請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57721完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳添枝 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tian-Yu Jiang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔣天宇 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T06:59:53Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-07-29 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-07-29 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-07-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | SEMI PV Group，SEMI中國太陽能光伏顧問委員會及中國光伏產業聯盟（2013），《2013中國光伏產業發展報告》，
马驰, 付姗璐. '浅析中国光伏产业发展的制约因素.' 经济论坛 7 (2008): 46-48. 中國工信部（2013），“光伏製造行業規範條件” 中國工信部（2014），“2013年我國光伏產業運行情況” 中國國家可再生能源中心（2013），《2012中國可再生能源》 李园红, 高明. “基于产业链视角的中国光伏产业发展思路”[J]. 亚太经济, 2010 (4): 103-106. 李俊峰、王斯成、王勃華等（2013），《2013中國光伏發展報告》，中國資源綜合利用協會可再生能源專業委員會及中國光伏產業聯盟 李慧, 于佩. “浅析中国光伏产业' 双反' 问题及对策”[J]. 中国集体经济, 2012, 15: 026. 吴茜薇, 王振波. '金融危机背景下中国光伏产业发展现状与对策.' 首都师范大学学报: 自然科学版 33.1 (2012): 50-56. 常瑜. 《中国光伏发展报告: 2011》[M]. 中国环境科学出版社, 2011. Aggarwal, Aradhna, 2004, “Macroeconomic Determinants of Antidumping: a Comparative Analysis of Developed and Developing Countries,” World Development 32 (2004):1043–57. Avsar, Veysel, 2012, Antidumping, Retaliation Threats, and Export Prices, The World Bank Economic Review, vol.27,No.1,pp. 133–148 Blonigen, Bruce A. and Bown, Chad P. 2003, Antidumping and retaliation threats, Journal of International Economics, 60 (2003) 249–273 Brenton, P. 2001, Antidumping policies in the EU and trade diversion, European Journal of Political Economy, 17, 593–607 Chanadra, P. and Long, C. 2013, Anti-dumping Duties and Their Impact on Exporters: Firm Level Evidence from China, World Development, Vol. 51, pp. 169–186 Egger, Peter and Nelson, Douglas, 2011, How Bad Is Antidumping? Evidence from Panel Data, The Review of Economics and Statistics, November 2011, 93(4): 1374–1390 Ganguli, B. 2008, The trade effects of Indian antidumping actions, Review of International Economics, 16, 930–41. Hartigan, James C. and Vandenbussche, H. 2013, Disfavored Nations: Anti-Dumping at the WTO, Review of Development Economics, 17(1), 105–116 Irwin, D. 2005, The Rise of U.S. Anti-dumping Activity in Historical Perspective, The World Economy, 28(5): 651-668. Kang, M. and Lee, Hongshik and Park, Soonchan, 2012, Industry-specific effects of antidumping activities: evidence from the US, the European Union and China, Applied Economics, 2012, 44, 999–1008 LI, Yuefen, 2007, Why Has China Become a Target of Anti-dumping Activities? China Economist, January 2007, 48-59 Park, S. 2009, The trade depressing and trade diversion effects of antidumping actions: the case of China, China Economic Review, 20, 542–8. Perone, Francesco, 1995, 《Settlement of Anti-Dumping Cases by Price Undertaking: The European Community and United States Practice》，McGiIl University, Montreal，99-106 Prusa, T. J. 1991, The Selection of Antidumping Cases for ITC Determination, in: R. E. Baldwin (Ed.) Empirical Studies of Commercial Policy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Prusa, T.J., 2001, On the spread and impact of antidumping, Canadian Journal of Economics 34, 591–611 Prusa, Thomas J. 1992, Why are so many antidumping petitions withdrawn? Journal of International Economics, 33 (1992) l-20. North-Holland. Rutkowski, A. 2007, Determinants of Withdrawals of Anti-Dumping Complaints in the EU, Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Vol. 10, No. 2, 89–109 Rutkowski, A. 2007, Withdrawals of anti-dumping complaints in the EU: a sign of collusion, The World Economy, 30(3), pp. 470–503. Shen, Guobing. 2007a, Research on China-U.S. Trade Balance Issues. Beijing: China Financial and Economic Publishing House, 67-78 Shen, Guobing. 2007b, Macro Determinants of U.S. Anti-Dumping Actions against China and Their Effects, World Economy (11): 11-23. Shen, Guobing, 2013, Determinants of U.S. Anti-Dumping Actions against Chinese Products: A Study Based on Analysis of Case-Involved and Extended Samples, China Economist, Vol.8, No.1, January-February: 52-61 Staiger, Robert W. and Wolak, Frank A.1996, The Effect of Import Source on the Determinants and Impacts of Antidumping Suit Activity, The Political Economy of Trade Protection, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 85 - 94 Sudsawasd, S. 2011, Which Countries Are the Targets for Anti-dumping Filings? The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, Volume 5, Number 1 Sudsawasd, S. 2012, Tariff Liberalization and the Rise of Anti-dumping Use: Empirical Evidence from Across World Regions, The International Trade Journal, 26:4–18 Taylor, C. T. 2004, The economic effects of withdrawn antidumping investigations: is there evidence of collusive settlements? Journal of International Economics, 62(2), pp. 295–312. Xie, Jianguo. 