75-91. Leng, J., & Ye, Q. (2015). How Can New Online P2P Lending Platform Catch up from Behind-Take Ebaodai as an Example. I-Business, 7(4), 132. Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & Muñoz-Leiva, F. (2014). Antecedents of the adoption of the new mobile payment systems: The moderating effect of age. Computers in human behavior, 35, 464-478. Liao, X., Li, Y., & Dong, G. (2006). A multi-attribute group decision-making approach dealing with linguistic assessment information. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 9(9), 91-97. Lin, M. (2009). Peer-to-peer lending: An empirical study. AMCIS 2009 Doctoral Consortium, 17. Lin, M., Prabhala, N., & Viswanathan, S. (2009). Social networks as signaling mechanisms: Evidence from online peer-to-peer lending. WISE 2009. Lin, M., Prabhala, N. R., & Viswanathan, S. (2013). Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management science, 59(1), 17-35. Ling, H., & Rou-jia, S. (2016). An Empirical Analysis on the Relationship Between P2P Platform's Reputation and Service Fee in China. Industrial Economic Review(03), 60-68. Lu, Y., Zhao, L., & Wang, B. (2010). From virtual community members to C2C e-commerce buyers: Trust in virtual communities and its effect on consumers’ purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(4), 346-360. Lucking‐Reiley, D., Bryan, D., Prasad, N., & Reeves, D. (2007). Pennies from eBay: The determinants of price in online auctions. The journal of industrial economics, 55(2), 223-233. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological methods, 1(2), 130. Magee, J. R. (2011). Peer-to-peer lending in the United States: surviving after Dodd-Frank. NC Banking Inst., 15, 139. Malekipirbazari, M., & Aksakalli, V. (2015). Risk assessment in social lending via random forests. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(10), 4621-4631. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., & Byers, A. H. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. McCarter, M. W., & Northcraft, G. B. (2007). Happy together?: Insights and implications of viewing managed supply chains as a social dilemma. Journal of operations management, 25(2), 498-511. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological methods, 7(1), 64. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3), 297-323. McKnight, D. H., Kacmar, C. J., & Choudhury, V. (2004). Shifting Factors and the Ineffectiveness of Third Party Assurance Seals: A two‐stage model of initial trust in a web business. Electronic markets, 14(3), 252-266. Meyer, T., Heng, S., Kaiser, S., & Walter, N. (2007). Online P2P lending nibbles at banks' loan business. Deutsche Bank Research, 2(1), 39-65. Michels, J. (2012). Do unverifiable disclosures matter? Evidence from peer-to-peer lending. The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1385-1413. Mild, A., Waitz, M., & Wöckl, J. (2015). How low can you go?—Overcoming the inability of lenders to set proper interest rates on unsecured peer-to-peer lending markets. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1291-1305. Mishra, A. K., & Mishra, K. E. (1994). The role of mutual trust in effective downsizing strategies. Human Resource Management, 33(2), 261-279. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 20-38. Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(4), 622-647. Nord, W. (1973). Adam Smith and contemporary social exchange theory. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 32(4), 421-436. Nunnally, J. (1978). C.(1978). Psychometric theory: New York: McGraw-Hill. Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134. Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information systems research, 15(1), 37-59. Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2006). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online environments: a principal-agent perspective. MIS quarterly, 31(1), 105-136. Pavlou, P. A., Tan, Y.-H., & Gefen, D. (2003). The transitional role of institutional trust in online interorganizational relationships. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on. Pope, D. G., & Sydnor, J. R. (2011). What’s in a Picture? Evidence of Discrimination from Prosper. com. Journal of Human Resources, 46(1), 53-92. Przepiorka, W. (2013). Buyers pay for and sellers invest in a good reputation: More evidence from eBay. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 42, 31-42. Puro, L., Teich, J. E., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (2010). Borrower decision aid for people-to-people lending. Decision Support Systems, 49(1), 52-60. Ramcharan, R., & Crowe, C. (2013). The impact of house prices on consumer credit: evidence from an internet bank. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45(6), 1085-1115. Ravina, E. (2012). Love & loans: The effect of beauty and personal characteristics in credit markets. Available at SSRN 1107307. Rivard, S., & Huff, S. L. (1988). Factors of success for end-user computing. Communications of the ACM, 31(5), 552-561. Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two‐sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029. Rogers, E. (1971). M.(1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York, USA: Free Press of Glencoe, 1, 79-134. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404. Samuel, I. J. (2008). Warrantless location tracking. New York University Law Review, 83(4). Sarda, K., Gupta, P., Mukherjee, D., Padhy, S., & Saran, H. (2008). A distributed trust-based recommendation system on social networks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Hot Topics in Web Systems and Technologies. Schierz, P. G., Schilke, O., & Wirtz, B. W. (2010). Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(3), 209-216. Schlosser, A. E., White, T. B., & Lloyd, S. M. (2006). Converting web site visitors into buyers: how web site investment increases consumer trusting beliefs and online purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 133-148. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. Shankar, V., Urban, G. L., & Sultan, F. (2002). Online trust: a stakeholder perspective, concepts, implications, and future directions. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3), 325-344. Sharif, K. J., Kalafatis, S. P., & Samouel, P. (2005). Cognitive and behavioural determinants of trust in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(3), 409-421. Shaw, M. J. (1999). Electronic commerce: review of critical research issues. Information Systems Frontiers, 1(1), 95-106. Shen, D., Krumme, C., & Lippman, A. (2010). Follow the profit or the herd? Exploring social effects in peer-to-peer lending. Paper presented at the Social Computing (SocialCom), 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on. Sonenshein, S., Herzenstein, M., & Dholakia, U. M. (2011). How accounts shape lending decisions through fostering perceived trustworthiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 69-84. Tan, F. B., & Sutherland, P. (2004). Online consumer trust: a multi-dimensional model. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), 2(3), 40-58. Tan, J., & De Silva, D. G. (2011). Better off or worse off: An economic analysis of online P2P lending market. Paper presented at the ICSSSM11. Tan, Y.-H., & Thoen, W. (2002). Formal aspects of a generic model of trust for electronic commerce. Decision Support Systems, 33(3), 233-246. Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. Sage focus editions, 154, 10-10. Ullman, J. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward. Journal of personality assessment, 87(1), 35-50. Walter, T. (2008). Competition to default: Racial discrimination in the market for online peer-to-peer lending: Business. Wang, H., Chen, K., Zhu, W., & Song, Z. (2015). A process model on P2P lending. Financial Innovation, 1(1), 1-8. Wang, J.-C., & Chiang, M.-J. (2009). Social interaction and continuance intention in online auctions: A social capital perspective. Decision Support Systems, 47(4), 466-476. Warrington, T. B., Abgrab, N. J., & Caldwell, H. M. (2000). Building trust to develop competitive advantage in e-business relationships. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 10(2), 160-168. Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of agricultural research, 20(7), 557-585. Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Interpersonal trust and attitudes toward human nature. Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(5), 719-729. Wu, J., & Xu, Y. (2011). A Decision Support System for Borrower’s Loan in P2P Lending. Journal of Computers, 6(6), 1183-1190. Xu, Y., Qiu, J., & Lin, Z. (2011). How Does Social Capital Influence Online P2P Lending? A Cross-Country Analysis. Paper presented at the Management of e-Commerce and e-Government (ICMeCG), 2011 Fifth International Conference on. Yan, J., Yu, W., & Zhao, J. L. (2015). How signaling and search costs affect information asymmetry in P2P lending: the economics of big data. Financial Innovation, 1(1), 1. Yang, S.-C., & Farn, C.-K. (2009). Social capital, behavioural control, and tacit knowledge sharing—A multi-informant design. International Journal of Information Management, 29(3), 210-218. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods, Newbury Park. Cal.: SAGE Publications. Yum, H., Lee, B., & Chae, M. (2012). From the wisdom of crowds to my own judgment in microfinance through online peer-to-peer lending platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(5), 469-483. Zang, D., Qi, M., & Fu, Y. (2014). The credit risk assessment of P2P lending based on BP neural network. Paper presented at the Industrial Engineering and Management Science: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Science (IEMS 2014), August 8-9, 2014, Hong Kong. Zhang, J., & Liu, P. (2012). Rational herding in microloan markets. Management science, 58(5), 892-912. Zhang, Y., Yang, Z., & Pan, H. Influencing Factors of Online P2P Lending Success Rate in China. Zhao, H., Wu, L., Liu, Q., Ge, Y., & Chen, E. (2014). Investment recommendation in p2p lending: A portfolio perspective with risk management. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in organizational behavior. 温小霓, & 武小娟. (2014). P2P 网络借贷成功率影响因素分析——以拍拍贷为例. 金融论坛, 3(8). 杨宇焰, 陈倩, & 田忠成. (2014). P2P 网络信贷平台的主要模式, 风险及政策建议. 西南金融(1), 29-31. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59641 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著資訊科技在社會經濟活動中的深入應用與變革創新,互聯網時代催生了新的金融業
