Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 社會科學院
  3. 社會工作學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58463
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳毓文
dc.contributor.authorYao-Ting Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳瑤婷zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T08:16:02Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-09
dc.date.copyright2014-03-09
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2014-02-12
dc.identifier.citation內政部兒童局(2006)。兒童及少年保護工作指南。台北:內政部兒童局。
內政部兒童局(2012)。http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/internet/main/index.aspx
江麗美、李淑珺、陳厚愷譯(2008)。家族再生-逆境中的家庭韌性與療育(Strengthening family resilience)。(原作者:Walsh, F.)。台北:心靈工坊。(原著出版年:2006)
余瑞長(2003)。育幼機構受虐兒童之社會適應研究-以內政部北區兒童。國立中正大學社會福利研究所碩士論文。
余漢儀(2000)。家庭重聚。社會工作辭典。台北:內政部社區發展雜誌社。
李淑潔(2005)。「兒童及少年性交易防制條例後續追蹤服務」輔導員服務經驗之探討。東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
李開敏(2003)。性犯罪問題面面觀─受害兒少的創傷與輔導。月旦法學,第96期,54-74頁。
杜慈容(1999)。童年受虐少年「獨立生活」經驗探討。臺灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
沈瓊桃(2010)。暴力的童年、堅韌的青年:目睹婚暴暨受虐青年復原力之探討。中華輔導與諮商學報,第二十七期,115–160頁。
王牧恩、王美書、吳宜姍、吳震環、呂學榮、宋冀寧…蘇
周慧香(1992)。社會工作過程對寄養兒童生活適應影響之研究。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
林玟漪(2007)。接受「家庭重聚」服務之案家的經驗探討。臺灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。
林俐君(2000)。育幼機構院童成長脈絡之探討。國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
林萬億(2006)。當代社會工作─理論與方法。台北:五南出版社。
林萬億、陳毓文、鄭麗珍(審定)(2008)。社會工作研究法。(原作者:Allen Rubin、Earl R. Babbie)。台北:五南。
胡幼慧、姚美華(2002)。一些質性方法上的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何蒐集資料、登錄與分析。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例,頁141-158頁。台北:巨流圖書公司。
畢國蓮(2006)。歷經長期機構安置的兒少保護個案結案後的生活經驗初探。臺灣大學社會工作學研究所。
莊耀南(2011)。「自立生活」對歷經機構安置青少年之意涵。國立台灣大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
許令旻(2010)。經歷兒少安置的自立生活者之安全依附關係探究。國立台北大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南出版社。
陳怡如(2002)。非自願性專業關係中之抗拒行為─兒保社工人員之觀點。東吳大學碩士論文。
陳俐靜(2011)。結束安置後性交易少女之社會韌性。國立台北大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
陳彥竹(2001)。為何不再犯?少年時期進入矯治機構者離開後生活經驗之探究。台灣大學社會學研究所應用社會學組碩士論文。
陳桂絨(2000)。復原力的發現:以安置於機構之兒少保護個案為例。東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
陳毓文(2004)。少年憂鬱情緒的危險與保護因子之相關性研究。中華心理衛生學刊,第4期(17),67-95頁。
陳毓文、鄭麗珍(1998)。「兒童及少年性交易防制工作服務模式之研究」--以台北市發展經驗為例。台北:台北市政府社會局。
彭淑華(2011)。有血緣關係的陌生人?─兒童及少年安置機構離院個案之返家經驗。社會工作與社會發展:行動與展望研討會會議手冊,台北:國際社會福利協會中華民國總會、社團法人台灣社會教育學會、東吳大學社會工作學系。
曾文志(2005)。復原力的構念與研究之分析。臺中護專學報,第4期,36-56頁。
曾文志(2006)。復原力保護因子效果概化之統合分析。輔導與諮商學報,14期,1–35頁。
曾華源、黃韻如(2009)。中途學校特殊教育及輔導實施成效探討研究。內政部兒童局委託研究案。
黃元亭(2001)。不要破壞我的家─被認定為施虐父母之當事人對強制處遇介入經驗之探討。東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
黃巧婷(2003)。從事性交易少女離開機構後之生活經驗。國立台灣大學社工所論文。
黃瑋瑩(1996)。被尋獲失蹤兒童之家庭生活再適應。國立台灣大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
馮燕(2000)。如何達到子女最佳利益的時間?。當「兒福」遇上「家暴」兒童保護法律實務研討會會議手冊。台北:兒童福利聯盟文教基金會。
馮燕、高迪理(2007)。失蹤兒童少年離家期間生活型態及返家後適應狀況之探究。內政部兒童局委託研究案。
溫易珊(2012)。兒童及少年從事性交易歷程之研究。朝陽科技大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
劉玉儀(2004)。實踐「返家」為重點的兒保工作之行動歷程研究。東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
劉美芝(1999)。機構安置受虐兒童社會適應之研究。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
鄭貴華(2001)。身體受虐兒童對「家庭重聚」接受意願之探討-以內政部中區兒童之家為例。東海大學社會工作學研究所。
鄭麗珍(總校閱)(2011)。兒少保護社會工作。(原作者:American Humane Association)。台北:洪葉文化。(原著出版年:2004)
謝儒賢(2002)。發展兒童性侵害社會工作處遇模式之初探。朝陽人文社會學刊,第1期(1),71-100頁。
簡春安、鄒平儀(2004)。社會工作研究法。台北:巨流。
