請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59545
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃銘傑 | |
dc.contributor.author | Aude Lecomte | en |
dc.contributor.author | 雷奧蒂 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T09:27:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-23 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-05-23 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-05-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Books
Alford, W. P. (1995). To steal a book is an elegant offense: Intellectual property law in Chinese civilization, Stanford University Press. Backgrounder, A.-C. (2012). Chinese Anti-Counterfeit Efforts in China. Devonshire-Ellis, C., et al. (2011). Intellectual Property Rights in China, Springer Science & Business Media. Gassmann, O., et al. (2012). Profiting from innovation in China, Springer. Guan, W. (2014). Intellectual Property Theory and Practice. Lei, C. (2010). The historical development of the Civil Law tradition in China: a private law perspective, Brill. Li, J. (2016). Governance of Intellectual Property Rights in China and Europe Nari Lee, Niklas Bruun and Mingde Li (eds). Moser, M. J. (2007). Managing Business Disputes in Today's China: Duelling with Dragons, Kluwer Law International. Moser, M. J. (2011). Intellectual Property Law of China, Juris Publishing, Inc. Simon, T. W., et al. (2016). China's Changing Legal System: Lawyers & Judges on Civil & Criminal Law, Springer. Torremans, P. (2014). Research Handbook on Cross-border Enforcement of Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar Publishing. Torremans, P., et al. (2007). Intellectual property and TRIPs compliance in China: Chinese and European perspectives, Edward Elgar Publishing. 104 Xu, J. (2015). Chinese Intellectual Property: A Practitioner's Guide. Yu, P. K. (2007). Intellectual property, economic development, and the China puzzle. Yu, P. K. (2010). The TRIPS enforcement dispute. Articles (Journals) Devonshire-Ellis, C., et al. (2011). 'Intellectual Property Rights in China.' He, J. (2016). 'Admissibility of e-evidence generated by Telnet technology in software copyright litigation in China.' Digital Evidence & Elec. Signature L. Rev. 13: 44. Henessey, W. O. (2009). 'Protection of intellectual property in China (30 years and more): A personal reflection.' Hous. L. Rev. 46: 1257. Hsüeh, H., et al. (1999). 'Software protection in China: a complete guide.' Lee, T. V. L. (1997). 'Chinese law: social, political, historical and economic perspectives. 3, Contract, Guanxi, and dispute resolution in China.' Luney, P. R. (1989). 'Traditions and foreign influences: Systems of law in China and Japan.' Law and Contemporary Problems 52(2): 129-150. Maruyama, W. H. (1999). 'US-China IPR Negotiations: Trade, Intellectual Property, and the Rule of Law in a Global Economy.' Chinese intellectual property law and practice: 165-212. Massey, J. A. (2006). 'The emperor is far away: China's enforcement of intellectual property rights protection, 1986-2006.' Chi. J. Int'l L. 7: 231. Pelicci Jr, L. J. (2012). 'China and the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement-ACTA Faith, or ACT Futility: An Exposition of Intellectual Property Enforcement in the Age of Shanzhai.' Penn St. JL & Int'l Aff. 1: vii. Reuvid, J. and L. Yong (2006). 'Doing business with China.' 105 Stoianoff, N. P. (2012). 'The Influence of the WTO over China’s Intellectual Property Regime.' Yu, P. K. (2001). 