請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58723完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭伯壎 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tien-Yin Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 伍恬瑩 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T08:27:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-01-27 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-01-27 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-01-15 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
任金剛、林明村、陳以亨（2002）。華人員工歸類之標準與實徵研究。「第四屆華人心理學學家學術研討會」宣讀之論文，台北。 李明鈐（2001）。「組織內成員政治行為與單位績效之關係研究─以M公司為例」（未發表之碩士論文）。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所，高雄。 周麗芳（2006）。「 華人工作團隊之社會關係與成員效能: 多元向度，多重網絡的探討」（未發表之博士論文）。國立台灣大學心理學研究所，台北。 林家五、張國義、劉貞妤、林裘緒、陳筱華（2009）。差序對待知覺與同事間信任對公平態度與政治行為之影響。「 本土心理學研究」，31，143-175。 邱皓政（2003）。「量化研究與統計分析」。台北: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司. 姜定宇（2009）。華人企業主管知覺部屬效忠。「中華心理學刊」，51（1），27-45。 姜定宇、張菀真（2010）。華人差序式領導與部屬效能。「本土心理學研究」，33，109-177。 徐瑋伶（2004）。「海峽兩岸企業主管之差序式領導：一項歷程性的分析」（未發表之博士論文）。國立台灣大學心理學研究所，台北。 徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎、郭建志、胡秀華（2006）。「差序式領導」。見鄭伯壎、姜定宇（主編）：「華人組織行為：議題、作法及出版」。台北：華泰文化。 徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎、黃敏萍（2002）。華人企業領導人的員工歸類與管理行為。「本土心理學研究」，18，51-94。 張正林（2002）。「組織政治行為量表：一個本土化的經驗建構」（未發表之碩士論文）。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所，高雄。 戚樹誠、楊美玉、黃瓊億（2008）。團隊成員們的強勢溝通行爲與團隊關係衝突有關嗎? 探討團隊集體性的調節效果。「組織與管理」，1（2），37-60。 陳介玄、高承恕（1991）。台灣企業涉互的運作秩序：人情關係與法律。「東海學報」，32，219-232。 彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽（2006）。管理研究中的共同方法變異: 問題本質、影響、 測試和補救。「管理學報」，23（1），77-98。 費孝通（1948）。「鄉土中國與鄉土重建」。上海觀察社，上海。 黃光國（1985）。人情與面子：中國人的權力遊戲。見李亦園、楊國樞、文崇一（主編）「現代化與中國化論集」。桂冠圖書公司，台北。 黃光國（1988）。中國式家族企業的現代化。見黃光國（主編）「中國人的權力遊戲」。巨流圖書公司，台北。 黃芳銘（2006）。結構方程式理論與應用。五南圖書出版股份有限公司，台北。 楊國樞（1993a）。傳統價值觀與現代價值觀能否同時並存？。見楊國樞（主編）：「中國人的價值觀：社會科學觀點」。桂冠圖書公司，台北。 楊國樞（1993b）。中國人的社會取向：社會互動的觀點。見楊國樞、余安邦（主編）「中國人的心理與行為──理念及方法篇」。桂冠圖書公司，台北。 鄭伯壎（1995a）。差序格局與華人組織行為。「本土心理學研究」，3，142-219。 鄭伯壎（1995b）。家長權威與領導行為之關係：一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。「中央研究院民族學研究所集刊」，79，119-173。 鄭伯壎（2004）。本土文化與組織領導：由現象描述到理論驗證。「本土心理學研究」，22，195-254。 鄭伯壎（2005）。關係與領導：概念探索。見鄭伯壎（主編）「華人領導：理論與實際」。桂冠圖書公司，台北。 鄭伯壎、林家五（1998）。差序格局與華人組織行為：台灣大型民營企業的初步研究。「中央研究院民族學研究所集刊」，86，29-72。 Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422. Adkins, B., & Caldwell, D. (2004). Firm or subgroup culture: where does fitting in matter most? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 969-978. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Ansari, M. A., & Kapoor, A. (1987). Organizational context and upward influence tactics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,40(1), 39-49. Ashforth, B. E. (1985). Climate formation: Issues and extensions. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 837-847. Ashforth, B., & Humphrey, R. H. (1995). Labeling processes in the organization: Constructing the individual. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Barnard, C. (1968). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge: Harvard University. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588. Berkowitz, L. (1972). Social norms, feelings, and other factors affecting helping and altruism. AdVances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 63-108. Bettencourt, B., Charlton, K., Dorr, N., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: a meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological bulletin, 127(4), 520. Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1970). The fifth achievement. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 6(4), 413-426. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press. Bliese, P. D. (1998). Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 355-373. BlieBoies, K., & Howell, J. M. (2006). Leader–member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 246−257. Bommer, W. H., Dierdorff, E. C., & Rubin, R. S. (2007). Does prevalence mitigate releVance? The moderating effect of group-level OCB on employee performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1481-1494. Bond, M. H., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Cross-cultural social and organizational psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 205-235. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations, 71, 98. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109. Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1), 52-69. Brett, J. M., & Okumura, T. (1998). Inter-and intracultural negotiation: US and Japanese negotiators. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 495-510. Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725. Butterfield, F. (1982). China, alive in the bitter sea. New York: Times Books. Calori, R., & Sarnin, P. (1991). Corporate culture and economic performance: A French study. Organization Studies, 12(1), 49-74. Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1960). Leadership and group performance: Introduction. In Cartwright, D., & Zander, A.