請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57679
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林晏州(Yann-Jou Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Chun Hsu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 許媁鈞 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T06:57:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-12-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-07-29 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-07-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 大山正,(1998),色彩心理學:追尋牛頓與歌德的腳步,台北:牧村。
2. 王珮琪、林晏州,(1998),景觀規劃中色彩計畫流程之探討,造園學報,5,1-19。 3. 朱介英,(1998),色彩設計計畫,臺北:美工圖書社。 4. 李素馨,(1999),都市視覺景觀偏好之研究,都市計畫學報,26(1),19-40。 5. 李麗雪,(1998),台灣傳統庭園的情緖體驗及景觀偏好之硏究:以板橋林家花園為例,博士論文,國立臺灣大學,台北。 6. 林書堯,(1981),色彩認識論,台北:三民書局。 7. 徐思琦、林晏州,(2001),捷運系統高架路軌結構體色彩偏好影響因素之研究,中國園藝,47(4),419-440。 8. 張淳婷,(2004),大氣景觀與觀景設施色彩對視覺偏好及空間色彩意象之影響,碩士論文,私立東海大學,台中。 9. 曹啟雄,(2000),色彩調和論發展史與其內容之研究,現代藝術學報,3,159-176。 10. 莊明振、葉青林,(1999),色彩差異因素對物體色色彩調和的影響,設計學報,(3)2,113-130。 11. 陳怡婷、林晏州,(2007),聲音對民眾環境情緒體驗之影響,台灣園藝,53(3),333-344。 12. 陳俊宏,(1988),配色意象之調查與分析,台中商專學報,20,17-159。 13. 陳曉冏譯,大智浩著,(1983),設計的色彩計畫,台北:大陸。 14. 黃書倩譯,山中俊夫著,(1992),色彩學的基礎,臺北:六合出版社。 15. 黃照婷、林晏州,(2007),草花色彩配色之偏好與色知覺關係之研究,台灣園藝,53(4),481-490。 16. 黃照婷、林晏州,(2009),草花色彩配色之偏好與色知覺關係之研究,造園學報,14(4),19-34。 17. 歐聖榮、李美芬,(1998),應用虛擬實境餘植栽空間對情緒影響之研究,中國園藝,44(4),449-462。 18. 歐聖榮、陳博仁、傅克昌,(1991),六種觀賞植物色彩情感效應之研究,興大園藝,16,33-43。 19. 歐聖榮、曾怡錦,(2001),草花色彩之情緒體驗研究,造園學報,7(2),121-135。 20. 鄭佳昆、沈立、全珍衡,(2009),熟悉度於不同情境下對視覺景觀偏好之影響探討,戶外遊憩學報,22(4),1-21。 21. 鄭國裕、林磐聳,(1987),色彩計畫,台北市:藝風堂。 22. 賴一輝,(1993),色彩計畫,台北:新形象。 23. 賴明嘉、林晏州,(1995),水景形態及聲音對情緒體驗之影響,造園學報,2(1),1-17。 24. 賴瓊琦,(1999),設計的色彩心理,台北:視傳文化事業有限公司。 25. Balling, J. D., & Falk, J. H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior, 14(5), 5-28. 26. Bourassa, S. C (1988). Toward a theory of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15, 241-252. 27. Charles, T. (1997). Color meaning and context: Comparisons of semantic ratings of colors on samples and objects. Color Research and Application, 22(1), 40-50. 28. Chuang, M. C., & Ou, L. C. (2001). Influence of a holistic color interval on color harmony, Color Research and Application, 26(1), 29-39. 29. Gao, X. P., & Xin, J. H. (2006). Investigation of human’s emotional responses on colors. Color Research and Application, 31(5), 411-417 30. Gao, X. P., Xin, J. H., Sato, T., Hansuebsai, A., Scalzo, M., Kajiwara, K., Guan, S. S., Valldeperas, J., Lis, M. J., & Billger, M. (2007). Analysis of cross-cultural color emotion. Color Research and Application, 32(3), 223-229. 31. Garcia, L., Hernandez, J., & Ayuga, F. (2003). Analysis of the exterior colour of agroindustrial buildings: A computer aided approach to landscape integration. Journal of Environmental Management, 69, 93-104. 32. Guan, S. S., & Hung, P. S. (2010). Influences of psychological factors on image color preferences evaluation. Color Research and Application, 35(3), 213-232. 33. Ittelson, W. H. (1970). Environment perception and contemporary perceptual theory. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 32(7). 807-815. 34. Izard, C. E. (1972). An empirical analysis of anxiety in terms of discrete emotions. In C. E. Izard (Ed.), Patterns of emotions: A new analysis of anxiety and depression, (pp.83-88). New York: Academic Press. 35. Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19(1), 3-32. 36. Kenneth, E. B. (1991). Color harmony attributes. Color Research and Application, 16(4), 275-278. 37. Kenneth, E. B. (2002). Color harmony. Color Research and Application, 27(1), 28-31. 38. Kobayashi, S. (1981). The aim and method of the color image. Color Research and Application, 6(2), 93-107. 39. Kuo, W. G. (2007). The feasibility of establishing new color image scales using the magnitude estimation method. Color Research and Application, 32(6), 463-468. 40. Manav, B. (2007). Color-emotion associations and color preferences: A case study for residences. Color Research and Application, 32(2), 144-151. 41. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge: M.I.T Press. 42. Ou, L. C., & Luo, M. R. (2006). A colour harmony model for two-colour combinations. Color Research and Application, 36(3), 210-221. 43. Ou, L. C., Chong, P., Luo, M. R., & Minchew, C. (2011). Additivity of colour harmony. Color Research and Application, 36(5), 355-372. 44. Ou, L. C., Luo, M. R., Sun, P. L., Hu, N. C., & Chen, H. S. (2012). Age effects on colour emotion, preference, and harmony. Color Research and Application, 37(2), 92-105. 45. Ou, L. C., Luo, M. R., Woodcock, A., & Wright, A. (2004a). A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part I: Colour emotions for single colours. Color Research and Application, 29(3), 232-240. 46. Ou, L. C., Luo, M. R., Woodcock, A., & Wright, A. (2004b). A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part II: Colour emotions for two-colour combinations. Color Research and Application, 29(4), 292-298. 47. Ou, L. C., Luo, M. R., Woodcock, A., & Wright, A. (2004c). A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part III: Colour preference modeling. Color Research and Application, 29(5), 381-389. 48. Ou, L. C., Luo, M. R., Woodcock, A., Sun, P. L., Hu, N. C., Chen, H. S., Guan, S. S., Woodcock, A., Caivano, J. L., Huertas, R., Treme’ au, A., Billger, M., Izadan, H., & Richter, K. (2012). A cross-cultural comparison of colour emotion for two-colour combinations. Color Research and Application, 37(1), 23-43. 49. Plutchik, R. (1980). A structural model of the emotions. In R. Plutchik (Ed.), Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis, (pp.152-172). New York: Harper and Row Publishers. 50. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178. 51. Russell, J. A., & Mehrabian, A. (1978). Approach-avoidance and affiliation as function of the emotion-eliciting quality of an environment. Environment and Behavior, 10(3), 355-387. 52. Russell, J.A. & J. Snodgrass. (1987). Emotion and the environment. In Stokol, D. and Altman, I. Handbook of Environmental Psychology. 1, (pp.245-280). New York: A Wiley-Interscience Publishing. 53. Schloss, K. B., & Palmer, S. E. (2011). Aesthetic response to color combinations: Preference, Harmony, and similarity. Atten Percept Psychophys, 73, 551-571. 54. Solli, M., & Lenz, R. (2009). Color harmony for image indexing. IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops, 1885-1892. 55. Solli, M., & Lenz, R. (2011). Color emotions for multi-colored images. Color Research and Application, 36(3), 210-221. 56. Taft, C. (1997). Color meaning and context: Comparisons of semantic ratings of colors on samples and objects. Color Research and Application, 22(1), 40-50. 57. Ulrich, R S. (1981). Nature versus urban scenes some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13(5), 523-556. 58. Ulrich, R S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the Natural Environment. New York: Plenum Press. 59. Ulrich, R S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29-44. 60. Xin, J. H., Cheng, K. M., Taylor, G., Sato, T., & Hansuebsai, A. (2004). Cross-Regional comparison of colour emotions Part I: Quantitative analysis. Color Research and Application, 29(6), 451-457. 61. Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L., & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9, 1-33. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57679 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 景觀是由許多元素與色彩所交織而成,在我們生活環境之中,色彩是最直接且非均質存在的現象,然而關於環境色彩之研究卻鮮少著墨,近年來在環境保護與都市美化風潮下,開始重視人與自然環境間的關係,並設法讓人為介入自然之中,亦能呈現其地域性之美。藉由文獻回顧發現,色彩組成強烈影響著情緒感受與偏好,而情緒感受與景觀偏好除了受到景觀元素與空間序列構成的影響外,色彩的調和與否亦有著密不可分的關係,因此本研究主要目的在於瞭解環境色彩組成與色彩調和對情緒感受與景觀偏好的影響,並分為實驗一與實驗二兩步驟進行,首先透過image J影像軟體將200張之自然景觀影像轉換為量化之CIEL*a*b*色彩空間,以問卷進行色彩調和與景觀偏好的測量,並同時驗證色彩組成與色彩調和對景觀偏好的相關性,而後依據初步色彩調和測量結果,篩選出60張影像作為實驗二之刺激物,進行後續的緊張感、放鬆感、恐懼感、平靜感、興奮感、無聊感、愉悅感、憂鬱感等八個情緒形容詞與色彩調和、景觀偏好之問卷調查,並嘗試探討色彩空間與情緒體驗模型之間的關聯性。研究結果顯示,色彩組成的各個屬性與色彩調和程度與否的確會影響情緒感受與景觀偏好,其中色彩調和程度對於部份的情緒體驗與景觀偏好更有著高度的相關性。在自然景觀的刺激下,感到色彩調和的景觀,具有較高的正面情緒,而產生正向情緒感受時,對於此景觀的偏好亦會提升,此結果驗證了環境—情緒—行為反應模型中,認為情緒體驗為環境與行為反應之中介變項的概念,此外依據色彩組成與情緒感受測量結果,將CIEL*a*b*色彩空間對應到Russell環境情緒體驗環上,發現兩者具相對應之關係。