'From pirates to partners: Protecting intellectual property in China in the twenty-first century.' Am. UL Rev. 50: 131. Yu, P. K. (2011). 'The Middle Kingdom and the intellectual property world.' Yu, P. K. (2012). 'Building the Ladder: Three Decades of Development of the Chinese Patent System.' Articles (Law Firms & Business Reviews) ASBELL, M. and D. WANG (2014). China's New Trademark Law: Key Considerations. Catherine DRUEZ-MARIE (2007). LA PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE EN CHINE COMMENT PROTÉGER ET DÉFENDRE VOS DROITS EN CHINE ? Faure, D. (2000). The Mackay Treaty of 1902 and its impact on Chinese business. Asia Pacific Business Review. 7: 79-92. Harris, D. (2014). China IP Protection Is Possible. Julien Fréneaux, et al. (2016). Anti-counterfeiting 2016 – A Global Guide. King & Wood Mallesons (2011). Eight Key Points about the Third Amendment to the PRC Trademark Law. King & Wood Mallesons (2011). Tort Law Provides Supplementary Protection to IP Rights. Qin, Y. (2014). Contributions of the Development of China’s Intellectual Property Legal System to its Economic Development Articles (Reports) Australian Government Austrade (2014). Protecting intellectual property rights in China: an introductory guide. 106 EUIPO - European Union Intellectual Property Office Observatory (2016). EUR 83 billion and 790000 jobs lost every year across the EU due to counterfeiting and piracy. European Commission – TAXUD (2013). Report on EU customs enforcement of intellectual property rights: Results at the EU border. IIntellectual Property Owners Association (2013). Bad Faith Trade Mark Filings – An International Perspective INTA Anticounterfeiting Committee China Subcommittee (2015). Online Counterfeiting Issues and Enforcement in China 中国互联网的假冒问题及执法现状. IOECD & EUIPO (2016). Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods, Mapping the Economic Impact. IThomson Reuters (2014). Effective Anti-Counterfeiting Enforcement in China: Stage-by-Stage. OECD & EUIPO (2014). Le commerce de produits contrefaisants et pirates: ANALYSE DE L’IMPACT ECONOMIQUE, Résumé. Ong, R. (2009). Tackling Intellectual Property Infringement in China. China business review. 36. Suttmeier, R. P. and X. Yao (2011). China’s IP transition: rethinking intellectual property rights in a rising China. The National Bureau of Asian Research, NBR Special Report. 29. The Office of the United States Trade Representative (2016). 2016 Special 301 Report. Chinese Legislation General Principles of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China (中华人民共和国民法通则). Measures for Implementing the Chinese Regulation on Customs Protection of IPR. Provisions on the Determination and Protection of Well-Known Trademarks (2014 Revision) 驰名商 标认定和保护规定 (2014 修订) 国家工商行政管理总局令第 66 号, Order of the State Administration 107 for Industry and Commerce, No. 66. Regulation on Customs Protection of Intellectual Property Rights (the “Customs Regulations”). Regulations of the People's Republic of China Regarding Customs Protection of Intellectual Property Rights. 《最高人民法院关于北京、上海、广州知识产权法院案件管辖的规定》, (法释[2014]12 号) [No. 12 SPC Rules on the Jurisdiction of the IP Courts in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou]. 《最高人民法院关于审理专利纠纷案件适用法律问题的若干规定》第 17 条, 法释[2001]21 号 (Article 17 of SPC’s Regulations on the Application of Laws in Trials of Patent Infringement cases, Fashi). (1979). Agreement on Trade Relations Between the United States of America and the People's Republic of China. (1991). Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China. (1993). Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China. (1997). Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. (2002). The Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court Concerning Several Issues on Application of Law in Hearing Correctly the Civil Copyright. (2002). Regulations for the Implementation of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China. (2008). Outline of the National Intellectual Property Strategy. (2008). Patent Law of the People's Republic of China. (2009). Tort Law of the People’s Republic of China. (2014). The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress Decided to Establish Intellectual Property Courts in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou (Mainland China). 108 (2014). Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China. International, European and French legislation Commission Regulation (EC) No 1891/2004 of 21 October 2004. Council Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003 of 22 July 2003. Council Regulation (EEC) No 3842/86 of 1 December 1986. Law No. 2014-315 of 11 March 2014. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. The TRIPS Agreement. Cases Beijing Higher People’s Court Civil Judgment of (2005) Gao Min Zhong Zi No. 539. Supreme People’s Court Issues Decision of Review in Case of Italian Ferrero SPA v. Montresor Company and Zhengyuan Company for Unfair Competition. 中华人民共和国最高人民法院 (2008)民提字第 52 号民事判决书 (The SPC civil decision 2008 Mintizi No. 52). 健康第一有限公司与中华人民共和国国家工商行政管理总局商标评审委员会商标行政纠纷案, 北京市高级人民法院 (2006) 高行终字第 78 号行政判决书 (JianKang Diyi Ltd. v. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board on the matter of trademark administrative dispute, Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court administrative decision, 2006Gaoxingzhong No.78). 最高人民法院 (2009) 民申字第 268 号民事判决书 (The SPC civil decision, 2009 Minshenzi No. 268). 最高人民法院 (2010) 知行字第 55 号行政裁定书 (SPC administrative ruling, 2010 Zhixingzi No. 55). 109 北京市海淀区人民法院(2010)海民初字第 1438 号民事判决书 (Haidian District People’s Court in Beijing civil decision, 2010 Haiminchuzi No. 1438). 叶身铭,“‘UGG 案’引发的商标使用与侵权的思考,” 中华商标, no. 11 (2013): 83–85 (Ye Shenming, ‘The Reflection on the use of a trademark in the “UGG” case’ (2013) 11 Chinese Trademark 83–85. 周林诉北京奥美光机电联合开发公司、北京华奥电子医疗仪器有限公司侵犯专利权纠纷案,北 京市中级人民法院(1993)中经知初字第 704 号民事判决书 (Beijing Municipal Intermediate Court Decision 1993 Zhongjingzhichuzi No.704, Zhoulin v. Beijing Aomei Mechanic and Electronic Joint Development Ltd, Beijing Huaao Electronic Medical Equipment Ltd. on Infringement of Patent) . 大众交通(集团)股份有限公司、上海大众搬场物流有限公司诉北京百度网讯科技有限公司、 百度在线网络技术(北京)有限公司、百度在线网络技. 天丝医药保健有限公司与国家工商行政管理总局商标评审委员会第三人韦廷建第 800816 号“红 牛及图”商标撤销复审行政纠纷案,中华人民共和国最高人民法院 (2011) 知行字第 28 号行政裁 定书 (Tiansi Pharmaceutical and Health Ltd. v. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board and Wei Tingjian, No 800816 ‘Red Bull and its graphic’ case on trademark revocation review administrative dispute, SPC Administrative Ruling, 2011 Zhixingzi No. 28. 安徽省合肥市中级人民法院(2002)合民三初字第 94 号民事判决书 (Hefei Municipal Intermediate People’s Court civil decision 2002 Heminsanchuzi No. 94). In this case, the plaintiff appealed, but in the second instance, the parties settled the dispute, and the defendant paid a small amount to the plaintiff. 