Abramczyk, L. W, B, Maluccio, A. N, &. Thomlison. (1996). The theory, policy, and practice context of family reunification: An integrated research perspective. Children and Youth Services Review, 18(4/5), 473-488.
Anderson, G. L. (1989). Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status, and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 59(3): 249-270.
Anderson, L., Beinashowitz, J., Finnin, L., Flaherty, M., Grossman, F. K., & Sakurai, M. (1992).Risk and resilience in young adolescents.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12(5), 529-550.
Barth, R. P.(1990). On their own: The experience of youth after foster Care. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 7(5), 419-446.
Cash, S. J. (2001). Risk assessment in child welfare: The art and science. Children and Youth Services Review, 23(11), 811-830.
Choi, S., & Ryan, J. P.(2007). Co-occurring problems for substance abusing mothers in child welfare: Matching services to improve family reunification. Children and Youth Services Review. 29(11), 1395–1410.
Choi, S., Marsh, J.C., Ryan, J. P., &Testa, M. F(2005). Integrated services for families with multiple problems: Obstacles to family reunification. Children and Youth Services Review.28 (2006).1074-1087.
Fein, E., & Staff, I. (1993). “The interaction of research and practice in family reunification,” in Pine, Warsh, &Maluccio (eds) Together Again, 199-212, Washington DC: CWLA.
Festinger, T.(1996). Going home and returning to foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 18(4/5), 383-402.
Fraser, M. W., Lewis, R. E., Pecora, P. J., Walton, E., & Walton, W. K.(1996). An experiment in family reunification: Correlates of outcomes at one-year follow-up. Children and Youth Services Review, 18(4/5), 335-361.
Glicken, M. D. (2004). Using the strength perspective in social work practice: A positive approach for the helping professions.Boston: Allyn& Bacon.
Guo, S., & Wells, K. (1999).Reunification and reentry of foster children. Children and Youth Services Review, 21(4), 273-294.
Jones, L. (1998). The social and family correlates of successful reunification of children in foster care.Children and Youth Services Review, 20(4).305-323.
Jonson-Reid, M. (2003). Foster care and future risk of maltreatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 25, 271-294.
Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17(4): 63-84.
Lewandowski, C. A. & Pierce, L. (2004). Does family-centered out-of-home care work? Comparison of a family-centered approach and traditional care.Social Work Research, 28(3), 143-151.
Lietz C. A. & Strength, M. (2011). Stories of successful reunification: A narrative study of family resilience in child welfare. Families in society, 92(2), 203-210.
Lietz, C. A. (2006). Uncovering stories of family resilience: A mixed methods study of resilient families, Part 2. Families in Society, 88(1), 147-155.
Lietz, C. A. (2007). Uncovering stories of family resilience: A mixed methods study of resilient families, part 2. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 88(1), 147–155.
Lietz, C. A., Lacasse, J. R., & Cacciatore, J.(2011). Social support in family reunification: A qualitative study. Journal of family social work, 14, 3-14.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Cuba, E. G. (1984).Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Luthar, S. S.(1991). Vulnerability and resilience: a study of high-risk adolescents. Child Development, 62 (1991),600–616.
