請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59380
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 羅竹平 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-yun Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳佳韻 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T09:22:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2027-12-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-24 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-06-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中央銀行全球資訊網。五大銀行新承做放款金額與利率。取自http://www.cbc.gov.tw/np.asp?ctNode=521&mp=1
王昌鴻 (2011)。新加坡中央公積金制度管理運用之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。台北。 王靜怡 (2007)。公共層次個人帳戶基金運用中政府介入之探討:以新加坡公積金為例,臺灣社會福利學刊,5,67-102。 王靜怡 (2010)。經濟目標性投資運用於法定退休基金投資之探討:以美國加州公務員退休基金為例。臺灣社會福利學刊,8,161-212。 安聯人壽官網。利率公告。取自https://www.allianz.com.tw/zh-tw/ 行政院公共工程委員會全球資訊網。政府資訊公開。取自https://www.pcc.gov.tw/pccap2/TMPLfronted/ChtIndex.do?site=002 林俊儒 (2007)。OECD 國家因應人口老化之財政政策試析。經濟研究,7,133-162。 林盈課、王思妍 (2008)。以時間為友-有效資產配置的長期投資績效。台灣勞工,13,71-81。 邱淑卿、白彼德、李妍慧、黃郁惠、黃文昭、李思靜、王文範 (2015)。我國資產管理發展與規劃方向。孔繁琦 (計畫主持人),金融研究發展基金管理委員會委託研究報告(編號:103-01),未出版。 政府資料開放平臺。勞動部勞動基金運用局。取自http://data.gov.tw/ 施世駿與葉羽曼 (2011)。政治民主化與社會政策:探索政治制度對臺灣年金制度建構的影響,臺大社工學刊,23,47-92。 胡秋明與袁中美 (2011)。社會養老保險個人帳戶基金管理模式探析-基於新加坡中央公積金和香港強積金制度的比較分析,投資研究,2-8。 財政部官網。統計資料庫。取自https://www.mof.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=100 國際股市指數StockQ官網。取自http://www.stockq.org/ 張旭宏 (2016/04/13)。避稅?張虔生大舉轉讓33億元F-鼎固股票到海外【鉅亨網】。取自http://news.cnyes.com/news/id/759577 郭冠甫 (2011)。國外公共退休基金管理制度之發展及對我國的啟示,臺灣社會福利學刊,10,167-216。 陳昱名 (2006)。新加坡之中央公積金制度之分析研究¬-一個全球化體系的觀點。中山人文社會學科期刊,14,99-132。 陳昱名與顧長永 (2009)。臺灣、香港、新加坡公積金制年金發展之簡單民主模式分析,社會政策與社會工作學刊,13,93-140。 勞動部勞工保險局。取自http://www.bli.gov.tw/ 勞動部勞動基金運用局。政府公開資訊、基金專區。取自http://www.blf.gov.tw/front/main/153 黃琴雅 (2011/05/13)。曹興誠改當新加坡人 稅負少一半【中時電子報】。取自http://magazine.chinatimes.com/wealth/20110513002900-300205 鄭清霞、王正 (1996)。由總體觀點論公共年金基金之投資與運用,台灣銀行季刊,47(3),110-132。 鄭清霞、廖世仁 (2002)。公共年金基金與私人年金基金投資運用比較-美國經驗的探討,台灣銀行季刊,53(3),112-158。 賴勁麟 (2005)。台灣退休基金監理之研究 (碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,台北。 Asher, Mukul G. (1998) The Future of Retirement Protection in Southeast Asia. International Social Security Review, 51, 3-30. Asher Mukul G. and Bali, Azad S. (2012) Singapore. In Donghyun Park (Eds), Pension Systems in East and Southeast Asia (pp 85-98). Philippines:Development Bank. Asher, Mukul G. and Bali, Azad S. (2015) Public Pension Programs in Southeast Asia: An Assessment. Asian Economic Policy Review, 10, 225-245. Beyeler, M (2003) Globalization, Europeanization and Domestic Welfare State Reforms: New Institutionalist Concepts, Global Social Policy, 3, 153-172. Brinson, Gary P., Hood, L. Randolph and Beebower, Gilbert L. (1995) Determinants of Portfolio Performance., Financial Analysts Journal, 51, 133-138. Central Provident Fund Board (2016, December 12) CPF Schemes. Retrieved from https://www.cpf.gov.sg/members Chairman Letter of Berkshire's Corporate & FRED Retrieved from http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/2015ltr.pdf Fisher, K. L. and Statman, M. (1999) A Behavioral Framework for Time Diversification. Financial Analysts Journal, 55, 88-97. Glaeser, E. L. and Ponzetto, G. A.M. (2013) Shrouded Cost of Government: The Political Economy of State and Local Public Pensions. (NBER Working Paper NO. 18976). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18976 Government of Singapore Investment Corp. Retrieved from http://www.gic.com.sg/ Hu, Yuwei (2005) Pension Reform, Economic Growth and Financial Development - An Empirical Study. (Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University, UK). Investment Management Association of Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.fundsingapore.com/screener/basic_search Koh, Benedict S.K. and Mitchell, Olivia S. (2010) What’s on the Menu? Included Versus Excluded Investment Funds for Singapore’s Central Provident Fund Investors. Pensions: An International Journal, 15, 276-286. Koh, Benedict S.K. and Mitchell, Olivia S., Tanuwidjaja Toto and Fong Joelle (2008) Investment Patterns in Singapore’s Central Provident Fund System Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 7, 37-65. Mitchell, Olivia S, and Shea, Richard C. (2016) Reimagining Pensions : The Next 40 Years. Oxford University Press. McCarthy, Mitchell and Piggott (2001) Asset Rich and Cash Poor : Retirement Provision and Housing Policy in Singapore. (PRCWorking Paper) Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.466.8673&rep=rep1&type=pdf Nepp, A. N., Nikonov, O. I., Kryuchkova, P. V. and Semin, A. N. (2014) Management of Investment Risks in the Pension Systems of OECD Countries and Russia. Ponds, E., Severinson, C., and Yermo, J. (2012) Implicit Debt in Public-Sector Pension Plans: An International Comparison. International Social Security Review, 65, 75-101. Queisser, M. (1998) Regulation and Supervision of Pension Funds: Principles and Practices. International Social Security Review, 51, 39-55. Rozanov, A. (2015) Public Pension Fund Management: Best Practice and International Experience. Asian Economic Policy Review, 10, 275-295. Willis Towers Watson (2016, September) Willis Towers Watson 300 Analysis Year End 2015. Pensions & Investments, 39-46. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59380 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 退休基金之營運與風險管理為支應勞工退休後生活的主要關鍵,台灣勞保局的基金規模小且面臨破產的危機,影響到勞工退休後的經濟生活安全。新加坡的中央公積金規模為全球排名第8,是個結構複雜且多元的社會保險制度,同時提供了許多國家進行年金改革上的思路與參考價值。
本研究探討台灣與新加坡的退休基金制度與營運狀況,比較兩國基金資產配置與營運績效的差異。發現兩個國家政府理念不同會影響基金營運方式與規模大小,資產配置方面新加坡的投資標的相對較國際化,投資績效也比台灣來得好。由於台灣正實施年金改革,年金的供需失衡與財政赤字是互相影響的,本研究針對財政收入與支出方面進行預估,探討四個改善財政狀況的方法。 研究發現擴大基金規模為一大關鍵,假設台灣提撥金額的投資績效依公積金的加權平均報酬率估算,能將餅做大;又財政主要歲收來源為所得稅,政府給予企業之營所稅優惠導致法人負擔率低,假設依新加坡所得稅結構比例估算台灣的營所稅,可將金額補足於基金資產。另一部分為財政支出方面,發現政府為提振國家經濟大量投資公共建設,卻花費大筆經費在建造閒置公共建設,又醫療費用隨老年人口的增加,社會福利支出逐年增加,這都是財政上需有效管控的開銷。因此,本研究建議政府應開源節流且加強基金管理監督與財稅稽徵能力,以達到年金長期永續發展。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | One main key to a labor’s retirement life is the operation and risk management of the retirement fund. The Taiwan Labor Insurance Agency equipped only with a small scale of pension fund is on the verge of bankruptcy, which may adversely affect the labor’s life security. In Singapore, the size of its central provident fund is ranked No. 8 in the world, which is a comprehensive and diversified social insurance system, providing essential ideas and valuable reference for other countries which seeks to reform its own system.
This paper explores the system and operating conditions of retirement funds in both Taiwan and Singapore. It also compares the differences in asset allocation and operating performance between the two countries. In addition, they have different concepts on policies which affect the fund operation and its scale. The asset allocation of Singapore's investment target is relatively more international and its investment performance is better than Taiwan. Due to the implementation of annuity reform in Taiwan, the supply and demand imbalance of the annuity is interdependent with the fiscal deficit. This study recommends four avenues to improve the current financial status with respect to the fiscal revenue and expenditure. Hence, the study found that expansion of fund size is a key factor. To grow the pie bigger, we recommend Taiwan’s payment of funds be made in accordance with the weighted average rate of return of central provident fund. The revenue generated by the Taiwanese government is mainly through income tax. The result of this was due to concessions made towards enterprises by the government resulting in low tax collection received in this aspect. In view of the above, we recommend that the Taiwan's business tax be implemented in accordance to the proportion of income tax structure identical to that of Singapore which can be applied to the fund assets. In terms of the financial expenditure, we found that the government spends a huge amount of resources on idle public construction while boosting the economy by investing heavily in public construction. In addition, as the population ages, health care and social welfare costs increase annually. Therefore, this paper suggests that the government should strengthen its fund management and tax collection to achieve long-term sustainable development of the country’s annuity. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:22:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04627011-1.pdf: 2104196 bytes, checksum: f5ae6b919f4a549fc0bee8e6f5c11a5f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 v 表目錄 vii 圖目錄 viii 第一章 緒 論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的與方法 3 第三節 研究架構 3 第四節 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 年金基金投資運用理念 5 第二節 退休基金運用績效 7 第三節 國家政策的因素影響 9 第四節 小結 11 第三章 我國勞工退休制度與基金管理運用 12 第一節 政策制度 12 第二節 基金投資標的 14 第三節 基金營運績效 16 第四節 小結 22 第四章 新加坡退休制度與基金管理運用 23 第一節 政策制度 23 第二節 基金投資標的 25 第三節 基金營運績效 26 第四節 小結 32 第五章 政府政策影響之預估 33 第一節 年金制度改革 33 第二節 政府開源方面預估 35 第三節 政府節流方面預估 39 第四節 小結 42 第六章 結論與建議 43 第一節 結論 43 第二節 建議 44 參考文獻 45 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 我國勞工退休基金管理運用之研究—以新加坡公積金為借鏡 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study of the Labor Pension Fund Management in Taiwan - Lessons from Singapore’s Central Provident Fund | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林國慶,許淑? | |
dc.subject.keyword | 退休基金,中央公積金,基金資產,財政赤字,資產管理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Retirement fund,Central provident fund,Fund asset,Fiscal deficit,Asset management, | en |
dc.relation.page | 47 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201701128 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-06-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.05 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。