张俊雄侵犯著作权案,(2013)普刑(知)初字第11号 (Junxiong Zhang v. PRC (2013) First Trial of Criminal Case No. 11, People’s Court of Putuo District, Shanghai). 术(北京)有限公司上海软件技术分公司侵犯商标专用权与不正当竞争纠纷一案,上海市第二 中级人民法院(2007)沪二中民五(知)初字第 147 号民事判决书 (Dazhong Transportation Ltd., Shanghai Dazhong Banchang Logistic Ltd. v. Beijing Baidu Wangxun Technology Ltd., Baidu Online Network Technology Ltd (Beijing), Shanghai Software Technology Branch of Baidu Online Network Technology Ltd (Beijing) on infringement of trademark right and unfair competition, Shanghai Second People’s Intermediate Court civil decision, 2007 Huerzhong Minwu (zhi)Chuzi No. 147).63 《最高人 110 民法院关于审理商标民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第一条,法释 [2002]32 号,2002 年 10 月 12 日 (Article 1 of SPC’s Interpretations on the Application of law in the trial of Trademark Civil Disputes, Fashi [2002] No. 32,12 October 2002). 株式会社良品计画与国家工商行政管理总局商标评审委员会、京棉田纺织品有限公司商标异议 复审行政纠纷案,最高人民法院(2012)行提字第 2 号. 行政判决书 (Kabushiki-gaisha Ryōhin Keikaku v. the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, Jingmian Textile Ltd. on trademark objection review administrative dispute, the SPC administrative decision, 2012 Xingtizi No. 2). 美国杜邦公司诉北京国网信息有限公司计算机网络域名侵权纠纷案, 中华人民共和国最高人民 法院公报 2002.3 (DuPont v. Beijing Guowang Information Co., Ltd. on Domain Name Infringement Dispute in Computer Network, Supreme People’s Court Gazette, 2002.3). 鲁道夫·达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与浙江淘宝网络有限公司、陈仰蓉销售假冒注册商标的 商品纠纷案,广东省广州市中级人民法院(2006)穗中法民三初字第 179 号 民事判决书 (Puma Aktiengesellschaft Rudolf Dassler Sport v. Zhejiang Taobao Network Ltd., Chen Yangrong on the dispute of sale of good counterfeiting registered trademark, Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court civil decision, 2006 Suizhongfa Minsanchu No. 179). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59545 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 中國智慧財產權法律制度之建立與成熟乃高度受其他國家之影響。普通法系和大陸法系國家為了加強在中國之智慧財產權益之保護,皆在相關法律制度之規範與改善中給予中國當局壓力。然而,普通法系國家與大陸法系國家對於如何規範與改善現今中國智慧財產法提供了不同的思維、原理與規則。雖然中國之法體系被其政府定位為「社會主義法制」,究其本質而言,中國法律制度主要還是以大陸法系為基礎。
中國智慧財產權法是由許多不同之法律規範所組成,如商標法、專利法、著作權法和軟體保護規則等。然而,在思考智慧財產權的保障時,我們必須從中國法律制度整體觀之,考量其他法律於保障智慧財產權上之直接或間接之適用,例如反不正當競爭法、商業秘密法、侵權責任法、刑法、民事訴訟法、海關法等法規範之適用。 中國一直以來受到許多國家對於其在智慧財產權保護中法規範與權利行使上之缺乏之批評。除此之外,全球主要仿冒品來源地為中國,並且隨著中國電子商務之興盛,如阿里巴巴和淘寶,中國仿冒品問題也趨於嚴峻。於2017年3月,阿里巴巴創辦人馬雲,要求中國法律在仿冒品之問題上應採更嚴格之規範並建議仿冒者應坐牢以對智慧財產權有更好的保障。 許多外國公司誤解中國並沒有一個完善的智慧財產權保障系統。中國智慧財產權法律體制中的確在智慧財產權利之行使上仍有欠缺,同時又須面對新的挑戰,如網路平台上之侵權態樣。事實上,目前中國在智慧財產權之保障上有長足之進步、做出更多新的改革,例如最近專利法和反不正當競爭法之修正皆使智慧財產權之保護有所改善,而於2013年修訂之商標法亦然。 在學生的本篇論文中,學生嘗試論述近來中國在智慧財產權保障上具體之發展,特別是藉由修正後的商標法、許多與美國和歐盟間之合作和三座於2014年建立之智慧財產權法院中,討論已具體適用於新商標法中的普通法系和大陸法系之原理原則。在本篇論文之最後章節,將處理中國依然需面對之問題,如智慧財產權之行使和嚴苛之舉證責任,學生將對此提出建議。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The establishment and maturation of the Chinese Intellectual Property legal system are highly influenced by foreign countries. In fact, common and civilian law countries have given pressure on China to regulate and improve its laws in order to enhance the protection of intellectual property rights on the territory of the People’s Republic of China. The Common legal and Civil legal system provide different thought, principles and rules to regulate and modify existing laws. The legal system of the People’s Republic of China is defined by the government as a “socialist legal system”. Despite the official definition, however, China’s legal system is based primarily on the model of Civil Law .