Luthar, S. S. (1993). Annotation: Methodological and conceptual issues in research on child-hood resilience. Journal of child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 34(4), 441-453.
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: Acirtical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543-562.
M. E., Egley, L. C. (1995).Comparing one-parent and couple data on sensitive marital behaviors: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 995-1010.
Marsh, J., Ryan, J., Choi, S., &Testa, M. (2006). Integrated services for families with multiple problems: Obstacles to family reunification. Children and Youth Services Review,28, 1074–1087.
Masten A. S. &Coatswoth J. D. (1998).The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable enviornments.American Psychologist, 53(2), 205-220.
Masten, A. S. (1994). Resilience and development: Successful adaptation despite risk and adversity. In Wang, M. C., & Gordon, E. W. (Eds.), Educational Resilience in Inner-city America: Challenges and Prospects (pp.3-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocites.
McElwee, N.(2007). A focus on the personal and structural: Resilience explored. Child & Youth Services(The Haworth Press, Inc.), 29, (1), 57-69.
Parr, G.D., Montgomery, M. &DeBell, C.(1998). Flow theory as a model for enhancing Student resilience. Professional School Counseling, 1(5), 26-31.
Pinsof, W. M. (1992). Toward a scientific paradigm of family psychology:The integrative process systems perspective.Journal of Family Psychology, 5,432-447.
Rew, L. & S. D. Horner(2003).Youth resilience framework for reducing health-risk behaviors in adolescents.Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 18, 379-388.Szinovacz.
Smith, C. & Carlson, B. E. (1997).Stress, coping, and resilience in children and youth.Social Service Reciew, (71)2: 231-256.
Talbot, E. P. (2006). Successful family reunification: The contribution of social work theory in the provision of services and decision making. Illinois Child Welfare.3(1&2), 103-117.
Taussing, H. N., Clyman, R. B., Landsverk, J.(2001). Children who return home from foster care: A 6-year prospective study of behavioral health outcomes in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence.6(2).217-228.
Terling, T.(1999). The efficacy of family reunification practice: Reentry rates and correlates of reentry for abused and neglected children reunited with their families. Child Abuse & Neglect,23(12), 1359-1370.
Thomas, M., Chenot, D., &Reifel, B. (2005). A resilience-based model of reunification and reentry: Implications for out-of-home care services. Families in Society, 86(2), 235-243.
Turner, F. (2002).Diagnosis in social work: New imperatives. Toronto: Allyn& Bacon.
Walsh, F. (1998).Strengthening Family Resilience. New York: The Guilford Press.
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1998).Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: Adams, Bannister, Cox.
Werner, E., and R. Smith. (1992). Overcoming the Odds: High-Risk Children from Birth to Adulthood. New York: Cornell University Press.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58463-
dc.description.abstract為了協助被安置的兒少返家,美國政府訂定數項法案,例如:「領養協助與兒童福利法」(AACWA)、「領養與安全家庭法案」(ASFA),我國中央及地方單位亦積極推動「家庭處遇計畫」、「強制性親職教育」、「低親職功能家庭福利方案」、「兒童及少年結束家外安置後續追蹤輔導及自立生活服務作業規定」等方案或法令。雖安置及後續追蹤議題漸受重視,然而,無論國內外,相關研究仍多著重於機構內經驗,自立與返家後續追蹤則少,且普遍偏向負面結果,適應狀況較佳者鮮少呈現,因而,本研究的目標便是希望能對此領域有更多探討。
故針對符合以下條件之八位受訪者,進行半結構式深度訪談:
一、 曾因受到家中成人虐待(包含身體、精神、性虐待與疏忽),被迫安置者。
二、 因家庭恢復功能,或兒少具自我照顧能力,被社工人員評估可返家者,而前述返家,係指回到任何一個原生家庭,且與原來家庭仍保持聯繫與互動。
三、 返家後至少留在家中六個月,且經社工人員評估與家庭互動或適應尚佳者。
四、 為顧及受訪者之表達與認知能力,以12歲以上之兒少為主要對象。
為了解此群體之經驗,列出以下提問:兒少返家後,與家人間的互動經驗及適應歷程如何?兒少與家人所認為的良好適應經驗如何形塑而成?彼此互動的歷程中,能協助兒少適應的重要經驗為何?並佐以復原力觀點,檢視兒少返家重聚後,在家庭為主的場域中,「持續留在原生家庭」期間的適應情形。
綜合及分析受訪者之經驗,大致可得出以下結論:兒少返家初期的生疏適應歷程的一段必經之路,隨相互磨合,兒少及家庭彼此皆能逐漸釋出善意,雙方的努力使家庭發揮照顧功能。此外,兒少返家後的追蹤與橋樑功能十分重要,可促進溝通及提供資源;社會支持則能填補兒少與家庭互動過程中的空缺與需求,亦能補充及輔助專業服務及資源的不足。而衝突及社會福利介入,皆為協助兒少適應的重要經驗,此轉折亦是兒少、家庭及服務三方共同合作之結果。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractLegislations and policies concerning issues related to children and youth in placement are set up in recent years; however, issues related to “independent living” and “returning home (reunification)” caught less attention. Most studies focused on negative outcomes of children and youth leaving care, and few showed good adjustment. However, the experiences of those who adjust better can provide knowledge for better services, so the goal of this study is to find those who adjust well after returning home from placement.
