請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59091完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 季瑋珠 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Xin-Lian Lu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 呂欣璉 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T09:15:55Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-09-12 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-09-12 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-07-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136(5):E359-86.
2. Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1985;1(8433):829-32. 3. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen TH, et al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 2011;260(3):658-63. 4. Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ, et al. Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial. BMJ 2014;348:g366. 5. Sankaranarayanan R, Swaminathan R, Brenner H, et al. Cancer survival in Africa, Asia, and Central America: a population-based study. The Lancet Oncology 2010;11(2):165-73. 6. Soerjomataram I, Louwman MW, Ribot JG, et al. An overview of prognostic factors for long-term survivors of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;107(3):309-30. 7. Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Harirchi I, et al. Quality of life in patients with breast cancer before and after diagnosis: an eighteen months follow-up study. BMC Cancer 2008;8:330. 8. Arora NK, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, et al. Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the quality of life of younger women with breast carcinoma: a prospective study. Cancer 2001;92(5):1288-98. 9. Salonen P, Tarkka MT, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, et al. Effect of social support on changes in quality of life in early breast cancer patients: a longitudinal study. Scand J Caring Sci 2013;27(2):396-405. 10. Arora NK, Finney Rutten LJ, Gustafson DH, et al. Perceived helpfulness and impact of social support provided by family, friends, and health care providers to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psychooncology 2007;16(5):474-86. 11. Leung J, Pachana NA, McLaughlin D. Social support and health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer: a longitudinal study. Psychooncology 2014;23(9):1014-20. 12. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CH, Taal E, et al. Empowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis, or fibromyalgia. Qualitative health research 2008;18(3):405-17. 13. Hong Y, Pena-Purcell NC, Ory MG. Outcomes of online support and resources for cancer survivors: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ Couns 2012;86(3):288-96. 14. Bender JL, Katz J, Ferris LE, et al. What is the role of online support from the perspective of facilitators of face-to-face support groups? A multi-method study of the use of breast cancer online communities. Patient Educ Couns 2013;93(3):472-9. 15. Rodgers S, Chen Q. Internet Community Group Participation: Psychosocial Benefits for Women with Breast Cancer. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2005;10(4):00-. 16. Attai DJ, Cowher MS, Al-Hamadani M, et al. Twitter Social Media is an Effective Tool for Breast Cancer Patient Education and Support: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Survey. J Med Internet Res 2015;17(7):e188. 17. Batenburg A, Das E. Emotional approach coping and the effects of online peer-led support group participation among patients with breast cancer: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(11):e256. 18. Owen JE, Klapow JC, Roth DL, et al. Randomized pilot of a self-guided internet coping group for women with early-stage breast cancer. Ann Behav Med 2005;30(1):54-64. 19. Salzer MS, Palmer SC, Kaplan K, et al. A randomized, controlled study of Internet peer-to-peer interactions among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psychooncology 2010;19(4):441-6. 20. Eysenbach G. The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53(6):356-71. 21. 鄭天澤 楊, 陳麗霞, 胡正文. 2015 年台灣寬頻網路使用調查報告. 2015. 22. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010;127(12):2893-917. 23. Hortobagyi GN, de la Garza Salazar J, Pritchard K, et al. The Global Breast Cancer Burden: Variations in Epidemiology and Survival. Clinical Breast Cancer 2005;6(5):391-401. 24. Porter P. “Westernizing” Women's Risks? Breast Cancer in Lower-Income Countries. New England Journal of Medicine 2008;358(3):213-6. 25. Jorgensen KJ, Gotzsche PC. Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends. BMJ 2009;339:b2587. 26. Lantz PM, Remington PL, Newcomb PA. Mammography Screening and Increased Incidence of Breast Cancer in Wisconsin. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1991;83(21):1540-6. 27. White E, Lee CY, Kristal AR. Evaluation of the Increase in Breast Cancer Incidence in Relation to Mammography Use. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1990;82(19):1546-52. 28. Harding C, Pompei F, Burmistrov D, et al. Breast Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality Across US Counties. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175(9):1483-9. 29. Bleyer A, Welch HG. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med 2012;367(21):1998-2005. 30. Autier P, Boniol M, La Vecchia C, et al. Disparities in breast cancer mortality trends between 30 European countries: retrospective trend analysis of WHO mortality database. BMJ 2010;341:c3620. 