請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59133完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 高偉娟 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jyy-Rou Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳芷柔 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T09:16:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2027-07-29 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-14 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-07-13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ahmed, A., R. M. Monem, D. Delaney, and C. Ng. 2017. Gender diversity in corporate boards and continuous disclosure: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics.
Bakar, A. A. S., and R. Ameer. 2011. Readability of corporate social responsibility communication in Malaysia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 18 (1):50-60. Bear, S., N. Rahman, and C. Post. 2010. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics 97 (2):207-221. Beasley, M. S. 1996. An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review 71 (4):443-465. Bernardi, R. A., and V. H. Threadgill. 2011. Women directors and corporate social responsibility. EJBO: Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organizational Studies. Bewley, K., and Y. Li. 2000. Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: a voluntary disclosure perspective. In Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 201-226. Chan, M. C., J. Watson, and D. Woodliff. 2014. Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics 125 (1):59-73. Coffey, B. S., and J. Wang. 1998. Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (14):1595-1603. Cormier, D., and M. Magnan. 2003. Environmental reporting management: a continental European perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22 (1):43-62. Courtis, J. K. 1986. An investigation into annual report readability and corporate risk-return relationships. Accounting and Business Research 16 (64):285-294. Courtis, J. K. 1998. Annual report readability variability: tests of the obfuscation hypothesis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 11 (4):459-472. Dale, E., and J. S. Chall. 1948. A formula for predicting readability: Instructions. Educational research bulletin:37-54. Dhaliwal, D. S., S. Radhakrishnan, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang. 2012. Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review 87 (3):723-759. Erhardt, N. L., J. D. Werbel, and C. B. Shrader. 2003. Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance 11 (2):102-111. Fairfield, P. M. 1994. P/E, P/B and the present value of future dividends. Financial Analysts Journal:23-31. Feingold, A. 1994. Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin 116 (3):429. Firth, M. 2002. Auditor–provided consultancy services and their associations with audit fees and audit opinions. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 29 (5‐6):661-693. Flesch, R. 1948. A new readability yardstick. Journal of applied psychology 32 (3):221. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman 46. Freeman, R. E. 1999. Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of management review 24 (2):233-236. Gunning, R. 1952. The technique of clear writing. McGraw-Hill. Hackston, D., and M. J. Milne. 1996. Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 9 (1):77-108. Harris, T. L., and R. E. Hodges. 1981. A dictionary of reading and related terms. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 4 (4):602. Hermalin, B. E., and M. S. Weisbach. 2003. Boards of directors as endogenously determined institutions: A survey of the economic literature. . Economic Policy Review 9 (1):7-26. Hillman, A. J., and T. Dalziel. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of management review 28 (3):383-396. Holder-Webb, L., J. R. Cohen, L. Nath, and D. Wood. 2008. The Supply of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures Among U.S. Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (4):497-527. Huse, M., and A. G. Solberg. 2006. Gender-related boardroom dynamics: How Scandinavian women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in Management Review 21 (2):113-130. Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4):305-360. Jones, M. J., and P. A. Shoemaker. 1994. Accounting narratives: A review of empirical studies of content and readability. Journal of Accounting Literature 13:142. Kim, Y., M. S. Park, and B. Wier. 2012. Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review 87 (3):761-796. Kincaid, J. P., R. P. Fishburne Jr, R. L. Rogers, and B. S. Chissom. 1975. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel: DTIC Document. Klare, G. R. 1963. Measurement of readability. Klare, G. R. 1984. Readability. Handbook of reading research 1:681-744. Klein, A. 2002. Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Lev, B. 1992. Information disclosure strategy. California Management Review 34 (4):9-32. Li, F. 2008. Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45 (2-3):221-247. Liao, L., L. Luo, and Q. Tang. 2015. Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review 47 (4):409-424. Linsley, P. M., and M. J. Lawrence. 2007. Risk reporting by the largest UK companies: readability and lack of obfuscation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 20 (4):620-627. Loughran, T. I. M., and B. McDonald. 2014. Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures. The Journal of Finance 69 (4):1643-1671. Mallin, C., G. Michelon, and D. Raggi. 2013. Monitoring intensity and stakeholders’ orientation: how does governance affect social and environmental disclosure? Journal of Business Ethics 114 (1):29-43. Mallin, C. A., and G. Michelon. 2011. Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: An empirical investigation of the US best corporate citizens. Accounting and Business Research 41 (2):119-144. Mc Laughlin, G. H. 1969. SMOG grading-a new readability formula. Journal of reading 12 (8):639-646. McWilliams, A., and D. Siegel. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of management review 26 (1):117-127. McWilliams, A., D. S. Siegel, and P. M. Wright. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of management studies 43 (1):1-18. Miller, G. S. 2002. Earnings Performance and Discretionary Disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (1):173-204. Mishra, S., and S. B. Modi. 2013. Positive and negative corporate social responsibility, financial leverage, and idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Business Ethics 117 (2):431-448. Moser, D. V., and P. R. Martin. 2012. A broader perspective on corporate social responsibility research in accounting. The Accounting Review 87 (3):797-806. Muslu, V., S. Mutlu, S. Radhakrishnan, and A. Tsang. 2017. Corporate Social Responsibility Report Narratives and Analyst Forecast Accuracy. Journal of Business Ethics 140:1-24. Nazari, J. A., K. Hrazdil, and F. Mahmoudian. 2017. Assessing social and environmental performance through narrative complexity in CSR reports. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 13 (2):166-178. Nielsen, S., and M. Huse. 2010. The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review 18 (2):136-148. Post, C., N. Rahman, and E. Rubow. 2011. Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society 50 (1):189-223. Rennekamp, K. 2012. Processing Fluency and Investors’ Reactions to Disclosure Readability. Journal of Accounting Research 50 (5):1319-1354. Richardson, A. J., and M. Welker. 2001. Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital. Accounting, organizations and society 26 (7):597-616. Roberts, R. W. 1992. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, organizations and society 17 (6):595-612. Robinson, G., and K. Dechant. 1997. Building a business case for diversity. The Academy of Management Executive 11 (3):21-31. Rodrigue, M., M. Magnan, and C. H. Cho. 2012. Is Environmental Governance Substantive or Symbolic? An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 114 (1):107-129. Smith, J. E., and N. P. Smith. 1971. Readability: A measure of the performance of the communication function of financial reporting. The Accounting Review 46 (3):552-561. Tang, Z., C. E. Hull, and S. Rothenberg. 2012. How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR–financial performance relationship. Journal of management studies 49 (7):1274-1303. Ward, H., and N. C. Smith. 2008. Corporate Social Responsibilty at a Crossroads: Futures for CSR in the UK to 2015: IIED. Williams, R. J. 2003. Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics 42 (1):1-10. Xie, B., W. N. Davidson, and P. J. DaDalt. 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance 9 (3):295-316. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59133 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討女性董事對於企業社會責任報告書可讀性之關聯，即探討女性董事的多寡，對於公司社會責任表現之影響，以及公司是否因女性董事之增加，而改變其企業社會責任之揭露品質。
本研究主要針對英國2010年至2015年上市公司，所發布並公告之企業社會責任報告書進行測試。研究結果顯示，當女性董事比例越高時，企業社會責任報告書之可讀性就越佳，意即投資人較能理解企業社會責任報告書所揭露之資訊。此即顯示女性董事之比例高低，會影響企業社會責任報告書之揭露品質。 另外，本研究發現，在公司單獨出具企業社會責任報告書時，女性對於報告書可讀性之影響較顯著。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study examines the relationship between female board directors and the readability of corporate social responsibility reporting. Although existing literature indicates that female directors positively affect the board’s performance, little discussed the relationship between female directors and corporate engagement in corporate social responsibility (CSR). Using a sample of listed companies in the United Kingdom during 2010-2015, we find a significant positive association between women board directors and the readability of corporate social responsibility reporting. This suggests that female directors improve the disclosure quality of CSR reporting. The results are consistent with stakeholder theory, suggesting that a diversified board may balance a firm’s financial and non-financial goals with restrict resources. In addition, we find that its effect is still significant when a board with more independent directors. These findings should be useful for top managers and regulators, who are engaging in improving corporate governance and CSR policies. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:16:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04722036-1.pdf: 1180906 bytes, checksum: eb2cf85c29a42035ca41afdf4d13c071 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 I
ABSTRACT II 致謝 III 目錄 IV 表目錄 V 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 英國企業社會責任背景簡介 4 第三章 文獻回顧與假說設立 6 第一節 文獻回顧 6 第二節 假說發展 11 第四章 研究設計 13 第一節 樣本選取 13 第二節 變數衡量 14 第三節 實證模型 19 第五章 實證結果 21 第一節 敘述性統計 21 第二節 單變量分析 24 第三節 多元迴歸結果 27 第六章 額外測試 30 第七章 研究結論、限制及建議 34 第一節 研究結論 34 第二節 研究限制與建議 35 附錄 36 參考文獻 39 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 可讀性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業社會責任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 女性董事 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 英國 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | corporate social responsibility (CSR) | en |
| dc.subject | female directors | en |
| dc.subject | UK | en |
| dc.subject | readability | en |
| dc.title | 女性董事與企業社會責任報告書可讀性之關聯─英國上市公司之實證分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Relation between Female Board Directors and
Readability of Corporate Social Responsibility Report─An Empirical Analysis of Listed Firms In United Kingdom | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林世銘 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林嬋娟,吳淑鈴 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 女性董事,企業社會責任,可讀性,英國, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | female directors,corporate social responsibility (CSR),readability,UK, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 44 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201701521 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-07-14 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-106-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.15 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。