Using the semi-structured in-depth interview method, respondents who met the following conditions were recruited: 1) those who had been abused by any adults at home (including physical, mental, sexual abuse and neglect) and were placed; 2) those who returned home due to the removal of family violence, or who were assessed to leave care and returned home due to sufficient independent skills. The aforementioned “home” meant to live with any family members; 3) those who had stayed home for at least six months after returning home, and interacted with at least one family member without conflict; 4) the respondents should have the cognitive ability to express; and 5) they were older than 12 years. As a result, 8 respondents met the above requirements were interviewed.
To understand their experiences, following questions were asked: How did the children interact with their family members and adjust their new life? How did they think what make they adjust to the reunification process? In the adjustment process, what were important experiences that helped them to adjust better? This study would base on the resilience perspective to understand why these children would remain staying at home after leaving care.
Findings of this study indicated that after being placed for couple years, almost all interviewees were unfamiliar with their family members when they just returned home. However, they all tried to show their good-will, and helped the family to function better. In addition, social workers played very important roles in the adjustment process; they helped to improve their communication and provided resources for interviewees and their family members. Social supports were able to fill the gap and need of their interaction, as well as the short of professional services and resources. The conflicts and social welfare interventions are important experiences to help children adapt better. And finally, the cooperation of children, families, and the social service system were also imperative to their adjustment.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T08:16:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-102-R99330015-1.pdf: 892838 bytes, checksum: 3d68ea2c84b2fa46f3992fc4325a2655 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究緣起 1
第二節 研究背景 3
第三節 研究目的 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 返家概念與工作發展 6
第二節 理論視角:復原力觀點 11
第三節 安置返家後兒少適應狀況 15
第四節 小結 22
第三章研究方法 23
第一節 研究提問 23
第二節 質性研究典範的選取 23
第三節 研究對象選取 24
第四節 資料蒐集方法與分析策略 30
第五節 研究嚴謹度 32
第六節 研究倫理與角色 34
第四章研究發現 36
第一節 受訪者圖像與適應歷程 36
第二節 良好適應經驗的形塑歷程 64
第五章研究結論與建議 96
第一節 研究結論 96
第二節 研究建議 101
第三節 研究限制 106
第四節 研究貢獻 108
後記─研究者反思 109
參考文獻 113
附錄一:訪談大綱(兒少版) 118
附錄二:訪談大綱(家人版) 119
附錄三:訪談同意書 120
附錄四:家長同意書 121
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject適應zh_TW
dc.subject復原力觀點zh_TW
dc.subject返家重聚zh_TW
dc.subjectreturning homeen
dc.subjectresilienceen
dc.subjectadjustmenten
dc.title安置兒少返家後生活適應歷程探究─從復原力觀點出發zh_TW
dc.titleThe Process of Life Adjustment after Returning Home from Placement: From a Resilience Perspectiveen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear102-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee彭淑華,鄭麗珍
dc.subject.keyword返家重聚,復原力觀點,適應,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordreturning home,resilience,adjustment,en
dc.relation.page121
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2014-02-12
dc.contributor.author-college社會科學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept社會工作學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:社會工作學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-102-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
871.91 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved