請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58672
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 彭立沛(Li-Pei Peng) | |
dc.contributor.author | I-Ping Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王怡蘋 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T08:25:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-22 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-07-22 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-07-14 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王千文、陳敦源(2012)。形式上還是實質上的 [公私協力]: 全民健康保險總額支付制度個案分析。公共行政學報,(42),99-137。 丘昌泰(2000)。後現代社會公共管理理論的變遷: 從 [新公共管理] 到 [新公民統理]。 中國行政評論,10(1),1-32。 史育禎、張長義、蔡博文(2006)。社區林業作為部落自然資源管理之想像-新竹縣尖石鄉司馬庫斯部落個案研究。臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院實驗林研究告,20(1), 51-64。 江岷欽、孫本出、劉坤億(2004)。地方政府間建立策略性夥伴關係之研究:以臺北市及其鄰近縣市為例。國立臺北大學行政暨政策學報,38,78-79。 江明修、陳定銘(2001)。臺灣社區大學的創發與建構公民社會。經濟、社會與傳媒,122-129。 宋永俊(2010)。非營利組織參與公私協力之監督機制研究-以苗栗地區多元就業開發方案 (經濟型) 為例(碩士論文)。取自http://140.128.103.80:8080/handle/310901/1049 呂欣蕙(2007)。布農族望鄉部落生態旅遊發展之研究(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zx4hfx。 李光中、王鑫(2003)。社區參與山林守護之管理—一個行動研究架構的提議。 2003國家公園登山研討會發表之論文,花蓮,320-338.。 李光中、王鑫(2004)。建立和評估自然保護區社區參與論壇之研究── 以櫻花鉤吻鮭野生動物保護區為例。地理學報,36,1-22。 李明芝(2013)。原住民採取森林產物的文化困境與除罪化研究(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/64a8u4 李宗勳(2002)。社會資本與社區安全之初探。中國行政評論,11(3),1-44。 宋秉明、王敏(2002)。太魯閣國家公園與當地原住民互動之研究: 一個轉變中的過程。戶外遊憩研究,15(1),63-81。 吳英明(1998)。公共管理三P原則-以BOT為例。公共管理,601-615。 官大偉、林益仁(2008)。什麼傳統? 誰的領域?: 從泰雅族馬里光流域傳統領域調查經驗談空間知識的轉譯。考古人類學刊,(69),109-141。 林水波、李長晏(2005)。跨域治理,臺北市:五南。 林務局(2008)。林務局全球資訊網-林務局-台灣林業期刊電子書。 林淑馨(2010)。質性研究: 理論與實務。巨流圖書股份有限公司。 林淑馨(2012)。日本地方政府促進非營利組織協力之理想與現實。政治科學論叢,(51),91-128。 周威廷(1996)。公共合產之理論與策略:非營利組織公共服務功能的觀察(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/kgsuvd。 周書田(2017)。協力治理觀點下的原住民族地區資源共同管理–以南投縣信義鄉雙龍部落為例(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4axf4s。 洪廣冀、何俊頤(2018)。自然資源治理與原住民部落發展: 後發展與後人類的視角。 考古人類學刊,(89),93-141。 紀駿傑(2001)。原住民、自然資源與共同經營。 把人找回來:─在地參與自然資源管理,15-32。 孫本初、鍾京佑(2005)。治理理論之初探:政府,市場與社會治理架構。公共行政學報,,(16),107-135。 畢恆達(2001)。詮釋學與質性研究。質性研究,臺北:巨龍,27-45。 唐韻甯(2016)。臺北市國民小學推動食農教育之制度能力研究(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6mvn8q。 陳美惠、李來錫、洪士惟(2009)。社區林業組織發展的知識演化研究。中華林學季刊,42(1),107-122。 陳敦源、張世杰(2010)。公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭。 文官制度季刊,2(3),17-71。 張秦瑞、孫同文、郭瑞坤、沈逸晴(2013)。地方觀光發展協力治理機制之探究:以南投縣觀光發展為例。 觀光休閒學報, 19(2),105-128。 曾冠球(2011)。為什麼淪為不情願夥伴?─ 公私夥伴關係失靈個案的制度解釋.。臺灣民主季刊,8(4),83-133。 黃躍雯(2007)。雪霸國家公園與當地原住民夥伴關係的形成。戶外遊憩研究, 20(1), 1-26。 趙永茂(2008)。地方與區域治理發展的趨勢與挑戰。研考雙月刊,32(5),3-15。 蔡巧蓮(2013)。國家自然保護區管理制度調整之研究-以國家公園為例(博士論文)。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6rzpb8。 蔡明月、李旻嬑(2013)。臺灣社會科學引用文獻分析研究。教育資料與圖書館學, 50(3),293-317。 詹盛如、鄭瑞隆、李藹慈、洪志成、李奉儒、何粵東……、王順正(2012)。社會科學研究方法新論。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 臺大實驗林(2018)。第十期經營計畫。取自:https://www.exfo.ntu.edu.tw/page.php?id=18。 鄭欽龍、張竣翔(2009)。崩塌地水土保持工程參數成本估計模型之研究─ 以臺大實驗林為例。國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院實驗林研究報告,23(1),37-45。 盧道杰,、陳律伶、臺邦、撒沙勒、闕河嘉、裴家騏、…王進發(2010)。自然保護區發展共管機制的挑戰與機會。 臺灣原住民族研究季刊,3(2),91-130。 顏愛靜、陳亭伊(2011)。原住民傳統領域共同管理之研究以新竹縣尖石鄉泰雅族部落為例。 地理學報,,(61),1-30。 羅美娥(2001)。臺灣地名辭書卷十南投縣。南投市:臺灣省文獻委員會。 Andrade, G. S., Rhodes, J. R. (2012). Protected areas and local communities: an inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies?. Ecology and Society, 17(4). Anthony, B. (2007). The dual nature of parks: attitudes of neighbouring communities towards Kruger National Park, South Africa. Environmental Conservation, 34(3), 236-245. Ansell, C., Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543-571. Amarasinghe, U. S., De Silva, S. S. (1999). Sri Lankan reservoir fishery: a case for introduction of a co‐management strategy. Fisheries management and ecology, 6(5), 387-400. Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E., Patton, E. (2011). Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 995-1004. Baird, J., Plummer, R., Schultz, L., Armitage, D., Bodin, Ö. (2019). How does socio-institutional diversity affect collaborative governance of social–ecological systems in practice?. Environmental management, 63(2), 200-214. Baird, J., Schultz, L., Plummer, R., Armitage, D., Bodin, Ö. (2019). Emergence of Collaborative Environmental Governance: What are the Causal Mechanisms?. Environmental management, 63(1), 16-31. Barry, J. (2012). Indigenous state planning as inter-institutional capacity development: The evolution of “government-to-government” relations in coastal British Columbia, Canada. Planning theory practice, 13(2), 213-231. Bennett, R. J., Krebs, G. (1994). Local economic development partnerships: an analysis of policy networks in EC-LEDA local employment development strategies. Regional studies, 28(2), 119-140. Berkes, F., George, P., Preston, R. J. (1991). Co-management: the evolution in theory and practice of the joint administration of living resources. Alternatives, 12-18. Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352), eaan1114. Bodin, Ö., Sandström, A., Crona, B. (2017). Collaborative networks for effective ecosystem‐based management: A set of working hypotheses. Policy Studies Journal, 45(2), 289-314. Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1996). Collaborative management of protected areas: Tailoring the approach to the context (Issues in Social Policy). Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature. Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Farvar, M. T., Nguinguiri, J. C., Ndangang, V. (2000). Co-management of Natural Resources: Organising. Negotiating and Learning by Doing, IUCN, Yaoundé, Cameroon. Boons, F., Spekkink, W. (2012). Levels of institutional capacity and actor expectations about industrial symbiosis: Evidence from the Dutch stimulation program 1999–2004. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(1), 61-69. Bowcutt, F. (1999). Ecological restoration and local communities: a case study from Sinkyone Wilderness State Park, Mendocino County, California. Human Ecology, 359-368. Breukers, S., Wolsink, M. (2007). Wind energy policies in the Netherlands: Institutional capacity-building for ecological modernisation. Environmental Politics, 16(1), 92-112. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of Cross‐Sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public administration review, 66, 44-55. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross‐sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647-663. Carlsson, L., Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of environmental management, 75(1), 65-76. Cary, C., Dudley, N., Stolton, S. (2000). The importance and vulnerability of the world’s protected areas. WWF-World Wide Fund for Nature. Castro, A. P., Nielsen, E. (2001). Indigenous people and co-management: implications for conflict management. Environmental Science Policy, 4(4-5), 229-239. Chaffin, B. C., Garmestani, A. S., Gunderson, L. H., Benson, M. H., Angeler, D. G., Arnold, C. A., ... Allen, C. R. (2016). Transformative environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 399-423. Colchester, M. (2004). Conservation policy and indigenous peoples. Environmental Science Policy, 7(3), 145-153. Daniels, S. E., Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Denhardt, R. B., Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public administration review, 60(6), 549-559. Dobbin, K. B., Lubell, M. (2019). Collaborative Governance and Environmental Justice: Disadvantaged Community Representation in California Sustainable Groundwater Management. Policy Studies Journal. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of public administration research and theory, 22(1), 1-29. Gilek, M. (2016). Governing Europe's Marine Environment: Europeanization of Regional Seas Or Regionalization of EU Policies?. Routledge. 