請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59410完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王泰昌(Taychang Wang),劉嘉雯(Chiawen Liu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu Xiao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 肖鈺 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T09:22:55Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2027-06-24 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-06-24 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Bamber, E. M., & Bamber, L. S. 2009. Discussion of' Mandatory Audit Partner Rotation, Audit Quality, and Market Perception: Evidence from Taiwan'. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(2), 393-402.
Bamber, E. M., & Stratton, R. A. 1997. The Information Content of the Uncertainty-Modified Audit Report: Evidence from Bank Loan Officers. Accounting Horizons, 11(2), 1-11. Boone, J. P., Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. K. 2008. Audit Firm Tenure and the Equity Risk Premium. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 23(1), 115-140. Caikuai. 2010. Promoting the Large/medium Size Accounting Firm to Adopt the Special General Partnership in Organization Format. Promulgation 12. China: Ministry of Finance. In Chinese. Chen, C. J., Su, X., & Zhao, R. 2000. An Emerging Market's Reaction to Initial Modified Audit Opinions: Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17(3), 429-455. Chen, F., Peng, S., Xue, S., Yang, Z., & Ye, F. 2016. Do Audit Clients Successfully Engage in Opinion Shopping? Partner‐Level Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 79-112. Chen, S., Sun, S. Y., & Wu, D. 2010. Client Importance, Institutional Improvements, and Audit Quality in China: An Office and Individual Auditor Level Analysis. The Accounting Review, 85(1), 127-158. Chi, W. 2013. China from the Perspective of Accounting Research. Cross-Strait Banking and Finance, 1(1), 91-103. Chi, W., Douthett, E. B., & Lisic, L. L. 2012. Client Importance and Audit Partner Independence. Journal of Accounting and public Policy, 31(3), 320-336. Chi, W., & Huang, H. 2005. Discretionary Accruals, Audit-Firm Tenure and Audit-Partner Tenure: Empirical Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 1(1), 65-92. Choi, S. K., & Jeter, D. C. 1992. The Effects of Qualified Audit Opinions on Earnings Response Coefficients. Journal of accounting and economics, 15(2), 229-247. Chow, C. W., & Rice, S. J. 1982. Qualified audit opinions and auditor switching. Accounting Review, 326-335. Craswell, A. T. 1988. The Association Between Qualified Opinions and Auditor Switches. Accounting and Business Research, 19(73), 23-31. China Securities Regulatory Commission. 1996. Announcement of Some Rules on the Issuance of Shares. Promulgation 12. China: CSRC. In Chinese. DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor Independence,‘Low Balling’, and Disclosure Regulation. Journal of accounting and economics, 3(2), 113-127. Dhaliwal, D. S., Lamoreaux, P. T., Lennox, C. S., & Mauler, L. M. 2015. Management Influence on Auditor Selection and Subsequent Impairments of Auditor Independence during the Post‐SOX Period. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(2), 575-607. Dopuch, N., Holthausen, R. W., & Leftwich, R. W. 1986. Abnormal Stock Returns Associated with Media Disclosures of ‘Subject to’ Qualified Audit Opinions. Journal of accounting and economics, 8(2), 93-117. Du, X., & Guo, J. 2008. Auditor Switching and Audit Opinion-Shopping: An Empirical Research. Journal of Shanxi Finance and Economics University, 30(11), 101-107. Firth, M., Mo, P. L., & Wong, R. M. 2012. Auditors’ Organizational Form, Legal Liability, and Reporting Conservatism: Evidence from China. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 57-93. Francis, J. R., Michas, P. N., & Seavey, S. E. 2013. Does audit market concentration harm the quality of audited earnings? Evidence from audit markets in 42 countries. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), 325-355. García Osma, B., Gill-de-Albornoz, B., & de las Heras, E. 2016. Opinion-Shopping: Partner versus Firm-Level Evidence. Working paper. Charles III University of Madrid, Jaume I University, and Autonomous University of Madrid. Gow, I. D., Ormazabal, G., & Taylor, D. J. 2010. Correcting for Cross-sectional and Time-series Dependence in Accounting Research. The Accounting Review, 85(2), 483-512. Gul, F. A., Sun, S. Y., & Tsui, J. S. 2003. Tracks: Audit Quality, Earnings, and the Shanghai Stock Market Reaction. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 18(3), 411-427. Gul, F. A., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. 2013. Do Individual Auditors Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from Archival Data. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1993-2023. Guo, Z. 2011. Big 4 and Audit Quality. Auditing Research, 1(1), 98-108. Hackenbrack, K., Jensen, K. L., & Payne, J. L. 2000. The effect of a bidding restriction on the audit services market. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(2), 355-374. Ke, B., Lennox, C. S., & Xin, Q. 2014. The Effect of China's Weak Institutional Environment on the Quality of Big 4 Audits. The Accounting Review, 90(4), 1591-1619. Krishnan, J. 1994. Auditor Switching and Conservatism. Accounting Review, 69(1), 200-215. Krishnan, J., & Stephens, R. G. 1995. Evidence on Opinion Shopping From Audit Opinion Conservatism. Journal of Accounting and public Policy, 14(3), 179-201. Lennox, C. 2000. Do Companies Successfully Engage in Opinion-shopping? Evidence from the UK. Journal of accounting and economics, 29(3), 321-337. Lin, Z. J., Liu, M., & Wang, Z. 2009. Market Implications of the Audit Quality and Auditor Switches: Evidence from China. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 20(1), 35-78. Lin, Z. J., Tang, Q., & Xiao, J. 2003. An Experimental Study of Users’ Responses to Qualified Audit Reports in China. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 12(1), 1-22. Liu, F., & Zhou, F. 2007. Does Big 4 Represent High Audit Quality? Accounting Research, 3(1), 79-89. Liu, G., & Mou, Q. 2008. Auditor Market Structure and Audit Quality: Empirical Evidence from the Chinese Securities Market. Accounting Research, 6, 11-21. Mansi, S. A., Maxwell, W. F., & Miller, D. P. 2004. Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(4), 755-793. China Ministry of Finance and China Security Regulation Commission. 2003. Provisions on Signed Certificate Professional Auditor Rotation of Audit Engagement on Securities and Futures. Promulgation 13. China: MOF & CSRC. In Chinese. Newton, N. J., Wang, D., & Wilkins, M. S. 2013. Does a lack of choice lead to lower quality? Evidence from auditor competition and client restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(3), 31-67. Pittman, J. A., & Fortin, S. 2004. Auditor Choice and the Cost of Debt Capital for Newly Public Firms. Journal of accounting and economics, 37(1), 113-136. Stated-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council. 2004. The Working Rules of Financial Statements Auditing of State-owned Enterprises Directly under the Central Government. Promulgation 173. China: SASAC. In Chinese. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 1988. Disclosure Amendments to Regulation SK, Form 8-K and Schedule 14A Regarding Changes in Accountants and Potential Opinion Shopping Situations. SEC Financial Reporting Release No. 31, SEC Docket 1140-1147. Washington, D.C.: SEC Stefaniak, C. M., Robertson, J. C., & Houston, R. W. 2009. The Causes and Consequences of Auditor Switching: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 28, 47-121. Teoh, S. H. 1992. Auditor Independence, Dismissal Threats, and the Market Reaction to Auditor Switches. Journal of Accounting Research, 30(1), 1-23. Williams, D. D. 1988. The Potential Determinants of Auditor Change. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 15(2), 243-261. Yang, L., Tang, Q., Kilgore, A., & Hong, J. 2001. Auditor-government Associations and Auditor Independence in China. The British Accounting Review, 33(2), 175-189. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59410 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究參考Chen et al. (2016) 和García Osma et al. (2016)針對審計意見購買的研究設計，檢驗透過更換合夥人和事務所兩種不同方式的審計意見購買現象是否廣泛存在於中國。此外，進一步研究審計客戶會選擇什麼層級來進行第一次的審計意見購買，而在審計意見購買嘗試失敗後又會選擇什麼層級進行之後的審計意見購買嘗試。本研究提出了四個假說，第一和第二個假說檢驗公司能成功的在兩個層級實施審計意見購買；而第三和第四個假說中，本研究假設審計客戶會優先選擇合夥人層級的審計意見購買作為第一次嘗試，而在第一次嘗試失敗後，則會選擇更換會計師事務所作為之後的審計意見購買嘗試。
