Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57816
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor張伯茹(Po-Ju Chang)
dc.contributor.authorCheng-Hung Tsaien
dc.contributor.author蔡承宏zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T07:05:21Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-23
dc.date.copyright2020-07-23
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2020-07-21
dc.identifier.citation中文文獻
1.內政部統計處(2018年4月14日)。內政統計通報107年第15週。取自https://www.moi.gov.tw/files/news_file/107%E5%B9%B4%E7%AC%AC15%E9%80%B1%E5%85%A7%E6%94%BF%E7%B5%B1%E8%A8%88%E9%80%9A%E5%A0%B1_%E9%AB%98%E9%BD%A1%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83.pdf
2.內政部營建署(2015年10月22日)。內政部主管活動場所無障礙設施設備設計標準。取自https://www.cpami.gov.tw/%E6%9C%80%E6%96%B0%E6%B6%88%E6%81%AF/%E6%B3%95%E8%A6%8F%E5%85%AC%E5%91%8A/31-%E5%85%AC%E5%85%B1%E5%B7%A5%E7%A8%8B%E7%AF%87/19277-%E5%85%A7%E6%94%BF%E9%83%A8%E4%B8%BB%E7%AE%A1%E6%B4%BB%E5%8B%95%E5%A0%B4%E6%89%80%E7%84%A1%E9%9A%9C%E7%A4%99%E8%A8%AD%E6%96%BD%E8%A8%AD%E5%82%99%E8%A8%AD%E8%A8%88%E6%A8%99%E6%BA%96.html
3.王志仁, 陳亮宇, 彭莉甯. (2016). 老年尿失禁之評估與治療. 台灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌, 11(3), 156-168.
4.行政院主計總處(2010年9月)。99年人口及住宅普查總報告統計結果提要分析。取自https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=31969 ctNode=3272 mp=1
5.李素馨, 張淑貞, 侯錦雄, 胡志宏. (2015). 高齡者鄰里公園休閒活動支應性之研究. 造園景觀學報, 20(3), 71-94.
6.林益章, 莊美幸, 方怡謨. (2007). 老年人視力障礙的常見原因. 基層醫學, 22(7), 235-243.
7.周文賢, 張欽富. (2000). 聯合分析在產品設計之運用. 華泰.
8.侯錦雄. (1999). 休閒生活態度與鄰里公園使用行為之不同層級城市比較-以台北, 台中, 彰化市居民為例. 戶外遊憩研究, 12(2), 55-69.
9.姚晓蔚, 朱传耿, 史春云, 孙勇, 巫丹, 唐晓丹. (2015). 徐州城市居民绿地开放空间的时间利用特征研究. Journal of Jiangsu Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 33(2).
10.張文甄, 蔡燿全. (2014). 以聯合分析法探討學生校外套房租屋屬性偏好之研究─ 以國立成功大學學生為例. 商業現代化學刊, 7(4), 65-87.
11.廖思婷, 林晏州. (2004). 觀葉植物消費行為之研究. 中國園藝, 50(1), 99-115.
12.趙子元, 黃彙雯. (2016). 高齡友善理念下公共空間規劃設計之初探. 建築學報, (95), 49-70.
13.劉康立, 林晏州. (2007). 鄰里公園實質環境屬性與情緒體驗關係之研究. 臺灣園藝, 53(1), 127-138.
14.蔡淑瑩. (2014). 以高齡友善城市觀點探討臺北市公共空間-以信義區及萬華區為例. 建築學報, (90), 23-34.
15.鄭亦卉, 林晏州, 林寶秀. (2009). 聯合分析法中替選方案呈現方式對公園使用者願付費用之影響. 戶外遊憩研究, 22(1), 77-98.
16.鄭傑元. (2012). 夜間開放空間的光環境與人們停留位置選擇的關係. 中原大學建築研究所學位論文, 1-157.
英文文獻
1.Alves, S., Aspinall, P. A., Ward Thompson, C., Sugiyama, T., Brice, R., Vickers, A. (2008). Preferences of older people for environmental attributes of local parks: The use of choice-based conjoint analysis. Facilities, 26(11/12), 433-453.