40-44 Grimshaw, D., Vincent, S., Willmott, H. (2002). Going privately: partnership and outsourcing in UK public services. Public Administration, 80(3), 475-502. Gruber, J. S. (2010). Key principles of community-based natural resource management: a synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons. Environmental management, 45(1), 52-66. Hamilton, A., Cunningham, A., Byarugaba, D., Kayanja, F. (2000). Conservation in a region of political instability: Bwindi Impenetrable Forest, Uganda. Conservation Biology, 14(6), 1722-1725. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan International Higher Education. Healey, P. (1999). Institutionalist analysis, communicative planning, and shaping places. Journal of planning education and research, 19(2), 111-121. Healey, P. (2003). Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning theory, 2(2), 101-123. Holdgate, M., Phillips, A. (1999). Protected areas in context. Integrated protected area management ,1-24. Ingles, A. W., Musch, A., Qwist-Hoffmann, H. (1999). The participatory process for supporting collaborative management of natural resources. FAO, Rome. Innes, J. , and D. Booher . 1999. Consensus building as role playing and bricolage. Toward a theory of collaborative planning. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 65(1):9–25. IUCN. (1996). Resolutions and recommendations. Paper presented at World Conservation Congress, Montreal, Canada. http://iucn.org/wcc/resolutions/resrecen.pdf. [last accessed October 25,2015]. Jentoft, S. (2005). Fisheries co-management as empowerment. Marine policy, 29(1), 1-7. Kamensky, J. M., Burlin, T. J., Abramson, M. A. (2004). Networks and partnerships: Collaborating to achieve results no one can achieve alone. Collaboration: Using networks and partnerships, 3-20. Keller, R. H., Turek, M. F. (1999). American Indians and national parks. University of Arizona Press. Klijn, E. H., Teisman, G. R. (2003). Institutional and strategic barriers to public—private partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases. Public money and Management, 23(3), 137-146. Kobe De Pourcq, E. T., Arts, B., Vranckx, A., Léon-Sicard, T., Van Damme, P. (2015). Conflict in protected areas: who says co-management does not work?. PLoS One, 10(12). Kothari, A., Camill, P., Brown, J. (2013). Conservation as if people also mattered: policy and practice of community-based conservation. Conservation and society, 11(1), 1. Kouwenhoven, Vincent. (1993). Public-Private Partnership: A Model for the Management of Public-Private Cooperation.Kooiman, 119‐130. Kuperan, K., Abdullah, N. M. R., Pomeroy, R. S., Genio, E. L., Salamanca, A. M. (2008). Measuring transaction costs of fisheries co-management. Coastal Management, 36(3), 225-240. López-Rodríguez, M. D., Cabello, J., Castro, H., Rodríguez, J. (2019). Social Learning for Facilitating Dialogue and Understanding of the Ecosystem Services Approach: Lessons from a Cross-Border Experience in the Alboran Marine Basin. Sustainability, 11(19), 5239. Lucas, P. H. C. (1992). Protected landscapes: a guide for policy makers and planners. Springer Science Business Media. Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskaemper, E., Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 269-297. McCay, B. J., Jentoft, S. (1998). Market or community failure? Critical perspectives on common property research. Human organization, 21-29. Moller, H., Berkes, F., Lyver, P. O. B., Kislalioglu, M. (2004). Combining science and traditional ecological knowledge: monitoring populations for co-management. Ecology and society, 9(3). Moorman, M. C., Peterson, N., Moore, S. E., Donoso, P. J. (2013). Stakeholder perspectives on prospects for co-management of an old-growth forest watershed near Valdivia, Chile. Society Natural Resources, 26(9), 1022-1036. Peters, B. G. (1999). Institutional Theory in Political Science, The New Insti tutionalism, Continuum. Peng, L. P. (2013). Effects of anti-dam campaigns on institutional capacity: a case study of Meinung from Taiwan. Paddy and Water Environment, 11(1-4), 353-367. Peng, L. P., Kuki, Y., Hashimoto, S., Hsieh, Y. S. (2014). Institutional capacity and rural community planning in Japan: an event history analysis. Paddy and water environment, 12(1), 55-69. Phillips, A. (2003). Turning ideas on their head: the new paradigm for protected areas. The George Wright Forum 20(2), 8-32) Pinkerton, E. W. (1992). Translating legal rights into management practice: overcoming barriers to the exercise of co-management. Human Organization, 330-341. Pinkerton, E. W. (1994). Local fisheries co-management: a review of international experiences and their implications for salmon management in British Columbia. Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences, 51(10), 2363-2378. Provan, K. G., Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(2), 229-252. Redpath, S. M., Linnell, J. D., Festa‐Bianchet, M., Boitani, L., Bunnefeld, N., Dickman, A., ... McMahon, B. J. (2017). Don't forget to look down–collaborative approaches to predator conservation. Biological Reviews, 92(4), 2157-2163. Reed, M. S., Vella, S., Challies, E., de Vente, J., Frewer, L., Hohenwallner‐Ries, D., ... van Delden, H. (2018). A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?. Restoration Ecology, 26, S7-S17. Rethemeyer, R. K., Hatmaker, D. M. (2008). Network management reconsidered: An inquiry into management of network structures in public sector service provision. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 617-646. Rhodes, R. A. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University. Robitaille, P. A., Shahi, C., Smith, M. A., Luckai, N. (2017). Growing together: A principle-based approach to building collaborative Indigenous partnerships in Canada’s forest sector. The Forestry Chronicle, 93(1), 44-57. Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: its roots, evolution and directions in the 1990s. Rusnak, G. (1997). Co-management of natural resources in Canada: A review of concepts and case studies. Minga working paper,2. Schumann, S. (2007). Co-management and “consciousness”: fishers’ assimilation of management principles in Chile. Marine Policy, 31(2), 101-111. Scott, M. (2004). Building institutional capacity in rural Northern Ireland: the role of partnership governance in the LEADER II programme. Journal of Rural Studies, 20(1), 49-59. Singleton, S. G. (1998). Constructing cooperation: the evolution of institutions of comanagement. University of Michigan press. Tewdwr-Jones, M., Allmendinger, P. (1998). Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environment and planning A, 30(11), 1975-1989. The World Bank.(1999). Report from the International Workshop on Community-Based natural Resource Management (CBNRM),Washington, DC, 10–14 May 1998. URL:http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/conatrem/ [ last accessed October 25,2015]. UNCED. (1992). Agenda 21, New York :United Nations General Assembly. Western, M., Wright, E. O. (1994). The permeability of class boundaries to intergenerational mobility among men in the United States, Canada, Norway and Sweden. American Sociological Review, 606-629. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58672 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在自然資源管理方式改變以及原住民族權益提升的環境下,自然資源管理單位與原住民部落的關係備受關注。而位在南投縣信義鄉的望鄉部落,其後山與傳統獵場現隸屬於國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院附屬實驗林(以下簡稱臺大實驗林)管轄,雙方以往關係相當對立與冷漠,但自2010年始雙方進入公私協力,建立合作關係,關係明顯改善。因此,本研究以望鄉部落為個案,進行文獻分析、半結構式深度訪談,以協力治理模型分析望鄉部落與臺大實驗林公私協力的過程,並引入Healey協力規劃理論中制度能力概念,檢視望鄉部落在經過公私協力後知識資源、關係資源、動員能力的改變。 結果發現望鄉部落與臺大實驗林的公私協力在關係改善以及可常態性的山林巡守有所成效,對於望鄉部落的制度能力方面,在山林保護方面的制度能力增長較多,而在部落發展方面的制度能力則因為經濟誘因不足以及望鄉部落內部政治環境而有進步的空間。