請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58279完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 杜震華 | |
| dc.contributor.author | En-Lu Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳恩祿 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T08:10:07Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-07-22 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-07-22 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-04-06 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 李欣蓁、陳逸潔，2011，東亞國家自由貿易協定優惠關稅利用率之比較，中華經濟研究院(台灣WTO中心)
何軍明，2009，「東亞FTA原產地規則的成本與特惠利用率」，南京財經大學學報，2009年第1期，頁31-34 林培州，2004，「比較國際區域貿易協定之優惠性原產地規則—兼論東亞經濟整合對我國之影響」，貿易政策論叢，第2期，頁251-284 ______，2009，「東協加一與區域內重要FTA的ROO」，東亞經濟整合趨勢研討會，頁147-188 施與立，1988，「韓國紡織業發展概況」，台灣經濟金融月刊，第27卷，第二期， 頁43-51 許介麟，2006，「日本殖民統治台灣與朝鮮的比較(二)」，海峽評論，2006年2月號 ______，2011，「日本殖民統治的後遺症－台灣vs.朝鮮」，初版，頁50-53，台北市：文英堂 張蘊嶺、沈銘輝、劉德偉，2010，「FTA對商業活動的影響─基於對中國企業的問卷調查」，當代亞太，2010年第1期 當代中國叢書編輯部，1984，「當代中國的紡織業」，北京：中國社會科學出版社，頁535-539 經濟部國際貿易局，2002，WTO與區域貿易協定原產地規則及我國相關規定，臺北市：經濟部國際貿易局 蔡孟佳，2011，「從經濟效果論優惠性原產地規則之適法性及其未來發展」，歐美研究，第四十二卷，第二期，頁281-337 Anderson, J. E. (1979). “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation,” American Economic Review, 69, 1, 106-116 Augier, P., M. Gasiorek and C. Lai-Tong (2003).,“The Impact of Rules of Origin on Trade Flows,” Mimeo. Asakura, H. (1993). “The Harmonizd System and Rules of Origin,” Journal of World Trade. 27: 5-21. Bergstrand, J. (1989). “The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 143-153. Brenton, P. and M. Manchin ,(2002). “Making EU Trade Agreements Work: The Role of Rules of Origin,” Working Document No. 183. Brussels: Center for European Policy Studies. Cheong, I. (1999). “The Impact of Preferential Rules of Origin on Trade Deflection in the Regional Trading Blocs,” Journal of International Economic Policy Studies. 3(2):122-145. Chia, S.Y. (2010). “Regional Trade Policy Cooperation and Architecture in East Asia,” ADBI Working Paper 191, Tokyo:Asian Development Bank Institute. Deardorff, A.V. (1998). “Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World,” in Frankel, J. A., Ed., The Regionalization of the World Economy, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Duttagupta, R. and A. Panagariya (2002). “Free Trade Areas and Rules of Origin:Economics and Politics,” Seminar Paper. Estevadeordal, A. (2000).,“Negotiating Preferential Market Access: The Case of the North American Free Trade Agreement,” Journal of World Trade, 34: 141-200. Estevadeordal, A. and E. Miller (2002). “ Rules of Origin and the Pattern of Trade between U.S. and Canada,” Washington, DC: Integration, Trade and Hemispheric Issues Division, Inter-American Development Bank. Estevadeordal, A. and K. Suominen (2003). “Rules of Origin: A World Map and Trade Effects,” Paper prepared at the workshop of the INRA-DELTA.Paris, May 23-24. Gretton, P., & Gali, J. (2005). “The Restrictiveness of Rules of Origin in Preferential Trade Agreement,” Paper presented at the 34th Conference of Economists 2005, Melbourne, Australia. Haddad, M. (2007). “Overview: Rules of Origin in East Asia: Are They Working in Practice?” Trade Issues in East Asia: Preferential Rules of Origin , Policy Research Report. East Asia and Pacific Region, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management. The World Bank. Herin, J. (1986). “Rules of Origin and Differences Between Tariff Levels in EFTA and in the EC,” EFTA Occasional Paper No. 13, Geneva. Hoekman, B. (1993). “ Rules of Origin for Goods and Services,” Journal of World Trade, 4: 81-99. JETRO. (2012). “FY 2011 Survey on the International Operations of Japanese Firms,” Japan External Trade Organization. Kawai, M. and G. Wignaraja (2010). “ Free Trade Agreementsin East Asia: A Way toward Trade Liberalization?”ADB BRIEFS No.1 June 2010. _______________________, (2011). Asia’s free trade agreements: How is Business Responding? Asian Development Bank and Asian Development Bank Institute. Kingston, E. I. (1994). “The Economics of Rules of Origin,” In Rules of Origin in International Trade. Edited by E. Vermulst, P. Waer, and J. Bourgeois. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Kirk, R. (2007). “Rules of Origin in East Asia,” Trade Issues in East Asia: Preferential Rules of Origin, Policy Research Report. East Asia and Pacific Region Proverty Reduction and Economic Management. The World Bank. Krishma, Kala and Anne O. Kurger. (1995). “Implementing Free Trade Areas: Rules of Origin and Hidden Protection,” NBER Working Paper No. 4983. Cambridge, MA: NBER Krishina, K. (2003). “ Understanding Rules of Origin,” Paper presented at ISER Seminar. Pennsylvania State University, July 2. Kureger, Anne O. (1993). “Free Trade Agreement as Protectionist Devices: Rules of Origin,” NBER Working Paper No. 4352. Cambridge, MA: NBER. Kuroiwa, I. (2009). “Value Content and Production Networks in Southeast Asia: Application of AFTA and ASEAN-PLUS-ONE FTA formulas”, The Developing Economics, 47, 2: 147-176. Linnemann, H. (1966), An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows, Amsterdam: The North-Holland Publishing Company. Mabrouk, H. (2010). “ Rules of Origin as International Trade Hindrances,” Entrepreneurial Business Law Journal, 5, 1: 97-176. Manchin, M. and A. O. Pelkmans-Balaoing (2007). “Rules of Origin and the Web of East Asian Free Trade Agreements,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 4273. Pelzman, J. and Shoham, A. (2010). “Measuring the Welfare Effects of Country of Origin Rules: A Suggested Methodology,” Global Economy Journal, 10, 1: 1-23. Poyhonen, P. (1963). “A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade Between Countries,” The Weltwirtschaftliches Archive, 90, 93-100. Rosellon, J. (2000). “ The Economics of Rules of Origin,” Journal of International Trade and Economic Development. 