31. Ferlay J, Héry C, Autier P, et al. Global burden of breast cancer. Breast cancer epidemiology: Springer, 2010:1-19. 32. Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, et al. Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19(8):1893-907. 33. Narod SA, Iqbal J, Miller AB. Why have breast cancer mortality rates declined? Journal of Cancer Policy 2015;5:8-17. 34. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65(1):5-29. 35. Weedon-Fekjaer H, Romundstad PR, Vatten LJ. Modern mammography screening and breast cancer mortality: population study. BMJ 2014;348:g3701. 36. Schopper D, de Wolf C. How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidence. Eur J Cancer 2009;45(11):1916-23. 37. Bray F, Ren JS, Masuyer E, et al. Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008. Int J Cancer 2013;132(5):1133-45. 38. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55(2):74-108. 39. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(1):43-66. 40. WHO. Field Trial WHOQOL-100: Introduction and Background.; 1995. (Accessed). 41. Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2008;27:32. 42. Mols F, Vingerhoets AJ, Coebergh JW, et al. Quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2005;41(17):2613-9. 43. Pandey M, Thomas BC, Ramdas K, et al. Early effect of surgery on quality of life in women with operable breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2006;36(7):468-72. 44. Lee MC, Bhati RS, von Rottenthaler EE, et al. Therapy choices and quality of life in young breast cancer survivors: a short-term follow-up. The American Journal of Surgery 2013;206(5):625-31. 45. Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, et al. Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a population-based study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2008;134(12):1311-8. 46. Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, et al. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92(17):1422-9. 47. Nissen MJ, Swenson KK, Ritz LJ, et al. Quality of life after breast carcinoma surgery: a comparison of three surgical procedures. Cancer 2001;91(7):1238-46. 48. The American Cancer Society medical and editorial content team. Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. American Cancer Society 2016. (https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/treatment/chemotherapy-for-breast-cancer.html). (Accessed). 49. Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Leedham B, et al. Quality of life in long-term, disease-free survivors of breast cancer: a follow-up study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94(1):39-49. 50. Hwang SY, Chang SJ, Park BW. Does chemotherapy really affect the quality of life of women with breast cancer? J Breast Cancer 2013;16(2):229-35. 51. Joly F, Espie M, Marty M, et al. Long-term quality of life in premenopausal women with node-negative localized breast cancer treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 2000;83(5):577-82. 52. Ganz PA, Kwan L, Stanton AL, et al. Physical and psychosocial recovery in the year after primary treatment of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(9):1101-9. 53. Uchino BN. Social Support and Physical Health Understanding the Health Consequences of Relationships. Yale University Press; 2004. 54. Kwan ML, Ergas IJ, Somkin CP, et al. Quality of life among women recently diagnosed with invasive breast cancer: the Pathways Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;123(2):507-24. 55. Schmid-Buchi S, Halfens RJ, Dassen T, et al. A review of psychosocial needs of breast-cancer patients and their relatives. Journal of clinical nursing 2008;17(21):2895-909. 56. Fernandes AF, Cruz A, Moreira C, et al. Social Support Provided to Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Treatment: A Study Review. Advances in Breast Cancer Research 2014;03(02):47-53. 57. Beck SJ, Keyton J. Facilitating social support: member-leader communication in a breast cancer support group. Cancer Nurs 2014;37(1):E36-43. 58. Weis J. Support groups for cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2003;11(12):763-8. 59. Till JE. Evaluation of support groups for women with breast cancer: importance of the navigator role. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:16. 60. Sammarco A. Perceived social support, uncertainty, and quality of life of younger breast cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs 2001;24(3):212-9. 61. Kroenke CH, Kwan ML, Neugut AI, et al. Social networks, social support mechanisms, and quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013;139(2):515-27. 62. So WK, Leung DY, Ho SS, et al. Associations between social support, prevalent symptoms and health-related quality of life in Chinese women undergoing treatment for breast cancer: a cross-sectional study using structural equation modelling. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2013;17(4):442-8. 63. Manning-Walsh J. Social support as a mediator between symptom distress and quality of life in women with breast cancer. Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN 2005;34(4):482-93. 64. Park JH, Bae SH, Jung YS, et al. Quality of life and symptom experience in breast cancer survivors after participating in a psychoeducational support program: a pilot study. Cancer Nurs 2012;35(1):E34-41. 65. Huang CY, Hsu MC. Social support as a moderator between depressive symptoms and quality of life outcomes of breast cancer survivors. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2013;17(6):767-74. 66. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons 2010;53(1):59-68. 67. Owen JE, Boxley L, Goldstein MS, et al. Use of Health-Related Online Support Groups: Population Data from the California Health Interview Survey Complementary and Alternative Medicine Study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2010;15(3):427-46. 68. Baym NK, Zhang YB, Lin M-C. Social Interactions Across Media. New Media & Society 2004;6(3):299-318. 69. Wang H, Wellman B. Social Connectivity in America: Changes in Adult Friendship Network Size From 2002 to 2007. American Behavioral Scientist 2010;53(8):1148-69. 70. Hampton K, Wellman B. Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City & Community 2003;2(4):277-311. 71. Nonnecke B, Preece J. Lurker demographics: counting the silent. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. The Hague, The Netherlands: ACM, 2000:73-80. 72. Setoyama Y, Yamazaki Y, Namayama K. Benefits of peer support in online Japanese breast cancer communities: differences between lurkers and posters. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(4):e122. 73. Sugawara Y, Narimatsu H, Hozawa A, et al. Cancer patients on Twitter: a novel patient community on social media. BMC Research Notes 2012;5(1):1-9. 74. Classen CC, Chivers ML, Urowitz S, et al. Psychosexual distress in women with gynecologic cancer: a feasibility study of an online support group. Psychooncology 2013;22(4):930-5. 75. Changrani J, Lieberman M, Golant M, et al. Online cancer support groups: experiences with underserved immigrant Latinas. Prim Psychiatry 2008;15(10):55-62. 76. Satterlund MJ, McCaul KD, Sandgren AK. Information Gathering Over Time by Breast Cancer Patients. J Med Internet Res 2003;5(3). 77. Wallner LP, Martinez KA, Li Y, et al. Use of Online Communication by Patients With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer During the Treatment Decision Process. JAMA Oncol 2016. 78. Lee CJ, Gray SW, Lewis N. Internet use leads cancer patients to be active health care consumers. Patient Educ Couns 2010;81 Suppl:S63-9. 79. Kagawa-Singer M, Padilla GV, Ashing-Giwa K. Health-related quality of life and culture. Semin Oncol Nurs 2010;26(1):59-67. 80. Yoo GJ, Levine EG, Pasick R. Breast cancer and coping among women of color: a systematic review of the literature. Support Care Cancer 2014;22(3):811-24. 81. Kim HS, Ko D. Culture and self-expression. Psychology Press New York, 2010. 82. 汪素敏, 顧乃平, 林幸台, et al. 心臟移植術後病人症狀困擾, 社會支持與自我照顧行為相關之探討. 護理研究 1998;6(1):4-18. 83. 季瑋珠、楊志新、許駿、賴佳君. 癌症病人特定疾病EORTC生活品質量表簡介. 台灣醫學 2002;6 (2):220-7. 84. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85(5):365-76. 85. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988. 86. Setoyama Y, Yamazaki Y, Nakayama K. Comparing support to breast cancer patients from online communities and face-to-face support groups. Patient Educ Couns 2011;85(2):e95-100. 87. Hsu L-L. An Exploratory Study of Taiwanese Consumers' Experiences of Using Health-Related Websites. Journal of Nursing Research 2005;13(2):129-40. 88. Chiu YC, Hsieh YL. Communication online with fellow cancer patients: writing to be remembered, gain strength, and find survivors. J Health Psychol 2013;18(12):1572-81. 89. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, et al. Coping with somatic illnesses in online support groups: Do the feared disadvantages actually occur? Computers in Human Behavior 2008;24(2):309-24. 90. van Uden-Kraan C, Drossaert C, Taal E, et al. Self-reported differences in empowerment between lurkers and posters in online patient support groups. Journal of medical internet research 2008;10(2):e18. 91. 郭淑珍, 楊雪華, 陳怡君. 乳癌病患使用部落格的疾病經驗交流之初探. 臺灣公共衛生雜誌 2014;33(6):621-36. 92. Zeng YC, Li D, Loke AY. Life after cervical cancer: quality of life among Chinese women. Nursing & health sciences 2011;13(3):296-302. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59091 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著乳癌預防篩檢的觀念普及與乳癌治療技術的進步,乳癌患者存活率日益提升,越來越多的研究開始注重乳癌患者的整體生活品質。過去的研究已經明確指出越多社會支持能夠顯著增進患者的生活品質;而社群媒體的廣泛使用可能可作為一個提供社會支持的新來源。故此研究目標即探討:(1) 在台灣,乳癌患者使用社群媒體的狀況、使用特徵;(2) 參與社群媒體與獲得社會支持間的關係;(3) 線上社會支持對於乳癌患者生活品質的影響。
此研究採橫斷式研究方法,研究場域為國立臺灣大學醫學院附設醫院的乳房醫學中心;本研究案共收案106名乳癌患者,收案條件包含:(1)年齡介於20至70歲:(2)診斷為乳癌0, I, II, III期;(3)最初診斷時間為距今三年內。參與者需要完成包含社群媒體使用狀況調查表、社會支持評量表以及生活品質量表之問卷(EORTC QLQ-C30;EORTC QLQ-BR23)。 結果顯示此研究族群中有42%的患者以健康意圖使用社群媒體;在使用者使用的社群媒體中,58%的社群媒體組織者主要為乳癌病友或病友家人。多數的社群媒體使用者以低互動性的方式參與社群媒體 (n=39, 93%),並且研究當下仍持續使用 (n=40, 95%)。針對所獲得的整體社會支持,社群媒體使用者顯著高於無使用者 (P<0.01);若比較社群媒體使用者,高頻率使用者較低頻率使用者顯著獲得較多的情緒支持 (P=0.01)和評價支持(P<0.01)。此研究並未發現線上社會支持與生活品質之任一構面有顯著相關。 根據研究結果,儘管乳癌患者參與社群媒體所獲得的線上社會支持並未與其生活品質有顯著相關,社群媒體仍具有提供社會支持的潛在性價值。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Because of active cancer screening and advances in medical technology, the survival of breast cancer patients has remarkable improvement. Therefore, there is increasing need for attention to quality of life of breast cancer survivors. Based on previous studies, social supports could improve patients’ quality of life. As the growing number of social media use, this study aimed to investigate :(1) the characteristics of social media use among breast cancer survivors in Taiwan, (2) the association of social supports received and social media participation, and (3) the effect of social support from social media on breast cancer survivors’ quality of life.
This cross-sectional study recruited 106 patients with breast cancer at Center of Breast Medicine of the National Taiwan University Hospital. These patients were diagnosed with breast cancer of stages 0, I, II, or III in the previous three years, and between 20 and 70 years of age. Participants were requested to complete the questionnaires containing characteristics of social media use (e.g., frequency of use), social support scale, EOCRTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23. In the present study, 42% of participants have used social media for health intention. Online communities which breast cancer survivors participated is manly composed of fellow patients and patients’ families (n=23, 58%). Most of the users (n=39, 93%) used social media with low interaction and still used it until the time being interviewed (n=40, 95%). Compared with non-users, users significantly received more social support. Moreover, those used social media frequently received more emotional support (P=0.01) and appraisal support (P<0.01). Quality of life as study outcome of social support form online, however, was not significantly different between users and non-users. Although no significant benefit of social media use on quality of life was found in this study, social media could be a potential source of social support for breast cancer survivors. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:15:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04849023-1.pdf: 2388380 bytes, checksum: 00e290a080ff4b76f0c5b161090241da (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i
致謝 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract iv Contents vi List of Tables ix List of Appendices x I. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Literature review 3 1.2.1 Breast cancer Epidemiology 3 1.2.2 Quality of Life 6 1.2.3 Social Support 9 1.2.4 Social Media 12 1.3 Research Purposes 16 1.3.1. Research Gaps 16 1.3.2. Research Aims 16 II. Methods 18 2.1. Research Design and Participants 18 2.2. Assessments 18 2.2.1. Social Media Participation 18 2.2.2. Social Support 19 2.2.3. Quality of Life 20 2.2.4. Demographic and Clinical characteristics 20 2.3. Sample size Estimation and Recruitment 21 2.4. Data Analysis 21 2.4.1. Descriptive and Inferential statistics 21 2.4.2. Regression analysis 21 III. Results 23 3.1. Recruitment and response 23 3.2. Descriptive statistic 23 3.3. Characteristics of social media use among the breast cancer survivors in Taiwan 24 3.4. Association of social media use and received social support 25 3.4.1. Total social support of user and non-user 25 3.4.2. Association of frequency of use and total social support. 25 3.4.3. Association of social support from different sources and social media use 25 3.4.4. Association of frequency of use and online social support 25 3.5. The effect of social support on quality of life. 26 IV. Discussion 41 4.1. Characteristics of social media use among the breast cancer survivors in Taiwan 41 4.1.1. Demographic profile of social media users 41 4.1.2. Characteristics of social media use 42 4.2. Association of social media use and received social support 44 4.2.1 A potential source of social support for breast cancer survivors 44 4.2.2 Different participation level and received social support 45 4.2.3 Other sources of social support and social media use 45 4.3. Correlation of social support and quality of life 47 4.4. Strengths and Limitations 48 4.5. Future Research 48 V. Conclusion 50 Reference 51 Appendices 59 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 生活品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社群媒體 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會支持 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 人際關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 乳癌 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Social media | en |
| dc.subject | Quality of Life | en |
| dc.subject | Breast cancer | en |
| dc.subject | Social support | en |
| dc.subject | Relationship | en |
| dc.title | 乳癌患者社群媒體使用、所獲得的社會支持與生活品質之關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Association of the Social Media Use, Social Support Obtained and Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Survivors. | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉仁沛,陳端容,程劭儀,郭淑珍 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 社群媒體,社會支持,人際關係,乳癌,生活品質, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Social media,Social support,Relationship,Breast cancer,Quality of Life, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 78 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201701636 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-07-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-106-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.33 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