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In the context of changes in natural resource management and the promotion of indigenous rights, the relationship between natural resource management units and indigenous tribes has attracted much attention. The mountain and traditional hunting grounds of Wangxiang tribe, Xinyi Township, Nantou County, are now under the jurisdiction of the National Taiwan University Experimental Forest (NTU Experimental Forest). Since 2010, NTU Experimental Forest and Wangxiang tribe have entered into public-private collaboration to establish a cooperative relationship, and the relationship has improved significantly. Therefore, this study takes Wangxiang tribe as a case, conducts literature analysis and semi-structured in-depth interviews, and uses the collaborative governance model to analyze the process of public-private collaboration between Wangxiang tribe and NTU Experimental Forest. Besides, researcher introduces the concept of institutional capacity in Healey collaborative planning theory to examine the changes in knowledge resources, relationship resources, and mobilization capability of the Wangxiang tribe after public-private collaboration. Finally, researcher found that the public-private collaboration of the Wangxiang Tribe and the NTU Experimental Forest has been effective in improving the relationship and the regularity of the mountain forest patrol. For the institutional capacity of the Wangxiang Tribe, the institutional capacity in mountain forest protection has increased more, and the institutional capacity for tribal development has room for improvement due to insufficient economic incentives and the political environment within the Wangxiang tribe. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T08:25:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1107202014252100.pdf: 10081750 bytes, checksum: 7423a867b24a390b92d81c5bedd05422 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 .................................................... i 致謝 ............................................................... ii 摘要 .............................................................. iii Abstract ........................................................... iv 目 錄 .............................................................. v 圖目錄 ........................................................... viii 表目錄 ............................................................. ix 第一章 緒論 ......................................................... 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 ........................................ 1 第二節 研究問題與目的 ........................................ 2 第三節 研究範圍 .............................................. 3 第四節 名詞解釋 .............................................. 3 第二章 文獻回顧 ..................................................... 5 第一節 自然資源管理 .......................................... 5 一、 自然資源管理的趨勢 ................................... 5 二、 臺灣自然資源管理的轉變 ............................... 8 第二節 公共管理型態的轉變 ................................... 11 一、 傳統官僚體制 ........................................ 11 二、 新公共管理 .......................................... 11 三、 新公共服務 .......................................... 12 四、 新治理 .............................................. 12 第三節 公私協力 ............................................. 13 一、 何謂公私協力 ........................................ 13 二、 公私協力相關研究 .................................... 16 三、 協力治理模型 ........................................ 17 第四節 制度能力 ............................................. 24 一、 制度能力概念與要素 .................................. 24 二、 制度能力相關研究 .................................... 27 三、 制度能力的衡量 ...................................... 28 第三章 研究方法 .................................................... 31 第一節 分析架構 ............................................. 31 第二節 研究個案 ............................................. 32 一、 望鄉部落 ............................................ 32 二、 臺大實驗林 .......................................... 35 三、 望鄉部落與臺大實驗林 ................................ 