9(4): 397-425. Shibata,H.,(1967).,“The Theory of Economic Unions: A Comparitive Analysisof Customs Unions, Free Trade Areas, and Tax Unions,” In Fiscal Harmonization in Common Markets. Edited by C.S. Shoup. New York: Columbia University Press. Swenson, Deborah. L. (2004). “ Foreign Investment and the Mediation of Trade Flow, ” Review of International Economics, 12(4), 609-629 Tinbergen, J. (1962) Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy, New York: The Twentieth Century Fund. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58279 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近十幾年來，簽署自由貿易協定的風潮在東亞地區尤其盛行，台灣也將簽署FTA視為發展經濟的重要手段之一。但在簽署自由貿易協定之時，原本被用來辨別商品是否適用優惠稅率的原產地規則，在過於嚴格的情況下，反而會阻礙貿易的發展，因此本研究透過Tinbergen (1962) 和Poyhonen (1962) 所建構之引力模型，除了標準引力模型的變數之外，將 Estevadeordal (2000) 所發展之原產地規則限制指數，以及Estevadeordal and Suominen (2003) 所發展之原產地規則促進指數，納入引力模型。另一方面，亞洲地區是全球紡織業出口比例最高的地區，台灣更是第六大紡織品出口國，同時也是台灣第四大貿易順差產業，因此本研究聚焦在紡織業之中，分析中國、南韓、日本、新加坡、 菲律賓以及泰國等六個國家，在1995-2011年期間的紡織品貿易資料，觀察原產地規則對於雙邊貿易所產生的影響。
本研究的實證結果發現：兩國GDP、海外直接投資、先進國家對貿易有正向的影響；距離、殖民關係、原產地規則限制指數、2009年和2011年兩個時間變數對貿易有負向的影響；東協自由貿易區以及原產地規則促進指數的對貿易的影響則並不顯著。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In the past few decades, the development of free trade agreements in East Asia has been thriving. Taiwan government also considered the free trade agreement as an important tool to create economy momentum. In a free trade agreement, the rules of origin is crucial to distinguish whether the product can be traded under the preferential tariff. If the rules of origin were set too strictly and the free trade may be injured. So this study applies the gravity model proposed by Tinbergen (1962) and Poyhonen (1962), with the restrictiveness of rules of origin index and facility index, which were constructed by Estevadeordal (2000) and Estevadeordal and Suominen (2003). On the other hand, Asia has the highest proportion of exports of textiles in the world. In Taiwan, the textile industry is the sixth largest export in the world, and also the fourth largest trade surplus industry in Taiwan. Therefore, this study focuses on textiles industry of six countries including China, Korea, Japan, Singapore, Philippines, and Thailand in East Asia between 1995-2011. By the data, we can observe the impact of rules of origin on bilateral trade.
The results of this study are as follows: First, the variables of gross domestic product, foreign direct investment, and advance countries have significant positive influence on the export flow. On the contrary, the variables of distance, colonial relationship, the dummy variable 2009, 2011 and the restrictiveness of rules of origin index have significant negative influence on the export flow. Other factors as ASEAN, and facility index have no influence on the export flow. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T08:10:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R99341037-1.pdf: 3667819 bytes, checksum: ff5f92f6ba92abc78b13f46766bc7c1a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1 第二節、研究目的 12 第三節、東亞地區紡織業介紹 13 第二章：相關概念與文獻探討 20 第一節、國際原產地規則介紹 20 第二節、相關理論回顧 30 第三節、相關實證分析 32 第三章、研究方法 36 第一節、研究架構與流程 36 第二節、變數衡量與分析方法 39 第三節、變數與描述統計 44 第四章：實證結果 46 第一節、傳統引力模型實證結果 46 第二節、考慮原產地規則效果之模型 51 第五章：結論與建議 54 第一節、主要研究發現 54 第二節、政策建議 56 第三節、後續研究建議 57 參考文獻 58 附錄 63 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 原產地規則 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 引力模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 促進指數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 紡織業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自由貿易協定 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 原產地規則限制指數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | facility index | en |
| dc.subject | textiles industry | en |
| dc.subject | gravity model | en |
| dc.subject | rules of origin | en |
| dc.subject | the restrictiveness of rules of origin index | en |
| dc.subject | free trade agreements | en |
| dc.title | 原產地規則與貿易效果－引力模型在東亞地區紡織業之應用 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Rules of Origin and Trade Effect-An Application of Gravity Model in the Textile Industry of East Asia | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃登興,劉孟俊 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 自由貿易協定,紡織業,引力模型,原產地規則,原產地規則限制指數,促進指數, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | free trade agreements,textiles industry,gravity model,rules of origin,the restrictiveness of rules of origin index,facility index, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 64 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-04-07 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國家發展研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國家發展研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.58 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。