Chinese intellectual property law includes a large range of laws such as trademark, patent, copyright and software regulations, however, legal system is a broader term, which comprises not only the traditional tools, but evokes the tools directly or indirectly useful for protecting intellectual property rights. For example, anti-unfair competition law, trade secret law, tort law, criminal law, civil procedure law, customs law and other. China has been criticized by many foreign countries, mainly due to its lack of regulations and inexistent enforcement of intellectual property rights. Additionally, most of counterfeit goods come from China, and with the e-commerce platforms as Alibaba and Taobao, China’s counterfeit problem continues to grow. In March 2017, Jack Ma, the founder of Alibaba calls for stricter Chinese laws on counterfeiting and suggested that counterfeiters are put in jail for a “better” intellectual property enforcement. Many foreign companies mistakenly believe that China does not have a developed intellectual property protection system. It is true that Chinese intellectual property legal system is still lacking in term of intellectual property enforcement, moreover, China has to face new challenges such as online infringement. Nevertheless, China is moving fast, making new reforms, such as recently in patent law, in anti-unfair competition law, and revise its laws to improve the intellectual property protection. Amended in 2013, the Trademark law of the People’s Republic of China was inspired by the Common and Civil law. In my paper, I develop certain recent and concrete improvements of the intellectual property protection system in China, particularly through the revised Trademark law, several cooperation with the United States and the European Union, and the establishment of three new intellectual property courts in 2014. I explain the Common and Civil legal principles that China has incorporated in its new Trademark law. In the last part, while I discuss the remaining difficulties that China has to solve, such as enforcement issues and a too strict evidentiary law, I am trying to provide some recommendations. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:27:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04a21121-1.pdf: 1763917 bytes, checksum: 4c3420d88203a2d62babbdccd2616544 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................................................................... 3
中⽂摘要.................................................................................................................................................. 4 ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................................ 5 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................... 7 SHORT TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... 9 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 1 FOREIGN INFLUENCES ON THE MATURATION OF CHINESE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LEGAL SYSTEM: FROM THE COMMON AND CIVIL LAW TRADITION 17 1.1 SECTION I – CHINESE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW AND FOREIGN INFLUENCES: IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE REFORM OF THE PRC TRADEMARK LAW AND INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COOPERATION ......................................................................................... 19 1.1.1 SUBDIVISION 1 – Reform of the Chinese Trademark Law in 2013: from the Common and Civil law tradition ......................................................................................................................... 20 PARAGRAPH 1 – Trademark registration and introduction of “good faith” in Chinese law ...................................20 PARAGRAPH 2 – Introduction of the “prior use” in Chinese intellectual property law...........................................23 PARAGRAPH 3 – Trademark protection and meaning of use in Chinese law..........................................................23 PARAGRAPH 4 – Well-known trademarks in Chinese law......................................................................................26 PARAGRAPH 5 – Opposition and cancellation process in Chinese trademark law .................................................26 PARAGRAPH 6 – Introduction of the likelihood of confusion (or confusion principle) in Chinese trademark law 28 PARAGRAPH 7 – Trademark infringement in Chinese law .....................................................................................28 PARAGRAPH 8 – Civil penalties and introduction of punitive damages in Chinese intellectual property law .......29 1.1.2 SUBDIVISION 2 – European anti-counterfeiting regulations and EU-China intellectual property cooperation..................................................................................................................... 32 PARAGRAPH 1 – EU anti-counterfeiting regulations and China .............................................................................33 PARAGRAPH 2 – French anti-counterfeiting regulations.........................................................................................36 1.2 SECTION 2 – DUAL ENFORCEMENT APPROACH IN CHINA: IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE REFORM OF THE CHINESE JUDICIAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SYSTEM .......................................... 39 1.2.1 SUBDIVISION 1 – Chinese judicial intellectual property system and its reform: establishment of the “three-in-one” pilot tribunals...................................................................... 40 1.2.2 SUBDIVISION 2 – “Rare” criminal enforcement of intellectual property rights in China 46 1.2.3 SUBDIVISION 3 – The central role of the Chinese administrative authorities regarding intellectual property protection..................................................................................................... 49 PARAGRAPH 1 – Administrative authorities and mediation in China .....................................................................50 PARAGRAPH 2 – General Administration of Customs (“GAC”) ............................................................................53 CHAPTER 2 FOREIGN INFLUENCES ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CHINESE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LEGAL SYSTEM: IMITATION AND COUNTERFEITING ISSUES 57 2.1 SECTION 1 – COUNTERFEITING AND PIRACY PHENOMENON IN CHINA.............................. 57 2.1.1 SUBDIVISION 1 – “Shanzhai”(山寨): a Chinese phenomenon ..................................... 