本研究採用了中國上市公司1999年至2012年共計16,525個樣本作為事務所層級的審計意見購買研究樣本（12,765個樣本作為合夥人層級的審計意見購買樣本），並沿用Lennox (2000) 對於審計意見購買的研究方法。實證結果發現審計客戶可以成功實施事務所層級的審計意見購買，然而合夥人層級的審計意見購買現象沒有廣泛地存在於中國。對於兩個層級的優先選擇研究，研究結果符合上述預期。在失敗的合夥人意見審計意見購買後，公司會接著進行事務所層級的審計意見購買，而不會選擇在同一事務所內更換審計合夥人。這個結果意味著公司會優先選擇合夥人層級的審計意見購買作為第一次嘗試，如果審計意見失敗，則會選擇更換事務所而非再次更換合夥人。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Based on the Chen et al. (2016) and García Osma et al. (2016), this study examines the pervasive existence of opinion-shopping at both firm- and partner- level in China and further studies whether audit clients prefer to switch firms or switch partners to shop audit opinion at first attempt and following a failed opinion-shopping respectively. This studies construct four hypotheses. The first two hypotheses are to test whether the companies successfully engage in the opinion-shopping at both levels. In the latter two hypotheses, this paper supposes that companies first switch partners to shop opinions and tend to switch firms if the prior attempt fails.
Using a sample of 16,525 for firm-level (and 12,765 for partner-level) firm-year over the period of 1999-2012 and following the approach of Lennox’s (2000), this research finds that while firm-level opinion-shopping exists pervasively in China, companies fail to engage in partner-level opinion-shopping. As for the preference of opinion-shopping at firm- and partner-level, the results show that the unsuccessful partner-level opinion-shopping are followed by firm-level opinion-shopping rather than another partner switch, indicating that the companies prefer to choose partner switches at the first attempt. Moreover, unsuccessful firm-level opinion-shopping leads to a higher probability of firm switches, as forthcoming firms are prone to issue clean audit opinions. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:22:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04722051-1.pdf: 859195 bytes, checksum: ef895b1db06edf124992e52f1925819c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
Abstract ii List of Tables iv List of Figures iv 1. Introduction 1 2. The audit institutional background in China 4 2.1. The evolution of audit profession in China 4 2.2. Appointment of external auditors and auditor rotation 6 2.3. Audit market structure and audit quality 7 3. Related literature and hypothesis 9 3.1. Prior research on opinion-shopping 9 3.2. Firm versus partner level opinion-shopping: Cost related to auditor switch 12 3.3. Hypotheses 14 4. Research design 15 5. Sample selection and descriptive statistics 18 5.1. Sample selection 18 5.2. Descriptive statistics 20 6. Empirical results 25 6.1. Main results 25 6.2. Prior opinion-shopping attempts and subsequent firm switches 38 7. Conclusion 43 Reference 45 Appendix. Variable definitions 49 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 會計師更換 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 審計意見購買 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 合夥人層級 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 中國審計市場 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | opinion-shopping | en |
| dc.subject | auditor switch | en |
| dc.subject | partner-level | en |
| dc.subject | China audit market | en |
| dc.title | 合夥人與事務所層級審計意見購買的優先選擇：來自中國的實證證據 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Preference of Partner- or Firm-level Opinion-Shopping: Evidence from China | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林瑞青,曾怡潔 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 審計意見購買,會計師更換,合夥人層級,中國審計市場, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | opinion-shopping,auditor switch,partner-level,China audit market, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 50 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201701097 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-06-26 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-106-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 839.06 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。