務形態——P2P 網路借貸。作為一種新型的民間借貸模式,P2P 網路借貸提供了及時便捷的 服務,有效地降低借貸交易的成本,促成了借貸雙方的資訊流動和資金流動,填補了傳統金 融市場中小微貸款的空缺。 P2P 網路借貸起源於歐美,而引入中國大陸之後,得以快速發展,與此同時,也出現了相 關法律建立緩慢,政府監管缺失,平台為了盈利,忽視借貸風險,進行盲目擴張,甚至違規 操作,導致平台頻繁倒閉或「跑路」等現象,嚴重損害了投資者的權益,由此引發P2P 網路 借貸產業發展的信任危機。在這種情況下,如何重塑投資者對P2P 網路借貸市場的信心就成 為了一個非常重要的議題。 然而,目前關於 P2P 網路借貸的研究主要集中在網路借貸的商業模式、風險量化、平台 運營及借款者相關資訊對投資者評估的影響以及投資者自身羊群行為等方面的研究,而關於 投資者採用借貸平台行為的研究則相對匱乏。此外,相較於歐美國家P2P 網路借貸的發展, 中國大陸的P2P 網路借貸市場具有一定的特殊性,存在平台數量多、模式異化嚴重、平台監 管不嚴、平台事故頻發等特點。為此,本研究以中國大陸P2P 網路借貸市場為背景,結合信 任理論,分析影響投資者對借貸平台信任的因素,以及這種信任對其後續採用借貸平台意圖 的影響。 本研究基於 Kim 的電子商務消費者信任研究框架,從投資者信任傾向、監管制度、成熟 技術、平台聲譽、交易保障及資訊品質等六個構面,並通過問卷調查法對影響投資者對借貸 平台初始信任的因素進行分析。分析的結果表明投資者個人的信任傾向作為一種基本因素會 影響到投資者對網路借貸監管制度、平台技術、平台聲譽、平台交易保障及平台資訊等方面 的感知,另外由於中國大陸P2P 網路借貸市場發展不成熟,法制不完善、群眾網路安全意識 薄弱等問題,導致借貸平台的聲譽機制、平台技術、監管制度等因素未能如理論預期般發揮 應有的作用。而本研究對P2P 網路借貸市場的信任機制進行深入分析,有助於進一步完善互 聯網金融的基礎理論,為P2P 網路借貸平台的運營及發展、政府監管和投資者引導提供參考, 促進P2P 網路借貸行業的繁榮。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With the development and innovation of information technology in social economic activities,the Internet era has given rise to a new financial business pattern - P2P lending. As a new model of private lending, P2P lending provides convenient services,reduces transaction cost, accelerates circulation of capital and information, fills the gap of small and medium-sized loans markets.P2P lending originates in Europe and America, and develops rapidly in China. However, P2P lending companies collapse or escape frequently in China, resulting from the loopholes of legal system and the wrong behaviors of companies such as ignoring transaction risk, expanding blindly. The interests of investors are damaged seriously, which led to the crisis of confidence in P2P lending market. In this case, how to reshape investor confidence becomes more and more important. Unluckily, many researches on P2P lending just focus on the business model, the quantification of transaction risk, the operation of platform, the impact of borrowers’information on investors, and investors’ herd behavior. The research on what affect the investors to adopt P2P lending platform is relatively scarce. Moreover, compared with the development of P2P lending in Europe and America,the P2P lending market in China has special characteristics, such as the large number of platforms,the serious alienation of the model, the lax regulation of the platform and the frequent occurrence of platform accidents. To this end, this study analyzes the factors that affect the trust of investors on the platform and the impact of this trust on the intention to adopt platform with trust theory. This study, with questionnaire survey, is based on the trust framework of Kim's research on consumer trust in e-commerce, which includes six aspects: investor’s disposition to trust,supervisory institution, technology, platform reputation, transaction safeguards and information quality. The results of the analysis show that the investor’s disposition to trust as a fundamental factor will affect the investor's evaluation of others factors which also affect the investor’s initial trust on P2P lending platform. Moreover, because of the immaturity of the P2P lending market, the leaky legal system and the weak consciousness of the Internet security of people in China, the reputation, technology, supervisory institution and other factors of the platform cannot play its due role as expected. With the help of this study, we can know the trust mechanism of the P2P lending market more clearly, which will help us to make correct decision in the operation of P2P lending platform, government supervision and investor guidance. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:31:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04725050-1.pdf: 2101368 bytes, checksum: 4c79ddc6d4b4ae478b32fad9dc790838 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝.....................................................................................................................................................iii
摘要.....................................................................................................................................................iv Abstract ................................................................................................................................................ v 目錄.....................................................................................................................................................vi 圖目錄.................................................................................................................................................ix 表目錄..................................................................................................................................................x 第一章 緒論..............................................................................................................................1 第一節 研究背景..............................................................................................................1 第二節 研究動機與目的..................................................................................................2 第三節 研究內容與架構..................................................................................................5 第二章 文獻探討......................................................................................................................6 第一節 P2P 網路借貸平台發展簡介..............................................................................6 第一項 歐美國家主要 P2P 網路借貸平台........................................................................8 第二項中國大陸主要 P2P 網路借貸平台......................................................................10 第二節 P2P 網路借貸平台相關文獻............................................................................14 第一項 關於 P2P 網路借貸商業模式的研究..................................................................14 第二項 關於 P2P 網路借貸風險量化的研究..................................................................19 第三項 關於 P2P 網路借貸平台使用者行為的研究......................................................21 1. 關於人口統計資訊對 P2P 網路借貸的影響......................................................21 2. 關於硬信用資訊對 P2P 網路借貸的影響..........................................................23 3. 關於軟信用資訊對 P2P 網路借貸的影響..........................................................25 4. 