2.Aspinall, P. A., Thompson, C. W., Alves, S., Sugiyama, T., Brice, R., Vickers, A. (2010). Preference and relative importance for environmental attributes of neighborhood open space in older people. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(6), 1022-1039.
3.Astell-Burt, T., Feng, X., Kolt, G. S. (2013). Mental health benefits of neighbourhood green space are stronger among physically active adults in middle-to-older age: evidence from 260,061 Australians. Preventive medicine, 57(5), 601-606.
4.de Oliveira Cunha, M. V. P., Costa, A. D. L., da costa Ireland, M. (2012). Ergonomic aspects to be considered in planning public spaces destined for elderly people. Work, 41(Supplement 1), 3827-3833.
5.Finlay, J., Franke, T., McKay, H., Sims-Gould, J. (2015). Therapeutic landscapes and wellbeing in later life: Impacts of blue and green spaces for older adults. Health Place, 34, 97-106.
6.Gale, N., Golledge, R. G., Halperin, W. C., Couclelis, H. (1990). Exploring spatial familiarity. The Professional Geographer, 42(3), 299-313.
7.Green, P. E., Krieger, A. M. (1991). Segmenting Markets with Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 20–31.
8.Green, P. E., Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. Journal of consumer research, 5(2), 103-123.
9.Haley, R. I. (1968). Benefit segmentation: A decision-oriented research tool. Journal of marketing, 32(3), 30-35.
10.IBM (2017).IBM SPSS Conjoint 25. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/search?lang=zh cc=tw q=conjoint
11.Johansson, M., Rosén, M., Küller, R. (2011). Individual factors influencing the assessment of the outdoor lighting of an urban footpath. Lighting Research Technology, 43(1), 31-43.
12.Karamanidis, K., Arampatzis, A. (2009). Evidence of mechanical load redistribution at the knee joint in the elderly when ascending stairs and ramps. Annals of biomedical engineering, 37(3), 467-476.
13.Lampinen, P., Heikkinen, R. L., Kauppinen, M., Heikkinen, E. (2006). Activity as a predictor of mental well-being among older adults. Aging and mental health, 10(5), 454-466.
14.Loukaitou-Sideris, A., Levy-Storms, L., Chen, L., Brozen, M. (2016). Parks for an aging population: Needs and preferences of low-income seniors in Los Angeles. Journal of the american planning association, 82(3), 236-251.
15.Michael, Y. L., Green, M. K., Farquhar, S. A. (2006). Neighborhood design and active aging. Health place, 12(4), 734-740.
16.Moran, M., Van Cauwenberg, J., Hercky-Linnewiel, R., Cerin, E., Deforche, B., Plaut, P. (2014). Understanding the relationships between the physical environment and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review of qualitative studies. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 11(1), 79.
17.Payne, L. L., Orsega-Smith, E., Roy, M., Godbey, G. C. (2005). Local Park Use and Personal Health Among Older Adults: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Park Recreation Administration, 23(2).
18.Pleson, E., Nieuwendyk, L. M., Lee, K. K., Chaddah, A., Nykiforuk, C. I., Schopflocher, D. (2014). Understanding older adults’ usage of community green spaces in Taipei, Taiwan. International journal of environmental research and public health, 11(2), 1444-1464.
19.Prince, F., Corriveau, H., Hébert, R., Winter, D. A. (1997). Gait in the elderly. Gait posture, 5(2), 128-135.
20.Rodiek, S. (2002). Influence of an outdoor garden on mood and stress in older persons. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 13(1), 13-21.
21.Sheehan, R. C., Gottschall, J. S. (2012). At similar angles, slope walking has a greater fall risk than stair walking. Applied ergonomics, 43(3), 473-478.
22.Smith, W. R. (1956). Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Journal of marketing, 21(1), 3-8.
23.Ståhl, A., Carlsson, G., Hovbrandt, P., Iwarsson, S. (2008). “Let’s go for a walk!”: identification and prioritisation of accessibility and safety measures involving elderly people in a residential area. European Journal of Ageing, 5(3), 265-273.
24.Sugiyama, T., Francis, J., Middleton, N. J., Owen, N., Giles-Corti, B. (2010). Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces. American Journal of Public Health, 100(9), 1752-1757.
25.Sugiyama, T., Thompson, C. W., Alves, S. (2009). Associations between neighborhood open space attributes and quality of life for older people in Britain. Environment and behavior, 41(1), 3-21.