(Eds.). Group dynamics: Research and theory(pp.487-510). EVanston Ill.: Row, Peterson. Chang, C. H., Rosen, C. C., & Levy, P. E. (2009). The relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and employee attitudes, strain, and behavior: A meta-analytic examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 779-801. Chen, G., & Bliese, P. D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self-and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 549. Chen, X. P., Lam, S. S., Naumann, S. E., & Schaubroeck, J. (2005). Group citizenship behaviour: Conceptualization and preliminary tests of its antecedents and consequences. Management and Organization Review, 1(2), 273-300. Cheng, B. S., Farh, J. L., Chang, H. F., & Hsu, W. L. (2002). Guanxi, zhongcheng, competence and managerial behavior in Chinese context. Journal of Chinese Psychology, 44, 151-166. Choi, J. N. (2006). Multilevel and cross-level effects of workplace attitudes and group member relations on interpersonal helping behavior. Human Performance,19(4), 383-402. Cialdini, R. B., Wosinska, W., Barrett, D. W., Butner, J., & Gornik-Durose, M. (1999). Compliance with a request in two cultures: The differential influence of social proof and commitment/consistency on collectivists and individualists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1242-1253. Conway, J. M. (1996). Additional construct validity evidence for the task/contextual performance distinction. Human Performance, 9(4), 309-329. Crisp, R. J., Stone, C. H., & Hall, N. R. (2006). Recategorization and subgroup identification: Predicting and preventing threats from common ingroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 230-243. Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A., & Toth, P. (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2), 159-180. Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78. de Vries, R. E., Roe, R. A., & Taillieu, T. C. (2002). Need for leadership as a moderator of the relationships between leadership and individual outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(2), 121-137. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(5), 410-436. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2000). Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999. Psychological Science, 11(4), 315-319. Ducharme, L. J., & Martin, J. K. (2000). Unrewarding work, coworker support, and job satisfaction: A test of the buffering hypothesis. Work and Occupations, 27, 223–243. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and Social Identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 161-186. Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 766. Erez, M., & Somech, A. (1996). Is group productivity loss the rule or the exception? Effects of culture and group-based motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1513-1537. Erikson, K. T. (1966). Wayward puritans: A study in the sociology of deviance. New York: Wiley. Euwema, M. C., Wendt, H., & Van Emmerik, H. (2007). Leadership styles and group organizational citizenship behavior across cultures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8), 1035-1057. Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S.(2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In Lee, J. T., Tsui , A. S.& Weldon, E.(Eds.), Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context. London: Macmillan. Farh, J. L., Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1990). Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction. Journal of Management, 16(4), 705-721. Feldman, D. C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9(1), 47-53. Ferris, G. R., & King, T. R. (1991). Politics in human resources decisions: A walk on the dark side. Organizational Dynamics, 20(2), 59-71. Ferris, G. R., Frink, D. D., Galang, M. C., Zhou, J., Kacmar, K. M., & Howard, J. L. (1996). Perceptions of organizational politics: Prediction, stress-related implications, and outcomes. Human Relations, 49(2), 233-266. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison process. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. Fiol, C. M., Pratt, M. G., & O'Connor, E. J. (2009). Managing intractable identity conflicts. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 32-55. Firebaugh, G. (1980). Groups as contexts and frog ponds. In K. H. Roberts & L. Burstein (Eds.), Issues in aggregation (pp. 43–52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Fleishman, E. A., & Harris, E. F. (1962). Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grieVances and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 15(1), 43-56. Gabrenya, W. K., Wang, Y. E., & Latane, B. (1985). Social Loafing on an optimizing task cross-cultural differences among Chinese and Americans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16(2), 223-242. Gandz, J., & Murray, V. V. (1980). The experience of workplace politics. Academy of Management Journal, 23(2), 237-251. Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10(4), 321-326. Gelfand, M. J., Bhawuk, D. P., Nishii, L., & Bechtold, D. (2004). Individualism and collectivism. In R. J. House,P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P.W. Dorfman,&V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 cultures (pp. 437–512). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 698. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827. Gibson, C. B., & Saxton, T. (2005). Thinking outside the black box outcomes of team decisions with third-party intervention. Small Group Research, 36(2), 208-236. Gomez, A., Dovidio, J. F., Huici, C., Gaertner, S. L., & Cuadrado, I. (2008). The other side of we: When outgroup members express common identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(12), 1613-1626. Graen, G. B., & Cashman, J. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A development approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership Frontiers (pp. 143-165). Kent, OH: Kent State University. Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior. CT: JAI Press. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. Graen, G. B., Wakabayashi, M., Graen, M. R., & Graen, M. G. (1990). International generalizability of American hypotheses about Japanese management progress: A strong inference investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(1), 1-24. Graen, G., Dansereau, F., & Minami, T. (1972). Dysfunctional leadership styles. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 7(2), 216-236. Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting‐Toomey, S. T. E. L. L. A., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism‐collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 510-543. Hall, A. T., Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., & Bowen, M. G. (2004). The dark side of politics in organizations. In R. W. Griffin, & A. M. O'Leary-Kelly (Eds.), The dark side of organizational behavior (pp. 237−261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2002). A user’s guide to The Experiment: Exploring the psychology of groups and power. London BBC Worldwide. Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 517-534. Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5-21. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140. Hopkins, N., Reicher, S., Harrison, K., Cassidy, C., Bull, R., & Levine, M. (2007). Helping to improve the group stereotype: On the strategic dimension of prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 776-788. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 143-156. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004).Culture, leadership, and organizations. Sage. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. Hui, C. H., & Villareal, M. J. (1989). Individualism-Collectivism and psychological needs their relationships in two cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20(3), 310-323. Humphrey, S. E., Morgeson, F. P., & Mannor, M. J. (2009). Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: A role composition model of team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 48. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306. Javidan, M., & House, R. J. (2001). Cultural acumen for the global manager: Lessons from project GLOBE. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 289-305. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. (2001). Similarity as a source of differentiation: The role of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(6), 621-640. Jiang, D. Y., & Cheng, B. S. (2008). Affect- and role-based loyalty to supervisors in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 214-221. Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131-146. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley. Keesing, R. M. (1974). Theories of culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3, 73-97. Kim, U. (1994). Introduction to individualism and collectivism: Conceptual clarification and elaboration. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagiticibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and application (pp. 19-40). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M. (1988). Upward-influence styles: Relationship with performance evaluations, salary, and stress. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(4), 528-542. Klein, K. J., Bliese, P. D., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Dansereau, F., Gavin, M. B., Griffin, M. A., Hofinann, D. A., James, L. R., Yammarino, F. J., & Bligh, M. C. (2000). Multilevel analytical techniques: Commonalities, differences, and continuing questions. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations(pp.512-553). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 195-229. Kline, T. J., Sulsky, L. M., & Rever-Moriyama, S. D. (2000). Common method variance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection. The Journal of Psychology, 134(4), 401-421. Kozlowski, S. W., & Hattrup, K. (1992). A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(2), 161. Kriesberg, L. (2003). Constructive conflicts: From escalation to resolution. New York: Rowman and Littlefield. Lalonde, R. N., & Silverman, R. A. (1994). Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 78. Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 451-465. Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader‐member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(6), 723-746. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. Martinez, S. M., & Dorfman, P. W. (1998). The Mexican entrepreneur: An ethnographic study of the Mexican empresario. International Studies of Management & Organization, 28(2), 97-124. Mayes, B. T., & Allen, R. W. (1977). Toward a definition of organizational politics. Academy of Management Review, 2(4), 672-678. McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40(7), 812. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York : Harper & Row. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402-433. Mintzberg, H. (1985). The organization as political arena. Journal of Management Studies, 22(2), 133-154. Misumi, J., & Peterson, M. F. (1985). The performance-maintenance (PM) theory of leadership: Review of a Japanese research program. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 198-223. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (2000). Socialization in organizations and groups. In M. Turner(Ed.), Groups at work: AdVances in theory and research (pp. 69–112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Murray, A. I. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 125-141. Mussweiler, T., Gabriel, S., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Shifting social identities as a strategy for deflecting threatening social comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 398. Nadler, A., Harpaz-Gorodeisky, G., & Ben-David, Y. (2009). Defensive helping: Threat to group identity, ingroup identification, status stability, and common group identity as determinants of intergroup help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 823. Nier, J. A., Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Ward, C. M., & Rust, M. C. (2001). Changing interracial evaluations and behavior: The effects of a common group identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4(4), 299-316. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Sage. Ouchi, W. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Business Horizons, 24(6), 82-83. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Hui, C. (1993). Organizational citizenship behaviors and managerial evaluations of employee performance: A review and suggestions for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 11(1), 1-40. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly,1(2), 107-142. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563. Redding, S. G. (1990). The spirit of Chinese capitalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter. Reichers, A. E., & Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs. Organizational Climate and Culture, 1, 5-39. Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1306−1314. Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization theory: Structures, designs, and applications, 3/e. Pearson Education India. Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Psychological contracts in the workplace: Understanding the ties that motivate. The Academy of Management Executive,18(1), 120-127. Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2005). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(2), 192-200. Schein, E. H.(1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Franciso : Jossey-Bass Schermerhorn Jr, J. R., Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N. (1997). Organization Behavior, N.J. : Wiley Schnake, M. E., & Dumler, M. P. (2003). Levels of measurement and analysis issues in organizational citizenship behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(3), 283-301. Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., Zhou, X., & Yammarino, F. J. (2001). The folly of theorizing “A” but testing “B”: A selective level-of-analysis review of the field and a detailed leader–member exchange illustration. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 515−551. Schyns, B. (2006). Are group consensus in leader–member exchange (LMX) and shared work values related to organizational outcomes? Small Group Research, 37, 20−35. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445. Silin, R. H. (1976). Leadership and value: The organization of large-scale Taiwan enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653. Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316-325. Tajfel, H. (1959). Quantitative Judgement in Social Perception. British Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 16-29. Tajfel, H. (1978). Interindividual behavior and intergroup behavior. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 27–60). London: Academic Press. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, Calif. : Brooks/Cole Pub. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson Hall. Timmerman, T. A. (2005). Missing persons in the study of groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(1), 21-36. Tjosvold, D., & Field, R. H. (1983). Effects of social context on consensus and majority vote decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 26(3), 500-506. Treadway, D. C., Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., Kacmar, C. J., Douglas, C., Ammeter, A. P., & Buckley, M. R. (2004). Leader political skill and employee reactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(4), 493-513. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. , US: Westview Press. Tsui, A. S., & Gutek, B. A. (1999). Demographic differences in organizations: Current research and future directions. Lanham, Md. : Lexington Books Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Van Knippenberg, A. (1984). Intergroup differences in group perceptions. The social dimension. European developments in social psychology, 2, 560-578. Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008. Van Leeuwen, E., & Tauber, S. (2011). Demonstrating knowledge: The effects of group status on outgroup helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 147-156. Vandyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & Parks, J. M. (1995). Extra role behaviors in pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters).Research in organizational behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, 17, 215-285. Westwood, R. I. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The culture basis for “paternalistic leadership” among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18, 445-480. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617. Williams, S., Pitre, R., & Zainuba, M. (2002). Justice and organizational citizenship behavior intentions: Fair rewards versus fair treatment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142(1), 33-44. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadVantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994. Wu, J. B., Tsui, A. S., & Kinicki, A. J. (2010). Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 90-106. Yammarino, F. J., & Dansereau, F. (2008). Multi-level nature of and multi-level approaches to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 135−141. Yammarino, F. J., Spangler, W. D., & Bass, B. M. (1993). Transformational leadership and performance: A longitudinal investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 4(1), 81-102. Yukl, G. A., & Van Fleet, D. D. (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations. Marvin, D. D,& Leaetta M. H(Eds.) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Palo Alto, Calif: Consulting Psychologists Press | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58723 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 差序式領導是華人企業組織中一種常見且獨特的領導風格，領導者傾向將部屬區分為自己人與外人兩種差序團體，並對不同部屬展現相異的管理方式與不均等的資源分配。因此，當論及差序式領導的效能問題時，其討論已無法再侷限於對偶層次，而必須提升至團體層次較貼合理論意涵，此點也形成重要的研究缺口。然而，依據社會認定理論的觀點，領導者的差別對待與內、外團體區別，會使得團體中的自己人與外人部屬產生社會認定威脅，並為了鞏固自己人地位或改變外人部屬類別而產生消極面與積極面的互動結果，如團體公民行為的減低與團體政治行為的增加。此外，團體集體性是一種強調團體利益優先的團體規範，會限制團體成員的互動方式，而可能是重要的調節因子。為了解決上述問題，本研究以台灣企業組織中的97個工作團體，共550位團體成員為研究對象，分析結果指出，在控制LMX變異的效果後：（1）差序式領導對團體效能仍具有額外的增額解釋力；（2）差序式領導對團體公民行為具有正向效果，而與假設預期相反；（3）差序式領導對團體政治行為具有正向效果；（4）差序式領導與團體集體性的交互作用，對團體公民行為具有正向效果、對團體政治行為則具有負向效果。最後，說明本研究的主要貢獻與研究限制，並提出未來研究方向及管理上的建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Differential leadership is a vivid leadership style in Chinese organizations. The leaders tend to divide subordinates into two distinct groups: “in-group” and “out-group”. Between the two groups, leaders express different leadership styles and allocate unequal resources toward them. Therefore, when discussing about the effectiveness of differential leadership, the research level should not be limited to individual or dyad level. Instead, the group level effect of differential leadership should be taken into consideration. This study aims to address this unsolved issue of how differential leadership affects group behaviors and effectiveness. According to the perspective of social identity theory, the tendency of leaders treating group members differently is a threat to group members’ identities. In order to stay in “in-group” status or change the current “out-group” status, group members will react by taking passive or active reactions, causing decrease in group organizational citizenship behaviors and increase in group political behaviors. In addition, group collectiveness is one of the situational norms which emphasizes group interests more than individual interests and might influences the interactions among group members. For this reason, group collectiveness might be an important moderating factor in this study. To solve the issues mentioned, this study conducted a survey research on 97 groups, which included 550 individual group members from Chinese organizations in Taiwan. This study finds that after excluding the effect of LMX differentiation: 1) Differential leadership still has significant effect toward group effectiveness, 2) Differential leadership is positively associated with group organizational citizenship behavior, which is opposite to the original hypothesis, 3) Differential leadership is positively associated with group political behavior, 4) The interaction of differential leadership and group collectiveness is positively associated with group organizational citizenship behavior and negatively associated with group political behavior. Contributions, limits, future directions and implications are discussed at the end. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T08:27:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R00227125-1.pdf: 811667 bytes, checksum: 1f83dbba63528285a3d76e070e1db0ba (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 差序式領導 4 第二節 差序式領導與團體效能 13 第三節 團體集體性的調節效果 27 第四節 研究架構 32 第三章 研究方法 34 第一節 研究樣本 34 第二節 施測程序 35 第三節 研究工具 38 第四節 資料分析 43 第四章 研究結果 49 第一節 模式適配度檢驗 49 第二節 各研究變項間之相關 49 第三節 迴歸分析 52 第四節 團體集體性的調節效果 57 第五節 補充分析 58 第五章 討論與建議 60 第一節 研究結果討論 60 第二節 研究貢獻 63 第三節 研究限制 64 第四節 未來研究方向 66 第五節 管理實務意涵 70 參考文獻 72 附錄一 研究問卷 90 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 差序式領導的雙面效果：團體集體性的調節作用 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Two Facets of Differential Leadership: The Moderating Effect of Group Collectiveness | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳宗祐,莊璦嘉,姜定宇 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 差序式領導,團體公民行為,團體政治行為,團體集體性,認定威脅, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | differential leadership,group organizational citizenship behavior,group political behavior,group collectiveness,identity threat, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 93 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-01-16 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 792.64 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。