新建科技廠房保固修繕及滲漏水案例之研究-以RH公司為例

Abstract

台灣的生產模式已經從小型的傳統家族產業，轉型為科技產業進而成為高科技產業，由於現今高科技廠房經由集資投資興建動輒數佰億仟億的設廠鉅額工程金額，完成後若沒有完善的修繕機制及計畫將影響生產線的進行，甚至產生成品與半成品物料耗料損失進而影響生產交貨訂單進度，更嚴重的甚至會有延誤工期之金額賠償進而喪失日後訂單的先機。 本研究鑒於對於科技廠房修繕問題國內外鮮少有文獻及報告，希望能藉由修繕實際案例研討能在先期規劃設計時考慮完善周詳以實際修繕案例回饋資料蒐集及分析，期許能提供建廠業主預期修繕發生分類次數多寡之參考，在營造承攬商於建廠施工上減少施工瑕疵的機率減少修繕次數，避免因應修繕而造成的停機生產損失；本研究室利用實際科技廠房建廠案例以一般營造廠承攬之土建結構物及其埋設於結構內之管線、屋頂防水、外牆構件、室內隔間、油漆、地坪裝修等屬硬體設施進行第二年至第五年間之保固修繕報修案件進行統計與分析。 而根據研究修繕報修案件結果統計與分析可得: (1).構造型式混搭形成界面點多發生修繕的次數比較多。 (2).構造型式多收邊材料複雜修繕費用比較高。 (3).構造型式多相同的系統性的修繕問題重複產生。 (4).傳統RC構造修繕問題較為單純比較容易解決。 (5).半預鑄廠房構造屬模組化比較沒變化且造型單調但系統性問題單純。 (6).第二年至第三年報修案件有逐年遞減的趨勢。 (7).滲水漏水的報修次數最多對產線的影響也最大。 (8).其他修繕次數居次之但大都包括一些非屬保固責任與非直接影響因素。 (9).水電空調直接影響的修繕次數次多對於產線影響次之。 有鑑於滲水漏水的次數最多而且對生產線的影響也最大，所以就針對滲水漏水報修案件之案例區域進行分類研討: (1)外牆 (2)屋頂地坪 (3)地下室外牆 透過本研究實際案例分析、研討、責任歸屬後進行建議與回饋來盡量避免，影響科技廠房產線的最大之因素滲水漏水修繕案件發生率，使業主及營造商都能得到裡外雙贏的利益及理想的目標。

The mode of the production in Taiwan has transformed from small traditional family business type to the technology industrial kind and then turn to be the high-tech industry. Due to the high-tech factories built by the huge amount of investment between billions NT and thousand billions NT, if there is no perfect repairing system and plan to apply after the completion of the plant that will cost the loss of finished goods and semi-finished materials. It severe delays the delivered product and even let producer lost money as forfeit for the late delivery. There will be even more for producer to pay which lose the opportunity of the future order. Based on the point of my view, there are few documents and reports from international countries and Taiwan on the repairing issues for the technological plants. I am hoping to contribute proprietors via the collected data and analysis of the actual repairing case studies in order to gain their consideration from the very early stage for the planning and design. I anticipate by providing references for plant owner to foresee repairing classifications, occurrence and the number of times. By performing that, a contract supplier can expects the probability to reduce the rate of the construction defects and repair times on the construction sites. It can avoid downtime and losses caused by repairing. According to the laboratory study, we apply practical technology plant case to gather statistics and analyze based on the reporting of the repairing which is from the second year through the fifth year as warranty period. The common civil engineering construction for reinforced concrete building includes embedded pipelines, waterproof roof, exterior wall components, interior partitions, paint, decoration floor as hardware facilities. From studying the cases of the renovation statistics and analysis, those results we get as. below: (1). The reinforced concrete structure type building attached with other building is required more repairing. (2). The reinforced concrete structure type needs more decorative materials after building completed than other types which overcharges higher because of the complicated repairing. (3). The reinforced concrete structure type repeatedly generates same problems via sharing the identical system that requires repairing. (4). The traditional RC structure creates problems simpler and easily solve for repairs. (5). Semi- precast structure plant is assembly style. It is monotonous with the simple shape that produces systemic problems, but easily to solve. (6). annual repairing cases have diminished form the second year and to the third. (7). Seepage and leaks cause repairs that impacts the production line in large. (8). Other repairs come behind, but most of them are non- warranty related and indirect factors. (9). The water and electricity air conditioning directly affecting the production line is less to repair for the times of the occurrence. The maximum of times of leaks and seepage deeply affect the production line. For the record, we focus on the case study of leaking repair issue to classify and discuss: (1) Exterior wall (2) Floor of the roof (3) Exterior wall of the basement Through our study, we analysis, discuss and include in charge Dept. and then provide advice and feedback to avoid the rate of the occurrence of the leakage raising as the main cause for slowing down the production line. It will be a win- win situation for both proprietor and contractor to gain benefits and reach ideal goal.