26.Veitch, J., Salmon, J., Deforche, B., Ghekiere, A., Van Cauwenberg, J., Bangay, S., Timperio, A. (2017). Park attributes that encourage park visitation among adolescents: A conjoint analysis. Landscape and urban planning, 161, 52-58.
27.Vriens, M., Loosschilder, G. H., Rosbergen, E., Wittink, D. R. (1998). Verbal versus realistic pictorial representations in conjoint analysis with design attributes. Journal of Product Innovation Management: AN INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION OF THE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 15(5), 455-467.
28.Wang, X., Rodiek, S. (2019). Older Adults’ Preference for Landscape Features Along Urban Park Walkways in Nanjing, China. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(20), 3808.
29.Wind, Y. (1978). Issues and advances in segmentation research. Journal of marketing research, 15(3), 317-337.
30.Wolfinbarger, K. G., Shehab, R. L. (2000, July). A survey of ramp and stair use among older adults. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 44, No. 24, pp. 4-76). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
31.World Health Organization (2002). Active Ageing
A Policy Framework. Retrieved from https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/WHO-Active-Ageing-Framework.pdf
32.World Health Organization (2007). Global age friendly cities a guide. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Global_age_friendly_cities_Guide_English.pdf
33.World Health Organization (2015).World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision. Retrieved April 03, 2020 from https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/world-population-prospects-2015-revision.html
34.Yung, E. H., Conejos, S., Chan, E. H. (2016). Public open spaces planning for the elderly: The case of dense urban renewal districts in Hong Kong. Land use policy, 59, 1-11.
35.Zhai, Y., Li, K., Liu, J. (2018). A Conceptual Guideline to Age-Friendly Outdoor Space Development in China: How Do Chinese Seniors Use the Urban Comprehensive Park? A Focus on Time, Place, and Activities. Sustainability, 10(10), 3678.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57816-
dc.description.abstract從過去世界衛生組織曾提及活躍老化、高齡友善城市等概念可得知都市綠地對於人類晚年生活扮演了重要角色。近年也有許多探討老年人對於環境需求的研究,整理調查結果能夠初步了解老年人所需,然而資源有限,縣市政府在分配預算至每一個鄰里公園時所剩的資金固然無法在短時間內進行公園整體的改善,本研究希望進一步了解中高齡者對鄰里綠地空間的哪些環境屬性更為重視或需要,以建立未來進行公園改善項目的優先順序。
本研究目的為尋找影響中高齡者選擇鄰里公園時所重視的環境屬性以及屬性間的相對重要性。研究方法首先以文獻回顧整理出中高齡者到訪鄰里公園時的32項初步環境屬性,再以集群分析K平均數法的統計方式篩選出9項重要環境屬性 並分別討論出每項屬性對應的水準項目,接著將這些屬性的水準以直交設計的方 式產生16個受測體組合方案,並將這些方案以文字描述結合圖片模擬的呈現方式 搜集受測者的偏好評分資料。
藉由聯合分析蒐集受測者對每項方案的評分,可以間接測量出每項屬性水準 的成分效用值與屬性之間的相對重要性。研究結果發現中高齡者到訪鄰里公園時 最在意夜晚照明程度(相對重要性 27.156%)、其次為廁所有無(相對重要性 12.215%)、喬木所形成的陰影(相對重要性 10.007%)。綜合此結果與過去相關 文獻討論,得知老年人之所以會排斥缺乏充足照明的黑暗環境有很大的原因來自 於心理上的不安全感,認為自身沒有能力面對而產生恐懼感,因此夜間照明是中高 齡者所重視的。最後以各項人口特性與公園使用行為及個別受測者之屬性相對重 要性為基礎將全體受測者分群討論,期望本研究結果未來可應用於進行鄰里公園 新建或改善時參考,將資源最有效地運用。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe World Health Organization mentioned the concepts of active aging and global age-friendly cities. It can be seen that urban green space plays an important role in later life. In recent years, there have been many studies on the needs of the elderly for the environment, and the results of the investigation can be used to understand the needs of the elderly. However, resources are limited, and the funds left by the city governments to allocate budgets to each neighborhood park certainly cannot improve the overall park within a short period of time. This study hopes to further understand which environmental attributes of the green space in the neighborhood are more important or necessary for the middle-aged and older people, so as to establish the priority of future park improvement projects.