最後透過以上結果得知色彩組成與色彩調和對情緒體驗和景觀偏好之關係以及色彩調和對自然環境之重要性,並以此為基礎提出未來規劃設計參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Landscapes are composed of various elements and colors. Colors play an important role and are never seen in isolation in our daily lives; however, there are few color studies on environmental space. With the recent trends of environmental protection and urban renewal, an effort is made herein to make a region reveal its own ‘personality’ regardless of the artificial facilities in a natural landscape. Studies have shown that color attributes strongly affect emotions and preferences; emotions and preferences were not only influenced by landscape elements and space sequences, but also have a strong relationship with color harmony. The main part of the study is aimed at finding the relationships among colors, emotions and preferences. This study is separated into two experiments. First, we collected 200 photos and used the software Image J to convert the RGB color space of the photos into CIEL*a*b* color space; we then evaluated color harmony and landscape preference through questionnaires. According to the result of color harmony evaluation from experiment 1, we chose 60 photos for the stimulus of experiment 2 and conducted a survey with 3 variables: emotional experience, color harmony and landscape preference. The emotional experience variables consisted of 8 different scales: tense, relaxed, afraid, calm, excited, bored, pleased and gloomy. We then tried to see if the CIEL*a*b* color space model reflects the Emotional Experience model. The results showed that there were differences among color attribute, color harmony, emotional experience and landscape preference. Color harmony had strong correlations with emotional experience and landscape preference. Under the stimulation of a natural landscape, when one feels harmonious, one will have a stronger relationship with positive emotions; the more positive the emotions, the higher the preference. This finding verifies the concept of emotion as a mediator between environment and behavior responses. Additionally, the CIEL*a*b* color space can be matched with the environmental psychology model. Through the results, we can determine the relationships among color attribute, color harmony, emotional experience and landscape preference. With the importance of color harmony to the natural environment, the study results can provide the basis for future planning and design reference. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T06:57:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01628303-1.pdf: 12090509 bytes, checksum: f33a11229bc0797e4a267a8c11350f3d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員審定書 I 中文摘要 V ABSTRACT VII 表目錄 XI 圖目錄 XIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究內容及流程 4 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 色彩學基本理論 7 第二節 色彩調和理論 14 第三節 情緒感受 26 第四節 景觀偏好 44 第三章 研究方法 49 第一節 研究架構內容 49 第二節 研究設計 55 第三節 資料處理分析計畫 64 第四章 研究結果與討論 67 第一節 實驗一之結果分析 67 第二節 實驗二之結果分析 74 第三節 研究假設之驗證 107 第四節 綜合討論 110 第五章 結論與建議 113 第一節 結論 113 第二節 後續研究與建議 117 參考文獻 119 附錄一 實驗一之問卷調查 123 附錄二 實驗二之問卷調查 125 附錄三 200張影像之色彩組成、色彩調和與景觀偏好評值 127 附錄四 60張色彩調和、情緒體驗與景觀偏好之評值 145 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 環境色彩組成與調和對情緒體驗與景觀偏好之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effect of Environmental Color Composition and Harmony on Emotional Experience and Landscape Preference | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 曹正(Cheng Tsao),歐聖榮(Sheng-Jung Ou),張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang),鄭佳昆(Chia-Kuen Cheng) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 環境色彩,色彩調和,情緒體驗,景觀偏好,色彩空間, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Environmental Color,Color Harmony,Emotional Experience,Landscape Preference,Color Space, | en |
dc.relation.page | 149 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-07-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 11.81 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。