58 10 2.1.2 SUBDIVISION 2 – Trademark dealers’ identity.............................................................. 59 2.2 SECTION 2 – TRADITIONAL CHINESE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW AND FOREIGN INFLUENCES: IMITATION IN ANCIENT CHINA .................................................................................... 61 2.2.1 SUBDIVISION 1 – Protection of symbols, marks and first intellectual property rules in Imperial China .............................................................................................................................. 61 2.2.2 SUBDIVISION 2 – Commercial treaties with Great Britain, U.S. and Japan under Qing dynasty (1644-1911/1912)............................................................................................................. 64 2.3 SECTION 3 – “MODERNIZING” OF CHINESE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW AND FOREIGN INFLUENCES ....................................................................................................................................... 66 2.3.1 SUBDIVISION 1 – “Modernizing” of Chinese law under Kuomintang: “small change” in Chinese practice during the Nanjing decade (1912-1949)........................................................... 66 2.3.2 SUBDIVISION 2 – Soviet influence on Chinese patent law: “ideology of Collectivism” (1949-1976)................................................................................................................................... 68 2.3.3 SUBDIVISION 3 – “Modern” Chinese intellectual property law under Deng Xiaoping: reform and opening to foreign investors (late 1970s-1997) ......................................................... 71 2.3.4 SUBDIVISION 4 – U.S. influence on Chinese intellectual property law: “U.S. threats against China” .............................................................................................................................. 73 CHAPTER 3 PERSISTENT DIFFICULTIES IN CHINESE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LEGAL SYSTEM: “OLD AND NEW CHALLENGES” ................................................................ 77 3.1 SECTION I – COMPLEMENTARY TOOLS WITHIN CHINESE LAW: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR “BETTER” INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION IN CHINA ........................................................... 77 3.1.1 SUBDIVISION 1 – Chinese Anti-Unfair Competition Law, Trade Secrets Law and Tort Law 77 PARAGRAPH 1 – Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People’s Republic of China ..............................................77 PARAGRAPH 2 – Trade Secrets Law in China.........................................................................................................79 PARAGRAPH 3 – Tort Law of the People’s Republic of China ...............................................................................80 3.1.2 SUBDIVISION 2 – Cross-border issues regarding trademark infringement: “OEM model” in China ......................................................................................................................................... 83 3.2 SECTION 2 – ENFORCEMENT ISSUES IN CHINESE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: “OLD AND NEW CHALLENGES”............................................................................................................................ 85 3.2.1 SUBDIVISION 1 – Intellectual property enforcement issues and evidentiary rules in China 86 PARAGRAPH 1 – “Strict” evidentiary rules in China...............................................................................................86 PARAGRAPH 2 – Intellectual property enforcement issues in China.......................................................................87 3.2.2 SUBDIVISION 2 – Possible solutions to avoid high costs and delays for “better” intellectual property protection in China: “anticipate, prevent and keep cautious” ................... 89 PARAGRAPH 1 – Solutions to avoid failure of trademark registration in China .....................................................90 PARAGRAPH 2 – Recommendations to make contracts enforceable in China ........................................................93 3.2.3 SUBDIVISION 3 – The need of more transparency, sensitization and cooperation for “better” intellectual property enforcement in China: “old challenges”...................................... 93 PARAGRAPH 1 – Lack of transparency regarding intellectual property legislation in China: “in progress” ..........93 PARAGRAPH 2 – Lack of sensitization to intellectual property law in China: a “slow progress”...........................94 PARAGRAPH 3 – Deficiency of the judicial authorities in China: judicial process and broad judicial interpretations .....................................................................................................................................................................................95 PARAGRAPH 4 – Lack of power and supervision of the administrative authorities in China: “conflicts between local entities and the State interests” ...................................................................................................................................96 3.2.4 SUBDIVISION 4 – Online infringement and E-Commerce Law: a “new challenge” .... 98 11 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................. 102 BIBLIOGRAPHY.............................................................................................................................. 103 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 中國智慧財產權法律制度之發展與外國因素之影響分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Development of the Chinese Intellectual Property Legal System And Foreign Influences | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李素華,沈宗倫 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 仿冒,盜版,侵權,智慧財產權,智慧財產保護,中國法系,中國商標法,執行措施議題,法制的移植,普通法系與大陸法系的傳統, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Counterfeiting,piracy,infringement,intellectual property rights,intellectual property protection,Chinese law,Chinese trademark law,enforcement issues,legal transplant,common and civil law traditions, | en |
dc.relation.page | 110 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201700789 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-05-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 法律學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.72 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。