關於投資者在網路借貸過程中所產生的羊群行為 ..........................................28 第三章 研究架構....................................................................................................................33 第一節 理論背景............................................................................................................33 第二節 研究模型............................................................................................................37 第三節研究假說............................................................................................................40 第一项 初始信任(Initial Trust) ........................................................................................41 第二项 信任傾向(Disposition-to-trust) ............................................................................43 第三项 監管制度(Institution) ...........................................................................................46 第四项 成熟技術(Technology) ........................................................................................47 第五项 平台聲譽(Reputation)..........................................................................................49 第六项 交易保障(Safeguard) ...........................................................................................51 第七项 資訊品質(Information-quality) ............................................................................53 第八项 控制變數(Control Variables) ...............................................................................55 第四章 研究方法....................................................................................................................55 第一節 問卷設計....................................................................................................................56 第二節 試測問卷的信度分析..................................................................................................59 第三節 試測問卷的效度分析..................................................................................................62 第五章 資料分析與研究結果................................................................................................67 第一節 樣本基本資料分析....................................................................................................68 第二節 樣本測量模式分析......................................................................................................72 第三節 結構方程模式分析....................................................................................................76 第六章 結論與建議................................................................................................................85 第一節 研究結論....................................................................................................................85 第二節 研究貢獻....................................................................................................................94 第一項 學術貢獻..............................................................................................................94 第二項 理論貢獻..............................................................................................................96 第三項 實務貢獻..............................................................................................................98 第三節 研究限制与未來研究建議......................................................................................103 第一項 研究物件............................................................................................................103 第二項 問卷設計............................................................................................................104 第三項 研究方法............................................................................................................105 第四項研究內容............................................................................................................106 第五項 研究目標............................................................................................................107 參考文獻..........................................................................................................................................108 附錄一 問卷....................................................................................................................................119 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 平台信任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 採用意圖 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | P2P 網路借貸 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Kim 信任框架 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Kim 信任框架 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | P2P 網路借貸 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 採用意圖 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 平台信任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Kim trust framework | en |
| dc.subject | P2P lending | en |
| dc.subject | Intention to Adopt | en |
| dc.subject | Platform trust | en |
| dc.subject | Kim trust framework | en |
| dc.subject | P2P lending | en |
| dc.subject | Intention to Adopt | en |
| dc.subject | Platform trust | en |
| dc.title | 投資者採用P2P 網路借貸平台意圖之影響因素研究:以中國大陸為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on the Intention to Use P2P Lending Platform in China | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 盧信銘(Xin-Ming Lu),郭佳瑋(Jia-Wei Guo) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | P2P 網路借貸,採用意圖,平台信任,Kim 信任框架, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | P2P lending, Intention to Adopt,Platform trust,Kim trust framework, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 120 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201700508 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-02-15 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-106-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.05 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