2006, Economic Impact, Divergence in Politics, and Clashes in Systems: A Case Study of U.S. Anti-Dumping Filing against China, Management World (12): 8-17. Xu, Shiteng and Tang, Yihong, 2009, European Union Antidumping Investigations Against China: Characteristics and Determinants, The Chinese Economy, vol. 42, no. 6, November–December 2009, pp. 66–80. Zanardi, M. 2004a, Antidumping law as a collusive device, Canadian Journal of Economics, 37(1), pp. 95–122 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57721 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文主要的研究對象為中國、美國及歐盟的太陽能光伏製造產業。 2011年及2012年，美國和歐盟分別對來自中國的光伏產品發起反傾銷及反補貼調查，美國案件以課稅為結果，而歐盟案件卻以價格具結為結果。本文從產業發展、市場發展、及相關政策三個角度分別對中國、美國及歐盟的光伏製造產業進行了研究，嘗試通過歐盟及美國光伏產業的經濟特性差異來解釋為何美國及歐盟廠商會發起這兩起雙反申訴，同時試圖從經濟因素的角度來解釋為何兩起雙反案件針對的目標產品幾乎相同，但案件的結果卻不盡相同。本文根據前人的相關理論研究，針對這兩起雙反案件提出了八個命題，從美國及歐盟光伏產業的產量增長率、產能增長率、產能利用率、來自中國的光伏產品進口增長率及市佔率、與中國之間的貿易差額、對中國的出口依賴程度、產業內員工數量等經濟因素以及法規差異的角度，證實了兩案的發起以及最終得到不同結果這一現象，與這八個命題相符合，也即一定程度上揭示了這兩起雙反案件背後的經濟原因。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis mainly focuses on the photovoltaic(PV) manufacturing industry of China, the United States and the European Union. In 2011 and 2012, the PV manufacturers in US and EU successively filed two antidumping petitions against the photovoltaic products from China. The US case ended with an imposition of anti-dumping duties, while the EU case ended with a price undertaking agreement between the EU authority and Chinese exproters. This thesis studies the PV industry of China, the United States and the European Union, focusing on three aspects: industrial development, market development and related government policies. The economic determinants of the filing of these two anti-dumping cases, and the reasons why they led to different outcomes are explored. Eight propositions are proposed based on the previous researche work. Economic indicators of the PV industry and macroeconomic conditions, along with the differences of anti-dumping policies in US and EU, are used to verify the propositions. All propositions are substantiated. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T06:59:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01323050-1.pdf: 1177893 bytes, checksum: c45afd3d1b9265232a5a9cf8e60706f6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 第一章。 文獻回顧 1 1.1 引言 1 1.2 反傾銷案件的申訴 1 1.3 反傾銷案件的結果及報復性反傾銷行為 3 1.4 本文結構 5 第二章。 光伏技術、產業鏈及全球產業概況 6 2.1 光伏技術 6 2.2 光伏產業鏈 6 2.3 全球光伏產業 8 2.3.1 產業發展 8 2.3.2 市場發展 9 第三章。 歐洲光伏產業發展 15 3.1 產業發展 15 3.2 市場發展 15 3.3 各國發展狀況及政策 20 3.3.1 德國 21 3.3.2 法國 21 3.3.3 英國 22 3.3.4 義大利 23 第四章。美國光伏產業發展 24 4.1 產業發展 24 4.2 市場發展 25 4.3 政策 29 第五章．中國光伏產業發展 31 5.1 產業發展 31 5.1.1 概述 31 5.1.2 多晶矽製造業 33 5.1.3 光伏電池製造業 36 5.2 市場發展 40 5.3 政策 43 5.3.1 提高入行條件 43 5.3.2 明確上網電價補貼額度 45 5.3.3 大力發展分散式發電 46 第六章．美國對中國晶體矽電池及元件的反傾銷案件 48 6.1 案件過程 48 6.2 目標產品與調查時段 48 6.3 調查成果 48 6.3.1 本案判別是否造成實質傷害的相關依據 48 6.3.2 中國（出口國）相關產業 49 6.3.3 相關雙反案件 49 6.3.4 其他非涉案進口來源 50 6.4 判決結果 52 第七章．歐盟對中國光伏產品反傾銷反補貼案件 53 7.1 案件過程 53 7.2 目標產品及調查時段 53 7.3 調查成果 53 7.3.1 取樣 53 7.3.2 傾銷差價 54 7.3.3 確立實質傷害 54 7.3.4 因果關係 56 7.3.5 歐盟各方利益考量 56 7.4 判決結果 57 第八章． 實證分析 59 8.1 影響反傾銷申訴之發動的產業經濟因素 59 8.2 影響反傾銷案件結果的產業經濟因素 64 第九章．總結 70 參考文獻： 73 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 總體經濟狀況 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 光伏產業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 反傾銷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 價格具結 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 經濟因素 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | economic determinants | en |
| dc.subject | price undertaking | en |
| dc.subject | anti-dumping | en |
| dc.subject | macroeconomic conditions | en |
| dc.subject | photovoltaic(PV) industry | en |
| dc.title | 中國、美國及歐盟光伏產業及相關反傾銷案件的經濟因素分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Photovoltaic Industry in China, United States and European Union, and Economic Determinants of Anti-dumping Actions | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 瞿宛文,劉碧珍 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 光伏產業,反傾銷,價格具結,經濟因素,總體經濟狀況, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | photovoltaic(PV) industry,anti-dumping,price undertaking,economic determinants,macroeconomic conditions, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 74 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-07-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.15 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。