38 第三節 分析方法 ............................................. 39 一、 文獻分析法 .......................................... 39 二、 深度訪談法 .......................................... 40 第四章 望鄉部落協力治理模型 ........................................ 45 第一節 初始狀況 ............................................. 45 一、 宏觀環境 ............................................ 45 二、 資源條件 ............................................ 46 三、 合作對抗歷史 ........................................ 48 第二節 參與動機 ............................................. 49 一、 臺大實驗林提出協力的動機 ............................ 49 二、 望鄉部落參與動機 .................................... 51 第三節 制度設計 ............................................. 53 一、 臺大實驗林社區林業作業規範 .......................... 53 二、 臺大實驗林共榮計畫 .................................. 57 第四節 促進型領導 ........................................... 61 一、 望鄉部落的促進型領導 ................................ 61 二、 臺大實驗林的促進型領導 .............................. 62 三、 協力的促進型領導 .................................... 64 第五節 協力過程 ............................................. 65 一、 直接對話 ............................................ 66 二、 信任建立 ............................................ 67 三、 資源互補與培力 ...................................... 67 四、 承認共同協力 ........................................ 68 五、 建立目標共識 ........................................ 69 六、 行動 ................................................ 71 七、 期間的結果 .......................................... 77 第六節 協力結果 ............................................. 80 一、 互動關係改善 ........................................ 80 二、 共同巡守山林 ........................................ 81 第七節 小結 ................................................. 82 第五章 望鄉部落的制度能力轉變 ...................................... 87 第一節 知識資源 ............................................. 87 一、 知識的增長 .......................................... 87 二、 知識的運用 .......................................... 95 第二節 關係資源 ............................................. 97 一、 內部資源 ............................................ 97 二、 外部資源 ............................................ 99 第三節 動員能力 ............................................ 100 一、 生態保育的動員 ..................................... 101 二、 社區發展的動員 ..................................... 102 第四節 小結 ................................................ 105 第六章 結論與建議 ................................................. 107 第一節 結論 ................................................ 107 一、 望鄉部落與臺大實驗林公私協力 ....................... 107 二、 公私協力與制度能力 ................................. 108 第二節 建議 ................................................ 109 一、 望鄉部落 ........................................... 109 二、 臺大實驗林 ......................................... 109 三、 林業管理單位 ....................................... 110 第三節 研究限制與未來研究 .................................. 110 參考文獻 .......................................................... 113 附錄 .............................................................. 121 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 制度能力觀點下的公私協力─以信義鄉望鄉部落為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Public-Private Collaboration from the Perspective of Institutional Capability: A Case Study of Wangxiang Tribe, Sinyi Township | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林如森(Ju-Sen Lin) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃裕星(Yu-Xing Huang),盧道杰(Dao-Jie Lu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 公私協力,制度能力,望鄉部落,臺大實驗林, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Public-Private Collaboration,Institutional Capability,Wangxiang Tribe,National Taiwan University Experimental Forest, | en |
dc.relation.page | 122 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202001438 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-07-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1107202014252100.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 9.85 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。