The research method first sorted out 32 preliminary environmental attributes by literature review, and then screened out 9 important environmental attributes by cluster analysis K-means method and discussed the corresponding Level items, then the level of these attributes is used by orthogonal design to generate 16 test subject combinations, and these plans are collected in the form of verbal description and picture description to collect the preference score data of the test subject.
By collecting the scores of the subjects for each scheme through conjoint analysis, the relative importance between each attribute and the utility of attribute level can be measured indirectly. The results of the study found that middle-aged and elderly paid the most attention to the degree of night lighting (relative importance 27.156%), followed by the presence of toilets (relative importance 12.215%), and the shadows of trees (relative importance 10.07%) when they visited the neighborhood park. Combining this result with the related literature discussion, it is known that the reason why the elderly will reject the dark environment lacking sufficient lighting comes from psychological insecurity, thinking that they don’t have ability to handle, so night lighting is valued by middle-aged and elderly. Finally, based on various demographic characteristics, park usage behavior, and the relative importance between each attribute of individual experimental subject, all subjects are discussed in groups. It is expected that the results of this study can be applied to the construction or improvement of neighborhood parks in the future. Use resources most effectively.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T07:05:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-1707202001514800.pdf: 3995213 bytes, checksum: a85ac6e435a3ac7a01ce20086d61d59b (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2020
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究緣起 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻回顧 4
第一節 老化現象與社會議題 4
一、中高齡者與高齡者定義 4
二、活躍老化 4
三、高齡友善城市 5
第二節 戶外環境議題 6
一、鄰里綠地空間 6
二、戶外環境屬性之相關研究 6
三、老化與環境相關研究 9
第三節 聯合分析 12
一、聯合分析之概念 12
二、聯合分析之相關研究 13
三、聯合分析決策過程 13
第四節 市場區隔理論 18
一、市場區隔定義 18
二、市場區隔變數 19
三、市場區隔模式 19
第三章 研究方法 21
第一節 研究架構 21
第二節 抽樣與資料收集方法 23
第三節 研究工具 23
一、前測問卷 23
二、正式問卷 31
第四節 資料分析與方法 38
一、次數分配 38
二、聯合分析 38
三、單因子變異數分析 39
四、獨立樣本t檢定 39
五、集群分析 39
第四章 結果與討論 40
第一節 樣本結構分析 40
第二節 全體受測者之聯合分析結果 43
一、全體樣本的屬性水準成分效用值與相對重要程度 43
二、使用者特性對各項屬性相對重要性的影響 51
第三節 市場區隔分析 63
第五章 結論與建議 75
第一節 研究結論 75
第二節 研究貢獻 80
第三節 未來研究與建議 80
第六章 參考文獻 84
附錄一 91
附錄二 100
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject圖片表示法zh_TW
dc.subject市場區隔zh_TW
dc.subject整體輪廓法zh_TW
dc.subject中高齡者zh_TW
dc.subject聯合分析zh_TW
dc.subjectConjoint Analysisen
dc.subjectMiddle-aged and Elderlyen
dc.subjectPictorial Representationen
dc.subjectFull-profileen
dc.subjectMarket Segmentationen
dc.title以聯合分析法探討中高齡者對鄰里公園環境屬性的偏好zh_TW
dc.titleAn Application of Conjoint Analysis to Preferences of Middle-aged and Elderly People for Environmental Attributes of Neighborhood Parksen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear108-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee鄭佳坤(Chia-Kuen Cheng),張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang),歐聖榮(Sheng-Jung Ou),何立智(Li-Chih Ho)
dc.subject.keyword中高齡者,聯合分析,圖片表示法,整體輪廓法,市場區隔,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordMiddle-aged and Elderly,Conjoint Analysis,Pictorial Representation,Full-profile,Market Segmentation,en
dc.relation.page110
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202001582
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2020-07-22
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝暨景觀學系zh_TW
Appears in Collections:園藝暨景觀學系

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
U0001-1707202001514800.pdf
  Restricted Access
3.9 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved